Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Reinforce LLM Reasoning through Multi-Agent Reflection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.08379 v1 pith:YWJEO7GM submitted 2025-06-10 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

Reinforce LLM Reasoning through Multi-Agent Reflection

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL
keywords dpsdpmodelsdirectdynamicfeedbacklearningmulti-agentout-of-distribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Leveraging more test-time computation has proven to be an effective way to boost the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Among various methods, the verify-and-improve paradigm stands out for enabling dynamic solution exploration and feedback incorporation. However, existing approaches often suffer from restricted feedback spaces and lack of coordinated training of different parties, leading to suboptimal performance. To address this, we model this multi-turn refinement process as a Markov Decision Process and introduce DPSDP (Direct Policy Search by Dynamic Programming), a reinforcement learning algorithm that trains an actor-critic LLM system to iteratively refine answers via direct preference learning on self-generated data. Theoretically, DPSDP can match the performance of any policy within the training distribution. Empirically, we instantiate DPSDP with various base models and show improvements on both in- and out-of-distribution benchmarks. For example, on benchmark MATH 500, majority voting over five refinement steps increases first-turn accuracy from 58.2% to 63.2% with Ministral-based models. An ablation study further confirms the benefits of multi-agent collaboration and out-of-distribution generalization.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Precise but Uncoupled: Reviewer Precision Does Not Guarantee Critique Uptake in Multi-Agent Math Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Reviewer precision and critique uptake come apart: a more precise specialized reviewer can be less effective than a less precise shared-state discussion because correct critiques often do not change the next candidate.

  2. Intern-S1-MO: Long-horizon Reasoning Agent for Olympiad?Level Mathematical Problem Solving

    cs.CL 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    A multi-round, lemma-memory reasoning agent with hierarchical RL reaches reported gold-medal-level scores on Olympiad math benchmarks, though the proof-based scores are self-graded.