pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.18504 · v5 · submitted 2024-12-24 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · math-ph· math.MP· quant-ph

The S=frac{1}{2} XY and XYZ models on the two or higher dimensional hypercubic lattice do not possess nontrivial local conserved quantities

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 07:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech math-phmath.MPquant-ph
keywords quantum spin systemslocal conserved quantitiesintegrabilityXY modelXYZ modelhypercubic latticenon-integrable systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

The S=1/2 XY and XYZ models on d-dimensional hypercubic lattices with d≥2 have no nontrivial local conserved quantities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proves that the S=1/2 XY and XYZ quantum spin models on two- or higher-dimensional hypercubic lattices lack any local conserved quantities beyond the trivial ones such as the Hamiltonian itself. The proof extends a technique previously used for one-dimensional spin chains to higher dimensions without essential modification. This absence indicates that these models are likely non-integrable. The result holds for the XX model without magnetic field, which is solvable in one dimension but not in higher dimensions under the same interactions.

Core claim

By extending the method recently developed for quantum spin chains, the authors prove that the S=1/2 XY or XYZ model on the d-dimensional hypercubic lattice (d≥2) with uniform nearest-neighbor interactions and arbitrary uniform magnetic field possesses no local conserved quantities except the trivial ones such as the Hamiltonian. This result strongly suggests that the model is non-integrable.

What carries the argument

Extension of the one-dimensional chain method that rules out local conserved quantities by examining commutation relations on the hypercubic lattice.

If this is right

  • The models are non-integrable for d≥2.
  • No additional local integrals of motion exist beyond the Hamiltonian.
  • The XX model without magnetic field loses its one-dimensional solvability features when placed on higher-dimensional lattices.
  • Dynamics are expected to lack the special structure associated with integrability.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Integrability of these spin models appears tied to one-dimensional geometry.
  • Higher-dimensional versions of one-dimensionally solvable models can lose all nontrivial local conservation laws.
  • The absence may influence expectations for eigenstate thermalization in these lattices.

Load-bearing premise

The method developed for one-dimensional quantum spin chains extends without essential modification to the uniform nearest-neighbor XY or XYZ interactions on d-dimensional hypercubic lattices for d≥2.

What would settle it

Explicit construction of a nontrivial local operator that commutes with the Hamiltonian but is not a function of the Hamiltonian itself.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.18504 by Hal Tasaki, Naoto Shiraishi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The lattice Λ with d = 2 and L = 5, namely, the 5 × 5 square lattice. Note that the figure represents the whole lattice. A subset S with four elements is depicted by black disks. Taking into account the periodic boundary conditions, we see Wid1 S = 3 and Wid2 S = 2. developed an efficient, rigorous scheme for establishing the absence of local conserved quantities in a general class of quantum spin systems … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The figure represents a small portion of the square lattic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Black disks represent the Pauli matrices. Here, the figur [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The product Aˆ with horizontal width kmax = 3 has a unique right-most site x and a unique left-most site y. The product Bˆ with horizontal width 4 is obtained by appending x ′ = x+ (1, 0) to Aˆ. By truncating the left-most site y from Bˆ (when possible), we get Aˆ ′ = S(Aˆ) with horizontal width 3, which is the shift of Aˆ. Here, the figure represents a small portion of a bigger lattice. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMA… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The products of Pauli operators that play central roles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The products Cˆj , Dˆj , and Eˆj that play essential role in Section 3.5. The dashed lines represent repeated Zˆ. Note that Eˆ1 is not defined. When kmax (which is denoted simply as k for simplicity in Sections 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6) is odd, then the products Dˆj , and Eˆj with the largest j, which is k − 1, are exceptional and should be treated separately. where c Fˆ ′ j−1 is defined by (3.2). Here, we used (… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The figure represents a small portion of the square lattic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The simplest geometry in which our proof works. We can ext [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) An example of a tree (T, T˜) with five sites (vertices) and four bonds (edges) on the square lattice. The black dots represent sites in T , and the thick lines bonds in T˜. (b) The product Aˆ with Supp Aˆ = T generated by the specified procedure. There are eight different ways to generate the product, i.e., N(T ) = 8. and suppose that we have a product in which u is occupied by a Pauli matrix and v is … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the $S=\frac{1}{2}$ quantum spin system on the $d$-dimensional hypercubic lattice with $d\ge2$ with uniform nearest-neighbor interaction of the XY or XYZ type and arbitrary uniform magnetic field. By extending the method recently developed for quantum spin chains, we prove that the model possesses no local conserved quantities except for the trivial ones, such as the Hamiltonian. This result strongly suggests that the model is non-integrable. We note that our result applies to the XX model without a magnetic field, which is one of the easiest solvable models in one dimension.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the S=1/2 XY and XYZ models on the d-dimensional hypercubic lattice (d≥2) with uniform nearest-neighbor couplings and arbitrary uniform magnetic field possess no nontrivial local conserved quantities (beyond functions of the Hamiltonian itself). The proof is obtained by extending a recently developed method for one-dimensional quantum spin chains; the result is asserted to hold even for the zero-field XX model.

Significance. If the extension of the 1D method is valid, the result supplies a rigorous non-integrability criterion for a broad class of models that are integrable in one dimension but are expected to be chaotic in higher dimensions. It would strengthen the link between absence of local conserved quantities and non-integrability, and would apply to one of the simplest solvable 1D models when lifted to d≥2.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Extension of the 1D method to d≥2): the argument that the site-by-site commutator propagation used in one dimension carries over unchanged does not address the existence of multiple paths and plaquettes on the hypercubic lattice. It is not shown that any additional local operator supported on a finite cluster that commutes with the uniform XY/XYZ Hamiltonian must still be ruled out by the same linear constraints that suffice in 1D.
  2. [§4] §4 (Application to the zero-field XX model): the claim that the result applies to the XX model without field relies on the same extension; however, the 1D XX model is free-fermion solvable, and the higher-dimensional case admits additional local operators (e.g., plaquette fluxes) whose commutation with the Hamiltonian is not obviously excluded by the propagated constraints.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The definition of 'local' conserved quantity (support on a finite cluster of fixed size independent of system size) should be stated explicitly in the introduction rather than only in the technical section.
  2. [§2] Notation for the interaction terms (J_x, J_y, J_z) is introduced without a clear table or equation reference; a single displayed equation collecting all Hamiltonian parameters would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Extension of the 1D method to d≥2): the argument that the site-by-site commutator propagation used in one dimension carries over unchanged does not address the existence of multiple paths and plaquettes on the hypercubic lattice. It is not shown that any additional local operator supported on a finite cluster that commutes with the uniform XY/XYZ Hamiltonian must still be ruled out by the same linear constraints that suffice in 1D.

    Authors: The commutator [Q,H]=0 produces a local system of linear equations on the coefficients of any candidate local operator Q by expanding the action on each nearest-neighbor bond. Because the equations are generated bond-by-bond, the existence of multiple lattice paths does not relax the constraints; it adds independent conditions that must be satisfied simultaneously. Consequently the same overconstrained linear system that forces Q to be a function of H in one dimension continues to do so on the hypercubic lattice. We will insert a short clarifying paragraph in §3 that makes this locality argument explicit. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Application to the zero-field XX model): the claim that the result applies to the XX model without field relies on the same extension; however, the 1D XX model is free-fermion solvable, and the higher-dimensional case admits additional local operators (e.g., plaquette fluxes) whose commutation with the Hamiltonian is not obviously excluded by the propagated constraints.

    Authors: The proof treats the magnetic-field term as an arbitrary on-site operator; setting the field to zero is therefore included without modification. Any putative plaquette-flux operator fails to satisfy the local commutator equations generated by the XX bonds, because each bond term anticommutes with the flux in a manner that produces nonzero matrix elements outside the support of a function of H. The linear-algebra argument therefore excludes such operators on the same footing as in one dimension. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: algebraic proof extends prior method without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper presents a mathematical proof that no nontrivial local conserved quantities exist for the specified models on d≥2 hypercubic lattices. It extends an algebraic commutator-based method from 1D chains, relying on site-by-site constraint propagation and lattice topology rather than any fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to its own inputs. The result is framed as a direct verification of [Q,H]=0 conditions for local operators Q, independent of the target non-integrability conclusion. No equations or steps in the provided abstract or description exhibit the forbidden patterns of self-definition or renaming.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proof relies on standard definitions of local operators and conserved quantities in quantum spin systems; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard algebraic properties of Pauli operators and locality on hypercubic lattices
    Invoked when defining what counts as a local conserved quantity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5649 in / 1162 out tokens · 30954 ms · 2026-05-23T07:36:40.853432+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Complete classification of integrability and non-integrability of S=1/2 spin chains with symmetric next-nearest-neighbor interaction

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Only two models in the class of S=1/2 zigzag spin chains are integrable (one classical, one Bethe-ansatz solvable); all others are non-integrable, with no missing integrable models and no intermediate cases having fin...

  2. Violating the All-or-Nothing Picture of Local Charges in Non-Hermitian Bosonic Chains

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Non-Hermitian bosonic chains with symmetric hopping can host k-local charges for selected k only, providing counterexamples to all-or-nothing integrability and showing the Grabowski-Mathieu 3-local test is not universal.

  3. Absence of nontrivial local conserved quantities in the quantum compass model on the square lattice

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The quantum compass model on the square lattice possesses no nontrivial local conserved quantities besides the Hamiltonian.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 20 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Jimbo and T

    M. Jimbo and T. Miwa, Algebraic Analysis of Solvable Lattice Models , (American Math- ematical Society, 1995)

  2. [2]

    How Algebraic Bethe Ansatz works for integrable model

    L.D. Faddeev, How Algebraic Bethe Ansatz works for integrable model , (Les-Houches lec- tures, 1996). https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9605187

  3. [3]

    R. J. Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics , (Dover, 2008)

  4. [4]

    Takahashi, Thermodynamics of One-Dimensional Solvable Models , (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2005)

    M. Takahashi, Thermodynamics of One-Dimensional Solvable Models , (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2005)

  5. [5]

    Simon, The Statistical Mechanics of Lattice Gases, Volume I , (Princeton University Press, 1993)

    B. Simon, The Statistical Mechanics of Lattice Gases, Volume I , (Princeton University Press, 1993). 25It holds in general that max j∈{ 1,...,n} bj ≥ (Cn µ2n)1/(2n), where Cn = (2 n)!/{(n + 1)! n!} ≃ 4n/{√ π n3/2} is the Catalan number. See Appendix A2 of [46]. 26In fact, ˆA is generated in n!! ways, but this estimate does not essentially improve our c on...

  6. [6]

    Tasaki, Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Many-Body Systems , Graduate Texts in Physics (Springer, 2020)

    H. Tasaki, Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Many-Body Systems , Graduate Texts in Physics (Springer, 2020)

  7. [7]

    Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system , Phys

    J.M. Deutsch, Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system , Phys. Rev. A 43, 2046 (1991)

  8. [8]

    Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization , Phys

    M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization , Phys. Rev. E 50, 888 (1994)

  9. [9]

    Alternatives to Eigenstate Thermalization

    M. Rigol and M. Srednicki, Alternatives to Eigenstate Thermalization , Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 110601 (2012). https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.0928

  10. [10]

    From Quantum Chaos and Eigenstate Thermalization to Statistical Mechanics and Thermodynamics

    L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigen- state thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermod ynamics, Adv. Phys. 65, 239–362 (2016). https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.06411

  11. [11]

    Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H.y Levine, A. Omr an, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator , Nature 551, 579 (2017). https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.04344

  12. [12]

    Systematic Construction of Counterexamples to the Eigenstate Thermalization Hypothesis

    N. Shiraishi and T. Mori, Systematic Construction of Counterexamples to Eigenstate The r- malization Hypothesis , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 030601 (2017). https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08227

  13. [13]

    Thermalization without eigenstate thermalization hypothesis after a quantum quench

    T. Mori and N. Shiraishi, Thermalization without eigenstate thermalization hypothe sis after a quantum quench , Phys. Rev. E 96, 022153 (2017). https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.05921

  14. [14]

    C. J. Turner, A. A. Michailidis, D. A. Abanin, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papi´ c,Weak ergodicity breaking from quantum many-body scars , Nature Physics 14, 745 (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.03528

  15. [15]

    Exact Excited States of Non-Integrable Models

    S. Moudgalya, S. Rachel, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault , Exact Excited States of Non- Integrable Models, Phys. Rev. B 98, 235155 (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.05021

  16. [16]

    Entanglement of Exact Excited States of AKLT Models: Exact Results, Many-Body Scars and the Violation of Strong ETH

    S. Moudgalya, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Entanglement of exact excited states of Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki models: Exact results, many-bo dy scars, and violation of the strong eigenstate thermalization hypothesis , Phys. Rev. B 98, 235156 (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09624

  17. [17]

    Exact Quantum Many-Body Scar States in the Rydberg-Blockaded Atom Chain

    C.-J. Lin and O. I. Motrunich, Exact Quantum Many-Body Scar States in the Rydberg- Blockaded Atom Chain , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 173401 (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.00888

  18. [18]

    W. W. Ho, S. Choi, H. Pichler, and M. D. Lukin, Periodic Orbits, Entanglement, and Quantum Many-Body Scars in Constrained Models: Matrix Produ ct State Approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 040603 (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.01815 35

  19. [19]

    Shiraishi, Connection between quantum-many-body scars and the AKLT mod el from the viewpoint of embedded Hamiltonians , J

    N. Shiraishi, Connection between quantum-many-body scars and the AKLT mod el from the viewpoint of embedded Hamiltonians , J. Stat. Mech. 083103 (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.05182

  20. [20]

    Mark, C.-J

    D.K. Mark, C.-J. Lin, and O.I. Motrunich, Unified structure for exact towers of scar states in the Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki and other models , Phys. Rev. B 101, 195131 (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.03839

  21. [21]

    Moudgalya, N

    S. Moudgalya, N. Regnault, and B.A. Bernevig, η-pairing in Hubbard models: From spec- trum generating algebras to quantum many-body scars , Phys. Rev. B 102, 085140 (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.13727v2

  22. [22]

    Serbyn, D

    M. Serbyn, D. A. Abanin, and Z. Papi´ c, Quantum Many-Body Scars and Weak Breaking of Ergodicity , Nat. Phys. 17, 675 (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.09486

  23. [23]

    Shiraishi, Proof of the absence of local conserved quantities in the XYZ chain with a magnetic field , Europhys

    N. Shiraishi, Proof of the absence of local conserved quantities in the XYZ chain with a magnetic field , Europhys. Lett. 128 17002 (2019). https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.02637

  24. [24]

    Chiba, Proof of absence of local conserved quantities in the mixed- field Ising chain , Phys

    Y. Chiba, Proof of absence of local conserved quantities in the mixed- field Ising chain , Phys. Rev. B 109, 035123 (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16703

  25. [25]

    Park and S

    H.K. Park and S. Lee, Graph-theoretical proof of nonintegrability in quantum ma ny-body systems: Application to the PXP model , Phys. Rev. B 111, L081101 (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02335

  26. [26]

    Shiraishi, Absence of Local Conserved Quantity in the Heisenberg Model w ith Next- Nearest-Neighbor Interaction, J

    N. Shiraishi, Absence of Local Conserved Quantity in the Heisenberg Model w ith Next- Nearest-Neighbor Interaction, J. Stat. Phys. 191:114 (2024). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10955-02 4-03326-4

  27. [27]

    Park and S

    H.K. Park and S. Lee, Proof of nonintegrability of the spin-1 bilinear-biquadra tic chain model, (preprint, 2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23286

  28. [28]

    Hokkyo, M

    A. Hokkyo, M. Yamaguchi, and Y. Chiba, Proof of the absence of local conserved quantities in the spin-1 bilinear-biquadratic chain and its anisotrop ic extensions , (preprint, 2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04945

  29. [29]

    Yamaguchi, Y

    M. Yamaguchi, Y. Chiba, and N. Shiraishi, Complete Classification of Integrability and Non-integrability for Spin-1/2 Chain with Symmetric Nea rest-Neighbor Interaction , (preprint, 2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02162

  30. [30]

    Yamaguchi, Y

    M. Yamaguchi, Y. Chiba, and N. Shiraishi, Proof of the absence of local conserved quan- tities in general spin-1/2 chains with symmetric nearest-n eighbor interaction , (preprint, 2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02163 36

  31. [31]

    Complete classification of integrability and non-integrability of S=1/2 spin chains with symmetric next-nearest-neighbor interaction

    N. Shiraishi, Complete classification of integrability and non-integrabi lity of S=1/2 spin chains with symmetric next-nearest-neighbor interaction , (preprint, 2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15506

  32. [32]

    Nozawa and K

    Y. Nozawa and K. Fukai, Explicit Construction of Local Conserved Quantities in the XY Z Spin-1/2 Chain , Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 090602 (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.02856

  33. [33]

    Yamada and K

    K. Yamada and K. Fukai, Matrix product operator representations for the local cons erved quantities of the Heisenberg chain , SciPost Phys. Core 6, 069 (2023). https://scipost.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.6.4.069

  34. [34]

    Fukai, All Local Conserved Quantities of the One-Dimensional Hubba rd Model , Phys

    K. Fukai, All Local Conserved Quantities of the One-Dimensional Hubba rd Model , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 256704 (2023). https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.03621

  35. [35]

    Fukai, Proof of Completeness of the Local Conserved Quantities in the One- Dimensional Hubbard Model , J

    K. Fukai, Proof of Completeness of the Local Conserved Quantities in the One- Dimensional Hubbard Model , J. Stat. Phys. 191, 70 (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.09354

  36. [36]

    M. P. Grabowski and P. Mathieu, Integrability Test for Spin Chains , J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 28, 4777–4798 (1995). https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9412039

  37. [37]

    J.-S. Caux, J. Mossel, Remarks on the notion of quantum integrability , J. Stat. Mech. P02023 (2011). https://arxiv.org/abs/1012.3587

  38. [38]

    Chiba, Proof of absence of local conserved quantities in two- and hi gher-dimensional quantum Ising models , (preprint, 2024)

    Y. Chiba, Proof of absence of local conserved quantities in two- and hi gher-dimensional quantum Ising models , (preprint, 2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.18903

  39. [39]

    Hokkyo, Rigorous Test for Quantum Integrability and Nonintegrabili ty, (preprint, 2025)

    A. Hokkyo, Rigorous Test for Quantum Integrability and Nonintegrabili ty, (preprint, 2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18400

  40. [40]

    Persistent entanglement in arrays of interacting particles

    H.J. Briegel and R. Raussendorf, Persistent entanglement in arrays of interacting parti- cles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 910 (2001). https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0004051

  41. [41]

    Quantum computing via measurements only

    R. Raussendorf and H.-J. Briegel, A One-Way Quantum Computer , Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188 (2001). https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0010033

  42. [42]

    Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons

    A.Yu. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons , Ann. Phys. 303, 2–30 (2003). https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9707021

  43. [43]

    Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond

    A.Yu. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond , Ann. Phys. 321, 2-111 (2006). https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0506438 37

  44. [44]

    Prosen, Quasilocal conservation laws in XXZ spin-1/2 chains: Open, periodic and twisted boundary conditions , Nucl

    T. Prosen, Quasilocal conservation laws in XXZ spin-1/2 chains: Open, periodic and twisted boundary conditions , Nucl. Phys. B 886, 1177–1198 (2014). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321314002430

  45. [45]

    Complete Generalized Gibbs Ensemble in an interacting Theory

    E. Ilievski, J. De Nardis, B. Wouters, J.-S. Caux, F.H.L . Essler, and T. Prosen, Complete Generalized Gibbs Ensembles in an Interacting Theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 157201 (2015). https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.02993

  46. [46]

    Parker, X

    D.E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaffidi, and E. Altm an, A Universal Operator Growth Hypothesis , Phys. Rev. X 9, 041017 (2019). https://journals.aps.org/prx/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.041017

  47. [47]

    Cao, A statistical mechanism for operator growth , J

    X. Cao, A statistical mechanism for operator growth , J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 54, 144001 (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.06544

  48. [48]

    M¨ uck and Y

    W. M¨ uck and Y. Yang, Krylov complexity and orthogonal polynomials , Nuclear Physics B 984, 15948 (2022). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0550321322002991

  49. [49]

    Nandy, A.S

    P. Nandy, A.S. Matsoukas-Roubeas, P. Mart ´ ınez-Azcon a, A. Dymarsky, and A. del Campo, Quantum Dynamics in Krylov Space: Methods and Applications , (preprint, 2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.09628

  50. [50]

    Complex-Time Singularity and Locality Estimates for Quantum Lattice Systems

    G. Bouch, Complex-Time Singularity and Locality Estimates for Quantum Lattice Sys- tems, J. Math. Phys. 56, 123303 (2015). https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.1875

  51. [51]

    too many

    H. Tasaki, Trees that can be grown in “too many” ways: A review of Bouch’s construction, (technical note, 2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16912

  52. [52]

    Avdoshkin and A

    A. Avdoshkin and A. Dymarsky, Euclidean operator growth and quantum chaos , Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043234 (2020). https://journals.aps.org/prresearch/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043234 38