Fact-based Court Judgment Prediction

Aniket Deroy; Shubham Kumar Nigam

Fact-based Court Judgment Prediction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.13350 v1 pith:ILND63AJ submitted 2023-11-22 cs.CL cs.AIcs.IRcs.LG

Fact-based Court Judgment Prediction

Shubham Kumar Nigam , Aniket Deroy This is my paper

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.IRcs.LG

keywords predictionjudgmentlegalcjpefactsildccourtdocuments

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

0 comments

read the original abstract

This extended abstract extends the research presented in "ILDC for CJPE: Indian Legal Documents Corpus for Court Judgment Prediction and Explanation" \cite{malik-etal-2021-ildc}, focusing on fact-based judgment prediction within the context of Indian legal documents. We introduce two distinct problem variations: one based solely on facts, and another combining facts with rulings from lower courts (RLC). Our research aims to enhance early-phase case outcome prediction, offering significant benefits to legal professionals and the general public. The results, however, indicated a performance decline compared to the original ILDC for CJPE study, even after implementing various weightage schemes in our DELSumm algorithm. Additionally, using only facts for legal judgment prediction with different transformer models yielded results inferior to the state-of-the-art outcomes reported in the "ILDC for CJPE" study.

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

AILQA: Evaluating AI-Driven Legal Question Answering Systems for the Indian Legal System
cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

RAG with top-3 chunk retrieval lifts smaller LLMs on Indian legal QA (Llama2-70B: 45.7% to 51.7% on AIBE) but often hurts large models, and under the study's own rating protocol some AI answers outscored the reference...
A Tree-of-Thoughts Inspired Hybrid Approach for Legal Case Judgement Summarization using LLMs
cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

A tree-of-thoughts inspired hybrid extractive-abstractive LLM prompt yields better legal case judgment summaries than standard extractive or abstractive prompts.