REVIEW 2 cited by
Estimating Conditional Mutual Information for Dynamic Feature Selection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Estimating Conditional Mutual Information for Dynamic Feature Selection
read the original abstract
Dynamic feature selection, where we sequentially query features to make accurate predictions with a minimal budget, is a promising paradigm to reduce feature acquisition costs and provide transparency into a model's predictions. The problem is challenging, however, as it requires both predicting with arbitrary feature sets and learning a policy to identify valuable selections. Here, we take an information-theoretic perspective and prioritize features based on their mutual information with the response variable. The main challenge is implementing this policy, and we design a new approach that estimates the mutual information in a discriminative rather than generative fashion. Building on our approach, we then introduce several further improvements: allowing variable feature budgets across samples, enabling non-uniform feature costs, incorporating prior information, and exploring modern architectures to handle partial inputs. Our experiments show that our method provides consistent gains over recent methods across a variety of datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
BRiG-AFA: Bellman Risk-to-Go Learning for Non-Myopic Active Feature Acquisition
BRiG-AFA learns budget-specific risk-to-go functions via backward Bellman regression and outperforms a one-step ablation at small acquisition budgets in controlled and image benchmarks.
-
Learning-To-Measure: In-Context Active Feature Acquisition
One transformer, pretrained with sequence modeling, greedily acquires features to reduce prediction uncertainty across multiple tasks with missing data, matching or beating task-specific AFA baselines without per-task...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.