Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 1 cited by

High luminosities and compact radii produce featureless spectra in luminous transients by driving high ionization.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-05-16 17:38 UTC

load-bearing objection The paper maps luminosity and radius to H/He line presence or absence using 1D radiative transfer, but the claim that non-homologous outflows are required rests on an untested extrapolation. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2601.00947 v2 submitted 2026-01-02 astro-ph.HE

The Emission and Suppression of Line Features in Luminous Transients

Olivia Aspegren , Daniel Kasen This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords LFBOTTDEfeatureless spectraradiative transferoutflowsluminous transientsionizationspectral lines
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper maps the conditions under which H, He I, and He II lines appear or vanish in the optical and UV spectra of luminous fast transients. Using one-dimensional radiative transfer, it shows that luminosities above 10^44 erg/s and radii below 10^14 cm heat and ionize the gas enough to erase lines, while intermediate or lower values produce He II or H/He I features. Large velocities above 0.1c can blend remaining lines into the continuum. The same framework is applied to LFBOTs and featureless TDEs to argue that only compact, non-homologous outflows can keep spectra featureless under optically thick, quasi-thermal conditions. Readers would care because the result ties a puzzling observational signature directly to measurable source properties.

Core claim

We describe the landscape of source and gas properties that are expected to form H, He I and He II emission lines, and map spectral types to the parameter space of luminosity and system radius. Using one-dimensional radiative transfer calculations, we show that high source luminosities (L > 10^44 erg s^{-1}) and compact ejecta radii (r < 10^14 cm) produce featureless spectra due to the high temperature and ionization state of the emitting medium. Intermediate luminosities and moderately compact systems can generate He II-dominated spectra, while lower luminosities and more extended atmospheres result in conspicuous H and He I emission. Large expansion velocities (v ≥ 0.1c) can further widen

What carries the argument

One-dimensional radiative transfer calculations that map source luminosity, ejecta radius, and velocity to the resulting spectral type under optically thick quasi-thermal conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The systems are optically thick and quasi-thermal, allowing one-dimensional radiative transfer to accurately predict whether lines appear or are suppressed.

What would settle it

Detection of clear H or He I lines in a transient whose luminosity exceeds 10^44 erg s^{-1} and radius is below 10^14 cm would contradict the predicted featurelessness.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Luminosities above 10^44 erg/s and radii below 10^14 cm erase optical and UV lines through high temperature and ionization.
  • Intermediate luminosities and radii produce spectra dominated by He II emission.
  • Lower luminosities and larger radii yield strong H and He I lines.
  • Velocities at or above 0.1c broaden lines until they blend into the continuum.
  • Featureless UV spectra require even higher ionization or velocity to suppress metal lines.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The requirement for non-homologous outflows implies that real events deviate from simple spherical expansion.
  • As the transient expands and luminosity drops, spectra should develop lines once they cross the mapped thresholds.
  • The same ionization argument could be tested against radius measurements from independent methods such as light-curve modeling.
  • Asymmetric or clumpy geometries not captured in one dimension might allow featurelessness at somewhat lower luminosities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses one-dimensional radiative transfer calculations to map luminosity L, radius r, and velocity v in optically thick, quasi-thermal outflows to resulting optical/UV spectral types. High L (>10^44 erg s^{-1}) and compact r (<10^14 cm) produce featureless spectra via high temperature and ionization; intermediate values yield He II-dominated spectra; lower L and larger r produce H and He I lines. Velocities v >= 0.1c broaden lines into the continuum. The framework is applied to LFBOTs and featureless TDEs, concluding that non-homologous compact outflows are necessary to sustain featurelessness.

Significance. If the parameter mapping holds, the work supplies a physically grounded interpretive framework for the puzzling absence of lines in luminous fast transients, connecting observed spectral types directly to ionization state, temperature, and velocity. The systematic exploration of L-r-v space offers a useful reference for future modeling and observations of LFBOTs and TDEs.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and application to LFBOTs/TDEs] Abstract and final application section: the claim that non-homologous compact outflows are 'likely necessary' for featurelessness is not directly supported by the presented calculations. The 1D RT models map L, r, and v to spectra but provide no indication that the velocity law itself was varied (e.g., homologous v ∝ r versus constant-velocity or broken-power-law non-homologous profiles). The specific necessity of non-homologous structure therefore remains an extrapolation.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Methods] The assumptions on the velocity field (homologous or otherwise) and the exact form of the density profile used in the radiative transfer code should be stated explicitly in the methods section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough and constructive review. The major comment highlights an important distinction between our direct calculations and the inferences drawn for LFBOTs and TDEs. We address this point below and have revised the manuscript to clarify the basis of our conclusions without overstating the direct support from the models.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and application to LFBOTs/TDEs] Abstract and final application section: the claim that non-homologous compact outflows are 'likely necessary' for featurelessness is not directly supported by the presented calculations. The 1D RT models map L, r, and v to spectra but provide no indication that the velocity law itself was varied (e.g., homologous v ∝ r versus constant-velocity or broken-power-law non-homologous profiles). The specific necessity of non-homologous structure therefore remains an extrapolation.

    Authors: We agree that the radiative transfer calculations assume a fixed homologous velocity profile (v ∝ r) and do not explicitly vary the functional form of the velocity law. The statement that non-homologous compact outflows are likely necessary is therefore an inference drawn from the mapped L–r–v parameter space rather than a direct result of comparing different velocity structures. To sustain the high luminosities and compact radii (r < 10^14 cm) required for persistent featurelessness over the observed timescales, a single homologous ejection would expand and dilute too rapidly to remain in the featureless regime. Non-homologous structure (e.g., continuous injection or stratified velocity fields) is thus required on physical grounds to keep the emitting region compact and optically thick. We have revised the abstract and the final application section to make this distinction explicit, to qualify the claim as an inference from the physical requirements, and to avoid implying that velocity-law variations were directly simulated. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation from radiative transfer modeling

full rationale

The paper performs forward one-dimensional radiative transfer calculations that map input parameters (luminosity L, radius r, velocity v) to output spectral types (featureless, He II-dominated, or H/He I lines). This generates predictions from physical assumptions rather than fitting parameters to the target observations or defining the result in terms of itself. The final claim that non-homologous compact outflows are necessary is an application of the modeled parameter space to LFBOTs/TDEs, not a self-referential reduction. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or smuggled ansatzes appear in the derivation chain. The modeling is independent and self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions in radiative transfer modeling for optically thick media, with no new free parameters or invented entities introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The emitting medium is optically thick and quasi-thermal
    This assumption is invoked to justify applying 1D radiative transfer calculations to predict when lines are suppressed or appear.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5546 in / 1298 out tokens · 78952 ms · 2026-05-16T17:38:44.991032+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Featureless optical and ultraviolet (UV) spectra are a puzzling signature to emerge from recent observations of luminous fast blue optical transients (LFBOTs) and some tidal disruption events (TDEs). We describe the landscape of source and gas properties that are expected to form H, He I and He II emission lines, and map spectral types to the parameter space of luminosity and system radius. Using one-dimensional radiative transfer calculations, we show that high source luminosities ($L > 10^{44}\,\rm erg~s^{-1}$) and compact ejecta radii ($r < 10^{14}\,\rm cm$) produce featureless spectra due to the high temperature and ionization state of the emitting medium. Intermediate luminosities and moderately compact systems can generate He II-dominated spectra, while lower luminosities and more extended atmospheres result in conspicuous H and He I emission. Large expansion velocities ($v \geq 0.1c$) can further broaden lines such that they blend into the continuum. Featureless UV spectra may require even more extreme ionization environments or velocities to suppress the many intrinsically strong metal lines at those wavelengths. Applying this framework to understand the absence of features observed in LFBOTs and featureless TDEs, we find that under the optically thick, quasi-thermal conditions considered here, non-homologous, compact outflows are likely necessary for featurelessness to persist in optical and UV spectra.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.00947 by Daniel Kasen, Olivia Aspegren.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The comoving luminosity at the thermalization depth (magenta) and photosphere (orange) as well as the final outgoing spectrum (black) from a 1 M⊙ cloud with rt = 1015 cm surrounding a source with L = 1043 erg s−1 . Each radius is calculated in the optical wavelength range (at 6000 ˚A), where electron scattering opacity dominates. The inset shows the Hα line emitted at each depth, forming up to the outgoing… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Estimate of the line-to-continuum ratio for Hα (orange), He I λ5876 (green) and He II λ4686 (blue) as a function of T, evaluated at the photosphere (Eq. 14). We take a 1 M⊙ cloud composed of H and He, with a power-law density structure and rt = 1014 cm. We expect features to evolve as the temperature varies. (b) Synthetic spectra of models with photospheric temperatures in the range 10000 to 40000 K. W… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The parameter space of line emission and sup￾pression as a function of bolometric luminosity, L, and ejecta radius, rt, for a 1 M⊙ cloud expanding at v = 0.05c. The shaded regions show the approximate ratio of line to con￾tinuum emission, with values ranging from 10−2 to 50. The orange contours represent the conditions where Hα appears, while green contours correspond to He I λ5876 emission and blue contou… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Synthetic optical spectra emitted by 1 M⊙ ejecta surrounding sources of five different bolometric luminosities. Each cloud has a solar composition and expands at a constant velocity of 0.05c. (b) Synthetic spectra from clouds with five characteristic ejecta radii. Each model has a bolometric luminosity of 1043 erg s−1 , a mass of 1 M⊙ and an expansion velocity of 0.05c. As the luminosity goes up, and a… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Synthetic spectra from material moving at 0.03c up to 0.2c. Each model has a mass of 1 M⊙, a radius of 1015 cm and a luminosity of 1043 erg s−1 . The increased line broadening at higher velocities washes out the emission fea￾tures and makes them less conspicuous. nent, narrow Balmer lines and He I λ5876. As we in￾crease the velocity, line features broaden and become less noticeable relative to the continuu… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Synthetic Hα line profiles from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Synthetic spectra produced by four clouds with varying masses from 0.01 to 10 M⊙. Each cloud has a characteristic radius of 1015 cm as well as an expansion velocity of 0.05c, and surrounds a source with a bolometric luminosity of 1043 erg s−1 . (b) The density profiles for each cloud. We calculate the mass-loss rates corresponding to each atmosphere, and indicate the photospheres of each density profil… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Synthetic optical spectra from helium-rich, 1 M⊙ ejecta with five bolometric luminosities. The medium expands at a constant velocity of 0.05c. (b) Spectra from helium-rich material with five characteristic radii. Each cloud surrounds a 1043 erg s−1 source, has a mass of 1 M⊙ and expands at 0.05c. At the highest luminosities, optical line emission is mostly suppressed. The spectra from compact systems (… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) Synthetic optical spectra from carbon/oxygen-rich ejecta with five input bolometric luminosities. Each cloud has M = 1M⊙, rt = 1015 cm and a constant velocity of 0.05c. (b) Synthetic spectra from carbon/oxygen-rich gas with five characteristic ejecta radii, M = 1 M⊙ and v = 0.05c, surrounding a central source emitting 1043 erg s−1 . While the emission and absorption lines weaken as the source brightens… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) Synthetic UV spectra from ejecta surrounding sources of varying luminosities. We use M = 1 M⊙ and an expansion velocity of 0.1c. Even at the highest source luminosity, some absorption features form at UV wavelengths. (b) Synthetic UV spectra from clouds with varying characteristic radii. For each model, a 1 M⊙ ejecta surrounds a 1043 erg s−1 source and expands at v = 0.1c. The most compact system can … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Synthetic spectra emitted from a 1 M⊙ ejecta undergoing homologous expansion with AT 2024wpp-like conditions. The luminosity evolves as L ∝ t −3.4 , the medium has solar metallicity and the velocity at the power-law break is 0.1c. By forty days, there are strong, broad emission fea￾tures unlike those observed in AT 2024wpp. A higher ejecta mass could prolong feature suppres￾sion, as the photosphere would … view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Synthetic spectra emitted from two outflows with constant velocities and mass-loss rates at (a) five days, with a source emitting 1.5 × 1045 erg s−1 and (b) forty days, with L = 8 × 1042 erg s−1 . One outflow has a mass-loss rate of 1 M⊙ yr−1 and moves at 0.2c (blue), while the other has M˙ = 50 M⊙ yr−1 and expands at 0.005c (gold). The inset shows the sum of the two forty-day spectra (black) in the optic… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Using one-dimensional radiative transfer calculations, we show that high source luminosities (L > 10^44 erg s^{-1}) and compact ejecta radii (r < 10^14 cm) produce featureless spectra due to the high temperature and ionization state of the emitting medium.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Implications of the UV/optical Plateau of AT2018cow

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A wind-and-irradiation disk model fits the AT2018cow UV plateau with accretor masses from 1.4 to ~100 solar masses, removing the need for a >200 solar-mass black hole.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2025, MNRAS, 541, 2674, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1113

    Aamer, A., Nicholl, M., Gomez, S., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 541, 2674, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1113

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1113 2025

  2. [2]

    W., Perley, D

    Andreoni, I., Coughlin, M. W., Perley, D. A., et al. 2022, Nature, 612, 430, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05465-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05465-8 2022

  3. [3]

    M., Howell, D

    Arcavi, I., Wolf, W. M., Howell, D. A., et al. 2016, ApJ, 819, 35, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/35

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/819/1/35 2016

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Barbarino, C., Sollerman, J., Taddia, F., et al. 2021, A&A, 651, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038890

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038890 2021

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Blagorodnova, N., Cenko, S. B., Kulkarni, S. R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab04b0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab04b0 2019

  6. [6]

    J., Lanz, T., & Fullerton, A

    Bouret, J.-C., Hillier, D. J., Lanz, T., & Fullerton, A. W. 2012, A&A, 544, A67, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118594

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118594 2012

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    Bright, J. S., Margutti, R., Matthews, D., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, 112, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4506

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4506 2022

  8. [8]

    S., Kochanek, C

    Brown, J. S., Kochanek, C. S., Holoien, T. W.-S., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 1130, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2372

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2372 2018

  9. [9]

    B., Krimm, H

    Cenko, S. B., Krimm, H. A., Horesh, A., et al. 2012, ApJ, 753, 77, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/77

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/753/1/77 2012

  10. [10]

    doi:10.3847/2041-8205/818/2/L32 , journal=

    Cenko, S. B., Cucchiara, A., Roth, N., et al. 2016, ApJL, 818, L32, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/818/2/L32 Featureless Spectra from Luminous Transients17

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/818/2/l32 2016

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    Charalampopoulos, P., Leloudas, G., Malesani, D. B., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142122

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142122 2022

  12. [12]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.18985, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.18985

    Chen, C., & Shen, R.-F. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.18985, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.18985

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.18985 2024

  13. [13]

    A., Jonker, P

    Chrimes, A. A., Jonker, P. G., Levan, A. J., & Mummery, A. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.03402, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.03402

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.03402 2025

  14. [14]

    A., Jonker, P

    Chrimes, A. A., Jonker, P. G., Levan, A. J., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, L47, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slad145

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad145 2024

  15. [15]

    L., Margutti, R., Terreran, G., et al

    Coppejans, D. L., Margutti, R., Terreran, G., et al. 2020, ApJL, 895, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8cc7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab8cc7 2020

  16. [16]

    R., & Begelman, M

    Coughlin, E. R., & Begelman, M. C. 2014, ApJ, 781, 82, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/781/2/82

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/781/2/82 2014

  17. [17]

    Crowther, P. A. 2007, ARA&A, 45, 177, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110615

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110615 2007

  18. [18]

    Miller, M. C. 2018, ApJL, 859, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aab429

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aab429 2018

  19. [19]

    2019, A&A, 621, A141, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834535

    Dessart, L. 2019, A&A, 621, A141, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834535

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834535 2019

  20. [20]

    R., Chornock, R., Soderberg, A

    Drout, M. R., Chornock, R., Soderberg, A. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 794, 23, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/794/1/23

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/794/1/23 2014

  21. [21]

    W., Smartt, S

    Fulton, M., Chen, T. W., Smartt, S. J., et al. 2024, Transient Name Server AstroNote, 206, 1 Guti´ errez, C. P., Mattila, S., Lundqvist, P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 977, 162, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad89a5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad89a5 2024

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    Hammerstein, E., van Velzen, S., Gezari, S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 942, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca283

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca283 2023

  23. [23]

    R., Millman , K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    Hinkle, J. T., Holoien, T. W. S., Shappee, B. J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5f54

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac5f54 2022

  25. [25]

    Ho, A. Y. Q., Phinney, E. S., Ravi, V., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 73, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf473

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf473 2019

  26. [26]

    Ho, A. Y. Q., Perley, D. A., Kulkarni, S. R., et al. 2020, ApJ, 895, 49, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8bcf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8bcf 2020

  27. [27]

    Ho, A. Y. Q., Perley, D. A., Gal-Yam, A., et al. 2023a, ApJ, 949, 120, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc533

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc533

  28. [28]

    Ho, A. Y. Q., Perley, D. A., Chen, P., et al. 2023b, Nature, 623, 927, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06673-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06673-6

  29. [29]

    Ho, A. Y. Q., Yao, Y., Matsumoto, T., et al. 2025, ApJ, 989, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade8f2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade8f2 2025

  30. [30]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  31. [31]

    ApJ , author =

    Kasen, D., Thomas, R. C., & Nugent, P. 2006, ApJ, 651, 366, doi: 10.1086/506190

    work page doi:10.1086/506190 2006

  32. [32]

    K., & Kasen, D

    Khatami, D. K., & Kasen, D. N. 2024, ApJ, 972, 140, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad60c0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad60c0 2024

  33. [33]

    Klencki, J., & Metzger, B. D. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.09745, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.09745

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.09745 2025

  34. [34]

    L., et al

    Kremer, K., Lu, W., Piro, A. L., et al. 2021, ApJ, 911, 104, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abeb14

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abeb14 2021

  35. [35]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.00951, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.00951

    LeBaron, N., Margutti, R., Chornock, R., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.00951, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.00951

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.00951 2025

  36. [36]

    1997, ApJ, 489, 573, doi: 10.1086/304814

    Loeb, A., & Ulmer, A. 1997, ApJ, 489, 573, doi: 10.1086/304814

    work page doi:10.1086/304814 1997

  37. [37]

    D., Chornock, R., et al

    Margutti, R., Metzger, B. D., Chornock, R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aafa01

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafa01 2019

  38. [38]

    D., et al

    Matthews, D., Margutti, R., Metzger, B. D., et al. 2023, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 7, 126, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/acdde1

    work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/acdde1 2023

  39. [39]

    A., Sullivan, M., Pian, E., Greiner, J., & Kann, D

    Mazzali, P. A., Sullivan, M., Pian, E., Greiner, J., & Kann, D. A. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 3455, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw512

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw512 2016

  40. [40]

    Metzger, B. D. 2022a, ApJ, 932, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6d59 —. 2022b, ApJL, 937, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac90ba

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6d59 2041

  41. [41]

    D., & Perley, D

    Metzger, B. D., & Perley, D. A. 2023, ApJ, 944, 74, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acae89

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acae89 2023

  42. [42]

    D., & Stone, N

    Metzger, B. D., & Stone, N. C. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 948, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1394

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1394 2016

  43. [43]

    J., Margutti, R., Wiston, E., et al

    Nayana, A. J., Margutti, R., Wiston, E., et al. 2025, ApJL, 993, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae0b4d

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0b4d 2025

  44. [44]

    O., Ozer, L., Konno, R., et al

    Ofek, E. O., Ozer, L., Konno, R., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.18359, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.18359

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.18359 2025

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    Parkinson, E. J., Knigge, C., Dai, L., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 540, 3069, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf880

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf880 2025

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    Parkinson, E. J., Knigge, C., Matthews, J. H., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 5426, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac027

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac027 2022

  47. [47]

    A., et al

    Perley, D. A., Mazzali, P. A., Yan, L., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 1031, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3420

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3420 2019

  48. [48]

    A., et al

    Perley, D. A., Ho, A. Y. Q., Yao, Y., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 5138, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2785

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2785 2021

  49. [49]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Piro, A. L., & Lu, W. 2020, ApJ, 894, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab83f6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab83f6 2020

  50. [50]

    J., Maguire, K., Smartt, S

    Prentice, S. J., Maguire, K., Smartt, S. J., et al. 2018, ApJL, 865, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aadd90

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aadd90 2018

  51. [51]

    L., Kuncarayakti, H., et al

    Pursiainen, M., Killestein, T. L., Kuncarayakti, H., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 3298, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf232

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf232 2025

  52. [52]

    Quataert, E., Lecoanet, D., & Coughlin, E. R. 2019, MNRAS, 485, L83, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slz031

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slz031 2019

  53. [53]

    M., De Cia, A., Gal-Yam, A., et al

    Quimby, R. M., De Cia, A., Gal-Yam, A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 855, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaac2f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaac2f 2018

  54. [54]

    What Sets the Line Profiles in Tidal Disruption Events? , volume =

    Roth, N., & Kasen, D. 2018, ApJ, 855, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaec6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaaec6 2018

  55. [55]

    The X-Ray through Optical Fluxes and Line Strengths of Tidal Disruption Events , volume =

    Roth, N., Kasen, D., Guillochon, J., & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. 2016, ApJ, 827, 3, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/3

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/827/1/3 2016

  56. [56]

    2009, title Clustering of luminous red galaxies - III

    Strubbe, L. E., & Quataert, E. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 2070, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15599.x 18

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15599.x 2009

  57. [57]

    ApJ , author =

    Thomsen, L. L., Kwan, T. M., Dai, L., et al. 2022, ApJL, 937, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac911f

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac911f 2022

  58. [58]

    2025, ApJ, 986, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add158

    Tsuna, D., & Lu, W. 2025, ApJ, 986, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add158

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add158 2025

  59. [59]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Uno, K., & Maeda, K. 2020, ApJ, 897, 156, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9632

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9632 2020

  60. [60]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.07380, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.07380

    Wise, J., Perley, D., Sarin, N., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2507.07380, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.07380

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.07380 2025

  61. [61]

    Yao, Y., Ho, A. Y. Q., Medvedev, P., et al. 2022a, ApJ, 934, 104, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7a41

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7a41

  62. [62]

    , keywords =

    Yao, Y., Lu, W., Guolo, M., et al. 2022b, ApJ, 937, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac898a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac898a

  63. [63]

    , keywords =

    Yao, Y., Ravi, V., Gezari, S., et al. 2023, ApJL, 955, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf216

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acf216 2023

  64. [64]

    D., Lu, W., et al

    Yao, Y., Alexander, K. D., Lu, W., et al. 2025, ApJ, 993, 198, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae08b3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae08b3 2025

  65. [65]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.22211, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.22211

    Zhu, J., Jiang, N., Wang, Y., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.22211, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2510.22211

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.22211 2025