REVIEW 1 cited by
A Quantum Approach to Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE)
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Quantum Approach to Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE)
read the original abstract
The paper proposes the Quantum-SMOTE method, a novel solution that uses quantum computing techniques to solve the prevalent problem of class imbalance in machine learning datasets. Quantum-SMOTE, inspired by the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), generates synthetic data points using quantum processes such as swap tests and quantum rotation. The process varies from the conventional SMOTE algorithm's usage of K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Euclidean distances, enabling synthetic instances to be generated from minority class data points without relying on neighbor proximity. The algorithm asserts greater control over the synthetic data generation process by introducing hyperparameters such as rotation angle, minority percentage, and splitting factor, which allow for customization to specific dataset requirements. Due to the use of a compact swap test, the algorithm can accommodate a large number of features. Furthermore, the approach is tested on a public dataset of Telecom Churn and evaluated alongside two prominent classification algorithms, Random Forest and Logistic Regression, to determine its impact along with varying proportions of synthetic data.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Enhancing Machine Learning for Imbalanced Medical Data: A Quantum-Inspired Approach to Synthetic Oversampling (QI-SMOTE)
QI-SMOTE claims quantum-inspired oversampling improves imbalanced medical classification, but the described VQE step is self-defeating and the evidence is internally inconsistent.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.