Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

BIRCO: A Benchmark of Information Retrieval Tasks with Complex Objectives

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.14151 v2 pith:K4TXAHQZ submitted 2024-02-21 cs.IR cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

BIRCO: A Benchmark of Information Retrieval Tasks with Complex Objectives

classification cs.IR cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords retrievalbenchmarkcomplextasksbircoinformationobjectivesmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the Benchmark of Information Retrieval (IR) tasks with Complex Objectives (BIRCO). BIRCO evaluates the ability of IR systems to retrieve documents given multi-faceted user objectives. The benchmark's complexity and compact size make it suitable for evaluating large language model (LLM)-based information retrieval systems. We present a modular framework for investigating factors that may influence LLM performance on retrieval tasks, and identify a simple baseline model which matches or outperforms existing approaches and more complex alternatives. No approach achieves satisfactory performance on all benchmark tasks, suggesting that stronger models and new retrieval protocols are necessary to address complex user needs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. HAKARI-Bench: A Lightweight Benchmark for Comparing Retrieval Architectures and Efficiency Settings under Unified Conditions

    cs.IR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    HAKARI-Bench reconstructs 35 benchmarks into 551 tasks across 43 languages, reproducing full MTEB, MMTEB, and BEIR rankings with Spearman correlation above 0.97 while supporting efficiency variant comparisons.

  2. Healthier LLMs: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Public Health Question Answering

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Hybrid RAG over UK public health guidance sharply raises MCQA accuracy and free-form faithfulness, letting smaller open models match larger closed models without retrieval.