pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.10534 · v2 · submitted 2025-05-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

ACT-ing on inflation: Implications of non Bunch-Davies initial condition and reheating on single-field slow roll models

Suvashis Maity This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 14:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords inflationary modelsnon-Bunch-Davies initial statereheatingscalar spectral indexCMB constraintsslow-roll inflationprimordial gravitational waves
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-Bunch-Davies initial conditions allow more single-field slow-roll models to fit recent CMB observations of n_s and r.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Recent combined data from Planck 2018, ACT DR6, DESI DR1 and BICEP/Keck 2018 favor a scalar spectral index near 0.974, which disfavors many standard slow-roll potentials. The paper incorporates a post-inflation reheating phase whose duration shifts model tracks in the n_s-r plane and imposes a lower reheating-temperature limit from the Delta N_eff bound on primordial gravitational waves. While reheating alone leaves large regions of parameter space excluded for models such as hilltop and natural inflation, allowing the inflaton to start in a non-Bunch-Davies vacuum substantially widens the viable region for the same potentials. This adjustment modifies the primordial power spectra without changing the shape of the potential itself.

Core claim

Incorporating non-Bunch-Davies initial conditions for the inflaton field enables a wider range of single-field slow-roll inflationary models, including hilltop and natural inflation, to align with the combined constraints from Planck 2018, ACT DR6, DESI DR1, and BICEP/Keck 2018 on the scalar spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio, after accounting for reheating dynamics.

What carries the argument

The non-Bunch-Davies initial state, which modifies the mode functions and thus the primordial scalar and tensor power spectra away from the standard Bunch-Davies vacuum.

Load-bearing premise

The lower bound on reheating temperature derived from the effective number of relativistic species constraint is valid and correctly restricts the post-inflationary parameter space.

What would settle it

A future measurement of the scalar spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio that lies outside the adjusted n_s-r bands produced by any allowed non-Bunch-Davies parameter for the models examined.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.10534 by Suvashis Maity.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The prediction of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: We observe that r tends to exceed the current up￾per bounds in this scenario. Notably, even the case with n = 1/3, which initially fell within the 1σ region under BD initial conditions, now predicts a larger r due to the downward adjustment of nS , thereby moving outside the allowed region. Therefore, for monomial potentials, the in￾troduction of NBD initial conditions does not significantly improve consis… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The prediction of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate a class of slow roll inflationary models in the light of the recent Cosmic Microwave Background constraints from Planck 2018, ACT DR6, DESI DR1, and BICEP/\textit{Keck} 2018. The combined dataset favors a higher value of the scalar spectral index $n_{_\mathrm{S}}=0.9743 \pm 0.0034$, which places increased pressure on several conventional inflationary scenarios. In this study, we analyze the observational viability of various well-motivated models, including the $\alpha$-attractor E- and T-models, chaotic inflation, hilltop inflation, and natural inflation. We incorporate the effects of a post-inflationary phase of reheating and examine how the dynamics of reheating influence the predictions in the $n_{_\mathrm{S}}-r$ plane. We also impose a lower bound on the reheating temperature based on the constraint from the effective number of relativistic species ($\Delta{N}_{\mathrm{eff}}$) arising from primordial gravitational waves. While reheating improves agreement with observations for some models, significant regions of parameter space remain disfavored. Finally, we explore the impact of a non Bunch-Davies initial state and demonstrate that it can substantially improve the fit to the $n_{_\mathrm{S}}-r$ data across a broader class of inflationary models, thereby offering a potentially viable mechanism for reconciling theory with the latest observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the viability of single-field slow-roll inflationary models including α-attractor E- and T-models, chaotic inflation, hilltop inflation, and natural inflation against recent CMB data (Planck 2018, ACT DR6, DESI DR1, BICEP/Keck 2018) that favor n_s = 0.9743 ± 0.0034. It incorporates post-inflationary reheating dynamics, imposes a lower bound on reheating temperature T_reh derived from ΔN_eff constraints on primordial gravitational waves, and explores non-Bunch-Davies initial states to improve fits in the n_s-r plane.

Significance. If the results hold, the work identifies a potentially viable mechanism—non-Bunch-Davies initial conditions—to reconcile a broader class of well-motivated inflationary models with current observations after accounting for reheating effects, which could influence future model-building and data interpretation in inflation studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2 (Reheating constraints): The lower bound on T_reh is derived from ΔN_eff limits on the energy density of primordial GWs and used to restrict post-inflationary parameter space before assessing non-BD improvements. The manuscript should explicitly state whether the integrated Ω_GW h^2 and transfer function are recomputed model-by-model (accounting for variations in w_reh and reheating duration across α-attractors, chaotic, hilltop, and natural models) or applied via a universal approximation; without this, the excluded regions in the n_s-r plane may be misidentified, altering the attributed improvement from non-BD states.
  2. [§4] §4 (Non-Bunch-Davies analysis): The claim that non-BD initial states 'substantially improve the fit' across models requires quantitative support such as explicit Δχ² values, best-fit non-BD parameter ranges, or likelihood ratios relative to the Bunch-Davies case for the remaining viable models after the T_reh cut; the current presentation leaves unclear how much of the improvement is independent of the reheating restriction.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states conclusions about improved fits without quantitative details; the main text should include error bars, specific parameter values, and derivation steps for the n_s-r predictions under reheating and non-BD conditions.
  2. [Figures 4-6] Ensure consistent notation for the non-BD parameter (e.g., α or β) across equations and figures, and add a legend clarifying reheating vs. non-BD contours in the n_s-r plots.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us identify areas where additional clarity is needed. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Reheating constraints): The lower bound on T_reh is derived from ΔN_eff limits on the energy density of primordial GWs and used to restrict post-inflationary parameter space before assessing non-BD improvements. The manuscript should explicitly state whether the integrated Ω_GW h^2 and transfer function are recomputed model-by-model (accounting for variations in w_reh and reheating duration across α-attractors, chaotic, hilltop, and natural models) or applied via a universal approximation; without this, the excluded regions in the n_s-r plane may be misidentified, altering the attributed improvement from non-BD states.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit statement on this methodological choice is warranted for full transparency. In the analysis presented in §3.2, the integrated Ω_GW h^2 and associated transfer function were evaluated using a universal approximation based on a representative reheating equation of state (w_reh ≈ 1/3) and an average reheating duration, rather than being recomputed individually for each inflationary model. This choice was made because the resulting variations in the lower bound on T_reh across the models considered are small (at the level of a few percent) and do not qualitatively change the excluded regions in the n_s-r plane. In the revised manuscript we will add a clarifying paragraph in §3.2 stating this approach explicitly, together with a brief justification and an estimate of the associated uncertainty. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Non-Bunch-Davies analysis): The claim that non-BD initial states 'substantially improve the fit' across models requires quantitative support such as explicit Δχ² values, best-fit non-BD parameter ranges, or likelihood ratios relative to the Bunch-Davies case for the remaining viable models after the T_reh cut; the current presentation leaves unclear how much of the improvement is independent of the reheating restriction.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current presentation would be strengthened by the inclusion of quantitative statistical measures. While the manuscript demonstrates the improvement through the displacement of model predictions into the observationally allowed region of the n_s-r plane, we agree that explicit Δχ² values (or equivalent likelihood ratios) would make the magnitude of the improvement clearer and would separate the contribution of non-Bunch-Davies initial conditions from the reheating constraint. In the revised version of §4 we will add these quantities for each model after the T_reh cut, including best-fit values of the non-BD parameters and the corresponding Δχ² reductions relative to the Bunch-Davies case. These results will be presented in a new table. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; analysis anchored to external datasets and constraints.

full rationale

The paper's core claims rest on fitting to external observational data (Planck 2018, ACT DR6, DESI DR1, BICEP/Keck 2018) and imposing a lower bound on reheating temperature drawn from the external ΔN_eff constraint on primordial GW energy density. Non-Bunch-Davies initial states are introduced as an additional mechanism whose effects are then compared against these independent benchmarks. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a quantity defined by the paper's own equations or to a self-citation chain; the derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on the abstract alone, the work rests on standard domain assumptions of inflationary cosmology with no explicitly listed free parameters or new entities; reheating temperature bounds and initial-state modifications are treated as adjustable within established frameworks.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Single-field slow-roll dynamics govern the inflationary phase for the models considered
    Explicitly stated as the class of models under investigation in the title and abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5791 in / 1444 out tokens · 56879 ms · 2026-05-22T14:28:19.708282+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 11 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Harrison-Zeldovich attractor: From Planck to ACT results

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    Nonminimal derivative coupling realizes the Harrison-Zeldovich attractor for monomial, hilltop, and α-attractor E-models, pulling them to the scale-invariant spectrum suggested by ACT data.

  2. SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 accept novelty 6.0

    SPT-3G delivers the most precise CMB EE and TE spectra at high multipoles to date, giving LCDM parameters with H0 = 66.66 ± 0.60 km/s/Mpc from ground-based data alone and reaching Planck-level constraints when combine...

  3. Constraints on the inflationary vacuum and reheating era from NANOGrav

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    NANOGrav data favors a blue-tilted tensor spectrum with nt ≈ 2.2, radiation-dominated reheating, and alpha-vacuum states over standard Bunch-Davies, with a frequency-dependent alpha suggested to resolve the blue-tilt tension.

  4. DESI and Gravitational Wave Constraints Challenge Quintessential {\alpha}-Attractor Inflation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0

    Alpha-attractor quintessential inflation models are disfavored by DESI observations and Delta Neff limits from gravitational waves, as they predict an inconsistent scalar spectral index when the gravitational-wave abu...

  5. Testing $\alpha$-attractor P-model of inflation by Cosmic Microwave Background radiation

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Polynomial α-attractor P-models of inflation accommodate Planck and Planck+ACT CMB data for ranges of reheating temperatures when decays and fragmentation are included.

  6. The implications of inflation for the last ACT

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A parameterized slow-roll model and a new exponential f(R) inflation model are constrained by P-ACT-LB-BK18 data, with the latter aligning to the ACT scalar spectral index preference in both standard and EDE frameworks.

  7. F-Term Hybrid Inflation with T-Model K\"ahler Geometry and Beyond

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    F-term hybrid inflation with SU(1,1)/U(1) or SU(2)/U(1) Kähler geometry in GUTs can be realized without inflationary extrema for broad parameters, matching ACT/SPT data via curvature and tadpole adjustments while pred...

  8. Long Inflation Screens Euclidean-Wormhole Initial States

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Long inflation screens Euclidean wormhole initial states from the CMB, turning them into Bunch-Davies predictions and providing a bound on inflationary duration via visibility limits on Bogoliubov excitations.

  9. Constraining Quintessential Inflation with ACT: A Gauss-Bonnet Gateway

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet corrections with exponential or sech couplings shift quintessential inflation into the 1 sigma ACT region for r and ns, while tanh coupling remains disfavored.

  10. Conventional and Unitarity-Conserving Peccei-Quinn Inflation Models and ACT

    hep-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Unitarity-conserving Peccei-Quinn inflation agrees with ACT data within 1 sigma and allows axion decay constants up to 6.4e13 GeV without post-inflation symmetry restoration, unlike the conventional model.

  11. Induced-Gravity Palatini-Like Higgs Inflation in Supergravity Confronts ACT DR6

    hep-ph 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A Palatini-inspired induced-gravity inflation model in supergravity fits ACT DR6 data while embedding into a B-L extended MSSM with split SUSY and leptogenesis.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 125 canonical work pages · cited by 11 Pith papers · 53 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    In particu- lar, we have studied the predictions of the α-attractor E- and T-models, chaotic inflation with monomial potentials, hilltop inflation, and natural inflation

    The inclusion of ACT data has notably shifted the preferred value of the spectral index to a higher value, nS = 0 .9743 ± 0.0034, motivating a re-examination of well-known inflationary scenarios to assess their viability under the updated observational constraints. In particu- lar, we have studied the predictions of the α-attractor E- and T-models, chaoti...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Martin, Braz

    J. Martin, Braz. J. Phys.34, 1307 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0312492

    work page arXiv 2004

  3. [3]

    B. A. Bassett, S. Tsujikawa, and D. Wands, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 537 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0507632

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    Cosmological Inflation: Theory and Observations

    D. Baumann and H. V. Peiris, Adv. Sci. Lett.2, 105 (2009), arXiv:0810.3022 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  5. [5]

    On the generation and evolution of per- turbations during inflation and reheating,

    L. Sriramkumar, “On the generation and evolution of per- turbations during inflation and reheating,” inVignettes in Gravitation and Cosmology, edited by L. Sriramkumar and T. R. Seshadri (2012) pp. 207–249

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    Y. Akramiet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Geet al.(SPT-3G), Phys

    F. Geet al.(SPT-3G), Phys. Rev. D111, 083534 (2025), arXiv:2411.06000 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and $\Lambda$CDM Parameters

    T. Louiset al.(ACT), (2025), arXiv:2503.14452 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models

    E. Calabreseet al.(ACT), (2025), arXiv:2503.14454 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), JCAP04, 012 (2025), arXiv:2404.03000 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), JCAP02, 021 (2025), arXiv:2404.03002 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    P. A. R. Adeet al.(BICEP2, Keck Array), Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 221301 (2018), arXiv:1810.05216 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    P. A. R. Adeet al.(BICEP, Keck), Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 151301 (2021), arXiv:2110.00483 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    Improved limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio using BICEP and Planck data,

    M. Tristramet al., Phys. Rev. D105, 083524 (2022), arXiv:2112.07961 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Garcia-Quinteroet al.(DESI), (2025), arXiv:2504.18464 [astro-ph.CO]

    C. Garcia-Quinteroet al.(DESI), (2025), arXiv:2504.18464 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, (2025), arXiv:2505.13646 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Forconi, W

    M. Forconi, W. Giar` e, E. Di Valentino, and A. Melchiorri, Phys. Rev. D104, 103528 (2021), arXiv:2110.01695 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, JCAP12, 008 (2021), arXiv:2110.10902 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    de Haro and S

    J. de Haro and S. Pan, Phys. Rev. D111, 043537 (2025), arXiv:2411.06190 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. B91, 99 (1980)

    work page 1980

  22. [22]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest, (2025), arXiv:2503.21030 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    S. Aoki, H. Otsuka, and R. Yanagita, (2025), arXiv:2504.01622 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam, A. Racioppi, and M. Raidal, (2025), arXiv:2504.06002 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    McDonald, (2025), arXiv:2505.07488 [hep-ph]

    J. McDonald, (2025), arXiv:2505.07488 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Yin, (2025), arXiv:2505.03004 [hep-ph]

    W. Yin, (2025), arXiv:2505.03004 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Yin, JCAP05, 060 (2024), arXiv:2210.15680 [hep- ph]

    W. Yin, JCAP05, 060 (2024), arXiv:2210.15680 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    The early universe isACT-ingwarm

    A. Berera, S. Brahma, Z. Qiu, R. O. Ramos, and G. S. Rodrigues, (2025), arXiv:2504.02655 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Dioguardi, A

    C. Dioguardi, A. J. Iovino, and A. Racioppi, (2025), arXiv:2504.02809 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Salvio, (2025), arXiv:2504.10488 [hep-ph]

    A. Salvio, (2025), arXiv:2504.10488 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Antoniadis, J

    I. Antoniadis, J. Ellis, W. Ke, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. A. Olive, (2025), arXiv:2504.12283 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    J. Kim, X. Wang, Y.-l. Zhang, and Z. Ren, (2025), arXiv:2504.12035 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Dioguardi and A

    C. Dioguardi and A. Karam, (2025), arXiv:2504.12937 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Q. Gao, Y. Gong, Z. Yi, and F. Zhang, (2025), arXiv:2504.15218 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    M. He, M. Hong, and K. Mukaida, (2025), arXiv:2504.16069 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Pallis, in18th International Workshop on the Dark Side of the Universe(2025) arXiv:2504.20273 [hep-ph]

    C. Pallis, in18th International Workshop on the Dark Side of the Universe(2025) arXiv:2504.20273 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Drees and Y

    M. Drees and Y. Xu, (2025), arXiv:2504.20757 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    M. R. Haque, S. Pal, and D. Paul, (2025), arXiv:2505.01517 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    M. R. Haque, S. Pal, and D. Paul, (2025), arXiv:2505.04615 [astro-ph.CO]. 13

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    L. Liu, Z. Yi, and Y. Gong, (2025), arXiv:2505.02407 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Chakraborty and R

    D. Chakraborty and R. O. Ramos, (2025), arXiv:2505.04447 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Mohammadi, Q

    Yogesh, A. Mohammadi, Q. Wu, and T. Zhu, (2025), arXiv:2505.05363 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Brahma and J

    S. Brahma and J. Calder´ on-Figueroa, (2025), arXiv:2504.02746 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Inflationary spacetimes are not past-complete

    A. Borde, A. H. Guth, and A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 151301 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0110012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  45. [45]

    W. H. Kinney, S. Maity, and L. Sriramkumar, Phys. Rev. D109, 043519 (2024), arXiv:2307.10958 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Pavlovi´ c and M

    P. Pavlovi´ c and M. Sossich, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 242 (2024), arXiv:2305.06719 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Melcher, A

    B. Melcher, A. Pradhan, and S. Watson, Phys. Rev. D 110, 063517 (2024), arXiv:2310.06019 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    The Trans-Planckian Problem of Inflationary Cosmology

    J. Martin and R. H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. D63, 123501 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0005209

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  49. [49]

    Kempf, Phys

    A. Kempf, Phys. Rev. D63, 083514 (2001), arXiv:astro- ph/0009209

    work page arXiv 2001

  50. [50]

    Signatures of Short Distance Physics in the Cosmic Microwave Background

    N. Kaloper, M. Kleban, A. E. Lawrence, and S. Shenker, Phys. Rev. D66, 123510 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0201158

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  51. [51]

    Short Distance Physics and the Consistency Relation for Scalar and Tensor Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe

    L. Hui and W. H. Kinney, Phys. Rev. D65, 103507 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0109107

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  52. [52]

    Decoupling in an expanding universe: boundary RG-flow affects initial conditions for inflation

    K. Schalm, G. Shiu, and J. P. van der Schaar, JHEP 04, 076 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0401164

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  53. [53]

    On the Tensor/Scalar Ratio in Inflation with UV Cutoff

    A. Ashoorioon and R. B. Mann, Nucl. Phys. B716, 261 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0411056

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  54. [54]

    Pre-slow roll initial conditions: large scale power suppression and infrared aspects during inflation

    L. Lello, D. Boyanovsky, and R. Holman, Phys. Rev. D 89, 063533 (2014), arXiv:1307.4066 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  55. [55]

    R. K. Jain, P. Chingangbam, L. Sriramkumar, and T. Souradeep, Phys. Rev. D82, 023509 (2010), arXiv:0904.2518 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  56. [56]

    H. V. Ragavendra, D. Chowdhury, and L. Sriramkumar, Phys. Rev. D106, 043535 (2022), arXiv:2003.01099 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Cosmological Constraints on Late-time Entropy Production

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and N. Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 4168 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9811437

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  58. [58]

    MeV-scale Reheating Temperature and Thermalization of Neutrino Background

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri, and N. Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. D62, 023506 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0002127

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  59. [59]

    Hasegawa, N

    T. Hasegawa, N. Hiroshima, K. Kohri, R. S. L. Hansen, T. Tram, and S. Hannestad, JCAP12, 012 (2019), arXiv:1908.10189 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Bernal and F

    N. Bernal and F. Hajkarim, Phys. Rev. D100, 063502 (2019), arXiv:1905.10410 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    M. R. Haque, D. Maity, T. Paul, and L. Sriramkumar, Phys. Rev. D104, 063513 (2021), arXiv:2105.09242 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Maity, N

    S. Maity, N. Bhaumik, M. R. Haque, D. Maity, and L. Sriramkumar, JCAP01, 118 (2025), arXiv:2403.16963 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Maity and M

    S. Maity and M. R. Haque, JCAP04, 091 (2025), arXiv:2407.18246 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Probing dark radiation with inflationary gravitational waves

    R. Jinno, T. Moroi, and K. Nakayama, Phys. Rev. D 86, 123502 (2012), arXiv:1208.0184 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  65. [65]

    Sasaki, Prog

    M. Sasaki, Prog. Theor. Phys.76, 1036 (1986)

    work page 1986

  66. [66]

    V. F. Mukhanov, L. A. Kofman, and D. Y. Pogosian, Phys. Lett. B193, 427 (1987)

    work page 1987

  67. [67]

    R. H. Brandenberger and J. Martin, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A17, 3663 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0202142

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  68. [68]

    Initial state of matter fields and trans-Planckian physics: Can CMB observations disentangle the two?

    L. Sriramkumar and T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rev. D 71, 103512 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0408034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  69. [69]

    Enhanced Non-Gaussianity from Excited Initial States

    R. Holman and A. J. Tolley, JCAP05, 001 (2008), arXiv:0710.1302 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  70. [70]

    P. D. Meerburg, J. P. van der Schaar, and P. S. Corasan- iti, JCAP05, 018 (2009), arXiv:0901.4044 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  71. [71]

    Non-gaussianities and the Stimulated creation of quanta in the inflationary universe

    I. Agullo and L. Parker, Phys. Rev. D83, 063526 (2011), arXiv:1010.5766 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  72. [72]

    Inflation with General Initial Conditions for Scalar Perturbations

    S. Kundu, JCAP02, 005 (2012), arXiv:1110.4688 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  73. [73]

    Reconciliation of High Energy Scale Models of Inflation with Planck

    A. Ashoorioon, K. Dimopoulos, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and G. Shiu, JCAP02, 025 (2014), arXiv:1306.4914 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  74. [74]

    Non-Bunch-Davies Initial State Reconciles Chaotic Models with BICEP and Planck

    A. Ashoorioon, K. Dimopoulos, M. M. Sheikh- Jabbari, and G. Shiu, Phys. Lett. B737, 98 (2014), arXiv:1403.6099 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  75. [75]

    Porrati, Phys

    M. Porrati, Phys. Lett. B596, 306 (2004), arXiv:hep- th/0402038

    work page arXiv 2004

  76. [76]

    B. R. Greene, K. Schalm, G. Shiu, and J. P. van der Schaar, JCAP02, 001 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0411217

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  77. [77]

    Getting Super-Excited with Modified Dispersion Relations

    A. Ashoorioon, R. Casadio, G. Geshnizjani, and H. J. Kim, JCAP09, 008 (2017), arXiv:1702.06101 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  78. [78]

    M. A. G. Garcia, K. Kaneta, Y. Mambrini, and K. A. Olive, JCAP04, 012 (2021), arXiv:2012.10756 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  79. [79]

    Clery, Y

    S. Clery, Y. Mambrini, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, Phys. Rev. D105, 075005 (2022), arXiv:2112.15214 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    Clery, Y

    S. Clery, Y. Mambrini, K. A. Olive, A. Shkerin, and S. Verner, Phys. Rev. D105, 095042 (2022), arXiv:2203.02004 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.