Code Readability in the Age of Large Language Models: An Industrial Case Study from Atlassian

Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn; Jirat Pasuksmit; Kun Chen; Micheal Fu; Ming Wu; Wannita Takerngsaksiri

Code Readability in the Age of Large Language Models: An Industrial Case Study from Atlassian

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.11264 v3 pith:L7ZWBD5H submitted 2025-01-20 cs.SE cs.AIcs.CL

Code Readability in the Age of Large Language Models: An Industrial Case Study from Atlassian

Wannita Takerngsaksiri , Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn , Micheal Fu , Jirat Pasuksmit , Kun Chen , Ming Wu This is my paper

classification cs.SE cs.AIcs.CL

keywords codereadabilitysoftwaredevelopmenthuman-writtenlanguagelargellm-generated

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

0 comments

read the original abstract

Software engineers spend a significant amount of time reading code during the software development process, especially in the age of large language models (LLMs) that can automatically generate code. However, little is known about the readability of the LLM-generated code and whether it is still important from practitioners' perspectives in this new era. In this paper, we conduct a survey to explore the practitioners' perspectives on code readability in the age of LLMs and investigate the readability of our LLM-based software development agents framework, HULA, by comparing its generated code with human-written code in real-world scenarios. Overall, the findings underscore that (1) readability remains a critical aspect of software development; (2) the readability of our LLM-generated code is comparable to human-written code, fostering the establishment of appropriate trust and driving the broad adoption of our LLM-powered software development platform.

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

A Causal Perspective on Measuring, Explaining and Mitigating Smells in LLM-Generated Code
cs.SE 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0

A probabilistic score of code-smell propensity in LLM output is validated, used in a causal analysis, and shown to drop when prompts explicitly discourage known smells.