REVIEW 1 cited by
LayerShuffle: Enhancing Robustness in Vision Transformers by Randomizing Layer Execution Order
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
LayerShuffle: Enhancing Robustness in Vision Transformers by Randomizing Layer Execution Order
read the original abstract
Due to their architecture and how they are trained, artificial neural networks are typically not robust toward pruning or shuffling layers at test time. However, such properties would be desirable for different applications, such as distributed neural network architectures where the order of execution cannot be guaranteed or parts of the network can fail during inference. In this work, we address these issues through a number of training approaches for vision transformers whose most important component is randomizing the execution order of attention modules at training time. With our proposed approaches, vision transformers are capable to adapt to arbitrary layer execution orders at test time assuming one tolerates a reduction (about 20\%) in accuracy at the same model size. We analyse the feature representations of our trained models as well as how each layer contributes to the models prediction based on its position during inference. Our analysis shows that layers learn to contribute differently based on their position in the network. Finally, we layer-prune our models at test time and find that their performance declines gracefully. Code available at https://github.com/matfrei/layershuffle.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Mobius Learning: Cyclic Depth Folding in Transformers
Möbius Learning, which cyclically shifts block order across data streams, achieves lower validation loss than fixed-order looped training at loop depths 6, 10, and 15 in a 124M-parameter GPT-2 experiment.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.