REVIEW 2 cited by
Self-Guided Action Diffusion
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Self-Guided Action Diffusion
read the original abstract
Recent works have shown the promise of inference-time search over action samples for improving generative robot policies. In particular, optimizing cross-chunk coherence via bidirectional decoding has proven effective in boosting the consistency and reactivity of diffusion policies. However, this approach remains computationally expensive as the diversity of sampled actions grows. In this paper, we introduce self-guided action diffusion, a more efficient variant of bidirectional decoding tailored for diffusion-based policies. At the core of our method is to guide the proposal distribution at each diffusion step based on the prior decision. Experiments in simulation tasks show that the proposed self-guidance enables near-optimal performance at negligible inference cost. Notably, under a tight sampling budget, our method achieves up to 70% higher success rates than existing counterparts on challenging dynamic tasks. See project website at https://rhea-mal.github.io/selfgad.github.io.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Why Does Action Chunking Improve Behavioral Cloning Performance in Robotic Control?
Action chunking in robotic behavioral cloning works mainly because it acts as a delayed-prediction policy and an implicit ensemble, not because of temporal consistency or horizon reduction.
-
ChainVLA: Chaining Vision-Language-Action Queries through a Unified Execution State for Long-Horizon Manipulation
ChainVLA chains vision-language-action queries by carrying both retrieved task progress and the previous prediction's unexecuted suffix into each new action horizon, reaching 62.8% on RMBench and 98.8% on LIBERO.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.