pith. sign in

arxiv: 2409.10508 · v2 · submitted 2024-09-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · gr-qc

General-relativistic resistive-magnetohydrodynamics simulations of self-consistent magnetized rotating neutron stars

Patrick Chi-Kit Cheong , Antonios Tsokaros , Milton Ruiz , Fabrizio Venturi , Juno Chun Lung Chan , Anson Ka Long Yip , Koji Uryu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 20:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE gr-qc
keywords neutron starsresistive MHDgeneral relativitygravitational wavesmagnetic field evolutionMHD instabilitiesrotating stars
0
0 comments X

The pith

Resistivity produces different magnetic geometries in rotating neutron stars while the poloidal-to-toroidal energy ratio stays fixed at 9:1.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper conducts the first general-relativistic resistive magnetohydrodynamics simulations of rotating neutron stars that begin with self-consistent mixed poloidal and toroidal magnetic fields. Resistivity is shown to alter the growth of magnetohydrodynamic instabilities, yielding new field configurations and weaker emitted gravitational waves over timescales up to 100 milliseconds. A striking result is that the ratio of poloidal to toroidal magnetic energy remains 9:1 across all models despite these changes. This matters for understanding how finite electrical conductivity shapes the magnetic evolution of neutron stars, which can influence their observable emissions and stability.

Core claim

Resistivity can significantly influence the development of magnetohydrodynamic instabilities, resulting in markedly different magnetic field geometries. Resistivity suppresses the growth of these instabilities, leading to a reduction in the amplitude of emitted gravitational waves. Despite the variations in magnetic field geometries, the ratio of poloidal to toroidal field energies remains consistently 9:1 throughout the simulations, for the models we investigated.

What carries the argument

General-relativistic resistive magnetohydrodynamics applied to self-consistent equilibrium configurations of rotating neutron stars with mixed poloidal and toroidal magnetic fields.

If this is right

  • Resistivity leads to markedly different magnetic field geometries.
  • Growth of MHD instabilities is suppressed, reducing gravitational wave amplitudes.
  • The poloidal to toroidal field energy ratio stays at 9:1.
  • Quasi-equilibrium configurations persist over at least 100 ms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Over longer timescales, resistivity could alter the overall magnetic braking and spin evolution of isolated neutron stars.
  • The preserved energy ratio might point to a robust attractor in the dynamics of magnetized compact objects under resistive effects.
  • Extending these models to include temperature-dependent resistivity or crust physics could test applicability to real pulsars.

Load-bearing premise

The initial magnetic field configurations represent self-consistent, equilibrium rotating neutron stars with mixed poloidal and toroidal components, and the chosen resistivity prescription accurately captures the relevant microphysics over the simulated timescales.

What would settle it

A direct comparison simulation without resistivity that produces identical magnetic geometries and gravitational wave signals would show that resistivity does not influence the instabilities as claimed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2409.10508 by Anson Ka Long Yip, Antonios Tsokaros, Fabrizio Venturi, Juno Chun Lung Chan, Koji Uryu, Milton Ruiz, Patrick Chi-Kit Cheong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The logarithmic plasma sigma [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Time evolution of the internal magnetic energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Time evolution of the rotational [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Angular velocity profile Ω along the coordinate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Three-dimensional renderings of model A2 with resistivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Similar plots as Fig. 7 but with the resistivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: A comparison between evolutions with different resistivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Toroidal magnetic field strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: We note here that the magnitude of the magnetic field in our initial models is unrealistically large. The rea￾son for adopting such large magnetic fields is to make [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Similar plots as Fig. 10 but on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Volume-integrated azimuthal mode decomposition of the conserved rest-mass density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Time evolution of the gravitational wave amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Comparison of the three-dimensional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Comparison of the evolutions of a strongly [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the first general-relativistic resistive magnetohydrodynamics simulations of self-consistent, rotating neutron stars with mixed poloidal and toroidal magnetic fields. Specifically, we investigate the role of resistivity in the dynamical evolution of neutron stars over a period of up to 100 ms and its effects on their quasi-equilibrium configurations. Our results demonstrate that resistivity can significantly influence the development of magnetohydrodynamic instabilities, resulting in markedly different magnetic field geometries. Additionally, resistivity suppresses the growth of these instabilities, leading to a reduction in the amplitude of emitted gravitational waves. Despite the variations in magnetic field geometries, the ratio of poloidal to toroidal field energies remains consistently 9:1 throughout the simulations, for the models we investigated.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the first general-relativistic resistive magnetohydrodynamics simulations of self-consistent rotating neutron stars with mixed poloidal and toroidal magnetic fields. It investigates the effects of resistivity on the dynamical evolution over up to 100 ms, finding that resistivity alters magnetic field geometries by influencing MHD instabilities, suppresses instability growth and thereby reduces gravitational-wave amplitudes, while the poloidal-to-toroidal magnetic energy ratio remains fixed at 9:1 across the investigated models.

Significance. If the initial configurations are confirmed as true GR equilibria, the work provides the first direct numerical evidence of resistive effects on instabilities and GW emission in mixed-field neutron stars; the invariant 9:1 energy ratio is a robust, falsifiable result that could constrain models of magnetar evolution and continuous GW sources.

major comments (2)
  1. [Initial data / equilibrium verification] Initial-data section (likely §3): the central claim that resistivity, rather than relaxation, drives the reported changes in field geometry and GW amplitude requires explicit documentation of how the mixed poloidal-toroidal equilibria were constructed (e.g., numerical solution of the GR Grad-Shafranov equation) together with a zero-resistivity control run demonstrating that the star remains stationary to within numerical error over the simulated interval.
  2. [Numerical results] Results and methods sections: no grid resolution, convergence tests, or quantitative error estimates are reported for the differences in field geometry or GW strain; without these, it is impossible to determine whether the claimed suppression of instabilities is numerically robust.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase “for the models we investigated” is vague; a brief statement of the range of resistivities and rotation rates explored would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below, indicating the changes we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Initial data / equilibrium verification] Initial-data section (likely §3): the central claim that resistivity, rather than relaxation, drives the reported changes in field geometry and GW amplitude requires explicit documentation of how the mixed poloidal-toroidal equilibria were constructed (e.g., numerical solution of the GR Grad-Shafranov equation) together with a zero-resistivity control run demonstrating that the star remains stationary to within numerical error over the simulated interval.

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation is required to confirm the initial configurations are true GR equilibria and to isolate the role of resistivity. In the revised manuscript we will expand the initial-data section to describe the numerical construction of the mixed poloidal-toroidal equilibria via the GR Grad-Shafranov equation. We will also add a zero-resistivity control simulation showing that the star remains stationary to within numerical error over the simulated interval, thereby confirming that the reported changes are driven by resistivity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Numerical results] Results and methods sections: no grid resolution, convergence tests, or quantitative error estimates are reported for the differences in field geometry or GW strain; without these, it is impossible to determine whether the claimed suppression of instabilities is numerically robust.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript does not report grid resolutions, convergence tests, or quantitative error estimates for the differences in field geometry and GW strain. In the revised version we will add this information, including the resolutions employed, results of convergence tests, and quantitative error estimates (e.g., relative differences across resolutions) to demonstrate the numerical robustness of the instability suppression. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct outputs of numerical evolution

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes from time-dependent GR resistive-MHD simulations of rotating neutron stars. All reported quantities (field geometries, instability growth, GW amplitudes, and the observed 9:1 poloidal-to-toroidal energy ratio) are evolved fields or diagnostics extracted from the simulation runs rather than quantities defined in terms of themselves or obtained by fitting a subset of the data and then relabeling the fit as a prediction. The initial-data construction is asserted to be self-consistent equilibria, but the paper does not derive any central result by substituting that construction back into itself; the evolution under resistivity is an independent dynamical step. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems imported from prior work by the same authors, or ansatzes smuggled via citation appear as load-bearing steps. The derivation chain is therefore the standard numerical one: initial data plus evolution equations plus diagnostics, with no reduction of outputs to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no information on free parameters, background axioms, or newly postulated entities; all such elements remain unidentified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5676 in / 1068 out tokens · 29336 ms · 2026-05-23T20:53:40.355284+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Magnetic field dynamics in isolated neutron stars with an external dipole field

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Long-term numerical relativity simulations find that neutron star magnetic fields relax to stable mixed configurations with toroidal energy fraction ≲10% within one Alfvén time after Tayler instability saturation.

  2. Dense Matter and Compact Stars in Strong Magnetic Fields

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Strong magnetic fields in compact stars induce Landau quantization and magnetic-moment couplings that change the equation of state and allow additional degrees of freedom such as hyperons, Delta resonances, and quark matter.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Non-magnetized evolution In this subsection, we compare the evolutions of a non- magnetized rapidly rotating neutron star with Gmunu and IllinoisGRMHD codes. The model employed in the case corresponds to a neutron stars with a central rest-mass density ρ = 4 .90 × 1014 g · cm−3, a gravitational mass M0 = 1.83M⊙, a radius RNS = 19.75 km along the x co- ord...

    work page

  2. [2]

    A2” with Gmunu and IllinoisGRMHD codes. This neutron star is the “A2

    Magnetized evolution In this subsection, we compare the evolutions of the same strongly magnetized rapidly rotating neutron star model “A2” with Gmunu and IllinoisGRMHD codes. This neutron star is the “A2” model as described in section II and [34]. Note that, the finest grid size at the centre of the star in the case of Gmunu is ∆x ≈ 346 m, while it is ab...

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    R. N. Manchester, G. B. Hobbs, A. Teoh, and M. Hobbs, The Australia Telescope National Facility pulsar cat- alogue, Astron. J. 129, 1993 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0412641

    work page arXiv 1993

  4. [4]

    Mereghetti, The strongest cosmic magnets: Soft Gamma-ray Repeaters and Anomalous X-ray Pul- sars, Astron

    S. Mereghetti, The strongest cosmic magnets: Soft Gamma-ray Repeaters and Anomalous X-ray Pul- sars, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 15, 225 (2008), arXiv:0804.0250 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  5. [5]

    P. M. Woods and C. Thompson, Soft gamma repeaters and anomalous X-ray pulsars: magnetar candidates, in Compact stellar X-ray sources , Vol. 39 (2006) pp. 547– 586

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    Efficient magnetic-field amplification due to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in binary neutron star mergers

    K. Kiuchi, P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, K. Kyutoku, Y. Sekiguchi, and M. Shibata, Efficient magnetic-field amplification due to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in binary neu- tron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D 92, 124034 (2015), arXiv:1509.09205 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Aguilera-Miret, D

    R. Aguilera-Miret, D. Vigan` o, F. Carrasco, B. Mi˜ nano, and C. Palenzuela, Turbulent magnetic-field amplifi- cation in the first 10 milliseconds after a binary neu- tron star merger: Comparing high-resolution and large- eddy simulations, Phys. Rev. D 102, 103006 (2020), arXiv:2009.06669 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi GBM, INTEGRAL, IceCube, AstroSat Cadmium Zinc Telluride Imager Team, IPN, Insight-Hxmt, ANTARES, Swift, AGILE Team, 1M2H Team, Dark Energy Camera GW-EM, DES, DLT40, GRAWITA, Fermi-LAT, ATCA, ASKAP, Las Cumbres Observa- tory Group, OzGrav, DWF (Deeper Wider Faster Program), AST3, CAASTRO, VINROUGE, MAS- TE...

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bog- danov, Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. Guillot, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, R. M. Lud- lam, S. Mahmoodifar, S. M. Morsink, P. S. Ray, T. E. Strohmayer, K. S. Wood, T. Enoto, R. Foster, T. Oka- jima, G. Prigozhin, and Y. Soong, PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from NICER Data and Implicatio...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, S. Bogdanov, P. S. Ray, R. M. 18 Ludlam, S. Guillot, Z. Arzoumanian, C. L. Baker, A. V. Bilous, D. Chakrabarty, K. C. Gendreau, A. K. Hard- ing, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, S. M. Morsink, and T. E. Strohmayer, A NICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation, ApJ 887, L21 (2019), arXiv:1912.05702 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    A. V. Bilous, A. L. Watts, A. K. Harding, T. E. Riley, Z. Arzoumanian, S. Bogdanov, K. C. Gendreau, P. S. Ray, S. Guillot, W. C. G. Ho, and D. Chakrabarty, A NICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Evidence for a Global-scale Multipolar Magnetic Field, ApJ 887, L23 (2019), arXiv:1912.05704 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    R. C. R. de Lima, J. G. Coelho, J. P. Pereira, C. V. Rodrigues, and J. A. Rueda, Evidence for a Multipolar Magnetic Field in SGR J1745-2900 from X-Ray Light- curve Analysis, ApJ 889, 165 (2020), arXiv:1912.12336 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    V. S. Beskin, Radio pulsars: already fifty years!, Physics Uspekhi 61, 353 (2018), arXiv:1807.08528 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    Contopoulos , author D

    I. Contopoulos, D. Kazanas, and C. Fendt, The axisym- metric pulsar magnetosphere, Astrophys. J. 511, 351 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9903049

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  15. [15]

    Spitkovsky, Time-dependent Force-free Pulsar Mag- netospheres: Axisymmetric and Oblique Rotators, As- trophys

    A. Spitkovsky, Time-dependent Force-free Pulsar Mag- netospheres: Axisymmetric and Oblique Rotators, As- trophys. J. Letters 648, L51 (2006), astro-ph/0603147

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  16. [16]

    ROTATING NEUTRON STAR MODELS WITH MAGNETIC FIELD

    M. Bocquet, S. Bonazzola, E. Gourgoulhon, and J. No- vak, Rotating neutron star models with a magnetic field., A&A 301, 757 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9503044 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  17. [17]

    Relativistic stars with purely toroidal magnetic fields

    K. Kiuchi and S. Yoshida, Relativistic stars with purely toroidal magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 78, 044045 (2008), arXiv:0802.2983 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  18. [18]

    Kiuchi, K

    K. Kiuchi, K. Kotake, and S. Yoshida, Equilibrium Con- figurations of Relativistic Stars with Purely Toroidal Magnetic Fields: Effects of Realistic Equations of State, ApJ 698, 541 (2009), arXiv:0904.2044 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  19. [19]

    C. Y. Cardall, M. Prakash, and J. M. Lattimer, Effects of Strong Magnetic Fields on Neutron Star Structure, ApJ 554, 322 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0011148 [astro- ph]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  20. [20]

    Yasutake, K

    N. Yasutake, K. Kiuchi, and K. Kotake, Relativistic hy- brid stars with super-strong toroidal magnetic fields: an evolutionary track with QCD phase transition, MNRAS 401, 2101 (2010), arXiv:0910.0327 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  21. [21]

    Equilibrium models of relativistic stars with a toroidal magnetic field

    J. Frieben and L. Rezzolla, Equilibrium models of rel- ativistic stars with a toroidal magnetic field, MNRAS 427, 3406 (2012), arXiv:1207.4035 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  22. [22]

    Consistent neutron star models with magnetic field dependent equations of state

    D. Chatterjee, T. Elghozi, J. Novak, and M. Oer- tel, Consistent neutron star models with magnetic- field-dependent equations of state, MNRAS 447, 3785 (2015), arXiv:1410.6332 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  23. [23]

    Franzon, V

    B. Franzon, V. Dexheimer, and S. Schramm, A self- consistent study of magnetic field effects on hybrid stars, MNRAS 456, 2937 (2016), arXiv:1508.04431 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    A. G. Pili, N. Bucciantini, and L. Del Zanna, Ax- isymmetric equilibrium models for magnetized neutron stars in General Relativity under the Conformally Flat Condition, MNRAS 439, 3541 (2014), arXiv:1401.4308 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    Bucciantini, A

    N. Bucciantini, A. G. Pili, and L. Del Zanna, The role of currents distribution in general relativistic equilibria of magnetized neutron stars, MNRAS 447, 3278 (2015), arXiv:1412.5347 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  26. [26]

    A. G. Pili, N. Bucciantini, and L. Del Zanna, Gen- eral relativistic models for rotating magnetized neutron stars in conformally flat space-time, MNRAS 470, 2469 (2017), arXiv:1705.03795 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  27. [27]

    Ury¯ u, E

    K. Ury¯ u, E. Gourgoulhon, C. M. Markakis, K. Fuji- sawa, A. Tsokaros, and Y. Eriguchi, Equilibrium solu- tions of relativistic rotating stars with mixed poloidal and toroidal magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 90, 101501 (2014), arXiv:1410.3913 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [28]

    Ury¯ u, S

    K. Ury¯ u, S. Yoshida, E. Gourgoulhon, C. Markakis, K. Fujisawa, A. Tsokaros, K. Taniguchi, and Y. Eriguchi, New code for equilibriums and quasiequi- librium initial data of compact objects. IV. Rotat- ing relativistic stars with mixed poloidal and toroidal magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 100, 123019 (2019), arXiv:1906.10393 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    K. Uryu, S. Yoshida, E. Gourgoulhon, C. Markakis, K. Fujisawa, A. Tsokaros, K. Taniguchi, and M. Za- mani, Equilibriums of extremely magnetized compact stars with force-free magnetotunnels, Phys. Rev. D107, 103016 (2023), arXiv:2303.17874 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Kiuchi, M

    K. Kiuchi, M. Shibata, and S. Yoshida, Evolution of neutron stars with toroidal magnetic fields: Axisymmet- ric simulation in full general relativity, Phys. Rev. D78, 024029 (2008), arXiv:0805.2712 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  31. [31]

    Instability-driven evolution of poloidal magnetic fields in relativistic stars

    R. Ciolfi, S. K. Lander, G. M. Manca, and L. Rez- zolla, Instability-driven Evolution of Poloidal Mag- netic Fields in Relativistic Stars, ApJ 736, L6 (2011), arXiv:1105.3971 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  32. [32]

    P. D. Lasky, B. Zink, K. D. Kokkotas, and K. Glampedakis, Hydromagnetic Instabilities in Rel- ativistic Neutron Stars, ApJ 735, L20 (2011), arXiv:1105.1895 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  33. [33]

    Poloidal-Field Instability in Magnetized Relativistic Stars

    R. Ciolfi and L. Rezzolla, Poloidal-field Instability in Magnetized Relativistic Stars, ApJ 760, 1 (2012), arXiv:1206.6604 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  34. [34]

    P. D. Lasky, B. Zink, and K. D. Kokkotas, Grav- itational Waves and Hydromagnetic Instabilities in Rotating Magnetized Neutron Stars, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1203.3590 (2012), arXiv:1203.3590 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  35. [35]

    A. Sur, W. Cook, D. Radice, B. Haskell, and S. Bernuzzi, Long-term general relativistic magne- tohydrodynamics simulations of magnetic field in isolated neutron stars, MNRAS 511, 3983 (2022), arXiv:2108.11858 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Tsokaros, M

    A. Tsokaros, M. Ruiz, S. L. Shapiro, and K. Ury¯ u, Mag- netohydrodynamic Simulations of Self-Consistent Ro- tating Neutron Stars with Mixed Poloidal and Toroidal Magnetic Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 061101 (2022), arXiv:2111.00013 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    D. I. Pontin and E. R. Priest, Magnetic reconnection: MHD theory and modelling, Living Reviews in Solar Physics 19, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Rembiasz, M

    T. Rembiasz, M. Obergaulinger, P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, M. ´Angel Aloy, and E. M¨ uller, On the measurements of numerical viscosity and resistivity in eulerian mhd codes, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 230, 18 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    Komissarov and D

    S. Komissarov and D. Phillips, A splitting method for numerical relativistic magnetohydrodynamics (2024), arXiv:2409.03637 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    S. S. Komissarov, Multidimensional numerical scheme 19 for resistive relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 382, 995 (2007), arXiv:0708.0323

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  41. [41]

    Dumbser and O

    M. Dumbser and O. Zanotti, Very high order PNPM schemes on unstructured meshes for the resistive rel- ativistic MHD equations, Journal of Computational Physics 228, 6991 (2009), arXiv:0903.4832

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  42. [42]

    Resistive Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Relativistic Magnetic Reconnection

    S. Zenitani, M. Hesse, and A. Klimas, Resistive Mag- netohydrodynamic Simulations of Relativistic Magnetic Reconnection, Astrophys. J. Lett. 716, L214 (2010), arXiv:1005.4485 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  43. [43]

    Beyond ideal MHD: towards a more realistic modeling of relativistic astrophysical plasmas

    C. Palenzuela, L. Lehner, O. Reula, and L. Rezzolla, Beyond ideal MHD: towards a more realistic modelling of relativistic astrophysical plasmas, MNRAS 394, 1727 (2009), arXiv:0810.1838 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  44. [44]

    Takamoto and T

    M. Takamoto and T. Inoue, A New Numerical Scheme for Resistive Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics Us- ing Method of Characteristics, Astrophys. J. 735, 113 (2011), arXiv:1105.5683 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  45. [45]

    Bucciantini, B

    N. Bucciantini, B. D. Metzger, T. A. Thompson, and E. Quataert, Short gamma-ray bursts with extended emission from magnetar birth: jet formation and col- limation, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 419, 1537 (2012), arXiv:1106.4668 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  46. [46]

    Palenzuela, L

    C. Palenzuela, L. Lehner, M. Ponce, S. L. Liebling, M. Anderson, D. Neilsen, and P. Motl, Electromagnetic and gravitational outputs from binary-neutron-star co- alescence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 061105 (2013)

    work page 2013

  47. [47]

    General-relativistic resistive magnetohydrodynamics in three dimensions: Formulation and tests

    K. Dionysopoulou, D. Alic, C. Palenzuela, L. Rez- zolla, and B. Giacomazzo, General-relativistic resis- tive magnetohydrodynamics in three dimensions: For- mulation and tests, Phys. Rev. D 88, 044020 (2013), arXiv:1208.3487 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  48. [48]

    Palenzuela, L

    C. Palenzuela, L. Lehner, S. L. Liebling, M. Ponce, M. Anderson, D. Neilsen, and P. Motl, Linking electro- magnetic and gravitational radiation in coalescing bi- nary neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 88, 043011 (2013), arXiv:1307.7372 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  49. [49]

    Palenzuela, Modelling magnetized neutron stars using resistive magnetohydrodynamics, MNRAS 431, 1853 (2013), arXiv:1212.0130 [astro-ph.HE]

    C. Palenzuela, Modelling magnetized neutron stars using resistive magnetohydrodynamics, MNRAS 431, 1853 (2013), arXiv:1212.0130 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  50. [50]

    Ponce, C

    M. Ponce, C. Palenzuela, L. Lehner, and S. L. Liebling, Interaction of misaligned magnetospheres in the coales- cence of binary neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 90, 044007 (2014), arXiv:1404.0692 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  51. [51]

    Dionysopoulou, D

    K. Dionysopoulou, D. Alic, and L. Rezzolla, General- relativistic resistive-magnetohydrodynamic simulations of binary neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D92, 084064 (2015), arXiv:1502.02021 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  52. [52]

    J. L. Friedman and N. Stergioulas, Rotating Relativis- tic Stars, by John L. Friedman , Nikolaos Stergioulas, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013 (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    P. C.-K. Cheong, L.-M. Lin, and T. G. F. Li, Gmunu: toward multigrid based Einstein field equa- tions solver for general-relativistic hydrodynamics sim- ulations, Classical and Quantum Gravity 37, 145015 (2020), arXiv:2001.05723 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    P. C.-K. Cheong, A. T.-L. Lam, H. H.-Y. Ng, and T. G. F. Li, Gmunu: paralleled, grid-adaptive, general- relativistic magnetohydrodynamics in curvilinear ge- ometries in dynamical space-times, MNRAS 508, 2279 (2021), arXiv:2012.07322 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    P. C.-K. Cheong, D. Y. T. Pong, A. K. L. Yip, and T. G. F. Li, An Extension of Gmunu: General- relativistic Resistive Magnetohydrodynamics Based on Staggered-meshed Constrained Transport with Ellip- tic Cleaning, ApJS 261, 22 (2022), arXiv:2110.03732 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2022

  56. [56]

    Bucciantini and L

    N. Bucciantini and L. Del Zanna, A fully covariant mean-field dynamo closure for numerical 3 + 1 resis- tive GRMHD, MNRAS 428, 71 (2013), arXiv:1205.2951 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  57. [57]

    C. R. Evans and J. F. Hawley, Simulation of Magneto- hydrodynamic Flows: A Constrained Transport Model, ApJ 332, 659 (1988)

    work page 1988

  58. [58]

    Shibata, S

    M. Shibata, S. Fujibayashi, and Y. Sekiguchi, Long- term evolution of a merger-remnant neutron star in general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics: Effect of magnetic winding, Phys. Rev. D 103, 043022 (2021), arXiv:2102.01346 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  59. [59]

    Harten, P

    A. Harten, P. Lax, and B. Leer, On upstream differencing and godunov-type schemes for hyper- bolic conservation laws, SIAM Review 25, 35 (1983), https://doi.org/10.1137/1025002

    work page doi:10.1137/1025002 1983

  60. [60]

    Colella and P

    P. Colella and P. R. Woodward, The Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for Gas-Dynamical Simula- tions, Journal of Computational Physics 54, 174 (1984)

    work page 1984

  61. [61]

    Cavaglieri and T

    D. Cavaglieri and T. Bewley, Low-storage im- plicit/explicit Runge-Kutta schemes for the simulation of stiff high-dimensional ODE systems, Journal of Com- putational Physics 286, 172 (2015)

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    M. Ruiz, S. L. Shapiro, and A. Tsokaros, Jet launching from binary black hole-neutron star mergers: Depen- dence on black hole spin, binary mass ratio, and mag- netic field orientation, Phys. Rev. D 98, 123017 (2018), arXiv:1810.08618 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [63]

    Paschalidis, M

    V. Paschalidis, M. Ruiz, and S. L. Shapiro, Relativis- tic Simulations of Black Hole-Neutron Star Coalescence: The Jet Emerges, ApJ806, L14 (2015), arXiv:1410.7392 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  64. [64]

    M. Ruiz, R. N. Lang, V. Paschalidis, and S. L. Shapiro, Binary Neutron Star Mergers: A Jet Engine for Short Gamma-Ray Bursts, ApJ 824, L6 (2016), arXiv:1604.02455 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  65. [65]

    M. Ruiz, A. Tsokaros, S. L. Shapiro, K. C. Nelli, and S. Qunell, Magnetic ergostars, jet formation, and gamma-ray bursts: Ergoregions versus horizons, Phys. Rev. D 102, 104022 (2020), arXiv:2009.08982 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  66. [66]

    G. B. Cook, S. L. Shapiro, and S. A. Teukolsky, Testing a simplified version of Einstein’s equations for numeri- cal relativity, Phys. Rev. D 53, 5533 (1996), arXiv:gr- qc/9512009 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 1996

  67. [67]

    Iosif and N

    P. Iosif and N. Stergioulas, On the accuracy of the IWM- CFC approximation in differentially rotating relativis- tic stars, General Relativity and Gravitation 46, 1800 (2014), arXiv:1406.7375 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  68. [68]

    Iosif and N

    P. Iosif and N. Stergioulas, Equilibrium sequences of differentially rotating stars with post-merger- like rotational profiles, MNRAS 503, 850 (2021), arXiv:2011.10612 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Iosif and N

    P. Iosif and N. Stergioulas, Models of binary neutron star remnants with tabulated equations of state, MN- RAS 510, 2948 (2022), arXiv:2104.13672 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  70. [70]

    P. C.-K. Cheong, N. Muhammed, P. Chawhan, M. D. Duez, F. Foucart, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, High angular momentum hot differen- tially rotating equilibrium star evolutions in confor- 20 mally flat spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 110, 043015 (2024), arXiv:2402.18529 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    M. Ruiz, S. L. Shapiro, and A. Tsokaros, Multimessen- ger Binary Mergers Containing Neutron Stars: Gravi- tational Waves, Jets, and γ-Ray Bursts, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 8, 39 (2021), arXiv:2102.03366 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    Dynamical Bar Instability in Rotating Stars: Effect of General Relativity

    M. Saijo, M. Shibata, T. W. Baumgarte, and S. L. Shapiro, Dynamical Bar Instability in Rotating Stars: Effect of General Relativity, ApJ 548, 919 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0010201 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  73. [73]

    W. H. Zurek and W. Benz, Redistribution of Angular Momentum by Nonaxisymmetric Instabilities in a Thick Accretion Disk, Astrophys. J. 308, 123 (1986)

    work page 1986

  74. [74]

    S. L. Shapiro, Differential Rotation in Neutron Stars: Magnetic Braking and Viscous Damping, Astrophys. J. 544, 397 (2000)

    work page 2000

  75. [75]

    R. J. Tayler, The adiabatic stability of stars containing magnetic fields-I.Toroidal fields, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 161, 365 (1973)

    work page 1973

  76. [76]

    Bateman, MHD instabilities (1978)

    G. Bateman, MHD instabilities (1978)

    work page 1978

  77. [77]

    A. Sur, B. Haskell, and E. Kuhn, Magnetic field config- urations in neutron stars from MHD simulations, MN- RAS 495, 1360 (2020), arXiv:2002.10357 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    The bar-mode instability in differentially rotating neutron stars: Simulations in full general relativity

    M. Shibata, T. W. Baumgarte, and S. L. Shapiro, The Bar-Mode Instability in Differentially Rotating Neutron Stars: Simulations in Full General Relativity, ApJ 542, 453 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0005378 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  79. [79]

    Baiotti, R

    L. Baiotti, R. de Pietri, G. M. Manca, and L. Rezzolla, Accurate simulations of the dynamical bar-mode insta- bility in full general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 75, 044023 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0609473 [astro-ph]

    work page Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  80. [80]

    C. D. Ott, H. Dimmelmeier, A. Marek, H. T. Janka, B. Zink, I. Hawke, and E. Schnetter, Rotating col- lapse of stellar iron cores in general relativity, Classi- cal and Quantum Gravity 24, S139 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0612638 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2007

Showing first 80 references.