pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.09355 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-10 · 🧮 math.OC · cs.LG

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

SHANG++: Robust Stochastic Acceleration under Multiplicative Noise

Yaxin Yu , Long Chen , Minfu Feng
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 13:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC cs.LG
keywords stochastic optimizationNesterov accelerationmultiplicative noiseconvergence analysisaccelerated gradient methodsdeep learningdiscretizationHessian-driven flow
0
0 comments X

The pith

SHANG++ improves stochastic acceleration by discretizing a Hessian-driven Nesterov flow with a damping correction, yielding faster convergence and greater robustness to multiplicative noise.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that standard Nesterov acceleration can diverge under multiplicative noise scaling where noise grows with the gradient magnitude. To address this, the authors discretize the continuous-time Hessian-driven Nesterov accelerated gradient flow. Their first method, SHANG, uses a Gauss-Seidel-type discretization for improved stability. SHANG++ further adds a damping correction, leading to faster convergence rates and stronger noise tolerance. Convergence is proven for both convex and strongly convex objectives with explicit parameter selections, and experiments confirm good performance in optimization and deep learning tasks even with significant noise.

Core claim

Under the multiplicative noise scaling condition, discretizing the Hessian-driven Nesterov accelerated gradient flow via a Gauss-Seidel scheme produces the SHANG method with enhanced stability; adding a damping correction in SHANG++ further accelerates convergence while preserving robustness, with explicit rates and parameters established for convex and strongly convex cases.

What carries the argument

Hessian-driven Nesterov accelerated gradient flow discretized by Gauss-Seidel scheme with damping correction.

If this is right

  • Convergence guarantees hold for convex objectives under MNS with chosen parameters.
  • Stronger robustness allows maintaining near-optimal accuracy in noisy deep learning settings with fixed hyperparameters.
  • Outperforms prior accelerated SGD variants in both speed and stability across tested problems.
  • Explicit parameter choices reduce the need for extensive tuning.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method might apply to other noise models if they can be approximated by MNS.
  • Extending the damping correction to non-convex landscapes could improve training of large models.
  • Connections to other discretization techniques in continuous-time optimization may yield further variants.
  • In practice, this could reduce the computational cost of hyperparameter search in noisy environments.

Load-bearing premise

The multiplicative noise scaling condition must accurately model the actual gradient noise encountered in the optimization problems of interest.

What would settle it

Running SHANG++ with the paper's explicit parameters on a simple quadratic convex problem under controlled multiplicative noise and checking if it converges at the claimed rate or diverges.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.09355 by Long Chen, Minfu Feng, Yaxin Yu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Performance of different algorithms under varying noise levels. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Training, test loss (log scale, running average with decay 0.99) on MNIST with LeNet-5 (batch size 50). learning rate is controlled by the time-scaling parameter γ, with effective learning rate 1/γ (see Algorithm 1). To implement an analogous decay, we increase γ after 25 epochs (thereby reducing the effective step size 1/γ), so that all methods undergo a comparable mid-training learning-rate reduction. Fo… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Training loss (left) and test loss (right) in log scale (running average with decay 0.99) on CIFAR-10 with ResNet-34, for batch sizes 32 (top row), 50 (middle row), and 256 (bottom row). 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Training, test loss (log scale, running average with decay 0.99) on CIFAR￾100 with ResNet-50 (batch size 50). Even under extreme noise, SHANG and SHANG++ consistently outper￾form other first-order stochastic momentum methods. Notably, when the batch size falls below 50, AGNES and SNAG lose their acceleration advan￾tage over SGD, whereas SHANG, SHANG++, and Adam still offer clear improvements (though Adam i… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Validation error under varying multiplicative noise level σ. Lower is better [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Training and test loss (log scale, running average with decay 0.99) on CIFAR-10 using U-Net with batch size 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Under the multiplicative noise scaling (MNS) condition, original Nesterov acceleration is provably sensitive to noise and may diverge when gradient noise overwhelms the signal. In this paper, we develop two accelerated stochastic gradient descent methods by discretizing the Hessian-driven Nesterov accelerated gradient flow. We first derive SHANG, a direct Gauss-Seidel-type discretization that already improves stability under MNS. We then introduce SHANG++, which adds a damping correction and achieves faster convergence with stronger noise robustness. We establish convergence guarantees for both convex and strongly convex objectives under MNS, together with explicit parameter choices. In our experiments, SHANG++ performs consistently well across convex problems and applications in deep learning. In a dedicated noise experiment on ResNet-34, a single hyperparameter configuration attains accuracy within 1% of the noise-free setting. Across all experiments, SHANG++ outperforms existing accelerated methods in robustness and efficiency, with minimal parameter sensitivity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to develop SHANG, a Gauss-Seidel discretization of the Hessian-driven Nesterov accelerated gradient flow, and SHANG++ with added damping correction, achieving faster convergence and stronger robustness under the multiplicative noise scaling (MNS) condition. It provides convergence guarantees for convex and strongly convex objectives with explicit parameters and shows good empirical performance in convex optimization and deep learning tasks.

Significance. Should the discretization be shown to preserve the continuous-time stability properties under MNS without introducing discrete instabilities, the results would be significant for stochastic optimization, offering theoretically grounded accelerated methods with practical robustness in noisy environments such as deep learning. The explicit parameter choices and the dedicated noise experiment are positive aspects.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2] The Gauss-Seidel-type discretization of the Hessian-driven Nesterov accelerated gradient flow, together with the damping correction in SHANG++, is asserted to maintain stability under MNS; however, the manuscript does not supply an explicit discrete Lyapunov function or step-size condition to bound potential noise accumulation in the coupled updates, which is critical for validating the convergence claims.
  2. [§4.1, Eq. (8)] The explicit parameter choice for the damping correction coefficient is presented as derived from continuous-time analysis, but without a corresponding discrete error analysis, it is unclear whether this choice guarantees the claimed convergence rates for finite step sizes under the MNS condition.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The claim of 'minimal parameter sensitivity' would be strengthened by including a sensitivity analysis or ablation study in the experiments section.
  2. [§5] More details on the statistical variability (e.g., standard deviations over multiple runs) in the ResNet-34 experiment would improve the assessment of the robustness claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive remarks on the significance of the results and the empirical validation. We address each major comment below with clarifications drawn directly from the existing analysis in the manuscript. Where additional transparency is warranted, we indicate revisions that will be incorporated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2] The Gauss-Seidel-type discretization of the Hessian-driven Nesterov accelerated gradient flow, together with the damping correction in SHANG++, is asserted to maintain stability under MNS; however, the manuscript does not supply an explicit discrete Lyapunov function or step-size condition to bound potential noise accumulation in the coupled updates, which is critical for validating the convergence claims.

    Authors: The convergence guarantees in Theorems 3.1 (convex case) and 3.2 (strongly convex case) are established via a discrete Lyapunov function that is constructed by discretizing the continuous-time energy functional and adapting it to the Gauss-Seidel ordering of the updates. The step-size restrictions stated in both theorems (involving the MNS constant and the damping parameters) are derived precisely to control the cross terms arising from noise accumulation in the coupled momentum and gradient steps. We acknowledge that the presentation could make the discrete Lyapunov construction more explicit. In the revision we will add a short subsection (new §3.3) that isolates the discrete Lyapunov function, shows the one-step decrease inequality, and explicitly derives the step-size bound from it. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.1, Eq. (8)] The explicit parameter choice for the damping correction coefficient is presented as derived from continuous-time analysis, but without a corresponding discrete error analysis, it is unclear whether this choice guarantees the claimed convergence rates for finite step sizes under the MNS condition.

    Authors: Equation (8) supplies the damping correction coefficient that is used verbatim in the discrete SHANG++ iteration. The proofs of Theorems 3.1 and 3.2 are carried out entirely in the discrete setting: they bound the discretization error introduced by the Gauss-Seidel scheme together with the multiplicative noise terms, and they verify that the same coefficient satisfies the required inequalities for any step size obeying the explicit upper bound given in the theorems. Thus the finite-step-size convergence rates already hold for the stated parameter choice. To remove any ambiguity we will insert a remark immediately after Eq. (8) that cross-references the discrete error terms appearing in the proof of Theorem 3.2. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: derivation from independent continuous-time flow

full rationale

The paper derives SHANG via Gauss-Seidel discretization of the Hessian-driven Nesterov accelerated gradient flow and SHANG++ by adding damping correction. Convergence guarantees under the MNS condition for convex and strongly convex objectives are stated with explicit parameter choices. No equation or claim reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the continuous-time stability analysis supplies an external foundation that the discrete methods inherit without the target rates being presupposed in the discretization itself. The analysis is therefore self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the multiplicative noise scaling condition being a realistic model and on the discretization preserving continuous-time convergence properties; explicit parameter choices are stated but their selection process is not detailed in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • damping correction coefficient
    Added in SHANG++ to improve noise robustness; value chosen explicitly but selection rule not visible in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Multiplicative noise scaling (MNS) condition holds for the gradient noise.
    Invoked as the setting under which original Nesterov may diverge and the new methods are stable.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5460 in / 1258 out tokens · 32372 ms · 2026-05-15T13:30:09.184409+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Adam-HNAG: A Convergent Reformulation of Adam with Accelerated Rate

    math.OC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Adam-HNAG is a splitting-based reformulation of Adam that yields the first convergence proof for Adam-type methods, including accelerated rates, in convex smooth optimization.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Hastie, R

    T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learn- ing: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Springer, 2009

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    X. Wu, S. S. Du, R. Ward, Global convergence of adaptive gradient methods for an over-parameterized neural network (2019).arXiv:1902. 07111

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    L. Wu, M. Wang, W. Su, The alignment property of sgd noise and how it helps select flat minima: A stability analysis, in: Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Gupta, J

    K. Gupta, J. W. Siegel, S. Wojtowytsch, Nesterov acceleration despite very noisy gradients, in: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Hodgkinson, M

    L. Hodgkinson, M. W. Mahoney, Multiplicative noise and heavy tails in stochastic optimization (2020).arXiv:2006.06293

    work page arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Polyak, Some methods of speeding up the convergence of iteration methods, USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 4 (5) (1964) 1–17

    B. Polyak, Some methods of speeding up the convergence of iteration methods, USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 4 (5) (1964) 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-5553(64) 90137-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0041-5553(64 1964

  7. [7]

    Nesterov, A method for solving the convex programming problem with convergence rateO(1/k2), Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences 269 (1983) 543–547

    Y. Nesterov, A method for solving the convex programming problem with convergence rateO(1/k2), Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences 269 (1983) 543–547

    work page 1983

  8. [8]

    D. P. Kingma, J. Ba, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, in: 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, 2015. 30

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Devolder, F

    O. Devolder, F. Glineur, Y. Nesterov, First-order methods of smooth convex optimization with inexact oracle, Mathematical Programming 146 (2014) 37–75

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Aujol, C

    J.-F. Aujol, C. Dossal, Stability of over-relaxations for the forward- backward algorithm, application to fista, SIAM Journal on Optimization 25 (4) (2015) 2408–2433.doi:10.1137/140994964

    work page doi:10.1137/140994964 2015

  11. [11]

    T. Liu, Z. Chen, E. Zhou, T. Zhao, Toward deeper understanding of nonconvex stochastic optimization with momentum using diffusion ap- proximations, ArXiv abs/1802.05155 (2018)

    work page arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    On the insufficiency of existing momentum schemes for Stochastic Optimization

    R. Kidambi, P. Netrapalli, P. Jain, S. M. Kakade, On the insufficiency of existing momentum schemes for stochastic optimization (2018).arXiv: 1803.05591

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    C. Liu, M. Belkin, Accelerating sgd with momentum for over- parameterized learning (2019).arXiv:1810.13395

    work page arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Assran, M

    M. Assran, M. G. Rabbat, On the convergence of nesterov’s accelerated gradient method in stochastic settings, ArXiv abs/2002.12414 (2020)

    work page arXiv 2002

  15. [15]

    Ganesh, R

    S. Ganesh, R. Deb, G. Thoppe, A. Budhiraja, Does momentum help in stochastic optimization? A sample complexity analysis., in: Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 216, 2023, pp. 602–612

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    P. Jain, S. M. Kakade, R. Kidambi, P. Netrapalli, A. Sidford, Accelerating stochastic gradient descent for least squares regression (2018).arXiv: 1704.08227

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    Vaswani, F

    S. Vaswani, F. Bach, M. Schmidt, Fast and faster convergence of SGD for over-parameterized models and an accelerated perceptron, in: Inter- national Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), 2019, pp. 1195–1204

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    M. Even, R. Berthier, F. Bach, N. Flammarion, P. Gaillard, H. Hendrikx, L. Massoulié, A. Taylor, A continuized view on nesterov acceleration for stochastic gradient descent and randomized gossip, in: Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021. 31

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Bollapragada, T

    R. Bollapragada, T. Chen, R. Ward, On the fast convergence of minibatch heavy ball momentum, IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis 45 (3) (2024) 1397–1424.doi:10.1093/imanum/drae033

    work page doi:10.1093/imanum/drae033 2024

  20. [20]

    Laborde, A

    M. Laborde, A. Oberman, A lyapunov analysis for accelerated gradient methods: from deterministic to stochastic case, in: Proceedings of the Twenty Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Vol. 108, 2020, pp. 602–612

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Hermant, M

    J. Hermant, M. Renaud, J.-F. Aujol, C. Dossal, A. Rondepierre, Gradient correlation is a key ingredient to accelerate sgd with momentum (2025). arXiv:2410.07870

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Nesterov, Efficiency of coordinate descent methods on huge-scale optimization problems, SIAM Journal on Optimization 22 (2) (2012) 341–362.doi:10.1137/100802001

    Y. Nesterov, Efficiency of coordinate descent methods on huge-scale optimization problems, SIAM Journal on Optimization 22 (2) (2012) 341–362.doi:10.1137/100802001

    work page doi:10.1137/100802001 2012

  23. [23]

    L. Chen, H. Luo, A unified convergence analysis of first order convex optimization methods via strong lyapunov functions (2021). arXiv: 2108.00132

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Lessard, B

    L. Lessard, B. Recht, A. Packard, Analysis and design of optimization algorithms via integral quadratic constraints, SIAM Journal on Opti- mization 26 (1) (2016) 57–95.doi:10.1137/15M1009597

    work page doi:10.1137/15m1009597 2016

  25. [25]

    Goujaud, A

    B. Goujaud, A. Taylor, A. Dieuleveut, Provable non-accelerations of the heavy-ball method (2025).arXiv:2307.11291

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    L. Chen, H. Luo, First order optimization methods based on hessian- driven nesterov accelerated gradient flow (2019).arXiv:1912.09276

    work page arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    L. Chen, Z. Xu, Hnag++: A super-fast accelerated gradient method for strongly convex optimization (2025).arXiv:2510.16680

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    LeCun, L

    Y. LeCun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, P. Haffner, Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition, Proceedings of the IEEE 86 (11) (1998) 2278–2324

    work page 1998

  29. [29]

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, J. Sun, Deep residual learning for image recognition, in: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 770–778.doi:10.1109/CVPR.2016.90. 32

    work page doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 2016

  30. [30]

    Krizhevsky, Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images, 2009

    A. Krizhevsky, Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images, 2009. URLhttps://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:18268744

    work page 2009

  31. [31]

    Thulasidasan, G

    S. Thulasidasan, G. Chennupati, J. Bilmes, T. Bhattacharya, S. Michalak, On mixup training: Improved calibration and predictive uncertainty for deep neural networks (2020).arXiv:1905.11001

    work page arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation

    O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, T. Brox, U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation (2015).arXiv:1505.04597

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  33. [33]

    Klenke, Probability Theory: A Comprehensive Course, Springer, 2013

    A. Klenke, Probability Theory: A Comprehensive Course, Springer, 2013

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    G. Chen, M. Teboulle, Convergence analysis of a proximal-like minimiza- tion algorithm using bregman functions, SIAM Journal on Optimization 3 (3) (1993) 538–543.doi:10.1137/0803026. 33

    work page doi:10.1137/0803026 1993