Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

ATM: Improving Model Merging by Alternating Tuning and Merging

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.03055 v4 pith:LL5OJNIZ submitted 2024-11-05 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

ATM: Improving Model Merging by Alternating Tuning and Merging

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV
keywords mergingmodelmultitaskeffectivenesslearningsteptasktuning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Model merging has emerged as a cost-efficient approximation to multitask learning. Among merging strategies, task arithmetic is notable for its simplicity and effectiveness. In this work, we provide a theoretical motivation for task vectors by highlighting that, under single-epoch full-batch gradient descent, they are equivalent to multitask gradients. This insight leads us to reinterpret model merging as a single step in an iterative procedure that Alternates between Tuning and Merging (ATM). We propose two applications of ATM: (1) as an alternative to multitask learning in scenarios where data sharing is restricted (e.g., federated settings), and (2) as a lightweight refinement step to improve existing model merging methods using a small validation set. Experiments across diverse vision tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of ATM.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Are we Merging the Right Models? Impact of Expert Training Duration on Model Merging for LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    The optimal training duration for expert models before merging depends on the merging method; sparsification-based merging benefits from overtrained experts.

  2. Model Merging: Foundations and Algorithms

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    New cycle-consistent optimization, task vector theory, singular vector decompositions, adaptive routing, and efficient evolutionary search provide foundations for merging neural network weights across tasks.

  3. Are we Merging the Right Models? Impact of Expert Training Duration on Model Merging for LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.5

    Sparsification-based model merging peaks well past expert validation optima, while averaging degrades with overtraining; duration and merge method must be chosen jointly.