Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

NotPlaNET: Removing False Positives from Planet Hunters TESS with Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.18278 v1 pith:INN43ZPR submitted 2024-05-28 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IMcs.LG

NotPlaNET: Removing False Positives from Planet Hunters TESS with Machine Learning

classification astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IMcs.LG
keywords planetcurvesfalselightnumberpositivessignalstransit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Differentiating between real transit events and false positive signals in photometric time series data is a bottleneck in the identification of transiting exoplanets, particularly long-period planets. This differentiation typically requires visual inspection of a large number of transit-like signals to rule out instrumental and astrophysical false positives that mimic planetary transit signals. We build a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) to separate eclipsing binaries and other false positives from potential planet candidates, reducing the number of light curves that require human vetting. Our CNN is trained using the TESS light curves that were identified by Planet Hunters citizen scientists as likely containing a transit. We also include the background flux and centroid information. The light curves are visually inspected and labeled by project scientists and are minimally pre-processed, with only normalization and data augmentation taking place before training. The median percentage of contaminants flagged across the test sectors is 18% with a maximum of 37% and a minimum of 10%. Our model keeps 100% of the planets for 16 of the 18 test sectors, while incorrectly flagging one planet candidate (0.3%) for one sector and two (0.6%) for the remaining sector. Our method shows potential to reduce the number of light curves requiring manual vetting by up to a third with minimal misclassification of planet candidates.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Estimating Orbital Parameters of Direct Imaging Exoplanet Using Neural Network

    astro-ph.EP 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0

    Warm-starting parallel-tempered MCMC with flow-matching posterior proposals infers β Pictoris b's orbit about 78-365× faster than conventional samplers with comparable posteriors, though the comparison is not fully ap...