pith. sign in

arxiv: 2501.17894 · v1 · pith:K4MI2L2Vnew · submitted 2025-01-29 · 💰 econ.GN · cs.AI· cs.CY· cs.LG· physics.soc-ph· q-fin.EC

Progress in Artificial Intelligence and its Determinants

classification 💰 econ.GN cs.AIcs.CYcs.LGphysics.soc-phq-fin.EC
keywords argumentartificialeverygrowthintelligencelearningmachinemeasures
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We study long-run progress in artificial intelligence in a quantitative way. Many measures, including traditional ones such as patents and publications, machine learning benchmarks, and a new Aggregate State of the Art in ML (or ASOTA) Index we have constructed from these, show exponential growth at roughly constant rates over long periods. Production of patents and publications doubles every ten years, by contrast with the growth of computing resources driven by Moore's Law, roughly a doubling every two years. We argue that the input of AI researchers is also crucial and its contribution can be objectively estimated. Consequently, we give a simple argument that explains the 5:1 relation between these two rates. We then discuss the application of this argument to different output measures and compare our analyses with predictions based on machine learning scaling laws proposed in existing literature. Our quantitative framework facilitates understanding, predicting, and modulating the development of these important technologies.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AI Adoption Across a Multinational Workforce: Sociotechnical Conditions for GenAI Acceptance in Human Resources

    cs.HC 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0

    GenAI adoption in HR depends on sociotechnical fit with employee positionalities and trust mechanisms such as source verification and colleague consultation.