Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Interpretable and Explainable Logical Policies via Neurally Guided Symbolic Abstraction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.01439 v2 pith:UC62TOLE submitted 2023-06-02 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLcs.LOcs.SC

Interpretable and Explainable Logical Policies via Neurally Guided Symbolic Abstraction

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLcs.LOcs.SC
keywords policieslogicagentsinterpretableneuralnudgedifferentiableexplainable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The limited priors required by neural networks make them the dominating choice to encode and learn policies using reinforcement learning (RL). However, they are also black-boxes, making it hard to understand the agent's behaviour, especially when working on the image level. Therefore, neuro-symbolic RL aims at creating policies that are interpretable in the first place. Unfortunately, interpretability is not explainability. To achieve both, we introduce Neurally gUided Differentiable loGic policiEs (NUDGE). NUDGE exploits trained neural network-based agents to guide the search of candidate-weighted logic rules, then uses differentiable logic to train the logic agents. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that NUDGE agents can induce interpretable and explainable policies while outperforming purely neural ones and showing good flexibility to environments of different initial states and problem sizes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. EntailLLM: Verifying LLM-Generated Vulnerability Discovery Paths with Domain Knowledge via Logic Programming

    cs.CR 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0

    A logic-based verifier using temporal annotated logic raises the share of LLM-proposed vulnerability exploration paths that satisfy domain knowledge from 78% to 98%.

  2. Model Science: getting serious about verification, explanation and control of AI systems

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0

    Proposes 'Model Science' as a model-centric paradigm for AI with four pillars: verification, explanation, control, and interface.