Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Foundation Models for Atomistic Simulation of Chemistry and Materials

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.10538 v3 pith:2MIZH4Z5 submitted 2025-03-13 physics.chem-ph

Foundation Models for Atomistic Simulation of Chemistry and Materials

Eric C.-Y. Yuan , Yunsheng Liu , Junmin Chen , Peichen Zhong , Sanjeev Raja , Tobias Kreiman , Santiago Vargas , Wenbin Xu
show 6 more authors
Martin Head-Gordon Chao Yang Samuel M. Blau Bingqing Cheng Aditi Krishnapriyan Teresa Head-Gordon
This is my paper
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords materialschemistryfoundationlargemodelsatomisticlearnedmlip
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Given the power of large language and large vision models, it is of profound and fundamental interest to ask if a foundational model based on data and parameter scaling laws and pre-training strategies is possible for learned simulations of chemistry and materials. The scaling of large and diverse datasets and highly expressive architectures for chemical and materials sciences should result in a foundation model that is more efficient and broadly transferable, robust to out-of-distribution challenges, and easily fine-tuned to a variety of downstream observables, when compared to specific training from scratch on targeted applications in atomistic simulation. In this Perspective we aim to cover the rapidly advancing field of machine learned interatomic potentials (MLIP), and to illustrate a path to create chemistry and materials MLIP foundation models at larger scale.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DPA4: Pushing the Accuracy-Cost Frontier of Interatomic Potentials with EMFA SO(2) Convolution

    physics.chem-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    DPA4 is a new SE(3)-equivariant interatomic potential with EMFA SO(2) convolution that sets new accuracy-cost records on Matbench Discovery and SPICE benchmarks using fewer parameters than prior models.

  2. From Evaluation to Design: Using Potential Energy Surface Smoothness Metrics to Guide Machine Learning Interatomic Potential Architectures

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    A bond-deformation benchmark plus a force-smoothness metric is proposed to detect PES artifacts and guide MLIP architecture design, with improvements shown on a new Transformer-style model.

  3. Revisiting quantum effects on dislocation glide in bcc metals from DFT calculations and machine-learning potentials

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Quantum zero-point effects contribute less to low-temperature dislocation glide in bcc metals than earlier empirical-potential studies indicated, leaving the simulation-experiment discrepancy unresolved.

  4. Benchmarking foundation potentials against quantum chemistry methods for predicting molecular redox potentials

    physics.chem-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0

    MACE-OMol foundation potential matches DFT accuracy for PCET redox potentials, but fails for multi-electron-transfer ions; a hybrid FP+DFT single-point workflow fixes this.