Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Multimodal Automated Fact-Checking: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.13507 v3 pith:LPXE7I2L submitted 2023-05-22 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV

Multimodal Automated Fact-Checking: A Survey

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.CV
keywords fact-checkingmisinformationmultimodalsurveyautomateddiscussfocusframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Misinformation is often conveyed in multiple modalities, e.g. a miscaptioned image. Multimodal misinformation is perceived as more credible by humans, and spreads faster than its text-only counterparts. While an increasing body of research investigates automated fact-checking (AFC), previous surveys mostly focus on text. In this survey, we conceptualise a framework for AFC including subtasks unique to multimodal misinformation. Furthermore, we discuss related terms used in different communities and map them to our framework. We focus on four modalities prevalent in real-world fact-checking: text, image, audio, and video. We survey benchmarks and models, and discuss limitations and promising directions for future research

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. D-SECURE: Dual-Source Evidence Combination for Unified Reasoning in Misinformation Detection

    cs.CV 2026-02 reject novelty 4.0

    D-SECURE fuses local manipulation detection with external evidence fact-checking, but the reported gains are undermined by a weaker strict accuracy and a post-hoc evaluation protocol.

  2. AI-Generated Content in Cross-Domain Applications: Research Trends, Challenges and Propositions

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 2.0

    A cross-domain vision paper that surveys AI-generated content and proposes research directions, without introducing new empirical results.