Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

The paper claims that Lorentzian Ricci flow, coupled to a density heat flow, is controlled by monotone F and W entropies and is therefore well-posed for finite flow time.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 15:50 UTC pith:UW6RKZVF

load-bearing objection The centerpiece monotonicity argument fails at Eq. (28) — a Lorentzian tensor square is not nonnegative — and the well-posedness claim collapses with it. the 5 major comments →

arxiv 2509.17733 v3 pith:UW6RKZVF submitted 2025-09-22 gr-qc hep-thmath-phmath.MP

Well-posedness of Ricci Flow in Lorentzian Spacetime and its Entropy Formula

M.J.Luo This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-thmath-phmath.MP MSC 53E2053C5083C05 PACS 04.20.-q04.60.-m
keywords Ricci flowLorentzian geometrymonotone entropywell-posednessconjugate heat equationgradient flowcosmological constantBekenstein-Hawking entropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper aims to extend the classic monotone entropy functionals used for three-dimensional Riemannian Ricci flow to four-dimensional Lorentzian spacetimes. It defines a normalized density on spacetime, builds Shannon, F, and W functionals, and claims their time derivatives are non-negative perfect squares along the coupled Ricci-DeTurck and conjugate heat flow. If true, the coupled system cannot blow up in finite time, because a blow-up would make the monotone functionals diverge. The author concludes that timelike modes of the metric and density are well-posed, and uses the same entropies to recover an action for gravity, a cosmological constant, and the area law for black hole entropy.

Core claim

The central claim is that the Lorentzian Ricci-DeTurck flow, coupled to the conjugate heat flow of a density u, is a gradient flow of monotone entropy functionals. Concretely, the paper asserts dF/dt = 2∫√|g| u (R_μν+∇_μ∇_ν f)^2 ≥ 0 and a similar perfect-square formula for W, with the square interpreted as a Lorentzian contraction that is claimed non-negative by an eigenvalue argument. Monotonicity then implies global control over finite flow time: would-be blow-up of timelike metric modes or of u would force the entropy functionals to infinity, contradicting their boundedness. Under the imposed boundary conditions—vanishing metric variation and vanishing probability current at spacetime inf

What carries the argument

The F-functional F = ∫ d^4X √|g| u (R + (∇f)^2), with u = e^{-f} normalized by ∫√|g|u = 1, together with its Legendre transform W = ∫√|g| u [τ(R + |∇f|^2) + f − D], are the central objects. The argument hinges on identities (27), (32), and (37), which express dF/dt and dW/dt as 2∫√|g| u (A_μν)^2 (or the W analogue with A_μν − (1/2τ)g_μν), where A_μν = R_μν + ∇_μ∇_ν f and the square is the Lorentzian contraction A^μ_ν A^ν_μ. The author assumes this contraction is non-negative because it 'equals the sum of the squares of its eigenvalues'; that positivity converts the time derivatives into perfect squares and makes entropy monotone. The gradient-flow variation of these functionals yields the Ri

Load-bearing premise

The proof's load-bearing premise is Eq. (28): that for any symmetric two-tensor A_μν, the Lorentzian contraction A^μ_ν A^ν_μ is non-negative because it 'equals the sum of the squares of its eigenvalues'; this premise is false for indefinite metrics (e.g. g=diag(-1,1,1,1), A_{01}=A_{10}=1 gives contraction -2), and without it the monotonicity of F and W is unsupported.

What would settle it

Take four-dimensional Minkowski space with metric diag(-1,1,1,1) and the symmetric tensor A with A_{01}=A_{10}=1 and all other components 0; then A^μ_ν A^ν_μ = -2, directly contradicting Eq. (28)'s claim that this contraction is the sum of squared eigenvalues and therefore non-negative. A reader can verify this by index contraction, and the same example can be fed into (27), (32), or (37) to show the asserted monotone inequalities are not proven.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The coupled Ricci-DeTurck and conjugate heat flow system (22) is claimed to be well-posed over finite flow intervals, with no high-frequency blow-up in timelike modes.
  • The F- and W-functionals are monotone along the flow, so any would-be singularity that makes curvature or |∇f| large would contradict finite boundedness.
  • Extremal configurations satisfy the gradient shrinking Ricci soliton equation R_μν + ∇_μ∇_ν f − (1/2τ)g_μν = 0, generalizing Einstein manifolds to fixed points of the flow.
  • The relative Shannon entropy obeys an H-theorem, dÑ/dt ≥ 0, describing relaxation of spacetime toward maximum-entropy, maximally symmetric states.
  • The Shannon entropy of the frame-field density reproduces the Einstein-Hilbert action with a cosmological-constant correction in the infrared limit, and the horizon density gives the Bekenstein-Hawking area law.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The monotonicity proof depends entirely on the sign of the Lorentzian contraction in Eq. (28); a flat-metric counterexample with A_{01}=A_{10}=1 gives contraction -2, so the perfect-square inequalities as stated are not established.
  • A testable extension would be to simulate numerical Ricci flow on a simple Lorentzian spacetime in DeTurck gauge and monitor dW/dt; a sign violation would show exactly where the claimed control breaks down.
  • The boundary assumptions (18)-(19) exclude null boundaries and asymptotically flat data, which are the physically relevant settings for black holes and cosmology; adapting the construction to those cases would be a natural next step.
  • If the entropy monotonicity could be repaired under an additional hypothesis, the paper's physical conclusions—renormalizable gravity action, dark energy as anomaly, and area law—would follow as direct applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Lorentzian generalization of Perelman's monotonic entropy functionals for the coupled Ricci-DeTurck and conjugate heat flow on a four-dimensional spacetime with signature (-,+,+,+). Starting from a normalized positive density u on a spacetime with |det g| volume, the author defines a Shannon entropy N, an F-functional, a relative entropy, and a W-functional, and claims these are monotonically non-decreasing along the flow. From this monotonicity the paper concludes that the entire coupled Lorentzian system is well-posed and that timelike high-frequency blow-up cannot occur. The final sections apply the construction to derive an effective gravitational action and the Bekenstein-Hawking area law for a Schwarzschild black hole.

Significance. If the monotonicity claims were correct, the paper would provide a notable extension of Perelman's entropy formalism to Lorentzian signature and a novel argument for well-posedness of Lorentzian Ricci flow, with possible implications for quantum gravity and black hole thermodynamics. The exposition is organized and the formal parallels to Perelman's Riemannian case are clear. However, the central mathematical step — the claim that a mixed Lorentzian tensor square is always nonnegative — is false. This invalidates the monotonicity of F and W, the relative-entropy inequality, and hence the well-posedness argument. The physical applications, including the black hole entropy, also rely on fitting parameters rather than independent derivation. The paper does not provide machine-checked proofs or verified computations; the algebra is formal and the decisive sign assertion is incorrect.

major comments (5)
  1. [§III.A, Eq. (28)] The claim that (R^μ_ν + ∇^μ∇_ν f)(R^ν_μ + ∇^ν∇_μ f) ≥ 0 is false in Lorentzian signature. For a symmetric two-tensor A_μν, the mixed contraction A^μ_ν A^ν_μ is not a sum of squares of eigenvalues unless the metric is positive definite; the eigenvalues need not be real. Counterexample: with g = diag(-1,1,1,1) and A_01 = A_10 = 1 (all other components zero), A^μ_ν A^ν_μ = -2. Therefore dF/dt in Eq. (27) is not proven nonnegative, and the monotonicity of F is not established.
  2. [§III.B, Eq. (32)] The chain of inequalities in Eq. (32) uses (i) the false nonnegativity from Eq. (28), and (ii) a Cauchy-Schwarz step applied to a Lorentzian contraction. Cauchy-Schwarz requires a positive-semidefinite inner product; the Lorentzian inner product is indefinite, so the inequality 2∫u(R-□log u)^2 ≥ (2/D)F^2 is unjustified. Consequently the claimed H-theorem, Eq. (34), and the bound dÑ/dt ≥ 0 are unsupported.
  3. [§III.C, Eq. (37)] The monotonicity of W collapses for the same reason. The final expression is another Lorentzian tensor square, (R_μν+∇_μ∇_ν f - (1/2τ)g_μν)^2, which again can be negative. Even if the algebra leading to Eq. (37) were formally correct, the asserted nonnegativity has no basis in Lorentzian signature. The equality case and the soliton interpretation therefore also lack support.
  4. [Conclusions and §V] The central claim — that monotonicity of F and W rules out high-frequency blow-up and proves well-posedness of the Lorentzian Ricci-DeTurck and conjugate heat flow — is not established. First, the monotonicity itself fails as noted above. Second, even in the Riemannian case, Perelman's entropy monotonicity is not by itself a local well-posedness theorem; it complements short-time existence and regularity theory. The paper provides no local existence, uniqueness, or continuous-dependence argument for the Lorentzian system, so the conclusion that the whole spacetime is well-posed is a leap from an unproven entropy bound.
  5. [§IV.B, Eq. (52)] The derivation of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is not a prediction: the cutoff is chosen as ϵ^2 = 1/(4πG) so that the coefficient becomes A/(4G). With arbitrary ϵ the entropy is A/(16πϵ²), so the area law with the standard coefficient is imposed by hand. The manipulation involving δ(|k|), the reduction to dk_r δ(k_r), and the integration domain are also heuristic and not rigorously justified. This does not support the paper's physical claims.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (29)] The 'Gaussian-type' density u* is not integrable to 1 over noncompact M^D because the exponent is |X²|/(4τ) and the volume is d^4X√|g|; for large spacelike directions this decays, but for large timelike directions with |X²| = |t² - r²| the decay is not uniform. The paper should state the precise domain or compactification assumed.
  2. [Eq. (42) and Eq. (43)] The relation λ∫d^4x = ∫ d^4X√|g|u = 1 is dimensionally inconsistent as written: λ is the coupling in the action S[X] = (1/2λ)∫ g_μν ∂X^μ∂X^ν, so it has mass dimension, while the right side is dimensionless. The normalization in Eq. (43) needs clarification.
  3. [General presentation] There are numerous grammatical infelicities and duplicated phrases (e.g., 'the the Ricci flow' in the abstract, 'the the density' in the introduction). Equations (5), (20), and (27) contain unnumbered intermediate steps that are hard to follow. It would be helpful to number all displayed equations and to define f = -log u explicitly at first use.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Two 'predictions' (Bekenstein-Hawking coefficient and Einstein-Hilbert action) are obtained by fixing cutoff/identification constants; the central monotonicity claim rests on a false Lorentzian sign assertion.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Section IV.B, after Eq. (52)]
    "If we take the length cutoff to be the Planck length, i.e. ϵ2 = 1/(4πG), and define the thermodynamic entropy as the negative of the Shannon entropy, we arrive at the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy."

    The immediately preceding calculation gives N ≈ −A/(16πϵ²), with ϵ an arbitrary UV cutoff introduced in the momentum integral. The famous A/(4G) is obtained only after choosing ϵ² = 1/(4πG) and multiplying by −1. Thus the coefficient 1/(4G) is inserted by hand; the entropy functional predicts only area proportionality, not the Bekenstein-Hawking normalization. The 'arrival' at Bekenstein-Hawking is a matching condition, not a derived result.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section IV.A, Eqs. (46)-(47)]
    "In the infrared regime, the u density approaches a constant value nearly equal to the cosmic critical density, i.e. u0 = λ = ρc = 3H0^2/(8πG). ... Consequently, the first two terms, u0(D/2 − R(0)τ) = 2λ − λR(0)τ, constitute the Einstein-Hilbert term R(τ)/(16πG) when τ is small at IR."

    The Einstein-Hilbert coefficient 1/(16πG) is not computed from the entropy functional; it is made to appear by identifying u0 with the critical density ρc = 3H0²/(8πG) and R(0) with 12H0². These identifications are exactly the matching conditions that convert λR(0)τ into R(τ)/(16πG). The claimed recovery of Einstein gravity is therefore a choice of constants (a fit), not an independent prediction of the formalism.

full rationale

I found two genuine circular reductions, both in the physical applications section. The black hole entropy calculation produces N ≈ −A/(16πϵ²); the Bekenstein-Hawking value A/(4G) is recovered only after setting ϵ² = 1/(4πG) and taking the thermodynamic entropy to be −N, so the famous coefficient is an input. Likewise, the effective action is said to recover the Einstein-Hilbert term, but the recovery is achieved by choosing u0 = ρc = 3H0²/(8πG) and R(0) = 12H0², precisely the values needed to produce 1/(16πG). These are fitted inputs presented as predictions. The central well-posedness argument in Section III is not itself circular, but it is unsupported: Eq. (28) asserts that the Lorentzian contraction A^μ_ν A^ν_μ is nonnegative because it equals the sum of eigenvalue squares. That is false for indefinite metrics (e.g., g = diag(-1,1,1,1), A01 = A10 = 1 gives −2), so the monotonicity of F, the Cauchy-Schwarz step in Eq. (32), the H-theorem, and the W-functional monotonicity all lack a valid proof. This is a mathematical correctness failure in the load-bearing step rather than a circular identity, so I do not count it as a separate circularity step; it should be weighed heavily when assessing the paper's correctness. The many self-citations [9-19] provide motivation and physical interpretation but are not used to justify the key inequalities or a uniqueness theorem, so they do not add circularity. Overall, partial circularity from the two fitted predictions gives a score of 6.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central derivation relies on six unproved or false assumptions, most importantly the nonnegativity of Lorentzian tensor squares. The two numerical 'predictions' in Section IV are obtained by fitting cutoffs and cosmological inputs. No new entity is independently evidenced.

free parameters (2)
  • UV cutoff epsilon in black hole entropy integral = epsilon^2 = 1/(4 pi G)
    In Eq. (52), the momentum integral diverges as 1/epsilon^2. Choosing the Planck length epsilon^2 = 1/(4 pi G) converts A/(16 pi epsilon^2) into the Bekenstein-Hawking value A/(4G). The famous coefficient is fitted, not derived.
  • Infrared identification u0 = rho_c and R(0) = 12 H0^2 = u0 = rho_c = 3 H0^2/(8 pi G), R(0) = 12 H0^2
    In Eqs. (46)-(47), these identifications are imported from Friedmann cosmology and GR to reproduce the Einstein-Hilbert term R/(16 pi G) and the cosmological constant. The paper then reads off lambda nu as a prediction, but the inputs H0 and G are already on both sides of the equation.
axioms (6)
  • ad hoc to paper For a symmetric 2-tensor A_uv in Lorentzian signature, the mixed contraction A^u_v A^v_u is nonnegative because it equals the sum of squared eigenvalues.
    Invoked in Eq. (28) to prove dF/dt >= 0. False for indefinite metrics; an off-diagonal component with metric diag(-1,1,1,1) gives a negative value. This invalidates the central monotonicity claim.
  • ad hoc to paper Cauchy-Schwarz and Jensen inequalities apply to indefinite Lorentzian contractions in Eq. (32).
    Used to pass from dF/dt = 2 integral u (A^2) to the relative-entropy inequality. Without positive-definiteness of the tensor square, the inequalities do not follow.
  • domain assumption The density current J^mu = grad^mu u vanishes on the spacetime boundary, Eq. (19).
    Needed in Eq. (26) for integration by parts. The paper assumes falloff at spacetime infinity but gives no proof for the constructed u solutions.
  • domain assumption The Gaussian light-cone density u* with ||X||^2 = |g_uv X^u X^v| is an admissible fundamental solution despite non-differentiability on the light cone.
    Used in Section III.B for the H-theorem. The light-cone singularity is acknowledged, but integrability, evolution, and boundary behavior are not established.
  • domain assumption Boundedness of F or W implies control of local curvature and high-frequency modes.
    This is the logical bridge from monotonicity to well-posedness in Section III.C and the Conclusions. Monotonicity of an integrated formal functional does not by itself imply PDE estimates, especially when the integrand is indefinite.
  • domain assumption The u-density can be chosen positive and normalized with integral sqrt(|g|) u = 1 in Lorentzian spacetime.
    Eq. (16) imposes a probability interpretation despite the indefinite metric. The flow may not preserve positivity, and the paper does not prove that such a global density exists.
invented entities (1)
  • Quantum reference frame fields X^mu(x) no independent evidence
    purpose: Provide the microscopic density u and the claimed physical origin of the entropy functionals and gravitational action in Eqs. (41)-(43).
    Borrowed from the author's prior self-cited framework [9-19]. This paper provides no independent falsifiable handle on these fields and uses them to reinterpret the entropy as a gravitational action.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 15865 in / 15232 out tokens · 135048 ms · 2026-08-04T15:50:31.183932+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper attempts to construct monotonic entropy functionals for four-dimensional Lorentzian spacetime under physical boundary conditions, as an extension of Perelman's monotonic entropy functionals constructed for three-dimensional compact Riemannian manifolds. The monotonicity of these entropy functionals is utilized to prove the well-posedness of applying Ricci flow to four-dimensional Lorentzian spacetime for a long flow-time, particularly for the timelike modes which would seem blow up and ill-defined. The general idea is that the Ricci flow of a Lorentzian spacetime metric and the coupled conjugate heat flow of a density on the Lorentzian spacetime as a whole turns out to be the gradient flows of the monotonic functionals for a long flow-time, so the superficial "blow-up" in the individual Ricci flow system or the conjugate heat flow system contradicts the boundedness of the monotonic functionals within finite flow interval, which gives a semi-global control to the whole coupled system. The physical significance and applications of these monotonic entropy functionals in real gravitational systems are also discussed.

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MOND from Second-Order Moment Modified Acceleration and Quantum Equivalence Principle

    gr-qc 2026-02 reject novelty 5.0

    MOND's v⁴=2GM a_bg relation is derived from second-order moment spectral broadening in a de Sitter background, with a_bg=sqrt(Λ/48)≈1.3×10⁻¹⁰ m/s², provided a quantum equivalence principle is assumed.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Hamilton

    Richard S. Hamilton. Three-manifolds with positive ricci curvature.Journal of Differential Geometry, 17(1982):255–306, 1982. 15

    1982

  2. [2]

    Four-manifolds with positive curvature operator.Journal of Differential Geometry, 24(2):153– 179, 1986

    Richard S Hamilton et al. Four-manifolds with positive curvature operator.Journal of Differential Geometry, 24(2):153– 179, 1986

    1986

  3. [3]

    Nonlinear models in 2+εdimensions.Physical Review Letters, 45(13):1057, 1980

    Daniel Friedan. Nonlinear models in 2+εdimensions.Physical Review Letters, 45(13):1057, 1980

    1980

  4. [4]

    D. Friedan. Nonlinear models in dimensions.Annals of Physics, 163(2):318–419, 1980

    1980

  5. [5]

    Deforming metrics in the direction of their ricci tensors.Journal of Differential Geometry, 18(1):157–162, 1983

    Dennis M DeTurck et al. Deforming metrics in the direction of their ricci tensors.Journal of Differential Geometry, 18(1):157–162, 1983

    1983

  6. [6]

    The entropy formula for the ricci flow and its geometric applications.arXiv preprint math/0211159, 2002

    Grisha Perelman. The entropy formula for the ricci flow and its geometric applications.arXiv preprint math/0211159, 2002

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  7. [7]

    Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds.arXiv preprint math/0303109, 2003

    Grisha Perelman. Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds.arXiv preprint math/0303109, 2003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  8. [8]

    Finite extinction time for the solutions to the ricci flow on certain three-manifolds.arXiv preprint math.DG/0307245, 2003

    Grisha Perelman. Finite extinction time for the solutions to the ricci flow on certain three-manifolds.arXiv preprint math.DG/0307245, 2003

    arXiv 2003

  9. [9]

    M. J. Luo. The cosmological constant problem and re-interpretation of time.Nuclear Physics, 884(1):344–356, 2014

    2014

  10. [10]

    M. J. Luo. Dark energy from quantum uncertainty of distant clock.Journal of High Energy Physics, 06(063):1–11, 2015

    2015

  11. [11]

    M. J. Luo. The cosmological constant problem and quantum spacetime reference frame.Int. J. Mod. Phys., D27(08):1850081, 2018

    2018

  12. [12]

    M. J. Luo. Ricci Flow Approach to The Cosmological Constant Problem.Found. Phys., 51(1):2, 2021

    2021

  13. [13]

    M. J. Luo. Trace anomaly, Perelman’s functionals and the cosmological constant.Class. Quant. Grav., 38(15):155018, 2021

    2021

  14. [14]

    M. J. Luo. Local conformal instability and local non-collapsing in the Ricci flow of quantum spacetime.Annals Phys., 441:168861, 2022

    2022

  15. [15]

    M. J. Luo. A Statistical Fields Theory underlying the Thermodynamics of Ricci Flow and Gravity.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 32(5):2350022, 2 2023

    2023

  16. [16]

    M. J. Luo. Quantum Modified Gravity at Low Energy in the Ricci Flow of Quantum Spacetime.Int. J. Theor. Phys., 62(4):91, 2023

    2023

  17. [17]

    M. J. Luo. Local Short-Time Acceleration induced Spectral Line Broadening and Possible Implications in Cosmology. Annals of Physics, 473:169899, November 2024

    2024

  18. [18]

    M. J. Luo. The Ricci flow and the early universe.Annals of Physics, 458:169452, November 2023

    2023

  19. [19]

    M. J. Luo. Second-order moment quantum fluctuations and quantum equivalence principle.Phys. Lett. A, 535:130273, 2025

    2025

  20. [20]

    Carfora and A

    M. Carfora and A. Marzuoli. Smoothing out spatially closed cosmologies.Physical Review Letters, 53(25):2445–2448, 1984

    1984

  21. [21]

    Averaging, renormalization group and criticality in cosmology

    Kamilla Piotrkowska. Averaging, renormalization group and criticality in cosmology. 8 1995

    1995

  22. [22]

    Regional averaging and scaling in relativistic cosmology.Class

    Thomas Buchert and Mauro Carfora. Regional averaging and scaling in relativistic cosmology.Class. Quant. Grav., 19:6109–6145, 2002

    2002

  23. [23]

    Ricci flow deformation of cosmological initial data sets

    Mauro Carfora and Thomas Buchert. Ricci flow deformation of cosmological initial data sets. In14th International Conference on Waves and Stability in Continuous Media, 1 2008

    2008

  24. [24]

    ultraviolet catastrophe

    (where Euclidean time allows for the normal application of the conventional Ricci flow), in order to circumvent the ill-posedness issues associated with applying the Ricci flow to Lorentzian spacetime. However, these attempts fail to preserve the causal structure of real spacetime and can thus only be regarded as approximations. Currently, there are only ...

  25. [25]

    Ricci flow and black holes.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 23(23):6683–6707, 2006

    Matthew Headrick and Toby Wiseman. Ricci flow and black holes.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 23(23):6683–6707, 2006

    2006

  26. [26]

    Cartas-Fuentevilla, A

    R. Cartas-Fuentevilla, A. Herrera-Aguilar, and J. A. Herrera-Mendoza. Constructing lifshitz spaces using the ricci flow. Annals of Physics, 415:168093, 2020

    2020

  27. [27]

    Cartas-Fuentevilla, A

    R. Cartas-Fuentevilla, A. Herrera-Aguilar, and J. A. Olvera-Santamaría. Evolution and metric signature change of maxi- mally symmetric spaces under the Ricci flow.Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 133(6):235, 2018

    2018

  28. [28]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov. Irreversibility of the Flux of the Renormalization Group in a 2D Field Theory.JETP Lett., 43:730–732, 1986

    1986

  29. [29]

    H. Osborn. Derivation of a four dimensional c-theorem for renormaliseable quantum field theories.Physics Letters B, 222(1):97–102, 1989

    1989

  30. [30]

    Jack and H

    I. Jack and H. Osborn. Analogs of the c-theorem for four-dimensional renormalisable field theories.Nuclear Physics B, 343(3):647–688, 1990

    1990

  31. [31]

    Field theory entropy, thehtheorem, and the renormalization group.Phys

    José Gaite and Denjoe O’Connor. Field theory entropy, thehtheorem, and the renormalization group.Phys. Rev. D, 54:5163–5173, Oct 1996

    1996

  32. [32]

    John L. Cardy. Is There a c Theorem in Four-Dimensions?Phys. Lett. B, 215:749–752, 1988

    1988

  33. [33]

    Space-time energy decreases under world sheet RG flow.JHEP, 01:073, 2003

    Michael Gutperle, Matthew Headrick, Shiraz Minwalla, and Volker Schomerus. Space-time energy decreases under world sheet RG flow.JHEP, 01:073, 2003

    2003

  34. [34]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta. A Finite entanglement entropy and the c-theorem.Phys. Lett. B, 600:142–150, 2004

    2004

  35. [35]

    Oliynyk, V

    T. Oliynyk, V. Suneeta, and E. Woolgar. Irreversibility of world-sheet renormalization group flow.Phys. Lett. B, 610:115– 121, 2005

    2005

  36. [36]

    Oliynyk, V

    T. Oliynyk, V. Suneeta, and E. Woolgar. A Gradient flow for worldsheet nonlinear sigma models.Nucl. Phys. B, 739:441– 458, 2006

    2006

  37. [37]

    Tseytlin

    Arkady A. Tseytlin. On sigma model RG flow, ’central charge’ action and Perelman’s entropy.Phys. Rev. D, 75:064024, 2007

    2007

  38. [38]

    On renormalization group flows in four dimensions.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2011(12):1–20, 2011

    Zohar Komargodski and Adam Schwimmer. On renormalization group flows in four dimensions.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2011(12):1–20, 2011

    2011

  39. [39]

    Vacaru, and Olivia Vacaru

    Vyacheslav Ruchin, Sergiu I. Vacaru, and Olivia Vacaru. On Relativistic Generalization of Perelman’s W-entropy and Statistical Thermodynamic Description of Gravitational Fields.Eur. Phys. J. C, 77(3):184, 2017

    2017

  40. [40]

    Vacaru, and Elşen Veli Veliev

    Iuliana Bubuianu, Sergiu I. Vacaru, and Elşen Veli Veliev. Quantum geometric information flows and relativistic gener- 16 alizations of G. Perelman thermodynamics for nonholonomic Einstein systems with black holes and stationary solitonic hierarchies.Quant. Inf. Proc., 21(2):51, 2022

    2022

  41. [41]

    Entropyfunctionalsandthermodynamicsofrelativisticgeometric flows, stationary quasi-periodic Ricci solitons, and gravity.Annals Phys., 423:168333, 2020

    IulianaBubuianu, SergiuI.Vacaru, andElşenVeliVeliev. Entropyfunctionalsandthermodynamicsofrelativisticgeometric flows, stationary quasi-periodic Ricci solitons, and gravity.Annals Phys., 423:168333, 2020

    2020

  42. [42]

    Vacaru, Elşen Veli Veliev, and Laurenţiu Bubuianu

    Sergiu I. Vacaru, Elşen Veli Veliev, and Laurenţiu Bubuianu. Off-diagonal cosmological solutions in emergent gravity theories and Grigory Perelman entropy for geometric flows.Eur. Phys. J. C, 81(1):81, 2021

    2021