pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.08931 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-09 · ✦ hep-ph · gr-qc· hep-th

Recognition: no theorem link

F-Term Hybrid Inflation with T-Model K\"ahler Geometry and Beyond

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 01:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph gr-qchep-th
keywords F-term hybrid inflationT-model Kähler geometrysupergravity correctionscosmic stringsgravitational wavesACT dataSPT data
0
0 comments X

The pith

F-term hybrid inflation can proceed without extrema on its trajectory in T-model Kähler geometries.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines F-term hybrid inflation in grand unified theories using Kähler potentials for the manifolds SU(1,1)/U(1) or SU(2)/U(1). It adds supergravity, radiative, and soft supersymmetry-breaking corrections to the tree-level potential. The analysis establishes that viable inflation occurs without extrema along the trajectory for a wide range of parameters. Predictions for observables depend strongly on the internal curvature and tadpole magnitude, which are adjusted to fit ACT and SPT data. Cosmic string formation and the resulting gravitational wave signals are also analyzed.

Core claim

Viable FHI can be realized without extrema along the inflationary trajectory for a broad region of the parameter space. For selected superpotential parameters the models' predictions are largely influenced by the curvature of the internal space and the magnitude of the tadpole parameter which are constrained so as to achieve compatibility with the current ACT and SPT data. The formation of cosmic strings and their associated gravitational wave signals are discussed as well.

What carries the argument

Kähler potentials for the manifolds SU(1,1)/U(1) or SU(2)/U(1), which set the curvature of the internal space and combine with the superpotential and corrections to control the shape of the inflationary potential.

If this is right

  • The inflationary trajectory remains free of extrema across a broad parameter space.
  • ACT and SPT compatibility is achieved by tuning the internal curvature and tadpole magnitude.
  • Cosmic strings form and generate gravitational wave signals that current and future detectors could observe.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Kähler structure might be applied to other hybrid inflation scenarios to check whether extrema can likewise be avoided.
  • Absence of extrema on the trajectory could simplify the dynamics of reheating and the production of other relics.
  • Gravitational wave searches could directly bound the tadpole parameter if the string tension is measured.

Load-bearing premise

The internal curvature and tadpole parameter can be chosen to match current data while keeping the trajectory free of extrema.

What would settle it

A future measurement of the scalar spectral index or tensor-to-scalar ratio lying outside the range permitted by these Kähler geometries, or the absence of cosmic-string gravitational waves at the frequencies predicted for viable parameter choices.

read the original abstract

We analyze F-term hybrid inflation (FHI) within various grand unified theories (GUTs) in the presence of a K\"ahler potential for the inflaton field which parameterizes the K\"ahler manifolds $SU(1,1)/U(1)$ or $SU(2)/U(1)$. We take into account supergravity, radiative, and soft supersymmetry-breaking corrections to the tree-level potential and find that viable FHI can be realized without extrema along the inflationary trajectory for a broad region of the parameter space. For selected superpotential parameters the models' predictions are largely influenced by the curvature of the internal space and the magnitude of the tadpole parameter which are constrained so as to achieve compatibility with the current ACT and SPT data. We also discuss the formation of cosmic strings and their associated gravitational wave signals, potentially detectable by current and upcoming experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes F-term hybrid inflation (FHI) in grand unified theories using Kähler potentials that realize the manifolds SU(1,1)/U(1) or SU(2)/U(1). It incorporates supergravity corrections, radiative corrections, and soft supersymmetry-breaking terms into the tree-level potential and concludes that viable FHI trajectories without extrema exist over a broad parameter region. For selected superpotential parameters, the spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio are shaped primarily by the curvature parameter and tadpole magnitude, which are adjusted to achieve consistency with ACT and SPT data; cosmic-string formation and the associated gravitational-wave signals are also examined.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies a concrete realization of F-term hybrid inflation in supergravity that evades the common problem of extrema along the inflationary valley while remaining compatible with current CMB data. The explicit inclusion of multiple correction terms and the discussion of potentially detectable gravitational waves from cosmic strings add phenomenological value and falsifiable predictions.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and parameter-space discussion] The assertion that viable trajectories exist for a 'broad region of the parameter space' (abstract) appears to rest on post-hoc selection of the curvature and tadpole parameters to reproduce the ACT/SPT values of n_s and r. It is not clear from the presented analysis whether the monotonicity condition remains satisfied over a genuinely independent interval once the data constraints are imposed, or whether the allowed region shrinks to a narrow slice after fitting.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that predictions are 'largely influenced' by curvature and tadpole but supplies no numerical ranges or example values; a brief table or plot of the allowed intervals after ACT/SPT constraints would improve clarity.
  2. [Model setup] Notation for the Kähler potential and the definition of the tadpole parameter should be introduced with an explicit equation early in the text rather than assumed from prior literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comment. We address the major point below and have revised the text to improve clarity on the parameter-space analysis.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and parameter-space discussion] The assertion that viable trajectories exist for a 'broad region of the parameter space' (abstract) appears to rest on post-hoc selection of the curvature and tadpole parameters to reproduce the ACT/SPT values of n_s and r. It is not clear from the presented analysis whether the monotonicity condition remains satisfied over a genuinely independent interval once the data constraints are imposed, or whether the allowed region shrinks to a narrow slice after fitting.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee drawing attention to this potential ambiguity. The monotonicity condition (absence of extrema along the inflationary valley) follows directly from the form of the effective scalar potential after including the SU(1,1)/U(1) or SU(2)/U(1) Kähler geometry, supergravity corrections, radiative corrections, and soft SUSY-breaking terms. This condition is analyzed in Section 3 and holds over a wide interval of the superpotential parameters, the curvature parameter α, and the tadpole parameter, independently of the CMB observables. Within this already monotonic region we then vary α and the tadpole to match the ACT/SPT values of n_s and r. The resulting viable parameter space remains broad; the data constraints do not reduce it to a narrow slice. To make this separation explicit we have revised the abstract and added a new paragraph plus a supplementary plot in Section 3 that displays the monotonic region before and after the n_s/r cuts. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper constructs the effective potential for F-term hybrid inflation explicitly from supergravity corrections, radiative effects, and soft SUSY-breaking terms on the specified Kähler manifolds SU(1,1)/U(1) or SU(2)/U(1). The central claim of viability without extrema along the trajectory for a broad parameter region follows from direct analysis of this potential. Parameter variation for curvature and tadpole to match ACT/SPT data is standard phenomenological scanning; the resulting ns, r, and cosmic-string predictions are derived outputs rather than tautological reductions to the fitted inputs. No load-bearing self-citations, self-definitional loops, or smuggled ansatze are present in the core derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; specific free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be extracted. The work appears to rest on standard supergravity and hybrid inflation assumptions without new entities introduced in the summary.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5457 in / 1125 out tokens · 50395 ms · 2026-05-12T01:46:34.575124+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V . Vennin,Encyclopædia Inflationaris,Phys. Dark Univ.5, 75 (2014) [arXiv:1303.3787]

  2. [2]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    Y . Akramiet al.[PlanckCollaboration],Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys. 641, A10 (2020) [arXiv:1807.06211]

  3. [3]

    Tristram, A

    M. Tristramet al.,Improved limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio using BICEP and Planck,Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151301 (2021) [arXiv:2112.07961]

  4. [4]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and $\Lambda$CDM Parameters

    T. Louiset al.[ACT Collaboration],The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods andΛCDM Parameters,arXiv:2503.14452

  5. [5]

    C., Jense, H

    E. Calabreseet al.[ACT Collaboration],The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models,arXiv:2503.14454

  6. [6]

    Ferreira, E

    E.G.M. Ferreira, E. McDonough, L. Balkenhol, R. Kallosh, L. Knox and A. Linde,The BAO-CMB Tension and Implications for Inflation,arXiv:2507.1245

  7. [7]

    E. Camphuiset al.[SPT-3G Collaboration],SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field,arXiv:2506.20707

  8. [8]

    Hazumiet al.,LiteBIRD: A Satellite for the Studies of B-Mode Polarization and Inflation from Cosmic Background Radiation DetectionJ

    M. Hazumiet al.,LiteBIRD: A Satellite for the Studies of B-Mode Polarization and Inflation from Cosmic Background Radiation DetectionJ. Low Temp. Phys.194, no. 5-6, 443 (2019)

  9. [9]

    CMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition

    K.N. Abazajianet al.[CMB-S4],CMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition,arXiv:1610.02743

  10. [10]

    Simons Observatory collaboration,The Simons Observatory: Science goals and forecasts,JCAP02, 056 (2019) [arXiv:1808.07445]. 19

  11. [11]

    Universality Class in Conformal Inflation

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Universality Class in Conformal Inflation, JCAP07, 002 (2013) [arXiv: 1306.5220]

  12. [12]

    Superconformal Inflationary $\alpha$-Attractors

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest,Superconformal Inflationarya-Attractors, JHEP11, 198 (2013) [arXiv:1311.0472]

  13. [13]

    Ferrara and R

    S. Ferrara and R. Kallosh,Seven-disk manifold,α-attractors, andBmodes,Phys. Rev. D94, no.12, 126015 (2016) [arXiv:1610.04163]

  14. [14]

    Pallis,Pole-induced Higgs inflation with hyperbolic K ¨ahler geometries, JCAP05, 043 (2021) [arXiv: 2103.05534]

    C. Pallis,Pole-induced Higgs inflation with hyperbolic K ¨ahler geometries, JCAP05, 043 (2021) [arXiv: 2103.05534]

  15. [15]

    T-model Higgs inflation and metastable cosmic 16 strings,

    C. Pallis,T-model Higgs inflation and metastable cosmic strings,JHEP01, 178 (2025) [arXiv: 2409.14338]

  16. [16]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M.A.G. Garc ´ıa, K.A. Olive and S. Verner,Constraints on Attractor Models of Inflation and Re- heating from Planck, BICEP/Keck, ACT DR6, and SPT-3G Data,Phys. Rev. D113, no.6, 063571 (2026) [arXiv:2510.18656]

  17. [17]

    Heidarian, M

    H. Heidarian, M. Solbi, S. Heydari and K. Karami,α-attractor inflation modified by GUP in light of ACT observations,Phys. Lett. B869, 139833 (2025) [arXiv:2506.10547]

  18. [18]

    Wolf,Inflationary attractors and radiative corrections in light of ACT,JCAP02, 088 (2026) [arXiv:2506.12436]

    W.J. Wolf,Inflationary attractors and radiative corrections in light of ACT,JCAP02, 088 (2026) [arXiv:2506.12436]

  19. [19]

    ACT-ing on inflation: Implications of non Bunch-Davies initial condition and reheating on single-field slow roll models

    S. Maity,ACT-ing on inflation: Implications of non Bunch-Davies initial condition and reheating on single- field slow-roll models,arXiv:2505.10534

  20. [20]

    Haque, S

    M.R. Haque, S. Pal and D. Paul,ACT DR6 Insights on the Inflationary Attractor models and Reheating, arXiv:2505.01517

  21. [21]

    Alexandre, L

    J. Alexandre, L. Heurtier and S. Pla,Exact Renormalisation Group Evolution of the Inflation Dynamics: Reconcilinga-Attractors with ACT,arXiv:2511.05296

  22. [22]

    Ahmed, W

    W. Ahmed, W. Ahmad, A. Illahi and M. Junaid,Warm Hybrid Axion Inflation ina-Attractor Models Con- strained by ACT and Future Plan experiments,arXiv:2601.10145

  23. [23]

    Iacconi, S

    L. Iacconi, S. Bhattacharya, M. Fasiello and D. Wands,Closing in ona-attractors,arXiv:2511.14673

  24. [24]

    C. Fu, D. Lu and S.J. Wang,Harrison-Zeldovich attractor: From Planck to ACT results,Phys. Rev. D113, no. 8, L081304 (2026) [arXiv:2510.24682]

  25. [25]

    Pallis,ACT-Inspired K ¨ahler-Based Inflationary Attractors, JCAP09, 061 (2025) [arXiv: 2507.02219]

    C. Pallis,ACT-Inspired K ¨ahler-Based Inflationary Attractors, JCAP09, 061 (2025) [arXiv: 2507.02219]

  26. [26]

    Pallis,Updating GUT-Scale Pole Higgs Inflation After ACT DR6, Phys

    C. Pallis,Updating GUT-Scale Pole Higgs Inflation After ACT DR6, Phys. Rev. D113, no 1, 015033 (2026) [arXiv:2510.02083]

  27. [27]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,On the Present Status of Inflationary Cosmology,Gen. Rel. Grav.57, no. 10, 135 (2025) [arXiv:2505.13646]

  28. [28]

    Dvali, Q

    G.R. Dvali, Q. Shafi and R.K. Schaefer,Large scale structure and supersymmetric inflation without fine tuning,Phys. Rev. Lett.73(1994) 1886 [hep-ph/9406319]

  29. [29]

    Lazarides,Basics of inflationary cosmology,J

    G. Lazarides,Basics of inflationary cosmology,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.53, 528 (2006) [hep-ph/0607032]

  30. [30]

    How generic is cosmic string formation in SUSY GUTs,

    R. Jeannerot, J. Rocher and M. Sakellariadou,How generic is cosmic string formation in SUSY GUTs, Phys. Rev. D68, 103514 (2003) [hep-ph/0308134]. 20

  31. [31]

    Afzal et al

    A. Afzalet al.[NANOGrav Collaboration],The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics,Astrophys. J. Lett.951, no. 1, L11 (2023);ibid.971, no. 1, L27 (2024) [arXiv:2306.16219]

  32. [32]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    G. Agazieet al.[NANOGrav Collaboration],The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational- wave Background,Astrophys. J. Lett.951, no. 1, L8 (2023) [arXiv:2306.16213]

  33. [33]

    Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA:), Astron

    J. Antoniadiset al.[EPTA Collaboration]The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals,Astron. Astrophys.678, A50 (2023) [arXiv:2306.16214]

  34. [34]

    R. M. Shannonet al.,Gravitational waves from binary supermassive black holes missing in pulsar obser- vations,Science349, 1522 (2015) [arXiv:1509.07320]

  35. [35]

    J. Antoniadiset al.[CPTA Collaboration],Searching for the nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave back- ground with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 24, 015024 (2024) [arXiv:2306.16216]

  36. [36]

    Metastable strings and dumbbells in supersymmetric hybrid inflation,

    W. Buchm ¨uller,Metastable strings and dumbbells in supersymmetric hybrid inflation,JHEP04, 168 (2021) [arXiv:2102.08923]

  37. [37]

    Pallis,PeV-Scale SUSY and Cosmic Strings from F-Term Hybrid Inflation,Universe10, no

    C. Pallis,PeV-Scale SUSY and Cosmic Strings from F-Term Hybrid Inflation,Universe10, no. 5, 211 (2024) [arXiv:2403.09385]

  38. [38]

    Pallis, [arXiv:2504.20273 [hep-ph]]

    C. Pallis,F-Term Hybrid Inflation, Metastable Cosmic Strings and Low Reheating in View of ACT, CORFU2024, 206 (2025) [arXiv:2504.20273]

  39. [39]

    Gravitational waves from metastable cosmic strings in the Pati-Salam model in light of new pulsar timing array data,

    W. Ahmed, T.A. Chowdhury, S. Nasri and S. Saad,Gravitational waves from metastable cosmic strings in Pati-Salam model in light of new pulsar timing array data,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 015008 [arXiv:2308.13248]

  40. [40]

    µ-hybrid inflation and metastable cosmic strings in SU(3)c×SU(2)L×SU(2)R×U(1)B-L,

    M.N. Ahmad, M. Mehmood, M.U. Rehman and Q. Shafi,µ-Hybrid Inflation and Metastable Cos- mic Strings inSU(3) c ×SU(2) L ×SU(2) R ×U(1) B−L,Phys. Rev. D111, no. 8, 8 (2025) [arXiv:2501.06307]

  41. [41]

    Afzal, W

    A. Afzal, W. Ahmed, M.U. Rehman and Q. Shafi,µ-hybrid inflation, gravitino dark matter, and stochastic gravitational wave background from cosmic strings,Phys. Rev. D105, no.10, 103539 (2022) [arXiv:2202.07386]

  42. [42]

    Antusch, K

    S. Antusch, K. Hinze, S. Saad and J. Steiner,Probing SUSY at gravitational wave observatories,Phys. Lett. B856, 138924 (2024) [arXiv:2405.03746]

  43. [43]

    S ¸eno˘guz and Q

    V .N. S ¸eno˘guz and Q. Shafi,Reheat temperature in supersymmetric hybrid inflation models,Phys. Rev. D71, 043514 (2005) [hep-ph/0412102]

  44. [44]

    Rehman, Q

    M.U. Rehman, Q. Shafi and J.R. Wickman,Supersymmetric Hybrid Inflation ReduxPhys. Lett. B683, 191 (2010) [arXiv:0908.3896]

  45. [45]

    Rehman, Q

    M.U. Rehman, Q. Shafi and J.R. Wickman,Minimal Supersymmetric Hybrid Inflation, Flipped SU(5) and Proton Decay,Phys. Lett. B688, 75 (2010) [arXiv:0912.4737]

  46. [46]

    Nakayama, F

    K. Nakayama, F. Takahashi and T.T. Yanagida,Constraint on the gravitino mass in hybrid inflation,JCAP 12, 010 (2010) [arXiv:1007.5152]

  47. [47]

    Pallis and Q

    C. Pallis and Q. Shafi,Update on Minimal Supersymmetric Hybrid Inflation in Light of PLANCK,Phys. Lett. B725, 327 (2013) [arXiv:1304.5202]

  48. [48]

    Buchm ¨uller, V

    W. Buchm ¨uller, V . Domcke, K. Kamada and K. Schmitz,Hybrid Inflation in the Complex Plane, JCAP07, 054 (2014) [arXiv:1404.1832]. 21

  49. [49]

    Lazarides and C

    G. Lazarides and C. Pallis,Probing the Supersymmetry-Mass Scale With F-term Hybrid Inflation,Phys. Rev. D108, no. 9, 095055 (2023)[arXiv:2309.04848]

  50. [50]

    Pallis,F-Term Hybrid Inflation and SUSY Breaking,PoSCORFU2024, 115 (2025) [arXiv:2504.02121]

    C. Pallis,F-Term Hybrid Inflation and SUSY Breaking,PoSCORFU2024, 115 (2025) [arXiv:2504.02121]

  51. [51]

    Panagiotakopoulos,Hybrid inflation with quasicanonical supergravity,Phys

    C. Panagiotakopoulos,Hybrid inflation with quasicanonical supergravity,Phys. Lett. B402, 257 (1997) [hep-ph/9703443]

  52. [52]

    Bastero-Gil, S.F

    M. Bastero-Gil, S.F. King and Q. Shafi,Supersymmetric Hybrid Inflation with Non-Minimal Kahler poten- tial,Phys. Lett. B651, 345 (2007) [hep-ph/0604198]

  53. [53]

    ur Rehman, V .N

    M. ur Rehman, V .N. Senoguz and Q. Shafi,Supersymmetric And Smooth Hybrid Inflation In The Light Of WMAP3,Phys. Rev. D75, 043522 (2007) [hep-ph/0612023]

  54. [54]

    Rehman, Q

    M.U. Rehman, Q. Shafi and J.R. Wickman,Observable Gravity Waves from Supersymmetric Hybrid Infla- tion II,Phys. Rev. D83, 067304 (2011) [arXiv:1012.0309]

  55. [55]

    Civiletti, C

    M. Civiletti, C. Pallis and Q. Shafi,Upper Bound on the Tensor-to-Scalar Ratio in GUT-Scale Supersym- metric Hybrid Inflation,Phys. Lett.B 733(2014) 276 [arXiv:1402.6254]

  56. [56]

    Rehman and Q

    M.U. Rehman and Q. Shafi,Supersymmetric Hybrid Inflation in light of Atacama Cosmology Tele- scope Data Release 6, Planck 2018 and LB-BK18,Phys. Rev. D112, no.2, 023529 (2025) [arXiv:2504.14831]

  57. [57]

    Ahmad and M.U

    M.N. Ahmad and M.U. Rehman,Supersymmetric Hybrid Inflation with K ¨ahler-InducedR-Symmetry Breaking,JCAP08, 061 (2025) [arXiv:2506.23244]

  58. [58]

    Moursy and Q

    A. Moursy and Q. Shafi,Waterfall phase in supersymmetric hybrid inflation,JHEP01, 162 (2026) [arXiv:2507.10460]

  59. [59]

    Armillis and C

    R. Armillis and C. Pallis,Implementing Hilltop F-term Hybrid Inflation in Supergravity,inRecent Ad- vances in Cosmology, edited by A. Travena and B. Soren (Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, 2013) arXiv:1211.4011

  60. [60]

    Panagiotakopoulos,Hybrid inflation in supergravity with(SU(1,1)/U(1)) m Kahler manifolds,Phys

    C. Panagiotakopoulos,Hybrid inflation in supergravity with(SU(1,1)/U(1)) m Kahler manifolds,Phys. Lett. B459, 473 (1999) [hep-ph/9904284]

  61. [61]

    Panagiotakopoulos,Realizations of hybrid inflation in supergravity with natural initial conditions,Phys

    C. Panagiotakopoulos,Realizations of hybrid inflation in supergravity with natural initial conditions,Phys. Rev. D71, 063516 (2005) [hep-ph/0411143]

  62. [62]

    Pallis,K ¨ahler Potentials for Hilltop F-Term Hybrid Inflation,JCAP04, 024 (2009) [arXiv:0902

    C. Pallis,K ¨ahler Potentials for Hilltop F-Term Hybrid Inflation,JCAP04, 024 (2009) [arXiv:0902. 0334]

  63. [63]

    Ahmed, C

    W. Ahmed, C. Pallis and M. Ur Rehman,GUT-Scale Smooth Hybrid Inflation with a Stabilized Modulus in Light of ACT and SPT Data,to appear in JCAParXiv:2510.20478

  64. [64]

    M.M.A. Abid, M. Mehmood, M.U. Rehman and Q. Shafi,Realistic inflation in no-scale U(1) R symmetric flipped SU(5),JCAP10, 015 (2021) [arXiv:2107.05678]

  65. [65]

    Pallis,Gravity-mediated SUSY breaking, R symmetry, and hyperbolic K ¨ahler geometry,Phys

    C. Pallis,Gravity-mediated SUSY breaking, R symmetry, and hyperbolic K ¨ahler geometry,Phys. Rev. D 100, no. 5, 055013 (2019) [arXiv:1812.10284]

  66. [66]

    Pallis,From Minkowski to de Sitter vacua with various geometries,Eur

    C. Pallis,From Minkowski to de Sitter vacua with various geometries,Eur. Phys. J. C83, no. 4, 328 (2023) [arXiv:2211.05067]

  67. [67]

    Einhorn and D.R

    M.B. Einhorn and D.R. T. Jones,Inflation with Non-minimal Gravitational Couplings in Supergravity, JHEP03, 026 (2010) [arXiv:0912.2718]. 22

  68. [68]

    Pallis and N

    C. Pallis and N. Toumbas,Non-Minimal Higgs Inflation and non-Thermal Leptogenesis in a Supersymmet- ric Pati-Salam Model,JCAP12, 002 (2011) [arXiv:1108.1771]

  69. [69]

    Masoud, M.U

    M.A. Masoud, M.U. Rehman and M.M.A. Abid,Nonminimal inflation in supersymmetric GUTs with U(1) R ×Z n symmetry,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28, no.16, 2040015 (2019) [arXiv:1910.10519]

  70. [70]

    N. Ijaz, M. Mehmood and M. U. Rehman,The stochastic gravitational-wave background from primordial black holes and observable proton decay in R-symmetric SU(5) Inflation,Eur. Phys. J. C85, no.12, 1394 (2025) [arXiv:2308.14908]

  71. [71]

    Ahmed, M.U

    W. Ahmed, M.U. Rehman and U. Zubair,Probing stochastic gravitational wave background fromSU(5)×U(1) χ strings in light of NANOGrav 15-year data,JCAP01, 049 (2024) [arXiv:2308.09125]

  72. [72]

    Barbon and J.R

    L.F. Barbon and J.R. Espinosa,On the Naturalness of Higgs Inflation,Phys. Rev. D79, 081302 (2009) [arXiv:0903.0355]

  73. [73]

    Comments on the Starobinsky Model of Inflation and its Descendants

    A. Kehagias, A.M. Dizgah and A. Riotto,Remarks on the Starobinsky model of inflation and its descen- dants,Phys. Rev. D89, 043527 (2014) [arXiv:1312.1155]

  74. [74]

    Mehmood, M

    M. Mehmood, M. U. Rehman and Q. Shafi,Observable proton decay in flipped SU(5),JHEP02, 181 (2021) [arXiv:2010.01665]

  75. [75]

    Lazarides and Q

    G. Lazarides and Q. Shafi,Origin of matter in inflationary cosmology,Phys. Lett.B 258(1991) 305

  76. [76]

    Towards a systematic study of non-thermal leptogenesis from inflaton decays,

    X. Zhang,Towards a systematic study of non-thermal leptogenesis from inflaton decays, JHEP05, 147 (2024) [arXiv:2311.05824]

  77. [77]

    Giudice and A

    G.F. Giudice and A. Romanino,Split supersymmetry,Nucl. Phys.B699, 65 (2004) [Nucl. Phys.B706, 65 (2005)] [hep-ph/0406088]

  78. [78]

    Hall and Y

    L.J. Hall and Y . Nomura,A Finely-Predicted Higgs Boson Mass from A Finely-Tuned Weak Scale,JHEP 03, 076 (2010) [arXiv:0910.2235]

  79. [79]

    Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters

    P.A.R. Adeet al.[Planck Collaboration],Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parametersAstron. As- trophys.594, A13 (2016) [arXiv:1502.01589]

  80. [80]

    CMB anisotropies from cosmic (super)strings in light of ACT DR6,

    J. Raidal, A. Avgoustidis, E. Copeland and A. Moss,CMB anisotropies from cosmic (super)strings in light of ACT DR6,arXiv:2602.18272

Showing first 80 references.