Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey of Neural Trojan Attacks and Defenses in Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.07183 v1 pith:76QBISRY submitted 2022-02-15 cs.CR cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.CV
keywords deeplearningattacksrecenttrojandefensesliteraturemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) relies heavily on deep learning - a technology that is becoming increasingly popular in real-life applications of AI, even in the safety-critical and high-risk domains. However, it is recently discovered that deep learning can be manipulated by embedding Trojans inside it. Unfortunately, pragmatic solutions to circumvent the computational requirements of deep learning, e.g. outsourcing model training or data annotation to third parties, further add to model susceptibility to the Trojan attacks. Due to the key importance of the topic in deep learning, recent literature has seen many contributions in this direction. We conduct a comprehensive review of the techniques that devise Trojan attacks for deep learning and explore their defenses. Our informative survey systematically organizes the recent literature and discusses the key concepts of the methods while assuming minimal knowledge of the domain on the readers part. It provides a comprehensible gateway to the broader community to understand the recent developments in Neural Trojans.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Experimental Study of Trojan Vulnerabilities in UAV Autonomous Landing

    cs.CR 2025-10 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A VGG16 landing-pad classifier trained with 30% 5x5-chessboard-triggered images drops from 96.4% to 73.3% accuracy on triggered input.

Pith tools