REVIEW 1 cited by
Effect of Noise Estimation in Time-Domain Ringdown Analysis: A Case Study with GW150914
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Effect of Noise Estimation in Time-Domain Ringdown Analysis: A Case Study with GW150914
read the original abstract
Accurate noise estimation from gravitational wave (GW) data is critical for Bayesian inference. However, recent studies on ringdown signal, such as those by Isi et al. [1], Cotesta et al. [2], and Isi and Farr [3], have encountered disagreement in noise estimation, leading to inconsistent results. The key discrepancy between these studies lies in the usage of different noise estimation methods, augmented by the usage of different sampling rates. We achieved consistent results across various sampling rates by correctly managing noise estimation, shown in the case study of the GW150914 ringdown signal. By conducting a time-domain Bayesian inference analysis on GW data, starting from the peak of the signal, we discovered that the first overtone mode is weakly supported by the amplitude distribution, with a confidence level of $1.6{\sigma}$, and is slightly disfavored by the log-Bayes factor. Overall, in our time-domain analysis we conclude there is no strong evidence for overtones in GW150914.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
First Overtone Mode in the Ringdown Signal of GW231028
The ringdown of GW231028 contains evidence for the 221 first overtone mode alongside the dominant 220 mode, with a Bayes factor of 193 at 10M after the peak.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.