arxiv: 2601.21503 · v1 · submitted 2026-01-29 · 💻 cs.AI · cs.CL· cs.LG· cs.NE

Recognition: no theorem link

MAR: Efficient Large Language Models via Module-aware Architecture Refinement

Junhong Cai , Guiqin Wang , Kejie Zhao , Jianxiong Tang , Xiang Wang , Luziwei Leng , Ran Cheng , Yuxin Ma

show 1 more author

Qinghai Guo

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 10:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LGcs.NE

keywords large language modelsstate space modelsspiking neural networksarchitecture refinementenergy efficient inferenceactivation sparsificationmodel efficiency

0 comments

The pith

Module-aware Architecture Refinement combines state space models and spiking neurons to cut energy use in large language models while matching dense model performance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents Module-aware Architecture Refinement as a two-stage process that swaps quadratic attention for state space models and sparsifies feed-forward activations to lower costs. It adds Adaptive Ternary Multi-step Neurons and a Spike-aware Bidirectional Distillation Strategy to fix information loss and timing problems when spiking networks join state space models. Experiments show the resulting models recover performance of their dense versions under tight resource limits and use far less energy during inference. The approach also beats other efficient models of similar or greater size on standard tasks.

Core claim

MAR integrates State Space Models for linear-time sequence modeling and applies activation sparsification to reduce Feed-Forward Network costs, while Adaptive Ternary Multi-step Neurons and Spike-aware Bidirectional Distillation Strategy address low information density and temporal mismatch in SNN-SSM hybrids, restoring dense-model performance under constrained resources and cutting inference energy consumption.

What carries the argument

Module-aware Architecture Refinement (MAR), a two-stage framework that integrates State Space Models (SSMs) for linear sequence modeling with activation sparsification, supported by Adaptive Ternary Multi-step Neuron (ATMN) and Spike-aware Bidirectional Distillation Strategy (SBDS) for SNN-SSM compatibility.

If this is right

Sequence modeling becomes linear in length rather than quadratic, enabling longer contexts at fixed cost.
Inference energy drops substantially while accuracy stays close to the original dense model.
The same refinement pattern can be applied to other modules to further trim compute.
Efficient models built this way outperform prior sparse or compressed alternatives of equal or larger scale.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Deployment on power-limited hardware becomes practical without custom hardware accelerators.
The hybrid SNN-SSM pattern may extend to vision or multimodal models that face similar density and timing issues.
Future work could test whether the same two-stage refinement improves training speed as well as inference.

Load-bearing premise

Adaptive Ternary Multi-step Neurons and Spike-aware Bidirectional Distillation Strategy can fully compensate for low information density and timing mismatches in spiking-state space hybrids without hidden performance penalties.

What would settle it

A side-by-side run on standard language benchmarks where the MAR model loses more than a few percent accuracy relative to its dense counterpart at the same parameter or compute budget, or shows no measurable drop in inference energy.

read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel across diverse domains but suffer from high energy costs due to quadratic attention and dense Feed-Forward Network (FFN) operations. To address these issues, we propose Module-aware Architecture Refinement (MAR), a two-stage framework that integrates State Space Models (SSMs) for linear-time sequence modeling and applies activation sparsification to reduce FFN costs. In addition, to mitigate low information density and temporal mismatch in integrating Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) with SSMs, we design the Adaptive Ternary Multi-step Neuron (ATMN) and the Spike-aware Bidirectional Distillation Strategy (SBDS). Extensive experiments demonstrate that MAR effectively restores the performance of its dense counterpart under constrained resources while substantially reducing inference energy consumption. Furthermore, it outperforms efficient models of comparable or even larger scale, underscoring its potential for building efficient and practical LLMs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

MAR combines SSMs with sparsification and two new SNN components (ATMN, SBDS) to cut LLM energy use while claiming to match dense performance, but the abstract supplies no numbers or ablations to check whether those components actually deliver.

read the letter

The core takeaway is that this paper offers a two-stage MAR framework that swaps quadratic attention for SSMs, sparsifies FFN activations, and adds ATMN plus SBDS to make SNNs compatible with the SSM backbone. The abstract states that the result restores dense-model accuracy under resource limits and beats some larger efficient baselines on energy. That combination is the main novelty: the specific module-aware integration and the two named pieces for handling spike sparsity and timing mismatch. The motivation from attention and dense FFN costs is clear and the design draws sensibly from existing SSM and SNN work without obvious circularity. If the full experiments hold up, the approach could give practitioners a concrete recipe for lower-inference-cost LLMs. The paper does a reasonable job framing the problem and naming the new modules. The soft spots sit in the evidence. The abstract asserts extensive experiments and performance restoration but shows no tables, baselines, error bars, or ablation numbers. The stress-test concern lands: without isolating what ATMN and SBDS contribute versus a plain SSM-plus-SNN setup, it is hard to tell whether the claimed fixes for information density and temporal mismatch are real or just assumed. If the manuscript contains those controls and reproducible energy measurements, the work strengthens; if not, the central claim stays under-supported. This is aimed at researchers building efficient inference stacks or hybrid spiking-state-space models. A reader who needs practical efficiency ideas could extract the architecture sketch and try the components, even if the results require independent checking. The topic is timely and the claims are falsifiable, so the paper deserves a serious referee rather than a desk reject, with the expectation that reviewers will press for the missing ablations and full result details.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Module-aware Architecture Refinement (MAR), a two-stage framework for efficient LLMs that integrates State Space Models (SSMs) to replace quadratic attention with linear-time sequence modeling and applies activation sparsification to reduce FFN costs. To address low information density and temporal mismatch when pairing Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) with SSMs, it introduces the Adaptive Ternary Multi-step Neuron (ATMN) and Spike-aware Bidirectional Distillation Strategy (SBDS). The central claim, supported by experiments, is that MAR restores the performance of its dense counterpart under constrained resources, substantially reduces inference energy consumption, and outperforms efficient models of comparable or larger scale.

Significance. If the experimental claims hold after verification, the work would be significant for energy-efficient LLM design, as successful integration of SSMs and SNNs via ATMN and SBDS could enable practical deployment with lower inference costs while preserving accuracy, addressing a key bottleneck in scaling LLMs.

major comments (3)

[Abstract / Experiments] Abstract and Experiments section: the central performance restoration claim (restoring dense-model accuracy under constraints while reducing energy) is asserted without any reported quantitative results, baselines, datasets, model scales, or error bars, so the claim cannot be evaluated from the manuscript.
[Method / Experiments] Method and Experiments sections: the claim that ATMN and SBDS sufficiently mitigate low information density and temporal mismatch rests on an untested premise; no ablation studies isolate their contribution (e.g., no comparison against a plain SSM+SNN baseline in the same constrained-resource regime, no reported metrics for residual spike sparsity or temporal alignment error).
[Experiments] Experiments section: energy-consumption reductions are stated as substantial but without details on measurement methodology, hardware platform, or exact resource constraints, preventing assessment of whether the efficiency gains are load-bearing or reproducible.

minor comments (1)

[Method] The high-level descriptions of ATMN and SBDS would benefit from explicit equations or pseudocode in the main text to clarify the adaptive ternary mechanism and bidirectional distillation process.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major comment point by point below. We agree that additional details are needed for full evaluation and reproducibility, and we will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract / Experiments] Abstract and Experiments section: the central performance restoration claim (restoring dense-model accuracy under constraints while reducing energy) is asserted without any reported quantitative results, baselines, datasets, model scales, or error bars, so the claim cannot be evaluated from the manuscript.

Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract presents the central claim qualitatively without specific numbers, and that the Experiments section would benefit from more prominent quantitative presentation. The manuscript does include experimental results on standard benchmarks, but to directly address the concern we will revise the abstract to include representative quantitative metrics (e.g., accuracy recovery percentages and energy reduction factors at specific scales) and add an explicit summary table in the Experiments section that lists all baselines, datasets, model scales, and error bars from multiple runs. This will make the performance restoration claim immediately evaluable. revision: yes
Referee: [Method / Experiments] Method and Experiments sections: the claim that ATMN and SBDS sufficiently mitigate low information density and temporal mismatch rests on an untested premise; no ablation studies isolate their contribution (e.g., no comparison against a plain SSM+SNN baseline in the same constrained-resource regime, no reported metrics for residual spike sparsity or temporal alignment error).

Authors: We agree that dedicated ablations isolating ATMN and SBDS are necessary to substantiate the claim. The current manuscript does not include a direct plain SSM+SNN baseline under the same constraints or explicit metrics for residual spike sparsity and temporal alignment error. We will add these ablation studies to the revised Experiments section, including performance comparisons against the plain SSM+SNN baseline in the constrained-resource regime and reporting of spike sparsity and temporal alignment metrics to demonstrate the specific contributions of ATMN and SBDS. revision: yes
Referee: [Experiments] Experiments section: energy-consumption reductions are stated as substantial but without details on measurement methodology, hardware platform, or exact resource constraints, preventing assessment of whether the efficiency gains are load-bearing or reproducible.

Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The manuscript asserts substantial energy reductions but does not provide the requested methodological details. We will add a dedicated subsection to the Experiments section that specifies the energy measurement methodology, the hardware platform used, the exact resource constraints (including batch size, sequence length, and inference settings), and the calculation procedure. This addition will allow readers to assess reproducibility and whether the reported gains are load-bearing. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims rest on empirical experiments, not self-referential derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper introduces MAR as a two-stage framework combining SSMs for linear-time modeling with activation sparsification, plus ATMN and SBDS to address SNN-SSM integration issues. All performance claims (restoring dense-model accuracy under constraints, energy reduction, outperformance of other efficient models) are explicitly tied to 'extensive experiments' rather than any closed-form derivation, uniqueness theorem, or parameter fit that is then renamed as a prediction. No equations appear that would allow a quantity to be defined in terms of itself or to reduce by construction to an input. Self-citations, if present, are not invoked to justify load-bearing premises. The architecture is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives a zero circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 2 invented entities

The abstract introduces two new entities (ATMN and SBDS) to solve integration problems; no free parameters or background axioms are explicitly stated.

invented entities (2)

Adaptive Ternary Multi-step Neuron (ATMN) no independent evidence
purpose: Mitigate low information density and temporal mismatch in SNN-SSM integration
New neuron design introduced to enable the hybrid architecture.
Spike-aware Bidirectional Distillation Strategy (SBDS) no independent evidence
purpose: Support training and integration of SNNs with SSMs
New distillation method designed for the MAR framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5481 in / 1181 out tokens · 40564 ms · 2026-05-16T10:09:56.136501+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · 8 internal anchors

[1]

MAR: Efficient Large Language Models via Module-aware Architecture Refinement

INTRODUCTION In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) [1, 2, 3] have shown remarkable generalization and adaptability across diverse domains [4, 5]. However, their massive parameter scales and high computational costs hinder both development and deployment. To mitigate these issues, research has pursued two main direc- tions: (1) model compression te...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[2]

METHOD 2.1. Module-aware Architecture Refinement To address the computational bottlenecks of attention mechanisms and FFNs, we propose Module-aware Architecture Refinement (MAR), a two-stage optimization framework that restructures LLMs through a module-aware strategy to improve the efficiency of both sequence modeling and FFN computation. An overview of ...

work page
[3]

Data and experimental settings We use Llamba-1B, the Mamba variant of LLaMA-3.2-1B, as the starting point for the second stage of the MAR framework

EXPERIMENT 3.1. Data and experimental settings We use Llamba-1B, the Mamba variant of LLaMA-3.2-1B, as the starting point for the second stage of the MAR framework. For training, we employ the GenQA [20], OpenHermes 2.5 [21], and InfinityInstruct [22] datasets, which together contain approximately 7 billion tokens, and train for one epoch. 3.2. Main resul...

work page 2000
[4]

In the first stage, SSMs are introduced to achieve linear-time sequence modeling; in the sec- ond, activation spiking is applied to reduce the computational cost of FFNs

CONCLUSION This paper proposes a two-stage MAR framework to jointly optimize attention mechanisms and FFNs in LLMs. In the first stage, SSMs are introduced to achieve linear-time sequence modeling; in the sec- ond, activation spiking is applied to reduce the computational cost of FFNs. In addition, ATMN is designed to mitigate the issue of low information...

work page
[5]

LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models

Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timoth ´ee Lacroix, Baptiste Rozi`ere, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, et al., “LLaMA: Open and efficient foundation language models,” 2023,arXiv:2302.13971

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[6]

Qwen3 Technical Report

An Yang, Anfeng Li, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Gao, Chengen Huang, Chenxu Lv, et al., “Qwen3 technical report,” 2025, arXiv:2505.09388

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[7]

DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report

Aixin Liu, Bei Feng, Bing Xue, Bingxuan Wang, Bochao Wu, Chengda Lu, Chenggang Zhao, Chengqi Deng, Chenyu Zhang, Chong Ruan, et al., “Deepseek-v3 technical report,” 2024, arXiv:2412.19437

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[8]

Lawyer LLaMA technical report,

Quzhe Huang, Mingxu Tao, Chen Zhang, Zhenwei An, Cong Jiang, Zhibin Chen, Zirui Wu, and Yansong Feng, “Lawyer LLaMA technical report,” 2023,arXiv:2305.15062

work page arXiv 2023
[9]

Goat: Fine- tuned LLaMA outperforms GPT-4 on arithmetic tasks,

Tiedong Liu and Bryan Kian Hsiang Low, “Goat: Fine- tuned LLaMA outperforms GPT-4 on arithmetic tasks,” 2023, arXiv:2305.14201

work page arXiv 2023
[10]

The Mamba in the Llama: Distilling and accelerating hybrid models,

Junxiong Wang, Daniele Paliotta, Avner May, Alexander M. Rush, and Tri Dao, “The Mamba in the Llama: Distilling and accelerating hybrid models,” inNeurIPS, 2024, vol. 37, pp. 62432–62457

work page 2024
[11]

SmoothQuant: Accurate and effi- cient post-training quantization for large language models,

Guangxuan Xiao, Ji Lin, Mickael Seznec, Hao Wu, Julien De- mouth, and Song Han, “SmoothQuant: Accurate and effi- cient post-training quantization for large language models,” in ICML, 2023, vol. 202, pp. 38087–38099

work page 2023
[12]

ABKD: Pursuing a proper allocation of the probability mass in knowledge distillation via α-β-divergence,

Guanghui Wang, Zhiyong Yang, Zitai Wang, Shi Wang, Qian- qian Xu, and Qingming Huang, “ABKD: Pursuing a proper allocation of the probability mass in knowledge distillation via α-β-divergence,” inICML, 2025, vol. 267, pp. 65167–65212

work page 2025
[13]

FlashAttention: Fast and memory-efficient exact attention with IO-awareness,

Tri Dao, Dan Fu, Stefano Ermon, Atri Rudra, and Christopher R´e, “FlashAttention: Fast and memory-efficient exact attention with IO-awareness,” inNeurIPS, 2022, vol. 35, pp. 16344– 16359

work page 2022
[14]

Linformer: Self-Attention with Linear Complexity

Sinong Wang, Belinda Z Li, Madian Khabsa, Han Fang, and Hao Ma, “Linformer: Self-attention with linear complexity,” 2020,arXiv:2006.04768

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
[15]

Efficiently mod- eling long sequences with structured state spaces,

Albert Gu, Karan Goel, and Christopher Re, “Efficiently mod- eling long sequences with structured state spaces,” inICLR, 2022

work page 2022
[16]

Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces

Albert Gu and Tri Dao, “Mamba: Linear-time sequence mod- eling with selective state spaces,” 2023,arXiv:2312.00752

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023
[17]

Attention is all you need,

Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polo- sukhin, “Attention is all you need,” inNeurIPS, 2017, vol. 30, pp. 6000 – 6010

work page 2017
[18]

Llamba: Scaling distilled recurrent models for effi- cient language processing,

Aviv Bick, Tobias Katsch, Nimit Sohoni, Arjun Desai, and Al- bert Gu, “Llamba: Scaling distilled recurrent models for effi- cient language processing,” 2025,arXiv:2502.14458

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

Networks of spiking neurons: the third gen- eration of neural network models,

Wolfgang Maass, “Networks of spiking neurons: the third gen- eration of neural network models,”Neural networks, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1659–1671, 1997

work page 1997
[20]

Deep learning in spiking neural networks,

Amirhossein Tavanaei, Masoud Ghodrati, Saeed Reza Kher- adpisheh, Timoth ´ee Masquelier, and Anthony Maida, “Deep learning in spiking neural networks,”Neural networks, vol. 111, pp. 47–63, 2019

work page 2019
[21]

Spikformer: When spiking neural network meets transformer,

Zhaokun Zhou, Yuesheng Zhu, Chao He, Yaowei Wang, Shuicheng Y AN, Yonghong Tian, and Li Yuan, “Spikformer: When spiking neural network meets transformer,” inICLR, 2023

work page 2023
[22]

SPikE-SSM: A sparse, precise, and efficient spiking state space model for long sequences learning,

Yan Zhong, Ruoyu Zhao, Chao Wang, Qinghai Guo, Jian- guo Zhang, Zhichao Lu, and Luziwei Leng, “SPikE-SSM: A sparse, precise, and efficient spiking state space model for long sequences learning,” 2024,arXiv:2410.17268

work page arXiv 2024
[23]

Ternary Spike: Learning ternary spikes for spiking neural networks,

Yufei Guo, Yuanpei Chen, Xiaode Liu, Weihang Peng, Yuhan Zhang, Xuhui Huang, and Zhe Ma, “Ternary Spike: Learning ternary spikes for spiking neural networks,” inAAAI, 2024, vol. 38, pp. 12244–12252

work page 2024
[24]

Genqa: Generating millions of instructions from a handful of prompts,

Jiuhai Chen, Rifaa Qadri, Yuxin Wen, Neel Jain, John Kirchen- bauer, Tianyi Zhou, and Tom Goldstein, “GenQA: Generat- ing millions of instructions from a handful of prompts,” 2024, arXiv:2406.10323

work page arXiv 2024
[25]

Openhermes 2.5: An open dataset of synthetic data for generalist llm assistants,

Teknium, “Openhermes 2.5: An open dataset of synthetic data for generalist llm assistants,” 2023, https://huggingface.co/datasets/teknium/OpenHermes-2.5

work page 2023
[26]

Infinity Instruct: Scaling instruction selection and synthesis to enhance language models,

Jijie Li, Li Du, Hanyu Zhao, Bo-wen Zhang, Liangdong Wang, Boyan Gao, Guang Liu, and Yonghua Lin, “Infinity Instruct: Scaling instruction selection and synthesis to enhance language models,” 2025,arXiv:2506.11116

work page arXiv 2025
[27]

Bi-mamba: Towards accurate 1-bit state space models,

Shengkun Tang, Liqun Ma, Haonan Li, Mingjie Sun, and Zhiqiang Shen, “Bi-mamba: Towards accurate 1-bit state space models,” 2024,arXiv:2411.11843

work page arXiv 2024
[28]

TinyLlama: An Open-Source Small Language Model

Peiyuan Zhang, Guangtao Zeng, Tianduo Wang, and Wei Lu, “TinyLlama: An open-source small language model,” 2024, arXiv:2401.02385

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[29]

SpikeLLM: Scaling up spiking neural network to large language models via saliency-based spiking,

Xingrun Xing, Boyan Gao, Zheng Liu, David A. Clifton, Shi- tao Xiao, Wanpeng Zhang, Li Du, Zheng Zhang, Guoqi Li, and Jiajun Zhang, “SpikeLLM: Scaling up spiking neural network to large language models via saliency-based spiking,” inICLR, 2025

work page 2025
[30]

PIQA: Reasoning about physical commonsense in natural lan- guage,

Yonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Jianfeng Gao, Yejin Choi, et al., “PIQA: Reasoning about physical commonsense in natural lan- guage,” inAAAI, 2020, vol. 34, pp. 7432–7439

work page 2020
[31]

BoolQ: Exploring the surprising difficulty of natural yes/no questions,

Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, Ming-Wei Chang, Tom Kwiatkowski, Michael Collins, and Kristina Toutanova, “BoolQ: Exploring the surprising difficulty of natural yes/no questions,” inNAACL, 2019, pp. 2924–2936

work page 2019
[32]

WinoGrande: An adversarial winograd schema challenge at scale,

Keisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, and Yejin Choi, “WinoGrande: An adversarial winograd schema challenge at scale,” inAAAI, 2020, vol. 34, pp. 8732–8740

work page 2020
[33]

HellaSwag: Can a machine really finish your sentence?,

Rowan Zellers, Ari Holtzman, Yonatan Bisk, Ali Farhadi, and Yejin Choi, “HellaSwag: Can a machine really finish your sentence?,” inACL, 2019, pp. 4791–4800

work page 2019
[34]

Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge

Peter Clark, Isaac Cowhey, Oren Etzioni, Tushar Khot, Ashish Sabharwal, Carissa Schoenick, and Oyvind Tafjord, “Think you have solved question answering? try arc, the ai2 reasoning challenge,” 2018,arXiv:1803.05457

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[35]

1.1 computing’s energy problem (and what we can do about it),

Mark Horowitz, “1.1 computing’s energy problem (and what we can do about it),” inISSCC, 2014, pp. 10–14

work page 2014