Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Quantifying the synthetic and real domain gap in aerial scene understanding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.19913 v1 pith:ZJ6VJHUF submitted 2024-11-29 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

Quantifying the synthetic and real domain gap in aerial scene understanding

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG
keywords domainscenesyntheticaerialmodelreal-worldunderstandingconsensus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantifying the gap between synthetic and real-world imagery is essential for improving both transformer-based models - that rely on large volumes of data - and datasets, especially in underexplored domains like aerial scene understanding where the potential impact is significant. This paper introduces a novel methodology for scene complexity assessment using Multi-Model Consensus Metric (MMCM) and depth-based structural metrics, enabling a robust evaluation of perceptual and structural disparities between domains. Our experimental analysis, utilizing real-world (Dronescapes) and synthetic (Skyscenes) datasets, demonstrates that real-world scenes generally exhibit higher consensus among state-of-the-art vision transformers, while synthetic scenes show greater variability and challenge model adaptability. The results underline the inherent complexities and domain gaps, emphasizing the need for enhanced simulation fidelity and model generalization. This work provides critical insights into the interplay between domain characteristics and model performance, offering a pathway for improved domain adaptation strategies in aerial scene understanding.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Multi-modal video data-pipelines for machine learning with minimal human supervision

    cs.CV 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0

    An open-source video pipeline automatically extracts 13+ visual modalities from raw video with no human annotation, and a sub-1M-parameter distilled model reaches near-Mask2Former accuracy on an aerial scene benchmark.