REVIEW 1 cited by
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Phantom hairy black holes and wormholes in Einstein-bumblebee gravity
read the original abstract
In this paper we study Einstein-bumblebee gravity theory minimally coupled with external matter -- a phantom/non-phantom(conventional) scalar field, and derive a series of hairy solutions -- bumblebee-phantom(BP) and BP-dS/AdS black hole solutions, regular Ellis-bumblebee-phantom (EBP) and BP-AdS wormholes, etc. We first find that the Lorentz violation (LV) effect can change the so called black hole no-hair theorem and these scalar fields can give a hair to a black hole. If LV coupling constant $\ell>-1$, the phantom field is admissible and the conventional scalar field is forbidden; if $\ell<-1$, the phantom field is forbidden and the conventional scalar field is admissible. By defining the Killing potential $\omega^{ab}$, we study the Smarr formula and the first law for the BP black hole, find that the appearance of LV can improve the structure of these phantom hairy black holes -- the conventional Smarr formula and the first law of black hole thermodynamics still hold; but for no LV case, i.e., the regular phantom black hole reported in [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf96}, 251101], the first law cannot be constructed at all. When the bumblebee potential is linear, we find that the phantom potential and the Lagrange-multiplier $\lambda$ behave as a cosmological constant $\Lambda$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Primordial black hole in Lorentz-violating theories: Insights from Bumblebee gravity
Bumblebee gravity enhances primordial black hole abundance through three mechanisms, but the model harbors a ghost instability and a tachyonic instability that make it cosmologically unviable.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.