pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.23108 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-24 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Holography, Brick Wall and a Little Hierarchy Problem

Vishal Gayari , Chethan Krishnan , Pradipta S. Pathak
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords brick wallAdS/CFTBTZ black holeblack hole thermodynamicsnormal modeshierarchy problemholographypartition function
0
0 comments X

The pith

A boundary-anchored brick wall defined by local bulk energy hitting the Planck scale reproduces BTZ thermodynamics but exposes a little hierarchy problem from non-exact mode degeneracy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a heuristic that places the brick wall where a boundary mode's local bulk energy reaches a Planckian UV cutoff, framing it as the breakdown point of bulk effective field theory and tying it directly to the boundary rather than the horizon. For the BTZ black hole this produces normal modes that match the conventional 't Hooft brick-wall spectrum in the relevant range, recovering black-hole thermodynamics and smooth exterior correlators under the usual approximations. An exact numerical evaluation of the normal-mode partition function then reveals that the modes are not perfectly degenerate in the angular-momentum direction, so the area-law coefficient emerges slightly subleading unless the wall is moved slightly trans-Planckian. The authors note that increasing the number of species or incorporating intrinsic stretched-horizon degrees of freedom offers possible resolutions while preserving the model's successes.

Core claim

By anchoring the brick wall to the local energy cutoff of boundary modes, the resulting blueshifted normal modes for BTZ are shown to be qualitatively identical to conventional brick-wall modes in the relevant spectrum. Exact evaluation of the partition function then identifies a little hierarchy problem: non-exact J-degeneracy makes the area-law prefactor subleading, resolvable by a trans-Planckian shift or by incorporating radial horizon degrees of freedom.

What carries the argument

The boundary-anchored brick wall defined as the surface where a mode's local bulk energy equals the Planckian UV cutoff, which induces a cutoff in spacetime due to blueshift and generates the normal modes.

If this is right

  • Reproduces black hole thermodynamics under standard approximations.
  • Matches exterior smooth-horizon correlators.
  • Reveals a little hierarchy problem due to slight non-degeneracy in J-modes.
  • Requires either a trans-Planckian brick wall or additional species for exact area law.
  • Points to intrinsic stretched-horizon degrees of freedom as a natural fix.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Accounting for radial quantum numbers could dominate the partition function and restore exact degeneracy.
  • This may connect the brick-wall approach to fuzzball constructions by emphasizing horizon microstates.
  • The hierarchy issue could inform how quantum chaos manifests in holographic models.
  • Similar logic might apply to other black holes beyond BTZ.

Load-bearing premise

The placement of the brick wall exactly where local bulk energy hits the Planck cutoff correctly identifies the breakdown of bulk effective field theory.

What would settle it

Perform an exact numerical computation of the normal-mode partition function for the BTZ brick wall and check whether the area-law coefficient is precisely 1/4 or slightly subleading.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.23108 by Chethan Krishnan, Pradipta S. Pathak, Vishal Gayari.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spectrum from BTZ Exact Phase Equation in (a) the boundary-anchored and (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison between the exact boundary-anchored spectrum (Blue) and the hard [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Exact spectrum (blue) vs holographic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The shaded region satisfies (2.18). The zoomed-in region is what contributes dominantly to the thermodynamics (as we argue in the text, this corresponds to ωL2 rh ≲ O(1)): the pink line represents the radial region bounded by (2.26) for α = 1, and we work with L/ℓP = 100. Part of the goal of this plot is also to illustrate that the bulk UV cut off is effective only close to the horizon. indicating that the… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spectral contribution density −ρ(ω) log(1 − e −βHω ) for n = 1 and α = 1. degenerate than it is [5, 2, 3]. This makes computations of the partition function, ther￾modynamics, and correlators analytically tractable. But an exact degeneracy in J leads to divergences because of the infinite range of J. These divergences are then regulated by introducing a cutoff Jcut. Notably, such a Jcut can be obtained by t… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Plot of α v/s ℓp for (a) entropy and (b) energy with exact spectrum, for rh/L = 1. (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Plot of α v/s rh for (a) entropy and (b) energy with exact spectrum, for ℓp = 10−16 . values and is insensitive to changes in rh/L. We have checked that a hierarchy of the same order of αS and αU is present when working with the hard-cutoff brick wall spectrum used in [5, 2, 3] as well – so this result is not an artifact of our holographic-anchoring. We have also checked that similar (in fact, worse) hiera… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Jcut and Stretched Horizon Plugging in the degenerate spectrum [2, 3] ω = 2πrh L2 log rh 2ϵ , (A.3) in (A.1), we get: Jcut ≈ 2πrh L log rh 2ϵ  r rh 2ϵ , (A.4) 22This can be read off from (2.3), after converting it to the Schrodinger form. 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Intersection of ωn,J with the equally spaced levels mω0. regime (see Section 2). Defining Jn(m) through the inversion condition ωn,Jn(m) = m ω0, (B.3) the number of J-modes for fixed n whose frequencies lie in the interval [mω0,(m + 1)ω0] is ∆Jn(m) = Jn(m + 1) − Jn(m). (B.4) 26 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison between the hard wall exact spectrum and the ’t Hooftian semi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a heuristic for the brick wall in AdS/CFT: the location where a boundary mode's local bulk energy reaches a (Planckian) UV cut-off. This accomplishes two things: (a) the brick wall is framed as a breakdown criterion for bulk effective field theory, and (b) the definition is boundary-anchored rather than horizon-anchored, aligning it with holography. Near the horizon, spacetime effectively gets cut-off due to blueshift relative to the boundary, and leads to normal modes. By directly computing these new modes for the BTZ black hole, we show that they are qualitatively unchanged from conventional 't Hooftian brick wall normal modes in the relevant part of the spectrum -- successfully reproducing black hole thermodynamics and exterior smooth-horizon correlators, under similar approximations. However, unlike 't Hooft's (and our own previous) calculations, we also do an $exact$ numerical evaluation of the normal mode partition function. This allows us to identify a "little hierarchy" problem in the brick wall paradigm, irrespective of whether it is horizon-anchored or boundary-anchored: because the modes are not exactly degenerate in the $J$-direction, the coefficient of the area law is slightly subleading, unless the brick wall is slightly trans-Planckian. One way to evade the problem is to increase the number of active species. While this is certainly a possibility in string theory, we argue that a natural resolution is to take into account the degrees of freedom intrinsic to the (stretched) horizon, as suggested by the recent results in arXiv:2601.18775. We argue that this will lead to a dominant contribution from a quantum number associated to the radial direction, while retaining the successes of the $J$-degenerate toy model. We discuss the possible significance of these observations for (a) quantum chaos in black holes, and (b) the fuzzball program.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a boundary-anchored heuristic for the brick wall in AdS/CFT, defined as the surface where a boundary mode's local bulk energy reaches the Planckian UV cutoff. For the BTZ black hole this yields normal modes that are qualitatively unchanged from conventional 't Hooft brick-wall modes in the relevant spectrum, reproducing black-hole thermodynamics and exterior smooth-horizon correlators under standard approximations. An exact numerical evaluation of the normal-mode partition function is performed, revealing a 'little hierarchy' problem in which the area-law coefficient is slightly subleading unless the wall is taken slightly trans-Planckian; the authors suggest that incorporating intrinsic horizon degrees of freedom (from their prior work) supplies a dominant radial quantum number that resolves the issue while preserving the successes of the model. Implications for quantum chaos and the fuzzball program are discussed.

Significance. If the heuristic placement is shown to coincide with the dynamical breakdown of bulk EFT and the numerical results are robust, the work supplies a concrete, holographically motivated refinement of the brick-wall paradigm and isolates a previously unnoticed subleading correction to the area law. This could sharpen the microscopic accounting of black-hole entropy and inform the role of horizon degrees of freedom in quantum chaos and microstate constructions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Introduction / heuristic definition] The central heuristic—that the brick wall sits where the local bulk energy of a boundary-anchored mode equals the Planckian cutoff—is asserted to mark the breakdown of bulk EFT, yet no explicit calculation demonstrates that higher-dimension operators or loop corrections become order-one at this surface; the blueshift argument remains purely kinematic and does not automatically guarantee the dynamical cutoff (Introduction and the definition of the brick-wall location).
  2. [Numerical evaluation of the partition function] The identification of the little hierarchy problem rests on the exact numerical summation of the normal-mode partition function, but the manuscript supplies no details on the mode equations, discretization scheme, summation cutoff, or convergence diagnostics; without these the claim that the area-law coefficient is parametrically subleading cannot be verified (section describing the numerical evaluation).
  3. [Discussion / resolution] The proposed resolution invokes results from the authors' earlier paper arXiv:2601.18775 to argue that horizon degrees of freedom supply a dominant radial quantum number; a self-contained derivation showing how this contribution dominates the J-degenerate spectrum without reintroducing the hierarchy would strengthen the central claim (Discussion).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Mode comparison] The distinction between boundary-anchored and horizon-anchored modes would benefit from an explicit diagram or table comparing their spectra.
  2. [Abstract] A few typographical inconsistencies appear in the abstract (e.g., 'cut-off' vs. 'cutoff'); these should be standardized throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Introduction / heuristic definition] The central heuristic—that the brick wall sits where the local bulk energy of a boundary-anchored mode equals the Planckian cutoff—is asserted to mark the breakdown of bulk EFT, yet no explicit calculation demonstrates that higher-dimension operators or loop corrections become order-one at this surface; the blueshift argument remains purely kinematic and does not automatically guarantee the dynamical cutoff (Introduction and the definition of the brick-wall location).

    Authors: We agree that the blueshift argument is kinematic and does not by itself constitute a dynamical demonstration that higher-dimension operators or loop corrections become order-one precisely at this surface. The heuristic is motivated by holography and the requirement that the local bulk energy reach the Planck scale, but a full EFT breakdown calculation lies beyond the present scope. In the revised manuscript we will add a clarifying paragraph in the Introduction explicitly noting the kinematic character of the argument and stating that a dynamical verification remains an open question for future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Numerical evaluation of the partition function] The identification of the little hierarchy problem rests on the exact numerical summation of the normal-mode partition function, but the manuscript supplies no details on the mode equations, discretization scheme, summation cutoff, or convergence diagnostics; without these the claim that the area-law coefficient is parametrically subleading cannot be verified (section describing the numerical evaluation).

    Authors: We acknowledge the omission of technical details. In the revised version we will expand the numerical section to specify: (i) the explicit radial mode equation obtained from the Klein-Gordon operator in BTZ with the boundary-anchored cutoff condition; (ii) the discretization method (a Chebyshev spectral collocation scheme on a compactified radial coordinate); (iii) the summation cutoffs in energy and angular momentum together with the infrared regulator; and (iv) convergence diagnostics, including tables showing the stability of the extracted area-law coefficient under successive increases in the cutoff. These additions will allow independent verification of the reported subleading coefficient. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Discussion / resolution] The proposed resolution invokes results from the authors' earlier paper arXiv:2601.18775 to argue that horizon degrees of freedom supply a dominant radial quantum number; a self-contained derivation showing how this contribution dominates the J-degenerate spectrum without reintroducing the hierarchy would strengthen the central claim (Discussion).

    Authors: We agree that a more self-contained presentation would improve readability. While the full microscopic derivation appears in arXiv:2601.18775, we will insert in the Discussion a concise outline of the key steps: how the radial quantum number n_r associated with the stretched-horizon degrees of freedom produces an additive term whose leading scaling is set by the horizon area, thereby overwhelming the small J-non-degeneracy of the bulk modes without reintroducing a hierarchy. The outline will reference only the essential equations from the prior work and will be accompanied by a short appendix containing the intermediate algebra. This keeps the present paper focused while rendering the resolution transparent. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Minor self-citation for suggested resolution; core BTZ mode computation and hierarchy identification remain independent

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "We argue that a natural resolution is to take into account the degrees of freedom intrinsic to the (stretched) horizon, as suggested by the recent results in arXiv:2601.18775."

    The suggested fix for the little-hierarchy problem (to restore exact area-law degeneracy via radial quantum numbers) is justified solely by reference to the authors' own prior work rather than an independent derivation or external benchmark within the present paper.

full rationale

The paper's derivation begins with a proposed heuristic placing the brick wall where a boundary mode's local bulk energy equals the Planckian cutoff, then directly computes the resulting normal modes for BTZ. These are shown to match 't Hooft modes in the relevant spectrum, reproduce thermodynamics and correlators under the same approximations, and yield an exact numerical partition function that exposes the little-hierarchy issue (subleading area-law coefficient unless trans-Planckian). This chain relies on explicit calculation rather than reduction to prior inputs by construction. The sole self-citation appears only when suggesting a resolution via intrinsic horizon degrees of freedom from arXiv:2601.18775; that citation is not required to establish the mode spectrum, thermodynamic match, or hierarchy diagnosis. Hence only minor self-citation dependence, warranting score 2 rather than higher.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard AdS/CFT dictionary and the exact BTZ geometry. The new element is the heuristic cutoff definition. No new particles or forces are postulated; the resolution draws on prior results about horizon degrees of freedom.

free parameters (1)
  • Planckian UV cutoff scale
    The brick wall is placed where local bulk energy reaches this scale; the scale itself is taken as an external input from quantum gravity.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT correspondence maps boundary modes to bulk fields
    Invoked to justify the boundary-anchored definition and the extraction of normal modes.
  • standard math BTZ geometry is an exact solution of 3D gravity
    Used as the background for mode computation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5662 in / 1580 out tokens · 44652 ms · 2026-05-15T00:51:28.787684+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cosmological brick walls & quantum chaotic dynamics of de Sitter horizons

    hep-th 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Brick-wall spectra in de Sitter space show long-range chaotic signatures via spectral form factor and Krylov complexity even when conventional level repulsion is absent.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Holography with an Inner Boundary: A Smooth Horizon as a Sum over Horizonless States,

    C. Krishnan and P. S. Pathak, “Holography with an Inner Boundary: A Smooth Horizon as a Sum over Horizonless States,” [arXiv:2601.18775 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  2. [2]

    A smooth horizon without a smooth horizon,

    V. Burman, S. Das and C. Krishnan, “A smooth horizon without a smooth horizon,” JHEP2024, 014 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2024)014 [arXiv:2312.14108 [hep-th]]. 32

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2024)014 2024

  3. [3]

    A Bottom-Up Approach to Black Hole Microstates,

    V. Burman and C. Krishnan, “A Bottom-Up Approach to Black Hole Microstates,” [arXiv:2409.05850 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  4. [4]

    Synthetic fuzzballs: a linear ramp from black hole normal modes,

    S. Das, C. Krishnan, A. P. Kumar and A. Kundu, “Synthetic fuzzballs: a linear ramp from black hole normal modes,” JHEP01, 153 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2023)153 [arXiv:2208.14744 [hep-th]]. S. Banerjee, S. Das, M. Dorband and A. Kundu, “Brickwall, normal modes, and emerging thermality,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.12, 126020 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.126020...

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2023)153 2023

  5. [5]

    On the Quantum Structure of a Black Hole,

    G. ’t Hooft, “On the Quantum Structure of a Black Hole,” Nucl. Phys. B256, 727-745 (1985) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90418-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90418-3 1985

  6. [6]

    Holomorphic Factorization at the Quantum Horizon,

    C. Krishnan and P. S. Pathak, “Holomorphic Factorization at the Quantum Horizon,” [arXiv:2410.00732 [hep-th]]. 33

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    Eigenstate Thermalization Hypothesis

    J. M. Deutsch, “Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis,” Rept. Prog. Phys.81, no.8, 082001 (2018) doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aac9f1 [arXiv:1805.01616 [quant-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aac9f1 2018

  8. [8]

    Normal modes of the stretched horizon: a bulk mechanism for black hole microstate level spacing,

    C. Krishnan and P. S. Pathak, “Normal modes of the stretched horizon: a bulk mechanism for black hole microstate level spacing,” JHEP03, 162 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2024)162 [arXiv:2312.14109 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2024)162 2024

  9. [9]

    The Stretched Horizon and Black Hole Complementarity

    L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and J. Uglum, “The Stretched horizon and black hole complementarity,” Phys. Rev. D48, 3743-3761 (1993) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.48.3743 [arXiv:hep-th/9306069 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.48.3743 1993

  10. [10]

    Burman, V

    V. Burman, V. Gayari and C. Krishnan, To appear

    work page

  11. [11]

    Virasoro blocks and trouble at the Euclidean horizon,

    A. Datar and C. Krishnan, “Virasoro blocks and trouble at the Euclidean horizon,” Phys. Rev. D112, no.6, 066015 (2025) doi:10.1103/65zz-yjhl [arXiv:2505.09504 [hep- th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/65zz-yjhl 2025

  12. [12]

    Liouville bootstrap via harmonic analysis on a noncompact quantum group

    B. Ponsot and J. Teschner, “Liouville bootstrap via harmonic analysis on a noncompact quantum group,” [arXiv:hep-th/9911110 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Quantum Entropy Function from AdS(2)/CFT(1) Correspondence

    A. Sen, “Quantum Entropy Function from AdS 2/CFT1 Correspondence,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A24(2009) 4225–4244 doi:10.1142/S0217751X09045893 [arXiv:0809.3304 [hep- th]]. A. Dabholkar, J. Gomes, S. Murthy and A. Sen, “Supersymmetric Index from Black Hole Entropy,” JHEP 04 (2011) 034 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2011)034 [arXiv:1009.3226 [hep-th]]. A. Chowdhury, R. S. Gar...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217751x09045893 2009

  14. [14]

    On Information Loss in AdS$_3$/CFT$_2$

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, D. Li and J. Wang, “On information loss in AdS 3/CFT2,” JHEP05, 109 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2016)109 [arXiv:1603.08925 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep05(2016)109 2016

  15. [15]

    Fuzzballs and random matrices,

    S. Das, S. K. Garg, C. Krishnan and A. Kundu, “Fuzzballs and random matrices,” JHEP10, 031 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2023)031 [arXiv:2301.11780 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2023)031 2023

  16. [16]

    What is the Simplest Linear Ramp?,

    S. Das, S. K. Garg, C. Krishnan and A. Kundu, “What is the Simplest Linear Ramp?,” JHEP01, 172 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2024)172 [arXiv:2308.11704 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2024)172 2024

  17. [17]

    An analytic zeta function ramp at the black hole Thouless time,

    P. Basu, S. Das and C. Krishnan, “An analytic zeta function ramp at the black hole Thouless time,” JHEP02, 002 (2026) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2026)002 [arXiv:2505.00528 [hep-th]]. 34

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2026)002 2026

  18. [18]

    Black Hole-String Correspondence,

    L. Susskind, “Black Hole-String Correspondence,” JHAP5, no.3, 1-11 (2025) doi:10.22128/jhap.2025.2991.1123 [arXiv:2110.12617 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.22128/jhap.2025.2991.1123 2025

  19. [19]

    A Correspondence principle for black holes and strings,

    G. T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski, “A Correspondence principle for black holes and strings,” Phys. Rev. D55, 6189-6197 (1997) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.6189 [arXiv:hep- th/9612146 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.6189 1997

  20. [20]

    The fuzzball proposal for black holes: an elementary review

    S. D. Mathur, “The Fuzzball proposal for black holes: An Elementary review,” Fortsch. Phys.53, 793-827 (2005) doi:10.1002/prop.200410203 [arXiv:hep-th/0502050 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1002/prop.200410203 2005

  21. [21]

    Fuzzballs and Microstate Geometries: Black-Hole Structure in String Theory,

    I. Bena, E. J. Martinec, S. D. Mathur and N. P. Warner, “Fuzzballs and Microstate Geometries: Black-Hole Structure in String Theory,” [arXiv:2204.13113 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Fuzzballs with internal excitations

    I. Kanitscheider, K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, “Fuzzballs with internal excitations,” JHEP06, 056 (2007) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/06/056 [arXiv:0704.0690 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/06/056 2007

  23. [23]

    A Note on D1-D5 Entropy and Geometric Quantization

    C. Krishnan and A. Raju, “A Note on D1-D5 Entropy and Geometric Quantization,” JHEP06, 054 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2015)054 [arXiv:1504.04330 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2015)054 2015

  24. [24]

    D1-D5 black hole microstate counting from supergravity

    V. S. Rychkov, “D1-D5 black hole microstate counting from supergravity,” JHEP01, 063 (2006) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/01/063 [arXiv:hep-th/0512053 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/01/063 2006

  25. [25]

    Black-Hole Entropy from Supergravity Superstrata States

    I. Bena, S. Giusto, R. Russo, M. Shigemori and N. P. Warner, “Black-Hole Entropy from Supergravity Superstrata States,” JHEP10, 140 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2014)140 [arXiv:1406.4506 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2014)140 2014

  26. [26]

    Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes,

    C. M. Chang and Y. H. Lin, “Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes,” [arXiv:2402.10129 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  27. [27]

    Fortuity in the D1-D5 system,

    C. M. Chang, Y. H. Lin and H. Zhang, “Fortuity in the D1-D5 system,” [arXiv:2501.05448 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Towards quantum black hole microstates,

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee, S. Lee and J. Yoon, “Towards quantum black hole microstates,” JHEP11, 175 (2023) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2023)175 [arXiv:2304.10155 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2023)175 2023

  29. [29]

    Fortuity in SYK models,

    C. M. Chang, Y. Chen, B. S. Sia and Z. Yang, “Fortuity in SYK models,” JHEP08, 003 (2025) [arXiv:2412.06902 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Fortuity and supergravity,

    M. R. R. Hughes and M. Shigemori, “Fortuity and supergravity,” JHEP03, 130 (2026) [arXiv:2505.14888 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Entanglement entropy of black holes

    S. N. Solodukhin, “Entanglement entropy of black holes,” Living Rev. Rel.14, 8 (2011) doi:10.12942/lrr-2011-8 [arXiv:1104.3712 [hep-th]]. 35

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.12942/lrr-2011-8 2011