REVIEW 2 cited by
Multimodal Automated Fact-Checking: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Multimodal Automated Fact-Checking: A Survey
read the original abstract
Misinformation is often conveyed in multiple modalities, e.g. a miscaptioned image. Multimodal misinformation is perceived as more credible by humans, and spreads faster than its text-only counterparts. While an increasing body of research investigates automated fact-checking (AFC), previous surveys mostly focus on text. In this survey, we conceptualise a framework for AFC including subtasks unique to multimodal misinformation. Furthermore, we discuss related terms used in different communities and map them to our framework. We focus on four modalities prevalent in real-world fact-checking: text, image, audio, and video. We survey benchmarks and models, and discuss limitations and promising directions for future research
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
D-SECURE: Dual-Source Evidence Combination for Unified Reasoning in Misinformation Detection
D-SECURE fuses local manipulation detection with external evidence fact-checking, but the reported gains are undermined by a weaker strict accuracy and a post-hoc evaluation protocol.
-
AI-Generated Content in Cross-Domain Applications: Research Trends, Challenges and Propositions
A cross-domain vision paper that surveys AI-generated content and proposes research directions, without introducing new empirical results.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.