REVIEW 4 cited by
Exploring Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Techniques for Code Generation with Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Exploring Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Techniques for Code Generation with Large Language Models
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities to generate accurate code snippets given natural language intents in a zero-shot manner, i.e., without the need for specific fine-tuning. While prior studies have highlighted the advantages of fine-tuning LLMs, this process incurs high computational costs, making it impractical in resource-scarce environments, particularly for models with billions of parameters. To address these challenges, previous research explored in-context learning (ICL) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) as strategies to guide the LLM generative process with task-specific prompt examples. However, ICL and RAG introduce inconveniences, such as the need for designing contextually relevant prompts and the absence of learning task-specific parameters, thereby limiting downstream task performance. In this context, we foresee parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) as a promising approach to efficiently specialize LLMs to task-specific data while maintaining reasonable resource consumption. In this paper, we deliver a comprehensive study of PEFT techniques for LLMs in the context of automated code generation. Our comprehensive investigation of PEFT techniques for LLMs reveals their superiority and potential over ICL and RAG across a diverse set of LLMs and three representative Python code generation datasets: Conala, CodeAlpacaPy, and APPS. Furthermore, our study highlights the potential for tuning larger LLMs and significant reductions in memory usage by combining PEFT with quantization. Therefore, this study opens opportunities for broader applications of PEFT in software engineering scenarios. Our code is available at https://github.com/martin-wey/peft-llm-code/.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Vibe Coding: An Experiment with Test-Driven Development
In TDD tasks, agentic coding yields the fastest functionally correct code but adds untested complexity, whereas human-AI collaboration produces higher-quality test suites.
-
Balancing Usefulness and Naturalness: An LLM-based Curation Pipeline for Code Review Comments
Selective LLM reformulation guided by high-quality exemplars yields cleaner, more diverse code-review datasets that improve downstream comment generation and code refinement.
-
EXPEREPAIR: Dual-Memory Enhanced LLM-based Repository-Level Program Repair
ExpeRepair improves LLM-based repository-level program repair by maintaining episodic memory of concrete fixes and semantic memory of abstract insights, reaching 60.3% and 74.6% pass@1 on SWE-Bench Lite and Verified.
-
Quantize with Confidence? An Empirical Study of Quantization for Code Generation
4-bit quantization of code LLMs mostly preserves pass@1, but AQLM matches or beats full precision while QuIP# degrades most on complex prompts; sensitivity is model-dependent.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.