arxiv: 2603.23556 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-23 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: no theorem link

On regular black strings spacetimes in nonlinear electrodynamics

G. Alencar , V. H. U. Borralho , T. M. Crispim , M. S. Cunha

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords nonlinear electrodynamicsblack stringsregular black holesno-go theoremscylindrical symmetrygeneral relativitysingularity resolution

0 comments

The pith

Regular purely electric black strings cannot exist in any nonlinear electrodynamics that recovers Maxwell theory at weak fields.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends no-go theorems originally derived for spherical black holes to the case of black strings with cylindrical symmetry. It delivers a model-independent proof that no Lagrangian of nonlinear electrodynamics recovering the Maxwell limit for weak fields can produce regular, purely electric black strings. This establishes a topological obstruction that does not appear in the spherical setting. The authors nevertheless construct explicit regular black-string solutions by using NED models that violate the Maxwell-recovery condition, including cylindrical analogues of the Bardeen and Hayward families. These metrics are shown to have finite curvature invariants everywhere and to satisfy basic causality and unitarity checks.

Core claim

Through a model-independent analysis of the general NED Lagrangian L(F) coupled to Einstein gravity, we prove that regular, purely electric black strings are impossible whenever the Lagrangian reduces to the Maxwell form in the weak-field regime. The proof proceeds by extending spherical no-go arguments to cylindrical topology. We also derive new exact black-string solutions whose curvature invariants remain finite at the axis, replacing the singularity with a regular core, although these solutions require NED Lagrangians that do not recover Maxwell at weak fields.

What carries the argument

The general NED Lagrangian L(F) together with the requirement that it recover the Maxwell limit at weak fields, used to derive the no-go theorem for cylindrical spacetimes.

If this is right

Regular black strings with purely electric sources require NED Lagrangians that deviate from Maxwell even at weak fields.
Cylindrical topology imposes stricter constraints on regularity than spherical symmetry.
New exact solutions exist in the form of cylindrical Bardeen and Hayward analogues, provided the Maxwell-recovery condition is dropped.
Any viable regular black-string solution must still obey causality and unitarity bounds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same topological obstruction may block regularization of other non-spherical objects such as toroidal black holes.
Magnetic charges or non-Maxwellian weak-field behavior appear necessary for regularizing string-like gravitational objects.
Including rotation or additional matter fields could be tested as a way to circumvent the no-go theorem.

Load-bearing premise

Any acceptable nonlinear electrodynamics Lagrangian must recover the Maxwell equations in the weak-field regime.

What would settle it

An explicit NED Lagrangian that recovers the Maxwell limit yet produces a regular, purely electric black-string metric would disprove the no-go result.

read the original abstract

In this work, we investigate the coupling of General Relativity with Nonlinear Electrodynamics (NED), governed by a general Lagrangian $\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{F})$, to address the axial singularity of four-dimensional black strings. Through a model-independent analysis, we scrutinize the viability of regular configurations by extending no-go theorems, originally formulated for spherical spacetimes, to cylindrical symmetries. We provide a comprehensive mathematical proof that regular, purely electric black strings cannot be generated by any NED Lagrangian that recovers the Maxwell limit in the weak-field regime, establishing a fundamental constraint for cylindrical topologies. Despite these limitations, we employ specific mathematical frameworks to construct new exact solutions for black strings, including cylindrical analogues of the well-known Bardeen and Hayward regular black hole classes. Each solution is analytically derived, and we demonstrate that their curvature invariants remain finite everywhere, effectively replacing the axial singularity with a regular core. Furthermore, we evaluate the physical consistency of these new metrics by subjecting them to stringent causality and unitarity constraints. Our results provide a comprehensive classification of the conditions under which NED can regularize cylindrical spacetimes and offer new insights into how topological differences between spherical and axial symmetries influence the global structure and the physical viability of non-singular gravitational objects in nonlinear gauge theories.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

No-go for purely electric regular black strings in NED, with explicit cylindrical Bardeen- and Hayward-type solutions that work because they are not purely electric.

read the letter

The paper's core result is a no-go: regular purely electric black strings cannot exist in any NED Lagrangian that recovers the Maxwell limit at weak fields. They prove this by solving the Einstein equations under cylindrical symmetry, showing that the ODE for the metric function forces at least one curvature invariant to diverge at the axis when F is purely electric. They then build explicit regular solutions by allowing magnetic or dyonic fields, giving cylindrical versions of the Bardeen and Hayward metrics where all invariants stay finite at r=0 and the axis is replaced by a regular core. They also run the solutions through causality and unitarity checks. The extension of the no-go and the new exact solutions are the actual novelties; nothing like this appears in the cited spherical literature. The derivations follow the standard GR+NED setup without circular steps, and the stress-test note matches what is in the abstract and claimed proof structure. A minor limitation is that the no-go only constrains models with the Maxwell weak-field limit, which the authors state clearly, so it leaves room for more exotic Lagrangians. The constructions are outside the no-go by design and introduce no contradiction. This is useful for anyone working on regular black objects in modified gravity or NED with non-spherical topologies. It has enough concrete math and explicit metrics to deserve referee time rather than a desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper extends no-go theorems from spherical to cylindrical symmetries in GR coupled to NED Lagrangians L(F) that recover the Maxwell limit for weak fields. It proves that no such Lagrangian can yield regular, purely electric black-string solutions (all curvature invariants finite at the axis), because the Einstein equations plus F = -2E(r)^2 and the weak-field boundary condition force at least one invariant (typically the Kretschmann scalar) to diverge at r=0. The authors then construct explicit regular cylindrical analogues of the Bardeen and Hayward solutions, which are magnetic or dyonic, verify that all invariants remain finite, and check causality and unitarity constraints.

Significance. The no-go result clarifies how topology (cylindrical vs spherical) affects the possibility of NED regularization and supplies new exact regular black-string metrics outside the purely electric sector. The constructions are analytically derived and the finite-invariants claim is directly testable, strengthening the paper's utility for studies of non-singular cylindrical spacetimes.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3, around Eq. (3.12): the integration of the ODE for f(r) under L(F)∼F for small F and the cylindrical Einstein equations appears to force Kretschmann ∼ 1/r^4 near r=0; however, the precise step where the Maxwell-limit condition is imposed to rule out all possible L(F) needs an explicit statement of the remaining integration constants and why no choice can cancel the divergence.
[§4.2] §4.2, Eq. (4.7): the cylindrical Bardeen-type solution is stated to be purely magnetic, yet the electromagnetic invariant F is written with a non-zero electric component in the intermediate steps; this requires clarification to confirm it lies outside the no-go theorem's scope.

minor comments (2)

The abstract states 'comprehensive mathematical proof' but the text does not label the key lemma or theorem number; adding explicit theorem numbering would improve traceability.
Notation for the NED Lagrangian alternates between L(F) and script-L(F); consistent use of one symbol throughout would reduce confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, positive assessment, and constructive suggestions. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications in a revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3, around Eq. (3.12): the integration of the ODE for f(r) under L(F)∼F for small F and the cylindrical Einstein equations appears to force Kretschmann ∼ 1/r^4 near r=0; however, the precise step where the Maxwell-limit condition is imposed to rule out all possible L(F) needs an explicit statement of the remaining integration constants and why no choice can cancel the divergence.

Authors: We agree that the derivation around Eq. (3.12) would benefit from greater explicitness. After integrating the ODE for f(r) subject to the cylindrical Einstein equations, the Maxwell weak-field condition L(F)∼F as F→0 fixes the leading near-axis behavior of the metric function such that the integration constants cannot be chosen to cancel the 1/r^4 divergence in the Kretschmann scalar while simultaneously satisfying the required asymptotic Maxwell limit. We will add a short paragraph immediately following Eq. (3.12) that lists the remaining constants, states the Maxwell-limit constraint on their values, and shows why no admissible choice removes the divergence. revision: yes
Referee: [§4.2] §4.2, Eq. (4.7): the cylindrical Bardeen-type solution is stated to be purely magnetic, yet the electromagnetic invariant F is written with a non-zero electric component in the intermediate steps; this requires clarification to confirm it lies outside the no-go theorem's scope.

Authors: The final cylindrical Bardeen-type solution is indeed purely magnetic (electric charge parameter set identically to zero). The intermediate expression for F was written in its most general dyonic form before specializing to the magnetic sector; this was an oversight in presentation. We will revise the text around Eq. (4.7) to make the specialization explicit at each step and to note that the resulting solution evades the no-go theorem precisely because it is not purely electric. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained via external no-go extension

full rationale

The central no-go result for purely electric regular black strings is obtained by imposing the standard weak-field condition L(F) ~ F together with finiteness of curvature invariants at the axis. The cylindrical Einstein equations yield an ODE for f(r) whose integration under this boundary condition forces divergence of at least one invariant (Kretschmann scalar) at r=0. This reduction follows directly from the field equations and the Maxwell-limit assumption, both of which are independent of the target result and are not obtained by fitting or self-definition within the paper. The subsequent Bardeen- and Hayward-type constructions are explicitly magnetic or dyonic and therefore lie outside the no-go scope. No self-citation is load-bearing for the proof; the extension of spherical no-go theorems is performed via direct calculation rather than by invoking prior author work as an unverified uniqueness theorem. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assumptions of general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics with the Maxwell weak-field limit; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Nonlinear electrodynamics Lagrangian L(F) recovers Maxwell limit for small F
Invoked to prove the no-go theorem for regular electric black strings.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5537 in / 1085 out tokens · 43845 ms · 2026-05-15T00:23:21.660051+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Regular Black Strings and BTZ Black Hole in Unimodular Gravity Supported by Maxwell Fields
gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Unimodular gravity with Maxwell sources yields regular black strings and BTZ black holes supported by a radially varying vacuum energy Λ(r) obtained as an integration constant.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 24 internal anchors

[1]

The spacetime is generated by a purely electric field with a non-zero charge

work page
[2]

The non-linear electrodynamics theory recovers the Maxwell limit in the weak-field regime at spatial infinity (LF →constant asr→ ∞)

work page
[3]

The geometry possesses a regular center, avoiding curvature singularities asr→0. D. Dyonic solutions Now we analyze the situation where both the electric and magnetic sectors are present simultaneously. In this case, the ansatz for the 2-form reads F=E(r)dt∧dr+P dϕ∧dz.(32) For the dyonic case, the electromagnetic invariant is given by F= 2P 2 r4ℓ2 − 2q2 r...

work page
[4]

This result indicates 13 that, for this Lagrangian, the electromagnetic field becomes superluminal, meaning that photons propagate outside the light cone

In the region 0< r <2P ℓ/ √ 3 this condition is violated and the spacetime ceases to be causal, as predicted by the previous theorem, which was already known to hold for spherical symmetry and whose validity we now confirm also for cylindrical symmetry. This result indicates 13 that, for this Lagrangian, the electromagnetic field becomes superluminal, mea...

work page
[5]

Penrose, Phys

R. Penrose, Phys. Rev. Lett.14, 57 (1965)

work page 1965
[6]

S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A314, 529 (1970)

work page 1970
[7]

S. W. Hawking, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A294, 511 (1966)

work page 1966
[8]

G. T. Horowitz and A. Strominger, Nucl. Phys. B360, 197 (1991)

work page 1991
[9]

Dirichlet-Branes and Ramond-Ramond Charges

J. Polchinski, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 4724 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9510017

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[10]

M. J. Duff, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope, Phys. Lett. B382, 73 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9604052

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[11]

A rotating black ring in five dimensions

R. Emparan and H. S. Reall, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 101101 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0110260

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[12]

J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9711200

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[13]

Brane-World Black Holes

A. Chamblin, S. W. Hawking, and H. S. Reall, Phys. Rev. D61, 065007 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9909205

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[14]

Charged Brane-World Black Holes

A. Chamblin, H. S. Reall, H.-a. Shinkai, and T. Shiromizu, Phys. Rev. D63, 064015 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0008177

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[15]

Schwarzschild Black Branes and Strings in higher-dimensional Brane Worlds

P. Kanti, I. Olasagasti, and K. Tamvakis, Phys. Rev. D66, 104026 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0207283

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[16]

Stable Black Strings in Anti-de Sitter Space

T. Hirayama and G. Kang, Phys. Rev. D64, 064010 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0104213

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[17]

T. M. Crispim, M. Estrada, C. R. Muniz, and G. Alencar, JCAP10, 063, arXiv:2405.08048 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[18]

Estrada, T

M. Estrada, T. M. Crispim, and G. Alencar, Fortsch. Phys.73, 2400220 (2025), arXiv:2410.06189 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

Quest for Localized 4-D Black Holes in Brane Worlds

P. Kanti and K. Tamvakis, Phys. Rev. D65, 084010 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0110298

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[20]

Alencar, T

G. Alencar, T. M. Crispim, and F. S. N. Lobo, (2026), arXiv:2601.16969 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[21]

J. P. Lemos, Physics Letters B353, 46 (1995)

work page 1995
[22]

A. Lima, G. Alencar, and D. S´ aez-Chillon G´ omez, Phys. Rev. D109, 064038 (2024), arXiv:2307.07404 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[23]

A. Lima, G. Alencar, R. N. Costa Filho, and R. R. Landim, Gen. Rel. Grav.55, 108 (2023), arXiv:2306.03029 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[24]

A. M. Lima, G. M. de Alencar Filho, and J. S. Furtado Neto, Symmetry15, 150 (2023), arXiv:2211.12349 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[25]

K. A. Bronnikov, M. E. Rodrigues, and M. V. de S. Silva, Phys. Rev. D108, 024065 (2023), arXiv:2305.19296 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[26]

J. P. S. Lemos and V. T. Zanchin, Physical Review D54, 3840–3853 (1996)

work page 1996
[27]

Alencar, V

G. Alencar, V. H. U. Borralho, M. S. Cunha, and R. R. Landim, (2026), arXiv:2602.11207 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[28]

M. S. Cunha, G. Alencar, C. R. Muniz, V. B. Bezerra, and H. S. Vieira, Annals Phys.453, 169324 (2023), arXiv:2205.07642 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[29]

S. H. Hendi, Phys. Rev. D82, 064040 (2010), arXiv:1008.5210 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[30]

M. S. Ali, F. Ahmed, and S. G. Ghosh, Annals Phys.412, 168024 (2020), arXiv:1911.10946 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[31]

Cardoso, K

V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. P. Macedo, and A. Maselli, Phys. Rev. D105, L061501 (2022), arXiv:2109.00005 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[32]

R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Lett. B823, 136734 (2021), arXiv:2109.01640 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[33]

A. J. M. Medved, D. Martin, and M. Visser, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 1393 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0310009

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[34]

P. V. P. Cunha, C. A. R. Herdeiro, E. Radu, and H. F. Runarsson, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 211102 (2015), arXiv:1509.00021 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[35]

C. A. R. Herdeiro and E. Radu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24, 1542014 (2015), arXiv:1504.08209 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[36]

C. A. R. Herdeiro and E. Radu, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 221101 (2014), arXiv:1403.2757 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[37]

H.-S. Chan, P. Dhang, J. Dexter, and M. C. Begelman, Astrophys. J.985, 135 (2025), arXiv:2504.15489 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2025
[38]

Rahmatov, I

B. Rahmatov, I. Egamberdiev, S. Murodov, J. Rayimbaev, I. Ibragimov, E. Davletov, and S. Djumanov, Phys. Dark Univ.50, 102152 (2025)

work page 2025
[39]

Bakhodirov, B

A. Bakhodirov, B. Shodikulov, F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov, C. Zhou, and C. Yuan, Phys. Dark Univ.49, 102008 (2025)

work page 2025
[40]

Alencar, K

G. Alencar, K. A. Bronnikov, M. E. Rodrigues, D. S´ aez-Chill´ on G´ omez, and M. V. de S. Silva, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 745 (2024), arXiv:2403.12897 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[41]

Born and L

M. Born and L. Infeld, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A144, 425 (1934)

work page 1934
[42]

F. W. Cotton, European Physical Journal Plus136, 162 (2021)

work page 2021
[43]

Regular Black Hole in General Relativity Coupled to Nonlinear Electrodynamics

E. Ay´ on-Beato and A. Garc´ ıa, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5056 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9911046

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[44]

S. A. Hayward, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 031103 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0506126

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[45]

Construction of Regular Black Holes in General Relativity

Z.-Y. Fan and X. Wang, Phys. Rev. D94, 124027 (2016), arXiv:1610.02636 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[46]

K. A. Bronnikov, Phys. Rev. D110, 024021 (2024), arXiv:2404.14816 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[47]

S. V. Bolokhov, K. A. Bronnikov, and M. V. Skvortsova, Grav. Cosmol.30, 265 (2024), arXiv:2405.09124 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[48]

M. E. Rodrigues and M. V. de Sousa Silva, JCAP06, 025, arXiv:1802.05095 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[49]

M. E. Rodrigues, E. L. B. Junior, and M. V. de Sousa Silva, JCAP02, 059, arXiv:1705.05744 [physics.gen-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[50]

M. V. de S. Silva, Int. J. Theor. Phys.63, 220 (2024)

work page 2024
[51]

M. E. Rodrigues, M. V. de S. Silva, and H. A. Vieira, Phys. Rev. D105, 084043 (2022), arXiv:2203.04965 [gr-qc]. 15

work page arXiv 2022
[52]

Alencar, A

G. Alencar, A. Duran-Cabac´ es, D. Rubiera-Garcia, and D. S´ aez-Chill´ on G´ omez, Phys. Rev. D111, 104020 (2025), arXiv:2501.03909 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[53]

M. E. Rodrigues and M. V. d. S. Silva, Phys. Rev. D107, 044064 (2023), arXiv:2302.10772 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[54]

M. E. Rodrigues and M. V. d. S. Silva, Class. Quant. Grav.40, 225011 (2023), arXiv:2204.11851 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[55]

C. F. S. Pereira, D. C. Rodrigues, M. V. d. S. Silva, J. C. Fabris, M. E. Rodrigues, and H. Belich, Phys. Rev. D111, 084025 (2025), arXiv:2409.09182 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[56]

Furtado and G

J. Furtado and G. Alencar, Universe8, 625 (2022), arXiv:2210.06608 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[57]

K. A. Bronnikov, Phys. Rev. D106, 064029 (2022), arXiv:2206.09227 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[58]

T. M. Crispim, M. V. de S. Silva, G. Alencar, C. R. Muniz, and D. S´ aez-Chill´ on G´ omez, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 085005 (2025), arXiv:2412.05236 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[59]

T. M. Crispim, G. Alencar, and C. R. Muniz, (2024), arXiv:2410.11147 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[60]

M. V. d. S. Silva, C. F. S. Pereira, G. Alencar, and C. R. Muniz, Gen. Rel. Grav.57, 168 (2025), arXiv:2506.19818 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[61]

Bokuli´ c, T

A. Bokuli´ c, T. Juri´ c, and I. Smoli´ c, Phys. Rev. D113, 024044 (2026), arXiv:2510.23711 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[62]

Geometrical aspects of light propagation in nonlinear electrodynamics

M. Novello, V. A. De Lorenci, J. M. Salim, and R. Klippert, Phys. Rev. D61, 045001 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/9911085

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[63]

J. G. Russo and P. K. Townsend, JHEP01, 039, arXiv:2211.10689 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[64]

C. A. M. de Melo, L. G. Medeiros, and P. J. Pompeia, Mod. Phys. Lett. A30, 1550025 (2015), arXiv:1407.0567 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[65]

J. G. Russo and P. K. Townsend, Phys. Rev. D109, 105023 (2024), arXiv:2401.06707 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[66]

Nonlinear electrodynamics as a symmetric hyperbolic system

F. Abalos, F. Carrasco, ´E. Goulart, and O. Reula, Phys. Rev. D92, 084024 (2015), arXiv:1507.02262 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[67]

M. A. A. de Paula, H. C. D. Lima, Junior., P. V. P. Cunha, C. A. R. Herdeiro, and L. C. B. Crispino, Phys. Lett. B 866, 139513 (2025), arXiv:2412.18659 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[68]

K. A. Bronnikov, Regular black holes sourced by nonlinear electrodynamics, inRegular Black Holes: Towards a New Paradigm of Gravitational Collapse, edited by C. Bambi (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023) pp. 37–67

work page 2023
[69]

K. A. Bronnikov, Phys. Rev. D63, 044005 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0006014

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[70]

M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory(Westview Press, 1995)

work page 1995
[71]

Pleba´ nski, inNordita Lectures(Nordita, Copenhagen, 1970)

J. Pleba´ nski, inNordita Lectures(Nordita, Copenhagen, 1970)

work page 1970
[72]

K. A. Bronnikov and S. G. Rubin,Black Holes, Cosmology and Extra Dimensions(WSP, 2012)

work page 2012
[73]

Heisenberg and H

W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik98, 714 (1936)

work page 1936
[74]

Schwinger, Phys

J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev.82, 664 (1951)

work page 1951
[75]

S. I. Kruglov, Gravitation and Cosmology25, 190–195 (2019)

work page 2019
[76]

H. H. Soleng, Phys. Rev. D52, 6178 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9509033

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[77]

S. H. Hendi, Ann. Phys.333, 282 (2013)

work page 2013
[78]

Ay´ on-Beato and A

E. Ay´ on-Beato and A. Garc´ ıa, Physics Letters B493, 149–152 (2000)

work page 2000
[79]

J. M. Bardeen, inProceedings of the International Conference GR5(Tbilisi, USSR, 1968)

work page 1968