REVIEW 2 cited by
BIRCO: A Benchmark of Information Retrieval Tasks with Complex Objectives
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
BIRCO: A Benchmark of Information Retrieval Tasks with Complex Objectives
read the original abstract
We present the Benchmark of Information Retrieval (IR) tasks with Complex Objectives (BIRCO). BIRCO evaluates the ability of IR systems to retrieve documents given multi-faceted user objectives. The benchmark's complexity and compact size make it suitable for evaluating large language model (LLM)-based information retrieval systems. We present a modular framework for investigating factors that may influence LLM performance on retrieval tasks, and identify a simple baseline model which matches or outperforms existing approaches and more complex alternatives. No approach achieves satisfactory performance on all benchmark tasks, suggesting that stronger models and new retrieval protocols are necessary to address complex user needs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
HAKARI-Bench: A Lightweight Benchmark for Comparing Retrieval Architectures and Efficiency Settings under Unified Conditions
HAKARI-Bench reconstructs 35 benchmarks into 551 tasks across 43 languages, reproducing full MTEB, MMTEB, and BEIR rankings with Spearman correlation above 0.97 while supporting efficiency variant comparisons.
-
Healthier LLMs: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Public Health Question Answering
Hybrid RAG over UK public health guidance sharply raises MCQA accuracy and free-form faithfulness, letting smaller open models match larger closed models without retrieval.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.