REVIEW 2 cited by
Data Representativity for Machine Learning and AI Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Data Representativity for Machine Learning and AI Systems
read the original abstract
Data representativity is crucial when drawing inference from data through machine learning models. Scholars have increased focus on unraveling the bias and fairness in models, also in relation to inherent biases in the input data. However, limited work exists on the representativity of samples (datasets) for appropriate inference in AI systems. This paper reviews definitions and notions of a representative sample and surveys their use in scientific AI literature. We introduce three measurable concepts to help focus the notions and evaluate different data samples. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the contrast between a representative sample in the sense of coverage of the input space, versus a representative sample mimicking the distribution of the target population is of particular relevance when building AI systems. Through empirical demonstrations on US Census data, we evaluate the opposing inherent qualities of these concepts. Finally, we propose a framework of questions for creating and documenting data with data representativity in mind, as an addition to existing dataset documentation templates.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Prototypical Signature Approach for Writer-Independent Offline Signature Verification
Prototypical signatures enable generation of diverse negative samples for writer-independent offline signature verification, improving skilled forgery detection and allowing scalable linear SVM alternatives to RBF models.
-
Intuitions of Machine Learning Researchers about Transfer Learning for Medical Image Classification
Source-dataset selection for medical transfer learning is driven by community practice and perceived similarity, and 'more similar is better' does not consistently hold.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.