Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Aligning Machine and Human Visual Representations across Abstraction Levels

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.06509 v4 pith:PTSWF2O6 submitted 2024-09-10 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

Aligning Machine and Human Visual Representations across Abstraction Levels

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG
keywords humanrepresentationsneuralhuman-alignedmodelsacrossbehaviorjudgments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks have achieved success across a wide range of applications, including as models of human behavior and neural representations in vision tasks. However, neural network training and human learning differ in fundamental ways, and neural networks often fail to generalize as robustly as humans do raising questions regarding the similarity of their underlying representations. What is missing for modern learning systems to exhibit more human-aligned behavior? We highlight a key misalignment between vision models and humans: whereas human conceptual knowledge is hierarchically organized from fine- to coarse-scale distinctions, model representations do not accurately capture all these levels of abstraction. To address this misalignment, we first train a teacher model to imitate human judgments, then transfer human-aligned structure from its representations to refine the representations of pretrained state-of-the-art vision foundation models via finetuning. These human-aligned models more accurately approximate human behavior and uncertainty across a wide range of similarity tasks, including a new dataset of human judgments spanning multiple levels of semantic abstractions. They also perform better on a diverse set of machine learning tasks, increasing generalization and out-of-distribution robustness. Thus, infusing neural networks with additional human knowledge yields a best-of-both-worlds representation that is both more consistent with human cognitive judgments and more practically useful, thus paving the way toward more robust, interpretable, and human-aligned artificial intelligence systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mixing Configurations for Downstream Prediction

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0

    Mixing multiple resolution clusterings of an embedding, aligned between train and test, and fused by attention, improves downstream regression and classification over single-resolution baselines.

  2. A Geometric Theory of Cognition for Machine Intelligence

    cs.AI 2025-12 reject novelty 4.0

    Cognition is re-described as Riemannian gradient flow on a manifold; an anisotropic metric makes fast intuitive and slow deliberative timescales emerge from a single equation.