Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Episodic Memories Generation and Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.13121 v1 pith:OM3HUQXB submitted 2025-01-21 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

Episodic Memories Generation and Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords episodicmemoryeventscapabilitiesmodelsbenchmarkcognitioncontexts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Episodic memory -- the ability to recall specific events grounded in time and space -- is a cornerstone of human cognition, enabling not only coherent storytelling, but also planning and decision-making. Despite their remarkable capabilities, Large Language Models (LLMs) lack a robust mechanism for episodic memory: we argue that integrating episodic memory capabilities into LLM is essential for advancing AI towards human-like cognition, increasing their potential to reason consistently and ground their output in real-world episodic events, hence avoiding confabulations. To address this challenge, we introduce a comprehensive framework to model and evaluate LLM episodic memory capabilities. Drawing inspiration from cognitive science, we develop a structured approach to represent episodic events, encapsulating temporal and spatial contexts, involved entities, and detailed descriptions. We synthesize a unique episodic memory benchmark, free from contamination, and release open source code and datasets to assess LLM performance across various recall and episodic reasoning tasks. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art models, including GPT-4 and Claude variants, Llama 3.1, and o1-mini, reveals that even the most advanced LLMs struggle with episodic memory tasks, particularly when dealing with multiple related events or complex spatio-temporal relationships -- even in contexts as short as 10k-100k tokens.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Setoka: A Benchmark for Hierarchical User Understanding in Personalized Agents over Heterogeneous Data

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0

    Setoka evaluates memory-augmented agents on four levels of user understanding—semantic memory, episodic memory, behavior patterns, and personality traits—over synthesized heterogeneous user data, and finds performance...

  2. Setoka: A Benchmark for Hierarchical User Understanding in Personalized Agents over Heterogeneous Data

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Existing agent memory systems score well on single-fact recall but fall near chance on behavior-pattern and personality-trait inference over heterogeneous synthetic user data.

  3. SelRoute: Query-Type-Aware Routing for Long-Term Conversational Memory Retrieval

    cs.IR 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    SelRoute routes queries to type-specific retrieval pipelines, achieving Recall@5 of 0.800 with a 109M model on LongMemEval_M and outperforming LLM-augmented baselines including a strong zero-ML lexical method.

  4. Persona2Web: Benchmarking Personalized Web Agents for Contextual Reasoning with User History

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Persona2Web is a new open-web benchmark where agents must infer a user's preferences from synthetic browsing history to solve intentionally ambiguous queries; current best agents score 13% success.

  5. Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents

    cs.AI 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A survey of evaluation methods for LLM-based agents from five perspectives, identifying trends toward realistic benchmarks and gaps in safety, cost-efficiency, and robustness.