Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Systematic Literature Review on the Use of Deep Learning in Software Engineering Research

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.06520 v2 pith:FKAHK2QQ submitted 2020-09-14 cs.SE cs.AIcs.LGcs.NE

A Systematic Literature Review on the Use of Deep Learning in Software Engineering Research

classification cs.SE cs.AIcs.LGcs.NE
keywords researchtechniqueslearningengineeringreviewsoftwareworkadopted
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

An increasingly popular set of techniques adopted by software engineering (SE) researchers to automate development tasks are those rooted in the concept of Deep Learning (DL). The popularity of such techniques largely stems from their automated feature engineering capabilities, which aid in modeling software artifacts. However, due to the rapid pace at which DL techniques have been adopted, it is difficult to distill the current successes, failures, and opportunities of the current research landscape. In an effort to bring clarity to this crosscutting area of work, from its modern inception to the present, this paper presents a systematic literature review of research at the intersection of SE & DL. The review canvases work appearing in the most prominent SE and DL conferences and journals and spans 128 papers across 23 unique SE tasks. We center our analysis around the components of learning, a set of principles that govern the application of machine learning techniques (ML) to a given problem domain, discussing several aspects of the surveyed work at a granular level. The end result of our analysis is a research roadmap that both delineates the foundations of DL techniques applied to SE research, and highlights likely areas of fertile exploration for the future.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Causal Perspective on Measuring, Explaining and Mitigating Smells in LLM-Generated Code

    cs.SE 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0

    A probabilistic score of code-smell propensity in LLM output is validated, used in a causal analysis, and shown to drop when prompts explicitly discourage known smells.