pith. sign in

arxiv: 2401.10785 · v5 · submitted 2024-01-19 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Composite learning control with modular backstepping and high-order tuners

Tian Shi , Shihua Li , Changyun Wen , Yongping Pan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 03:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords composite learningbackstepping controlinterval excitationparameter estimationadaptive controlhigh-order tunersmodular design
0
0 comments X

The pith

Composite learning backstepping achieves exponential stability under interval excitation without high-gain feedback.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a composite learning backstepping control strategy built on modular backstepping and high-order tuners. A new learning mechanism is constructed to maximize staged exciting strength, so that parameter estimates converge when the regressor satisfies only interval excitation or partial interval excitation. An added prediction error term is placed in the adaptive law to secure acceptable transients. The overall design yields closed-loop exponential stability while avoiding both persistent excitation and high-gain feedback.

Core claim

The composite learning mechanism that maximizes staged exciting strength enables parameter convergence under interval excitation or partial interval excitation within a modular backstepping framework equipped with high-order tuners; an extra prediction error in the adaptive law simultaneously guarantees transient performance, producing closed-loop exponential stability without high-gain feedback or persistent excitation.

What carries the argument

Composite learning mechanism that maximizes staged exciting strength, realized through high-order tuners inside modular backstepping.

If this is right

  • Parameter estimates converge exponentially once the regressor meets interval excitation.
  • Transient response improves through the prediction error term without raising feedback gains.
  • The closed-loop system is exponentially stable under the stated excitation condition.
  • Performance exceeds that of prior adaptive backstepping designs that require persistent excitation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same staged-excitation construction could be tested in other adaptive schemes that currently demand persistent excitation.
  • Reference signals with shorter rich intervals might suffice in practice, relaxing trajectory design constraints.
  • Partial interval excitation opens the possibility of online monitoring to confirm when convergence is guaranteed.

Load-bearing premise

The plant must admit a modular backstepping realization with high-order tuners so the composite learning can operate on interval excitation.

What would settle it

A closed-loop trajectory under verified partial interval excitation in which parameter errors remain bounded away from zero or the tracking error fails to decay exponentially.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2401.10785 by Changyun Wen, Shihua Li, Tian Shi, Yongping Pan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An illustration of the current maximal exciting strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: An illustration of the relationship between the channels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Performance comparisons of three controllers for the tracking problem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Performance comparisons of three controllers for the tracking problem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper proposes a composite learning backstepping control (CLBC) strategy based on modular backstepping and high-order tuners to achieve closed-loop exponential stability without high-gain feedback and PE. A novel composite learning mechanism that maximizes the staged exciting strength is designed for parameter estimation, enabling parameter convergence under interval excitation (IE) or even partial IE, which is strictly weaker than PE. An extra prediction error is employed in the adaptive law to ensure the transient performance without high-gain feedback. Simulations have demonstrated the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method in both parameter estimation and control compared to state-of-the-art methods.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a composite learning backstepping control (CLBC) strategy that integrates modular backstepping with high-order tuners to achieve closed-loop exponential stability without high-gain feedback or persistent excitation (PE). A novel composite learning mechanism is introduced that maximizes staged exciting strength to enable parameter convergence under interval excitation (IE) or partial IE (strictly weaker than PE). An extra prediction error is incorporated into the adaptive law to improve transient performance. Effectiveness and superiority over state-of-the-art methods are asserted via simulations.

Significance. If the stability proofs and convergence claims hold under the stated IE conditions, the result would be significant for adaptive nonlinear control. It relaxes the standard PE requirement to a weaker interval-based condition while preserving transients without high-gain feedback, which addresses a practical limitation in many applications. The modular separation of estimation and control, combined with the composite learning design, is a constructive strength; the use of high-order tuners and the explicit extra prediction error term are noted as targeted improvements. The stress-test concern regarding unstated restrictions on plant dynamics or reference signals does not appear to introduce an internal inconsistency based on the presented claims.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that simulations confirm superiority, but the main text should include explicit statements of the simulation parameters, initial conditions, and quantitative metrics (e.g., convergence rates or error norms) to allow direct comparison with the cited state-of-the-art methods.
  2. Notation for the staged exciting strength and the composite learning signal should be introduced with a clear forward reference to the relevant definition or equation in the control design section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the manuscript, the recognition of its significance in relaxing the PE condition to IE/partial IE, and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe a composite learning backstepping control design using modular backstepping, high-order tuners, and an extra prediction error term in the adaptive law to achieve exponential stability and parameter convergence under interval excitation (IE) or partial IE. No load-bearing steps are shown that reduce the claimed convergence or stability results to fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-definitional constructs, or chains of self-citations whose content is unverified. The excitation condition and composite mechanism are presented as design choices leveraging standard adaptive control tools, with simulations asserted as external confirmation. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and independent of the target claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the method appears to rest on standard assumptions of backstepping and adaptive control without new postulated entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5633 in / 1077 out tokens · 19864 ms · 2026-05-24T03:58:36.188172+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Finite-time parameter estimation in adaptive control of nonlinear systems,

    V . Adetola and M. Guay, “Finite-time parameter estimation in adaptive control of nonlinear systems,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 807–811, Apr. 2008

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    Performance improvement in adaptive control of linearly parame- terized nonlinear systems,

    ——, “Performance improvement in adaptive control of linearly parame- terized nonlinear systems,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 2182–2186, Sep. 2010

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    A historical perspective of adaptive control and learning,

    A. M. Annaswamy and A. L. Fradkov, “A historical perspective of adaptive control and learning,”Annu. Rev. Control, vol. 52, pp. 18–41, Dec. 2021

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Reinforcing robustness of adaptive dynamic surface control,

    C. Bechlioulis and G. Rovithakis, “Reinforcing robustness of adaptive dynamic surface control,”Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 323–339, Apr. 2013

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Adaptive tracking control of uncertain MIMO nonlinear systems with input constraints,

    M. Chen, S. S. Ge, and B. Ren, “Adaptive tracking control of uncertain MIMO nonlinear systems with input constraints,”Automatica, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 452–465, Mar. 2011

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    Application of adaptive controllers in teleoperation systems: A survey,

    L. Chan, F. Naghdy, and D. Stirling, “Application of adaptive controllers in teleoperation systems: A survey,”IEEE Trans. Human-Mach. Syst., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 337–352, Jun. 2014

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Adaptive intelligent controller design-based ISS modular approach for uncertain nonlinear systems with time-varying full-state constraints,

    Y . Chen, Y .-J. Liu, S. Tong, C. L. P. Chen, and L. Liu, “Adaptive intelligent controller design-based ISS modular approach for uncertain nonlinear systems with time-varying full-state constraints,”IEEE Trans. Artif. Intell., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 352–361, Aug. 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Concurrent learning for convergence in adaptive control without persistency of excitation,

    G. Chowdhary and E. N. Johnson, “Concurrent learning for convergence in adaptive control without persistency of excitation,” inProc. IEEE Conf. Decis. Control, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2010, pp. 3674–3679

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Least squares based modification for adaptive control,

    ——, “Least squares based modification for adaptive control,” inProc. IEEE Conf. Decis. Control, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2010, pp. 1767–1772

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    Recursively updated least squares based modification term for adaptive control,

    ——, “Recursively updated least squares based modification term for adaptive control,” inProc. Amer. Control Conf. (ACC), Baltimore, MD, USA, 2010, pp. 892–897. 12 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, VOL. , NO. , OCTOBER 2025

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    Exponential parameter and tracking error convergence guarantees for adaptive controllers without persistency of excitation,

    G. Chowdhary, M. Muhlegg, and E. N. Johnson, “Exponential parameter and tracking error convergence guarantees for adaptive controllers without persistency of excitation,”Int. J. Control, vol. 87, no. 8, pp. 1583–1603, May 2014

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Adaptive backstepping control using combined direct and indirect adaptation,

    M. K. Ciliz, “Adaptive backstepping control using combined direct and indirect adaptation,”Circuits Syst. Signal Process, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 911– 939, Nov. 2007

    work page 2007

  13. [13]

    Command filtered adaptive backstepping,

    W. Dong, J. A. Farrell, M. M. Polycarpou, V . Djapic, and M. Sharma, “Command filtered adaptive backstepping,”IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 566–580, May 2012

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Command filtered backstepping,

    J. A. Farrell, M. Polycarpou, M. Sharma, and W. Dong, “Command filtered backstepping,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1391–1395, Jun. 2009

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    Backstepping-based flight control with adaptive function approximation,

    J. Farrell, M. Sharma, and M. Polycarpou, “Backstepping-based flight control with adaptive function approximation,”J. Guid., Control, Dyn., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1089–1102, Nov.-Dec. 2005

    work page 2005

  16. [16]

    Immersion and invariance based command-filtered adaptive backstepping control of VTOL vehicles,

    J. Hu and H. Zhang, “Immersion and invariance based command-filtered adaptive backstepping control of VTOL vehicles,”Automatica, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 2160–2167, Jul. 2013

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    Composite learning enhanced neural control for robot manipulator with output error constraints,

    D. Huang, C. Yang, Y . Pan, and L. Cheng, “Composite learning enhanced neural control for robot manipulator with output error constraints,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 209–218, Dec. 2021

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Systematic design of adaptive controllers for feedback linearizable systems,

    I. Kanellakopoulos, P. V . Kokotovi´c, and A. S. Morse, “Systematic design of adaptive controllers for feedback linearizable systems,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1241–1253, Nov. 1991

    work page 1991

  19. [19]

    Richness and excitation on an interval-with application to continuous-time adaptive control,

    G. Kreisselmeier and G. Rietze-Augst, “Richness and excitation on an interval-with application to continuous-time adaptive control,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 165–171, Feb. 1990

    work page 1990

  20. [20]

    Adaptive nonlinear control without overparametrization,

    M. Krsti´c, I. Kanellakopoulos, and P. V . Kokotovi´c, “Adaptive nonlinear control without overparametrization,”Syst. & Control Lett., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 177–185, Sep. 1992

    work page 1992

  21. [21]

    On using least-squares updates without regressor filtering in identification and adaptive control of nonlinear systems,

    M. Krsti ´c, “On using least-squares updates without regressor filtering in identification and adaptive control of nonlinear systems,”Automatica, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 731–735, Mar. 2009

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    Command filter adaptive asymptotic tracking of uncertain nonlinear systems with time-varying parameters and disturbances,

    Y .-X. Li, “Command filter adaptive asymptotic tracking of uncertain nonlinear systems with time-varying parameters and disturbances,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 2973–2980, Jun. 2022

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Homography-based visual servoing of robot pose under an uncalibrated eye-to-hand camera,

    Z. Li, B. Lai, H. Wang, and Y . Pan, “Homography-based visual servoing of robot pose under an uncalibrated eye-to-hand camera,”IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1891–1902, Jun. 2024

    work page 1902

  24. [24]

    Image-based composite learning robot visual servoing with an uncalibrated eye-to-hand camera,

    Z. Li, B. Lai, and Y . Pan, “Image-based composite learning robot visual servoing with an uncalibrated eye-to-hand camera,”IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 2499–2509, Aug. 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Homography-based visual servoing of eye-in-hand robots with exact depth estimation,

    B. Lai, Z. Li, W. Li, C. Yang, and Y . Pan, “Homography-based visual servoing of eye-in-hand robots with exact depth estimation,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 3832–3841, Apr. 2024

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Adaptive tracking control of high-order nonlinear systems under asymmetric output constraint,

    S. Ling, H. Wang, and P. X. Liu, “Adaptive tracking control of high-order nonlinear systems under asymmetric output constraint,”Automatica, vol. 122, Art. No. 109281, Dec. 2020

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Semi-globally practical finite-time stability for uncertain nonlinear systems based on dynamic surface control,

    Y . Liu, X. Liu, Y . Jing, and Z. Zhang, “Semi-globally practical finite-time stability for uncertain nonlinear systems based on dynamic surface control,” Int. J. Control, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 476–485, 2021

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Preliminary evaluation of composite learning tracking control on 7-DoF collaborative robots,

    X. Liu, Z. Li, and Y . Pan, “Preliminary evaluation of composite learning tracking control on 7-DoF collaborative robots,”IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 54, no. 14, pp. 470–475, 2021

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Experiments of composite learning admittance control on 7-DoF collaborative robots,

    ——, “Experiments of composite learning admittance control on 7-DoF collaborative robots,” inProc. Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Appl., Yantai, China, 2021, pp. 532–541

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Adaptive backstepping with a high- order tuner,

    V . O. Nikiforov and K. V . V oronov, “Adaptive backstepping with a high- order tuner,”Automatica, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1953–1960, Dec. 2001

    work page 1953

  31. [31]

    Multivariable adaptive control: A survey,

    G. Tao, “Multivariable adaptive control: A survey,”Automatica, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 2737–2764, Nov. 2014

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    Higher-order tracking properties of adaptive back- stepping control systems,

    G. Tao and L. Wen, “Higher-order tracking properties of adaptive back- stepping control systems,”Automatica, vol. 153, Art. No. 111019, Jul. 2023

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Adaptive backstepping control with fast parametric convergence for a class of nonlinear systems,

    D. N. Gerasimov, L. Liu, and V . O. Nikiforov, “Adaptive backstepping control with fast parametric convergence for a class of nonlinear systems,” inProc. Eur. Control Conf., Naples, Italy, 2019, pp. 3432–3437

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Robust adaptive backstepping control with improved parametric convergence,

    D. N. Gerasimov and A. V . Pashenko, “Robust adaptive backstepping control with improved parametric convergence,”IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 52, no. 29, pp. 146–151, Dec. 2019

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    On key properties of the Lion’s and Kreisselmeier’s adaptation algorithms,

    D. N. Gerasimov and V . O. Nikiforov, “On key properties of the Lion’s and Kreisselmeier’s adaptation algorithms,”IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 3773–3778, 2020

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Improved adaptive compensation of unmatched multisinusoidal disturbances in uncertain nonlinear plants,

    D. N. Gerasimov, A. V . Pashenko, and V . O. Nikiforov, “Improved adaptive compensation of unmatched multisinusoidal disturbances in uncertain nonlinear plants,” inProc. Am. Control Conf., Denver, CO, USA, 2020, pp. 626–632

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    On key properties of the Lion’s and Kreisselmeier’s adaptation algorithms,

    D. N. Gerasimov and V . O. Nikiforov, “On key properties of the Lion’s and Kreisselmeier’s adaptation algorithms,”Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process., vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1285–1304, Jun. 2022

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Composite learning robot control with friction compensation: A neural network-based approach,

    K. Guo, Y . Pan, and H. Yu, “Composite learning robot control with friction compensation: A neural network-based approach,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 7841–7851, Dec. 2019

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    Composite learning control of robotic systems: A least squares modulated approach,

    K. Guo, Y . Pan, D. Zheng, and H. Yu, “Composite learning control of robotic systems: A least squares modulated approach,”Automatica, vol. 111, Art. No. 108612, 2020

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Locally weighted learning robot control with improved parameter convergence,

    K. Guo, Y . Liu, B. Xu, Y . Xu, and Y . Pan, “Locally weighted learning robot control with improved parameter convergence,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 13 236–13 244, Dec. 2022

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Composite adaptation and learning for robot control: A survey,

    K. Guo and Y . Pan, “Composite adaptation and learning for robot control: A survey,”Annu. Rev. Control, vol. 55, pp. 279–290, Dec. 2023

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Port- hamiltonian systems in adaptive and learning control: A survey,

    S. P. Nageshrao, G. A. D. Lopes, D. Jeltsema, and R. Babu ˇska, “Port- hamiltonian systems in adaptive and learning control: A survey,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1223–1238, May 2016

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    Modular adaptive back- stepping design with a high-order tuner,

    V . Nikiforov, D. Gerasimov, and A. Pashenko, “Modular adaptive back- stepping design with a high-order tuner,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 2663–2668, May 2022

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Command-filter-based finite-time adaptive control for nonlinear systems with quantized input,

    J. Ma, J. H. Park, and S. Xu, “Command-filter-based finite-time adaptive control for nonlinear systems with quantized input,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 2339–2344, May 2021

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    High-order parameter tuners for the adaptive control of linear and nonlinear systems,

    A. S. Morse, “High-order parameter tuners for the adaptive control of linear and nonlinear systems,” inSystems, Models and Feedback: Theory and Applications, A. Isidori and T.-J. Tarn, Eds., vol. 12. Boston, MA: Birkh¨auser, 1992, pp. 339–364

    work page 1992

  46. [46]

    On modified parameter estimators for identification and adaptive control. A unified framework and some new schemes,

    R. Ortega, V . Nikiforov, and D. Gerasimov, “On modified parameter estimators for identification and adaptive control. A unified framework and some new schemes,”Annu. Rev. Control, vol. 50, pp. 278–293, 2020

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Online data-driven composite adaptive back- stepping control with exact differentiators,

    Y . Pan, Y . Liu, and H. Yu, “Online data-driven composite adaptive back- stepping control with exact differentiators,”Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 779–789, May 2016

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    Model reference composite learning control without persistency of excitation,

    Y . Pan, J. Zhang, and H. Yu, “Model reference composite learning control without persistency of excitation,”IET Control Theory Appl., vol. 10, no. 16, pp. 1963–1971, Oct. 2016

    work page 1963

  49. [49]

    Composite adaptive dynamic surface control using online recorded data,

    Y . Pan, T. Sun, and H. Yu, “Composite adaptive dynamic surface control using online recorded data,”Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, vol. 26, no. 18, pp. 3921–3936, Dec. 2016

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Composite learning from adaptive dynamic surface control,

    Y . Pan and H. Yu, “Composite learning from adaptive dynamic surface control,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 2603–2609, Sep. 2016

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    Composite learning from adaptive backstepping neural network control,

    Y . Pan, T. Sun, Y . Liu, and H. Yu, “Composite learning from adaptive backstepping neural network control,”Neural Netw., vol. 95, pp. 134–142, Nov. 2017

    work page 2017

  52. [52]

    Composite learning robot control with guaranteed parameter convergence,

    Y . Pan and H. Yu, “Composite learning robot control with guaranteed parameter convergence,”Automatica, vol. 89, pp. 398–406, 2018

    work page 2018

  53. [53]

    Adaptive command-filtered backstep- ping control of robot arms with compliant actuators,

    Y . Pan, H. Wang, X. Li, and H. Yu, “Adaptive command-filtered backstep- ping control of robot arms with compliant actuators,”IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1149–1156, 2018

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Composite learning adaptive backstepping control using neural networks with compact supports,

    Y . Pan, C. Yang, M. Pratama, and H. Yu, “Composite learning adaptive backstepping control using neural networks with compact supports,”Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1726–1738, Dec. 2019

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    Efficient learning from adaptive control under sufficient excitation,

    Y . Pan, S. Aranovskiy, A. Bobtsov, and H. Yu, “Efficient learning from adaptive control under sufficient excitation,”Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 3111–3124, Jul. 2019

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    Bioinspired composite learning control under discontinuous friction for industrial robots,

    Y . Pan, K. Guo, T. Sun, and M. Darouach, “Bioinspired composite learning control under discontinuous friction for industrial robots,”IFAC- PapersOnLine, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 85–90, Aug. 2022

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Composite learning variable impedance robot control with stability and passivity guarantees,

    Y . Pan, Z. Li, T. Shi, and C. Wen, “Composite learning variable impedance robot control with stability and passivity guarantees,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 119–126, Jan. 2024

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Composite error learning robot control using discontinuous lyapunov analysis,

    Y . Pan, K. Guo, A. Bobtsov, C. Yang, and H. Yu, “Composite error learning robot control using discontinuous lyapunov analysis,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 1705–1712, 2024

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Comparative analysis of parameter converg- ence for several least-squares estimation schemes,

    Y . Pan, T. Shi, and R. Ortega, “Comparative analysis of parameter converg- ence for several least-squares estimation schemes,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 3341–3348, 2024

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    Adaptive estimation and control with online data memory: A historical perspective,

    Y . Pan and T. Shi, “Adaptive estimation and control with online data memory: A historical perspective,”IEEE Control Syst. Lett., vol. 8, pp. 267–278, 2024

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Performance improvement of adaptive backstepping output-feedback con- trol for a class of nonlinear plants with unmatched parametric uncertainties,

    A. V . Pashenko, D. N. Gerasimov, V . O. Nikiforov, and O. D. Suzdalev, “Performance improvement of adaptive backstepping output-feedback con- trol for a class of nonlinear plants with unmatched parametric uncertainties,” inProc. Am. Control Conf., New Orleans, USA, 2021, pp. 2457–2462. SHIet al.: COMPOSITE LEARNING BACKSTEPPING CONTROL WITH GUARANTEED EX...

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    Composite learning control with modular backstepping and high-order tuners

    T. Shi, C. Wen, and Y . Pan, “Composite learning backstepping control with guaranteed exponential stability and robustness,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.10785, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    Observer-based dynamic surface control for a class of nonlinear systems: An LMI approach,

    B. Song and J. Hedrick, “Observer-based dynamic surface control for a class of nonlinear systems: An LMI approach,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 1995–2001, Nov. 2004

    work page 1995

  64. [64]

    Nonlinear gain feedback adaptive dsc for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems with asymptotic output tracking,

    J. Song, M. Yan, Y . Ju, and P. Yang, “Nonlinear gain feedback adaptive dsc for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems with asymptotic output tracking,” Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 98, p. 2195–2210, Nov. 2019

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    Adaptive finite time command filtered backstepping control design for a class of uncertain full state constrained strict-feedback nonlinear systems,

    Y . Soukkou, M. Tadjine, and M. Nibouche, “Adaptive finite time command filtered backstepping control design for a class of uncertain full state constrained strict-feedback nonlinear systems,”Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, pp. 1–15, to be published, DOI: 10.1002/rnc.6906

    work page doi:10.1002/rnc.6906

  66. [66]

    A novel full errors fixed-time control for constraint nonlinear systems,

    S. Sui, C. L. P. Chen, and S. Tong, “A novel full errors fixed-time control for constraint nonlinear systems,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 2568–2575, Apr. 2023

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    Dynamic surface control of nonlinear systems,

    D. Swaroop, J. Gerdes, P. Yip, and J. Hedrick, “Dynamic surface control of nonlinear systems,” inProc. Am. Control Conf., Albuquerque, NM, USA, 1997, pp. 3028–3034

    work page 1997

  68. [68]

    Dynamic surface control for a class of nonlinear systems,

    D. Swaroop, J. Hedrick, P. Yip, and J. Gerdes, “Dynamic surface control for a class of nonlinear systems,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 1893–1899, Oct. 2000

    work page 2000

  69. [69]

    An iss-modular approach for adaptive neural control of pure-feedback systems,

    C. Wang, D. J. Hill, S. Ge, and G. Chen, “An iss-modular approach for adaptive neural control of pure-feedback systems,”Automatica, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 723–731, May 2006

    work page 2006

  70. [70]

    Neural network-based adaptive dynamic surface control of uncertain nonlinear pure-feedback systems,

    D. Wang, “Neural network-based adaptive dynamic surface control of uncertain nonlinear pure-feedback systems,”Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 527–541, Mar. 2011

    work page 2011

  71. [71]

    Adaptive compensation for infinite number of actuator failures or faults,

    W. Wang and C. Wen, “Adaptive compensation for infinite number of actuator failures or faults,”Automatica, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 2197–2210, Oct. 2011

    work page 2011

  72. [72]

    Adaptive command filtered control for switched multi-input multi-output nonlinear systems with hysteresis inputs,

    Y . Wang, B. Niu, A. Ahmad, Y . Liu, H. Wang, G. Zong, and F. Alsaadi, “Adaptive command filtered control for switched multi-input multi-output nonlinear systems with hysteresis inputs,”Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process., vol. 36, no. 12, p. 3023–3042, Dec. 2022

    work page 2022

  73. [73]

    Identi- fiability implies robust, globally exponentially convergent on-line pa- rameter estimation,

    L. Wang, R. Ortega, A. Bobtsov, J. G. Romero, and B. Yi, “Identi- fiability implies robust, globally exponentially convergent on-line pa- rameter estimation,”Int. J. Control, early access, Aug. 17, 2023, doi: 10.1080/00207179.2023.2246595

    work page doi:10.1080/00207179.2023.2246595 2023

  74. [74]

    Robust adaptive control of uncertain nonlinear systems in the presence of input saturation and external disturbance,

    C. Wen, J. Zhou, Z. Liu, and H. Su, “Robust adaptive control of uncertain nonlinear systems in the presence of input saturation and external disturbance,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 1672–1678, Jul. 2011

    work page 2011

  75. [75]

    Adaptive finite-time tracking control for parameter- ized nonlinear systems with full state constraints,

    Z. Wu and T. Zhang, “Adaptive finite-time tracking control for parameter- ized nonlinear systems with full state constraints,”Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process., vol. 35, no. 9, p. 1768–1788, Sep. 2021

    work page 2021

  76. [76]

    Adaptive dynamic surface control: A simp- lified algorithm for adaptive backstepping control of nonlinear systems,

    P. P. Yip and J. K. Hedrick, “Adaptive dynamic surface control: A simp- lified algorithm for adaptive backstepping control of nonlinear systems,” Int. J. Control, vol. 71, p. 959–979, 1998

    work page 1998

  77. [77]

    Tracking control of MIMO nonlinear systems under full state constraints: A single-parameter adaptation ap- proach free from feasibility conditions,

    K. Zhao, Y . Song, and Z. Zhang, “Tracking control of MIMO nonlinear systems under full state constraints: A single-parameter adaptation ap- proach free from feasibility conditions,”Automatica, vol. 107, pp. 52–60, Sep. 2019

    work page 2019

  78. [78]

    Adaptive neural dynamic surface control of strict-feedback nonlinear systems with full state constraints and unmodeled dynamics,

    T. Zhang, M. Xia, and Y . Yi, “Adaptive neural dynamic surface control of strict-feedback nonlinear systems with full state constraints and unmodeled dynamics,”Automatica, vol. 81, pp. 232–239, Jul. 2017

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    An improved adaptive dynamic surface control approach for uncertain nonlinear systems,

    Z. Zhang, G. Duan, and M. Hou, “An improved adaptive dynamic surface control approach for uncertain nonlinear systems,”Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 713–728, May 2018

    work page 2018

  80. [80]

    Command filter and universal approximator based backstepping control design for strict-feedback nonlinear systems with uncertainty,

    X. Zheng and X. Yang, “Command filter and universal approximator based backstepping control design for strict-feedback nonlinear systems with uncertainty,”IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 1310–1317, Mar. 2020

    work page 2020

Showing first 80 references.