Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 5 cited by

The one-dimensional Mpemba effect in a polynomial double-well potential is caused by a hard wall on the shallow side, not by the double-well shape or metastability; without such a wall, the effect disappears.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 16:54 UTC pith:KM3WNPR7

load-bearing objection Genuine boundary-driven Mpemba scaling for equal-tail polynomial potentials, but the 'wall necessity' claim is overbroad; the paper's own non-analytic counterexample shows a steeper left tail suffices. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2604.01543 v4 pith:KM3WNPR7 submitted 2026-04-02 cond-mat.stat-mech

The Mpemba effect likes to hit a wall

Yue Liu , Tan Van Vu , Rapha\"el Ch\'etrite , Fr\'ed\'eric van Wijland , Hisao Hayakawa This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mech PACS 05.40.-a05.70.Ln
keywords Mpemba effectanomalous relaxationoverdamped Langevin dynamicsdouble-well potentialhard wall boundarypopulation transferFokker-Planck spectrumfinite-size effects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that for a 1D overdamped particle in an asymmetric polynomial double-well potential, the Mpemba effect — a hotter initial equilibrium relaxing faster than a colder one — is caused by a hard wall on the shallow well side, not by the double-well shape or metastability. If the wall is removed, leaving an infinite system, the Mpemba effect vanishes. The Mpemba inverse temperature scales as β_M ∝ ln(L_−)/L_−^m, where L_− is the wall distance and m the potential's growth exponent. The underlying mechanism is a transfer of population out of the shallow side as the initial temperature rises, which requires a boundary or a steeper asymptotic tail to reverse the left/right population. The same mechanism explains Mpemba effects in single-well and symmetric double-well potentials.

Core claim

We establish that the one-dimensional Mpemba effect for a particle in an asymmetric polynomial double-well potential is driven solely by the presence of a hard wall on the shallow side. For potentials growing as x^m at both infinities, the Mpemba temperature obeys β_M ∝ ln(L_−)/L_−^m, so β_M → 0 as L_− → ∞ and no Mpemba effect exists in the infinite system. A second wall on the deep side, if placed too close, can suppress the effect. The same boundary-driven population-transfer mechanism operates in single-well and symmetric double-well potentials.

What carries the argument

The key object is the overlap coefficient a_2(β_i), the projection of the initial Boltzmann distribution onto the slowest non-equilibrium mode ℓ_2; a Mpemba effect is defined as a non-monotonicity of a_2 with initial inverse temperature β_i. At low bath temperature, ℓ_2 is approximated by a step function at the barrier position x*, and the Mpemba condition ∂a_2/∂β_i = 0 becomes a requirement that the conditional internal energies of the left and right domains, U_− and U_+, be equal. Asymptotic evaluation of these conditional energies for large wall distance gives Eq. (13), β_M ∝ ln(L_−)/L_−^m. The wall's role is to make the left population eventually saturate and then transfer to the right a

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes the potential's left and right tails grow as the same power m (V(x) ~ v_m x^m), so the hard wall is the only asymmetry; if the tails grow differently, an asymmetric potential without any wall can already produce the Mpemba effect, as the paper's own End Matter example shows.

What would settle it

Compute a_2(T_i) for an overdamped particle in an asymmetric quartic double-well (e.g., V(x) = (x^2−1)^2 − 0.2x) on the full real line, with no walls, by numerically diagonalizing the Fokker-Planck operator; the paper predicts monotonic a_2 and no Mpemba temperature. Also check that introducing a left wall at L_− yields β_M following ln(L_−)/L_−^4; a clear sign change at finite β would refute the scaling.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Existing and future colloidal 1D experiments should see the Mpemba effect disappear if the trap's shallow-side tail is made effectively infinite or if the confining potential is sufficiently flat.
  • Measurement of β_M as a function of wall position L_− in a quartic or sextic trap should follow ln(L_−)/L_−^m; deviations would indicate a role of tail asymmetry.
  • The double-well structure and energy barrier are not essential to the phenomenon; they merely provide a slow mode on which the effect can be observed.
  • Adding a wall close to the deep well can eliminate the Mpemba effect, giving a tunable switch.
  • The mechanism predicts Mpemba effects in single-well potentials grafted with a wall, offering simpler experimental setups.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the equal-power-law-tail restriction is relaxed (e.g., left tail steeper than right), the wall is unnecessary; the paper itself demonstrates a piecewise x^4/x^2 potential with two Mpemba temperatures. A testable extension is to engineer such a potential optically and detect the two crossings.
  • The wall-driven explanation suggests that for any confining finite system, the slow-mode coefficient a_2 will generically be non-monotonic when one side is bounded at a scale shorter than the other; this may connect boundary-driven relaxation anomalies to finite-size effects in simulations of many-body systems.
  • The paper's definition of Mpemba via non-monotonic a_2 is one of several distance measures; the wall-driven mechanism may be sensitive to the chosen observable, so experiments should report a_2-based diagnostics and compare with KL divergence or L1 distance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the classical 1D Mpemba effect for an overdamped Brownian particle in an asymmetric double-well potential. Using the coefficient a2 of the slowest non-equilibrium mode as a proxy for the Mpemba condition, the authors derive an asymptotic formula for the Mpemba inverse temperature as a function of the distance L_- to a hard wall on the shallow side: β_M ∝ ln(L_-)/L_-^m (Eq. 13). They argue that, for polynomial double-well potentials with the same power-law growth on both tails, a wall on the shallow side is necessary for the Mpemba effect and the effect disappears for an infinite system. They support the analysis with numerical diagonalization of the Fokker-Planck operator for quartic and sextic potentials, and they present a non-polynomial example with a steeper left tail that exhibits the Mpemba effect without any wall.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper would reframe the 1D Mpemba effect as a boundary/tail phenomenon rather than a consequence of metastability, and it provides a concrete, falsifiable scaling prediction for experiments. The derivation is built on standard spectral and metastability results, and the numerical tests cover a wide range of bath temperatures and wall distances. The paper is also commendably explicit about the non-analytic counterexample in the End Matter, which shows the boundaries of the main claim. However, the headline statement in the abstract is broader than the assumptions used in the proof, and the proof that the Mpemba effect disappears in the infinite-size limit is not fully supplied.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and End Matter, Eq. (32)] The abstract states that the 1D Mpemba effect for an asymmetric polynomial double-well potential is 'driven solely by the presence of a hard wall' and 'disappears if we consider an infinitely large system.' As the paper itself acknowledges in the main text and demonstrates in the End Matter, this is true only within the class of potentials whose left and right tails grow as the same power m (Eq. 9). The non-analytic example of Eq. (32) — with V~x^4 for x<0 and V~x^2 for x>0 — produces a Mpemba effect with no wall at all and even a second Mpemba temperature when a right wall is added. Since the abstract does not state the equal-asymptotic-growth restriction, it overstates the scope of the result. The authors should revise the abstract to explicitly say 'for polynomial potentials with identical power-law tails' and to qualify 'irrespective of the potential's shape' accordingly.
  2. [End Matter, 'Derivation of Eqs. (11) and (12)' and main text after Eq. (13)] The claim that a2 is monotonic in β_i when L_-=∞ is not actually proven. The asymptotic calculation shows that the wall-induced extremum found for large but finite L_- moves to β_M→0 as L_-→∞, but it does not exclude the possibility of a second solution at finite β_i for the unbounded polynomial potential with lower-order odd terms. The derivation leading to Eq. (30) explicitly uses the large-L_- limit, and the term that would survive with no wall is not analyzed. Since the 'no wall => no Mpemba' statement is central to the paper, the authors should either supply a rigorous argument for monotonicity in the L_-=∞ case for potentials of the form Eq. (9), or provide direct numerical evidence for the unbounded system over a comprehensive range of parameters.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (8)] The definition of p_- appears to have reversed integration limits in the main text; it should read p_- = ∫_{-L_-}^{x*} π(x,β_i) dx to match the subsequent formulas.
  2. [Eq. (6)] The normalization of ℓ2 is not specified. Since the condition ∂a2/∂β_i=0 is unaffected by an overall constant, this does not change the result, but the convention should be stated for clarity.
  3. [References] Several references contain '?' placeholders (e.g., [31?–50], [51? ?], [53?], and the '?' in the End Matter and Fig. 5 caption). These must be completed before publication.
  4. [Fig. 2] The dashed line representing the analytical result is not labeled in the figure panels. Please add a legend or explicit label. Also, the claim that Eq. (13) is 'pragmatically valid' down to L_- of order unity should be quantified with the fit parameters used.
  5. [Fig. 3] The text says the prediction Eq. (12) is 'consistent' with the data, but no theoretical curve is shown. Adding the predicted curve would make the test of the analytical formula more transparent.
  6. [Main text, comment on inverse Mpemba effect] The phrase 'inverse Mpemba effect' is used for β_M<β. Consider giving a one-sentence definition or reference at first use, as this terminology can be confused with other inverse effects in the literature.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation: the wall-necessity scaling follows from the stated polynomial class and independent spectral results; only a minor non-load-bearing self-citation is present.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained within its stated assumptions. The Mpemba condition is reduced, via Eq. (7), to the internal-energy equality U_-=U_+ (Eq. (8)). The only structural input is the low-temperature eigenfunction approximation Eq. (6), cited to the companion paper [52] together with independent, peer-reviewed metastability results [58,59]; those independent results carry the approximation, so the self-citation is redundant rather than load-bearing. Equations (10)-(13) and End Matter Eqs. (21)-(31) then follow by Laplace/asymptotic evaluation of integrals for the explicit potential class Eq. (9). No parameter is fitted to the quantity later announced as a prediction; Eq. (13) is the solution of the integral condition, not an input. The paper itself limits its own abstract's universal wording: 'if Pandora's box of mathematical possibilities is open to non-analytic potentials, with asymptotic behavior differing to the right and to the left, then of course a hard wall is not a necessary condition' and presents the x^4-left/x^2-right counterexample Eq. (32). This is a scope limitation of the claim 'irrespective of the potential's double-well shape' but not a circular step. Self-citations such as [52] are used for extensions and companion details, not as the sole justification of the central wall-scaling result. Hence no significant circularity; score 2 reflects only a minor non-load-bearing self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on standard spectral theory of the Fokker-Planck operator, the metastability approximation of ℓ2, and the assumption of equal asymptotic growth of the two tails. The main claim is not circular: the scaling βM ~ ln L/L^m is derived from an integral condition, not fitted. However, the universality implied in the abstract is narrower than the assumptions, and the numerical comparison uses unspecified prefactors.

free parameters (1)
  • C1, C2 (asymptotic prefactors in βM formula, Eqs. (12)-(13)) = not specified
    The scaling form is derived, but the prefactors are never computed. The dashed line in Fig. 2 presumably requires choosing them, so the quantitative test is not parameter-free.
axioms (6)
  • standard math Spectral expansion of the Fokker-Planck solution and detailed balance (Eqs. 2-5)
    The entire analysis assumes the eigenfunction expansion exists and is complete, and that the dynamics relax to the Boltzmann distribution.
  • domain assumption Definition of the Mpemba effect via non-monotonicity of a2 and dominance of the λ2 mode (Eq. 5)
    The paper follows the literature (e.g., Lu & Raz) in equating the Mpemba effect with a non-monotonic coefficient a2; this requires λ3 ≫ λ2 in the late-time regime.
  • domain assumption Low-temperature approximation of the left eigenvector ℓ2 as a step function at x* (Eq. 6)
    Eq. (6) is load-bearing for the derivation of the Mpemba condition U_- = U_+. It is cited to [52,58,59]; [52] is the authors' own companion, but independent metastability results also support it.
  • domain assumption Potential is a polynomial of even degree m with the same asymptotic growth on both sides (Eq. 9)
    The 'wall is necessary' result is derived only for this class. When the tails grow with different powers, the paper's own End Matter example shows the effect exists without a wall.
  • domain assumption Asymptotic regime with large L_- and βM V(-L_-) ≫ 1 (Eqs. 27-31)
    The scaling βM ∝ ln L_-/L_-^m follows from a delicate double limit that assumes the wall Boltzmann factor is not exponentially small. This regime is used to derive Eq. (13).
  • standard math Sturm-Liouville: ℓ2 has exactly one zero and is monotonic (used in Eq. 14)
    Used to justify the mechanism via the sign of ΔUi(x*) and the delta-function approximation of ∂xℓ2.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 11420 in / 16348 out tokens · 156859 ms · 2026-08-02T16:54:41.935149+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The original Mpemba effect refers to the idea that a macroscopic hot system cools faster than an initially colder one. In its microscopic and classical versions, the system is modeled as an overdamped particle in an external potential, and the corresponding Mpemba effect has been observed experimentally and explored theoretically. We establish that the existence of the one-dimensional Mpemba effect for a particle in an asymmetric polynomial double-well potential is driven solely by the presence of a hard wall, irrespective of the potential's double-well shape and metastability. The Mpemba effect disappears if we consider an infinitely large system. We then show that the underlying mechanism of the Mpemba effect is governed by the fine structure of the initial statistical population as it probes the tails of the potential, which also explains the Mpemba effect in single-well and symmetric double-well potentials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.01543 by Fr\'ed\'eric van Wijland, Hisao Hayakawa, Rapha\"el Ch\'etrite, Tan Van Vu, Yue Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The presence ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The inverse temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The inverse Mpemba temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. For a piecewise-quadratic potential, the transition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) (b) FIG. 6. For the choice a = 0.49 in the definition of V in Eq. (31) and L+ = 40, the coefficient a2 is shown as a function of the initial temperature Ti. This function exhibits extrema [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗

Review history (3 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum tunneling Mpemba effect

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Non-monotonic a2(Ti) from Sturm-Liouville nodal alignment drives a size-independent quantum tunneling Mpemba effect under boundary absorption when over-barrier decay vastly outpaces the tunneling doublet.

  2. Predicting the conditions for observing the Mpemba effect

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Boundaries in the potential, not internal structure, drive the Mpemba effect in 1D Langevin dynamics via eigenmode behavior at low temperature.

  3. Predicting the conditions for observing the Mpemba effect

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Boundaries in the potential landscape, not internal features such as metastability or number of minima, determine the Mpemba effect in 1D overdamped Langevin dynamics according to a spectral analysis of the Fokker-Pla...

  4. Predicting the conditions for observing the Mpemba effect

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0

    In 1D overdamped relaxation, hard or soft walls—not well count or metastability—determine whether the Mpemba effect appears.

  5. Inverse engineering of cooling protocols: from normal behavior to Mpemba effects

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Analytical expressions are derived for external temperature protocols that produce any prescribed internal temperature trajectory using Newtonian cooling and microscopic models, including cases with Mpemba effects.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    E. B. Mpemba and D. G. Osborne, Cool?, Phys. Educ. 4, 172 (1969)

    1969

  2. [2]

    H. C. Burridge and P. F. Linden, Questioning the Mpemba effect: Hot water does not cool more quickly than cold, Sci. Rep.6, 1 (2016)

    2016

  3. [3]

    J. I. Katz, Reply to Burridge & Linden: Hot water may freeze sooner than cold, arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.03219 (2017)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Kumar and J

    A. Kumar and J. Bechhoefer, Exponentially faster cool- ing in a colloidal system, Nature584, 64 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Ch´ etrite, A

    R. Ch´ etrite, A. Kumar, and J. Bechhoefer, The metastable Mpemba effect corresponds to a non- monotonic temperature dependence of extractable work, Front. Phys.9, 654271 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    Kumar, R

    A. Kumar, R. Ch´ etrite, and J. Bechhoefer, Anomalous heating in a colloidal system, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.119, e2118484119 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Biswas, R

    A. Biswas, R. Rajesh, and A. Pal, Mpemba effect in a Langevin system: Population statistics, metastability, and other exact results, J. Chem. Phys.159, 044120 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    G. Teza, R. Yaacoby, and O. Raz, Relaxation Short- cuts through Boundary Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 017101 (2023)

    2023

  9. [9]

    Lu and O

    Z. Lu and O. Raz, Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of the Markovian Mpemba effect and its inverse, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.114, 5083 (2017)

    2017

  10. [10]

    Lasanta, F

    A. Lasanta, F. Vega Reyes, A. Prados, and A. Santos, When the Hotter Cools More Quickly: Mpemba Effect in Granular Fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 148001 (2017)

    2017

  11. [11]

    Klich, O

    I. Klich, O. Raz, O. Hirschberg, and M. Vucelja, Mpemba index and anomalous relaxation, Phys. Rev. X9, 021060 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    Baity-Jesi, E

    M. Baity-Jesi, E. Calore, A. Cruz, L. A. Fernandez, J. M. Gil-Narvi´ on, A. Gordillo-Guerrero, D. I˜ niguez, A. Lasanta, A. Maiorano, E. Marinari, V. Martin- Mayor, J. Moreno-Gordo, A. Mu˜ noz Sudupe, D. Navarro, G. Parisi, S. Perez-Gaviro, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, S. F. Schifano, B. Seoane, A. Taranc´ on, R. Tripiccione, and D. Yllanes, Th...

    2019

  13. [13]

    Momp´ o, M

    E. Momp´ o, M. A. L´ opez-Casta˜ no, A. Lasanta, F. Vega Reyes, and A. Torrente, Memory effects in a gas of viscoelastic particles, Phys. Fluids33, 062005 (2021)

    2021

  14. [14]

    Biswas, V

    A. Biswas, V. V. Prasad, O. Raz, and R. Rajesh, Mpemba effect in driven granular Maxwell gases, Phys. Rev. E102, 012906 (2020)

    2020

  15. [15]

    Yang and J.-X

    Z.-Y. Yang and J.-X. Hou, Non-Markovian Mpemba ef- fect in mean-field systems, Phys. Rev. E101, 052106 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    G´ omez Gonz´ alez, N

    R. G´ omez Gonz´ alez, N. Khalil, and V. Garz´ o, Mpemba- like effect in driven binary mixtures, Phys. Fluids33, 053301 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    Biswas, V

    A. Biswas, V. V. Prasad, and R. Rajesh, Mpemba effect in an anisotropically driven granular gas, Europhys. Lett. 136, 46001 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    Takada, H

    S. Takada, H. Hayakawa, and A. Santos, Mpemba effect in inertial suspensions, Phys. Rev. E103, 032901 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    M. R. Walker and M. Vucelja, Anomalous thermal relax- ation of Langevin particles in a piecewise-constant po- tential, J. Stat. Mech.2021, 113105 (2021)

    2021

  20. [20]

    D. M. Busiello, D. Gupta, and A. Maritan, Inducing and optimizing Markovian Mpemba effect with stochastic re- set, New J. Phys.23, 103012 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    Holtzman and O

    R. Holtzman and O. Raz, Landau theory for the Mpemba effect through phase transitions, Commun. Phys.5, 280 (2022)

    2022

  22. [22]

    G. Teza, R. Yaacoby, and O. Raz, Eigenvalue Crossing as a Phase Transition in Relaxation Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 207103 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    Biswas, V

    A. Biswas, V. V. Prasad, and R. Rajesh, Mpemba ef- fect in driven granular gases: Role of distance measures, Phys. Rev. E108, 024902 (2023)

    2023

  24. [24]

    Biswas and A

    A. Biswas and A. Pal, Mpemba effect on nonequilibrium active Markov chains, Phys. Rev. E111, 054136 (2025). 6

    2025

  25. [25]

    Santos, Mpemba meets Newton: Exploring the Mpemba and Kovacs effects in the time-delayed cooling law, Phys

    A. Santos, Mpemba meets Newton: Exploring the Mpemba and Kovacs effects in the time-delayed cooling law, Phys. Rev. E109, 044149 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    N. Ohga, H. Hayakawa, and S. Ito, Microscopic theory of Mpemba effects and a no-Mpemba theorem for monotone many-body systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06623 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Van Vu and H

    T. Van Vu and H. Hayakawa, Thermomajorization Mpemba Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 107101 (2025)

    2025

  28. [28]

    Nava and R

    A. Nava and R. Egger, Pontus-Mpemba Effects, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 140404 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    A. Nava, R. Egger, B. Dey, and D. Giuliano, Speeding up Pontus-Mpemba effects via dynamical phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 043332 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    G. Teza, J. Bechhoefer, A. Lasanta, O. Raz, and M. Vucelja, Speedups in nonequilibrium thermal relax- ation: Mpemba and related effects, Phys. Rep.1164, 1 (2026)

    2026

  31. [31]

    Carollo, A

    F. Carollo, A. Lasanta, and I. Lesanovsky, Exponentially Accelerated Approach to Stationarity in Markovian Open Quantum Systems through the Mpemba Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 060401 (2021)

    2021

  32. [32]

    F. Ares, S. Murciano, and P. Calabrese, Entanglement asymmetry as a probe of symmetry breaking, Nat. Com- mun.14, 2036 (2023)

    2036

  33. [33]

    A. K. Chatterjee, S. Takada, and H. Hayakawa, Quantum Mpemba Effect in a Quantum Dot with Reservoirs, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 080402 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    A. K. Chatterjee, S. Takada, and H. Hayakawa, Multiple quantum Mpemba effect: Exceptional points and oscilla- tions, Phys. Rev. A110, 022213 (2024)

    2024

  35. [35]

    Rylands, K

    C. Rylands, K. Klobas, F. Ares, P. Calabrese, S. Mur- ciano, and B. Bertini, Microscopic Origin of the Quan- tum Mpemba Effect in Integrable Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 010401 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    Moroder, O

    M. Moroder, O. Culhane, K. Zawadzki, and J. Goold, Thermodynamics of the Quantum Mpemba Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 140404 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Yamashika, F

    S. Yamashika, F. Ares, and P. Calabrese, Entangle- ment asymmetry and quantum Mpemba effect in two- dimensional free-fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B110, 085126 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    Liu, H.-K

    S. Liu, H.-K. Zhang, S. Yin, and S.-X. Zhang, Symmetry Restoration and Quantum Mpemba Effect in Symmetric Random Circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 140405 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    Wang and J

    X. Wang and J. Wang, Mpemba effects in nonequilibrium open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033330 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Nava and R

    A. Nava and R. Egger, Mpemba Effects in Open Nonequi- librium Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 136302 (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    Longhi, Bosonic Mpemba effect with non-classical states of light, APL Quantum1, 046110 (2024)

    S. Longhi, Bosonic Mpemba effect with non-classical states of light, APL Quantum1, 046110 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    L. K. Joshi, J. Franke, A. Rath, F. Ares, S. Murciano, F. Kranzl, R. Blatt, P. Zoller, B. Vermersch, P. Cal- abrese, C. F. Roos, and M. K. Joshi, Observing the Quan- tum Mpemba Effect in Quantum Simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 010402 (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    S. A. Shapira, Y. Shapira, J. Markov, G. Teza, N. Ak- erman, O. Raz, and R. Ozeri, Inverse Mpemba Effect Demonstrated on a Single Trapped Ion Qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 010403 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    Zhang, G

    J. Zhang, G. Xia, C.-W. Wu, T. Chen, Q. Zhang, Y. Xie, W.-B. Su, W. Wu, C.-W. Qiu, P.-X. Chen, W. Li, H. Jing, and Y.-L. Zhou, Observation of quantum strong Mpemba effect, Nat. Commun.16, 301 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    Yamashika, P

    S. Yamashika, P. Calabrese, and F. Ares, Quenching from superfluid to free bosons in two dimensions: Entan- glement, symmetries, and the quantum Mpemba effect, Phys. Rev. A111, 043304 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    D. J. Strachan, A. Purkayastha, and S. R. Clark, Non- Markovian Quantum Mpemba Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 220403 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    Turkeshi, P

    X. Turkeshi, P. Calabrese, and A. De Luca, Quantum Mpemba Effect in Random Circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 040403 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    Bao and Z

    R. Bao and Z. Hou, Accelerating Quantum Relaxation via Temporary Reset: A Mpemba-Inspired Approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 150403 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    Beato and G

    N. Beato and G. Teza, Relaxation Control of Open Quan- tum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 070401 (2026)

    2026

  50. [50]

    Yamashika and F

    S. Yamashika and F. Ares, Quantum Mpemba Effect in Long-Range Spin Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 090402 (2026)

    2026

  51. [51]

    Y. Tian, Y. Zheng, L.-H. Liu, L. Wang, G.-C. Guo, and F.-W. Sun, Experimental study of Mpemba effect in an energy Langevin system, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L042020 (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    Y. Liu, T. Van Vu, R. Ch´ etrite, F. van Wijland, and H. Hayakawa, The classical Mpemba effect is boundary- driven (2026)

    2026

  53. [53]

    Bechhoefer, A

    J. Bechhoefer, A. Kumar, and R. Ch´ etrite, A fresh un- derstanding of the Mpemba effect, Nat. Rev. Phys.3, 534 (2021)

    2021

  54. [54]

    M¨ orsch, H

    M. M¨ orsch, H. Risken, and H. D. Vollmer, One- dimensional diffusion in soluble model potentials, Z. Phys. B - Condens. Matter32, 245 (1979)

    1979

  55. [55]

    Risken,The Fokker-Planck Equation, 2nd ed

    H. Risken,The Fokker-Planck Equation, 2nd ed. (Springer, 1996)

    1996

  56. [56]

    Arrhenius, ¨Uber die Dissociationsw¨ arme und den Ein- fluss der Temperatur auf den Dissociationsgrad der Elek- trolyte, Z

    S. Arrhenius, ¨Uber die Dissociationsw¨ arme und den Ein- fluss der Temperatur auf den Dissociationsgrad der Elek- trolyte, Z. Phys. Chem.4, 96 (1889)

  57. [57]

    H. A. Kramers, Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions, Physica7, 284 (1940)

    1940

  58. [58]

    B. J. Matkowsky and Z. Schuss, The exit problem for randomly perturbed dynamical systems, SIAM J. Appl. Math.33, 365 (1977)

    1977

  59. [59]

    Bovier, M

    A. Bovier, M. Eckhoff, V. Gayrard, and M. Klein, Metastability in reversible diffusion processes I: Sharp asymptotics for capacities and exit times, J. Eur. Math. Soc.6, 399 (2004)

    2004

  60. [60]

    Hayakawa and S

    H. Hayakawa and S. Takada, Mpemba effect in a two-dimensional bistable potential, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.24148 (2026). End Matter Behavior ofℓ 2(x):The eigenvectorℓ 2 ofW † corre- sponding toλ 2 is known to have a single node. Whenλ 2 is quasi-degenerate with 0, which occurs at sufficiently low bath temperature, it takes the form of a step function wit...

    arXiv 2026