REVIEW 2 cited by
Large Language Models for Code Summarization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Large Language Models for Code Summarization
read the original abstract
Recently, there has been increasing activity in using deep learning for software engineering, including tasks like code generation and summarization. In particular, the most recent coding Large Language Models seem to perform well on these problems. In this technical report, we aim to review how these models perform in code explanation/summarization, while also investigating their code generation capabilities (based on natural language descriptions).
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Large Language Models for Code Generation from Multilingual Prompts: A Curated Benchmark and a Study on Code Quality
Prompt language affects LLM code generation, but English is not consistently best: Chinese prompts improve Python correctness on CoderEval, while quality and lexicon effects vary by model and programming language.
-
Using Mutation-Analysis to Examine an LLM's Ability to Summarize Code
Mutation-based testing shows LLM-generated code summaries frequently fail to reflect behavior-changing edits, with accuracy dropping as code complexity rises.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.