Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Exploring Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Techniques for Code Generation with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.10462 v3 pith:SYODJXAC submitted 2023-08-21 cs.SE cs.CLcs.LG

Exploring Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Techniques for Code Generation with Large Language Models

classification cs.SE cs.CLcs.LG
keywords llmscodepeftfine-tuninggenerationlanguagemodelstask-specific
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities to generate accurate code snippets given natural language intents in a zero-shot manner, i.e., without the need for specific fine-tuning. While prior studies have highlighted the advantages of fine-tuning LLMs, this process incurs high computational costs, making it impractical in resource-scarce environments, particularly for models with billions of parameters. To address these challenges, previous research explored in-context learning (ICL) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) as strategies to guide the LLM generative process with task-specific prompt examples. However, ICL and RAG introduce inconveniences, such as the need for designing contextually relevant prompts and the absence of learning task-specific parameters, thereby limiting downstream task performance. In this context, we foresee parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) as a promising approach to efficiently specialize LLMs to task-specific data while maintaining reasonable resource consumption. In this paper, we deliver a comprehensive study of PEFT techniques for LLMs in the context of automated code generation. Our comprehensive investigation of PEFT techniques for LLMs reveals their superiority and potential over ICL and RAG across a diverse set of LLMs and three representative Python code generation datasets: Conala, CodeAlpacaPy, and APPS. Furthermore, our study highlights the potential for tuning larger LLMs and significant reductions in memory usage by combining PEFT with quantization. Therefore, this study opens opportunities for broader applications of PEFT in software engineering scenarios. Our code is available at https://github.com/martin-wey/peft-llm-code/.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Vibe Coding: An Experiment with Test-Driven Development

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    In TDD tasks, agentic coding yields the fastest functionally correct code but adds untested complexity, whereas human-AI collaboration produces higher-quality test suites.

  2. Balancing Usefulness and Naturalness: An LLM-based Curation Pipeline for Code Review Comments

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Selective LLM reformulation guided by high-quality exemplars yields cleaner, more diverse code-review datasets that improve downstream comment generation and code refinement.

  3. EXPEREPAIR: Dual-Memory Enhanced LLM-based Repository-Level Program Repair

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0

    ExpeRepair improves LLM-based repository-level program repair by maintaining episodic memory of concrete fixes and semantic memory of abstract insights, reaching 60.3% and 74.6% pass@1 on SWE-Bench Lite and Verified.

  4. Quantize with Confidence? An Empirical Study of Quantization for Code Generation

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    4-bit quantization of code LLMs mostly preserves pass@1, but AQLM matches or beats full precision while QuIP# degrades most on complex prompts; sensitivity is model-dependent.