REVIEW 1 cited by
Analyzing Astronomical Data with Machine Learning Techniques
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Analyzing Astronomical Data with Machine Learning Techniques
read the original abstract
Classification is a popular task in the field of Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI), and it happens when outputs are categorical variables. There are a wide variety of models that attempts to draw some conclusions from observed values, so classification algorithms predict categorical class labels and use them in classifying new data. Popular classification models including logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), multilayer perceptron, Naive Bayes, and neural networks have proven to be efficient and accurate applied to many industrial and scientific problems. Particularly, the application of ML to astronomy has shown to be very useful for classification, clustering, and data cleaning. It is because after learning computers, these tasks can be done automatically by them in a more precise and more rapid way than human operators. In view of this, in this paper, we will review some of these popular classification algorithms, and then we apply some of them to the observational data of nonvariable and the RR Lyrae variable stars that come from the SDSS survey. For the sake of comparison, we calculate the accuracy and F1-score of the applied models.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Effective temperatures estimation of low-mass stars and identification of T Tauri stars in LAMOST DR10 using machine learning
A GBM regressor trained on PHOENIX synthetic spectra estimates Teff for 1,733,852 LAMOST DR10 low-mass spectra, and a robust logistic classifier identifies 2,534 T Tauri star candidates.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.