REVIEW 1 cited by
PINNverse: Accurate parameter estimation in differential equations from noisy data with constrained physics-informed neural networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
PINNverse: Accurate parameter estimation in differential equations from noisy data with constrained physics-informed neural networks
read the original abstract
Parameter estimation for differential equations from measured data is an inverse problem prevalent across quantitative sciences. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have emerged as effective tools for solving such problems, especially with sparse measurements and incomplete system information. However, PINNs face convergence issues, stability problems, overfitting, and complex loss function design. Here we introduce PINNverse, a training paradigm that addresses these limitations by reformulating the learning process as a constrained differential optimization problem. This approach achieves a dynamic balance between data loss and differential equation residual loss during training while preventing overfitting. PINNverse combines the advantages of PINNs with the Modified Differential Method of Multipliers to enable convergence on any point on the Pareto front. We demonstrate robust and accurate parameter estimation from noisy data in four classical ODE and PDE models from physics and biology. Our method enables accurate parameter inference also when the forward problem is expensive to solve.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Uncertainty-aware damage identification in short-span bridges via physics-informed variational autoencoder
A PI-GCVAE with a differentiable eigenvalue decoder and Gaussian-copula latents recovers true stiffness posteriors on noisy synthetic short-span bridge data at ~79% 95%-coverage.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.