Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Level-spacing statistics between integrability and chaos are controlled by the distribution of the perturbation's matrix elements alone.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 12:34 UTC

load-bearing objection Clean, predictive RMT construction for intermediate level statistics that actually works on two many-body systems and beats the usual baselines. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2604.03669 v2 submitted 2026-04-04 cond-mat.stat-mech math-phmath.MPnlin.CDquant-ph

Random matrix theory of integrability-to-chaos transition

Ben Craps , Marine De Clerck , Oleg Evnin , Maxim Pavlov This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mech math-phmath.MPnlin.CDquant-ph
keywords quantum chaoslevel spacing statisticsintegrability-to-chaos transitionrandom matrix theoryr-ratiomatrix element distributionspower lawsquantum resonant systems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

When an integrable quantum Hamiltonian is weakly deformed by a chaotic term, the gaps between energy levels no longer follow either the pure Poisson or Wigner-Dyson laws; intermediate curves have historically been system-dependent and hard to predict. This paper shows that the entire intermediate distribution is fixed by a single statistical object: the unordered sample of matrix elements of the chaotic perturbation written in the eigenbasis of the integrable Hamiltonian. From that sample one builds a minimal random-matrix ensemble whose eigenvalues match the physical level spacings once the overall strength of the deformation is identified by a single number, the average r-ratio. Across spin chains, resonant bosonic systems, billiards and oscillators the same construction works, and the matrix-element distributions themselves turn out to be dominated by power laws that span many orders of magnitude. The result supplies a practical, quantitative map from a Hamiltonian to its spectral statistics throughout the crossover regime.

Core claim

The unfolded nearest-neighbor level-spacing distribution of a Hamiltonian H = H0 + γ H1 (H0 integrable, H1 chaotic) is accurately reproduced, at large Hilbert-space dimension, by the eigenvalues of the random ensemble H = D + γ' M, where the diagonal entries of D are i.i.d. draws from the spectrum of H0 and the off-diagonal entries of M are i.i.d. draws from the single unordered sample of ⟨n|H1|m⟩. Matching the average r-ratio between the physical and random spectra identifies the corresponding values of γ and γ'.

What carries the argument

The random-matrix ensemble H = D + γ' M constructed from the spectral density of the integrable part and the empirical distribution of the perturbation matrix elements; once the overall scale is fixed by the average r-ratio, this ensemble carries the full level-spacing statistics of the physical crossover.

Load-bearing premise

That all correlations among the perturbation matrix elements, and any dependence on their precise locations inside the matrix, become irrelevant for level spacings once only the unordered sample of their values is retained.

What would settle it

Construct any concrete H0 + γ H1 of Hilbert-space dimension a few times 10^4, extract the empirical distributions of its eigenvalues and off-diagonal matrix elements, build the corresponding random ensemble, match the average r-ratio, and check whether the unfolded spacing histograms of the physical and random spectra disagree systematically beyond sampling fluctuations.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Spectroscopic data alone can constrain the statistics of the chaotic part of an unknown Hamiltonian.
  • The intermediate spacing curve is no longer an arbitrary fitting function; it is predicted once the matrix-element distribution is known.
  • Power-law tails in off-diagonal matrix elements become a new universal signature of integrability-to-chaos crossovers across widely different degrees of freedom.
  • Existing phenomenological fits (Brody, Rosenzweig-Porter) are systematically outperformed by a construction that uses only the physical matrix-element sample.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same matrix-element distributions that control level spacings may also govern the onset of eigenstate thermalization, offering a quantitative link between spectral statistics and ETH deviations.
  • Analytic methods already developed for diagonal-plus-random ensembles could now be applied to extract closed-form spacing distributions for power-law P_M, turning the numerical construction into an asymptotic theory.
  • If the power-law regime of P_M is truly universal, its exponent may serve as a single-parameter classifier of how a given system approaches chaos.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that the unfolded nearest-neighbor level-spacing distribution of a Hamiltonian H = H0 + γ H1 (integrable H0 plus chaotic perturbation H1) is controlled, at large Hilbert-space dimension D, by the unordered sample of off-diagonal matrix elements of H1 in the eigenbasis of H0. This is encoded in the random-matrix ensemble H = D + γ' M (Eq. 6), where the diagonal entries of D are drawn i.i.d. from the spectrum of H0 and the off-diagonal entries of M are drawn i.i.d. from the empirical distribution PM of those matrix elements. The single free parameter γ' is fixed by matching the average r-ratio of the physical and ensemble spectra. The construction is validated by direct numerical comparison on an open-boundary transverse-field Ising chain (L = 16, D ≈ 3.3 imes 10^4) and a quantum resonant system ((N, M) = (37, 37), D ≈ 2.2 imes 10^4) at four intermediate values of the average r-ratio; the ensemble histograms match the physical data and outperform both the Rosenzweig–Porter model and the Brody distribution (Figs. 1–2, Appendix D). In addition, the authors report that PM itself is dominated by a power-law regime over many orders of magnitude in these and two further systems (billiard, perturbed oscillator).

Significance. If the central claim holds, the long-standing problem of intermediate (neither Poisson nor Wigner–Dyson) level statistics is reduced to a concrete, falsifiable random-matrix ensemble whose only non-universal input is an empirically accessible distribution of matrix elements. The numerical evidence is strong for the reported system sizes: two distinct many-body models, fifty ensemble realizations, 2σ error belts, public codes, and clear out-performance of the standard baselines. The power-law observation for PM is an independent, potentially far-reaching empirical finding that links the construction to ETH-type matrix-element statistics. Analytic control of the ensemble remains open, but the numerical and conceptual advance is already substantial for the field.

major comments (2)
  1. The load-bearing premise (Sec. III) that correlations among the matrix elements of H1 and their precise locations inside the matrix become irrelevant once the unordered sample is fixed is tested only by the success of the i.i.d. ensemble (6) against the physical spectra. While the match in Figs. 1–2 and the 2σ belts of Appendix D are persuasive at D ∼ 2–3 imes 10^4, a single controlled counter-example (or a finite-size scaling of residual discrepancy) would strengthen the claim that the premise survives into the large-D limit. The present evidence does not invalidate the claim for the systems studied, but the assumption remains the softest point of the argument.
  2. The power-law regime of PM (Fig. 3 and Appendix E) is reported for four systems, yet the exponents differ (p ∈ [0, 1] for the many-body models versus p = 3/2 for the billiard). The manuscript does not clarify whether the level-spacing statistics remain insensitive to the precise value of p inside the claimed range, nor whether the same ensemble construction continues to work for the billiard and oscillator once their PM is inserted. A short additional panel or statement would make the universality claim more precise.
minor comments (4)
  1. The protocol for extracting PD and PM (Appendix B) relies on inverse-transform sampling from histograms of log10 |H1,nm|. A one-sentence statement of the binning resolution and of how exact numerical zeros are treated would improve reproducibility.
  2. Figs. 1 and 2 would benefit from a brief note in the caption that the physical histograms are obtained from a single realization of H1 (as stated in the text), while the ensemble curves average 50 draws.
  3. The analytic derivation of the billiard power law (Appendix E, Eq. E5) is elegant; a short remark on whether an analogous continuum limit exists for the many-body models would be welcome.
  4. A few typographical inconsistencies appear (e.g., “Lévy” vs. “Lévy-RP”, occasional missing spaces around “γ'”). These are easily cleaned.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: PD/PM extracted once from physical H0/H1, ensemble sampled independently, and full P(s) compared after matching only the scalar average r-ratio.

full rationale

The central claim is that the i.i.d. ensemble (6) with entries drawn from the empirical unordered samples PD (spectrum of H0) and PM (off-diagonal matrix elements of H1 in the H0 eigenbasis) reproduces the unfolded level-spacing histograms of the physical H = H0 + γ H1 once the single free parameter γ' is fixed by matching the average r-ratio (an independent spectral observable that does not require unfolding). This is not self-definitional: the spacing distribution P(s) is never used as an input to construct the ensemble or to set γ'; the match of the full curves in Figs. 1–2 (and the error belts of Appendix D) is therefore a genuine numerical test, not a tautology. The same construction is repeated for two unrelated families (spin chains and QRS) and outperforms both the RP model (different PM) and the Brody fit. The power-law observation on PM is purely empirical and is not fed back into the spacing prediction. Self-citations (prior QRS papers) supply only the integrable H0 examples, not any uniqueness theorem or load-bearing ansatz that forces the result. The sole modeling assumption (irrelevance of entry positions/correlations once the unordered sample is fixed) is stated explicitly and is precisely what the numerical agreement tests; it does not reduce the claimed prediction to its inputs by construction. Score 1 reflects only the ordinary, non-load-bearing use of author-related models as test beds.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 3 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on one modeling hypothesis (i.i.d. sampling from the empirical matrix-element distribution is sufficient) plus standard large-D and unfolding assumptions of quantum chaos. No free parameters are fitted to the spacing histograms themselves; γ′ is fixed by an independent observable (average r). The ensemble itself is an invented object whose only independent evidence is the numerical match shown in the paper.

free parameters (1)
  • γ′ (or equivalently average r)
    Single scalar that sets the overall strength of the random off-diagonal matrix; fixed by matching the average r-ratio of the physical spectrum rather than by fitting the spacing histogram.
axioms (3)
  • ad hoc to paper At large Hilbert-space dimension the level-spacing distribution of H0 + γ H1 depends only on the unordered sample of off-diagonal matrix elements of H1 in the H0 eigenbasis (correlations and positions become irrelevant).
    Stated as the main insight of Sec. III; tested only numerically for the dimensions studied.
  • domain assumption Spectral unfolding via local mesoscopic windows of width ∼√D yields a universal mean density of 1 that can be compared across systems.
    Standard procedure in quantum chaos (Sec. IV, citing Bohigas et al. and Guhr et al.).
  • domain assumption The average r-ratio is a faithful one-parameter proxy for the stage of the Poisson-to-Wigner crossover.
    Used throughout Sec. V; established in the literature (Oganesyan-Huse, Atas et al.).
invented entities (1)
  • Random-matrix ensemble H = D + γ′ M with PD and PM extracted from physical H0 and H1 no independent evidence
    purpose: To reproduce intermediate level-spacing distributions without retaining the full structure of the physical Hamiltonian.
    Defined in Sec. III; its only evidence is the numerical agreement shown in Figs. 1–2 and Appendices.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 19894 in / 2588 out tokens · 28904 ms · 2026-07-13T12:34:31.146605+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The statistics of gaps between quantum energy levels is a hallmark criterion in quantum chaos and quantum integrability studies. The relevant distributions corresponding to exactly integrable vs. fully chaotic systems are universal and described by the Poisson vs. Wigner-Dyson curves. In the transitional regime between integrability and chaos, the distributions are much less universal and have not been understood quantitatively until now. We point out that the relevant statistics that controls these distributions is that of the matrix elements of the nonintegrable perturbation Hamiltonian in the energy eigenbasis of the unperturbed integrable system. With this insight, we formulate a simple random matrix ensemble that correctly reproduces the level spacing distributions in a variety of test systems. For the distribution of matrix elements appearing in our construction, we furthermore discover surprising universal features: across a variety of physical systems with diverse degrees of freedom, these distributions are dominated by simple power laws.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.03669 by Ben Craps, Marine De Clerck, Maxim Pavlov, Oleg Evnin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The transition in level spacing distribution from Poisson to WD at four different values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Similar to Fig. 1, but now for the perturbed integrable QRS model (13) at ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The probability density on a log-log scale for the magnitude of offdiagonal elements of the random perturbations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Distribution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Distribution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The same data as in Fig. 1, but now with error bars included for the random models, depicted as a belt of width 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The same data as in Fig. 2, but now with error bars included for the random models, depicted as a belt of width 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Probability distribution of the offdiagonal matrix elements of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Probability distribution of the offdiagonal matrix elements of the perturbation in the eigenbasis of the integrable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Level statistics in the fractal phase of generalized Rosenzweig--Porter models

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    Full counting statistics of generalized Rosenzweig-Porter models collapse onto a universal scaling function of E/E_T in the fractal phase, confirmed by free-probability/replica analytics and large-deviation numerics, ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 40 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    and its classical limit is Lax-integrable [46]. We per- turbH 0 with a single random QRS realization, where the coefficientsC nmkl in (12) are drawn from a uniform distribution over the interval [0,1], while respecting the symmetriesC nmkl =C mnkl =C klnm. This choice de- finesH 1. With these definitions in hand, we repeat the numeri- cal experiment of th...

  2. [2]

    An impor- tant property of this probability distribution is that it is invariant under orthogonal transformations, reflecting the independence of the choice of basis

    for the offdiagonal elements. An impor- tant property of this probability distribution is that it is invariant under orthogonal transformations, reflecting the independence of the choice of basis. Furthermore, the Wigner surmise is analytically derived for 2×2 GOE matrices, and it matches the numerical results for large GOE matrices very well. The RP mode...

  3. [3]

    Babelon, D

    O. Babelon, D. Bernard and M. Talon,Introduction to classical integrable systems(Cambridge University Press, 2003)

    2003

  4. [4]

    J. S. Caux and J. Mossel,Remarks on the notion of quantum integrability,J. Stat. Mech.1102(2011) P02023, arXiv:1012.3587 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  5. [5]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys. 65(2016) 239, arXiv:1509.06411 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. 13

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    M. V. Berry and M. Tabor,Level clustering in the reg- ular spectrum, Proc. Roy. Soc. A356(1977) 375

    1977

  7. [7]

    Bohigas, M.-J

    O. Bohigas, M.-J. Giannoni and C. Schmit,Character- ization of chaotic quantum spectra and universality of level fluctuation laws,Phys. Rev. Lett.52(1984) 1

    1984

  8. [8]

    T. A. Brody, J. Flores, J. B. French, P. A. Mello, A. Pandey and S. S. M. Wong,Random-matrix physics: spectrum and strength fluctuations,Rev. Mod. Phys.53 (1981) 385

    1981

  9. [9]

    Haller, H

    E. Haller, H. K¨ oppel and L. S. Cederbaum,On the statistical behaviour of molecular vibronic energy levels, Chem. Phys. Lett.101(1983) 215

    1983

  10. [10]

    Akemann, M

    G. Akemann, M. Kieburg, A. Mielke and T. Prosen, Universal signature from integrability to chaos in dis- sipative open quantum systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019) 254101, arXiv:1910.03520 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    L. S´ a, P. Ribeiro and T. Prosen,Complex spacing ratios: a signature of dissipative quantum chaos,Phys. Rev. X10(2020) 021019, arXiv:1910.12784 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Grobe, F

    R. Grobe, F. Haake and H.-J. Sommers,Quantum dis- tinction of regular and chaotic dissipative motion,Phys. Rev. Lett.61(1988) 1899

    1988

  13. [13]

    Woldet al.,Experimental detection of dissipative quantum chaos,arXiv:2506.04325

    K. Woldet al.,Experimental detection of dissipative quantum chaos,arXiv:2506.04325

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    T. A. Brody,A statistical measure for the repulsion of energy levels,Lett. Nuovo Cim.7(1973) 482

    1973

  15. [15]

    Rosenzweig and C

    N. Rosenzweig and C. E. Porter,Repulsion of energy levels in complex atomic spectra,Phys. Rev.120(1960) 1698

    1960

  16. [16]

    J. R. Armstrong, S. ˚Aberg, S. M. Reimann and V. G. Zelevinsky,Complexity of quantum states in the two-dimensional pairing model,Phys. Rev. E86(2012) 066204

    2012

  17. [17]

    Feingold, D

    M. Feingold, D. M. Leitner and M. Wilkinson,Spec- tral statistics in semiclassical random-matrix ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett.66(1991) 986

    1991

  18. [18]

    Prosen,Berry-Robnik level statistics in a smooth bil- liard system,J

    T. Prosen,Berry-Robnik level statistics in a smooth bil- liard system,J. Phys. A31(1998) 7023, arXiv:cond- mat/9803341

    arXiv 1998

  19. [19]

    Robnik and T

    M. Robnik and T. Prosen,Comment on energy level statistics in the mixed regime,J. Phys. A30(1997) 8787, arXiv:chao-dyn/9706023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  20. [20]

    Serbyn and J

    M. Serbyn and J. E. Moore,Spectral statistics across the many-body localization transition,Phys. Rev. B,93 (2016) 041424, arXiv:1508.07293 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  21. [21]

    V. E. Kravtsov, I. M. Khaymovich, E. Cuevas and M. Amini,A random matrix model with localization and ergodic transitions,New J. Phys.17(2015) 122002, arXiv:1508.01714[cond-mat.dis-nn]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  22. [22]

    Sierant and J

    P. Sierant and J. Zakrzewski,Level statistics across the many-body localization transition,Phys. Rev. B 99 (2019) 104205, arXiv:1808.02795 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  23. [23]

    I. C. Percival,Regular and irregular spectra,J. Phys. B 6(1973) L229

    1973

  24. [24]

    Zakrzewski, K

    J. Zakrzewski, K. Dupret and D. Delande,Statistical properties of energy levels of chaotic systems: Wigner or non-Wigner?,Phys. Rev. Lett.74(1995) 522, arXiv:chao-dyn/9501016

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  25. [25]

    M. V. Berry and M. Robnik,Semiclassical level spacings when regular and chaotic orbits coexist,J. Phys. A17 (1984) 2413

    1984

  26. [26]

    Prosen and M

    T. Prosen and M. Robnik,Semiclassical energy level statistics in the transition region between integrability and chaos: transition from Brody-like to Berry-Robnik behaviour,J. Phys. A27(1994) 8059

    1994

  27. [27]

    B. De, P. Sierant and J. Zakrzewski,On intermedi- ate statistics across many-body localization transition, J. Phys. A55(2022) 014001, arXiv:2108.11654 [cond- mat.dis-nn]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Leyvraz and T

    F. Leyvraz and T. H. Seligman,Self-consistent pertur- bation theory for random matrix ensembles,J. Phys. A 23(1990) 1555

    1990

  29. [29]

    Venturelli, L

    D. Venturelli, L. F. Cugliandolo, G. Schehr, and M. Tarzia,Replica approach to the generalized Rosenzweig-Porter model,SciPost Phys.14(2023) 110, arXiv:2209.11732 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Zakrzewski,Quantum chaos and level dynamics,En- tropy25(2023) 491

    J. Zakrzewski,Quantum chaos and level dynamics,En- tropy25(2023) 491

    2023

  31. [31]

    Oganesyan and D

    V. Oganesyan and D. A. Huse,Localization of inter- acting fermions at high temperature,Phys. Rev. B75 (2007) 155111, arXiv:cond-mat/0610854 [cond-mat.str- el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  32. [32]

    Y. Y. Atas, E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud and G. Roux, Distribution of the ratio of consecutive level spacings in random matrix ensembles,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 084101, arXiv:1212.5611 [math-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  33. [33]

    Evnin and W

    O. Evnin and W. Piensuk,Quantum resonant systems, integrable and chaotic,J. Phys. A52(2019) 025102, arXiv:1808.09173 [math-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Lenz and F

    G. Lenz and F. Haake,Reliability of small matrices for large spectra with nonuniversal fluctuations,Phys. Rev. Lett.67(1991) 1

    1991

  35. [35]

    T. Guhr, A. M¨ uller–Groeling and H. A. Weidenm¨ uller, Random-matrix theories in quantum physics: com- mon concepts,Phys. Rep.299(1998) 189, arXiv:cond- mat/9707301

    arXiv 1998

  36. [36]

    D. A. Rabson, B. N. Narozhny, and A. J. Millis, Crossover from Poisson to Wigner-Dyson level statistics in spin chains with integrability breaking,Phys. Rev. B, 69(2004) 054403, arXiv:cond-mat/0308089

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  37. [37]

    Gubin and L

    A. Gubin and L. F. Santos,Quantum chaos: An intro- duction via chains of interacting spins 1/2,Am. J. Phys. 80(2012) 246, arXiv:1106.5557 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  38. [38]

    Sz´ asz-Schagrin, B

    D. Sz´ asz-Schagrin, B. Pozsgay and G. Tak´ acs,Weak in- tegrability breaking and level spacing distribution,Sci- Post Phys.11(2021) 037, arXiv:2103.06308 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Kundu, S

    D. Kundu, S. Kumar and S. S. Gupta,Spectral crossovers and universality in quantum spin chains cou- pled to random fields,Phys. Rev. B105(2022) 014205, arXiv:2309.14076 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Buijsman, V

    W. Buijsman, V. Cheianov and V. Gritsev,Ran- dom matrix ensemble for the level statistics of many- body localization,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 180601, arXiv:1807.05075 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Sol´ orzano, L

    A. Sol´ orzano, L. F. Santos and E. J. Torres-Herrera, Multifractality and self-averaging at the many-body lo- calization transition,Phys. Rev. Res.3(2021) L032030, arXiv:2102.02824 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    Zenodo 19412167 (2026)

    2026

  43. [43]

    Evnin,Resonant Hamiltonian systems and weakly nonlinear dynamics in AdS spacetimes,Class

    O. Evnin,Resonant Hamiltonian systems and weakly nonlinear dynamics in AdS spacetimes,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 203001, arXiv:2104.09797 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Biasi, P

    A. Biasi, P. Bizo´ n and O. Evnin,Solvable cubic res- onant systems, Comm. Math. Phys.369(2019) 433, arXiv:1805.03634 [nlin.SI]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    De Clerck and O

    M. De Clerck and O. Evnin,Time-periodic quantum states of weakly interacting bosons in a harmonic trap, Phys. Lett. A384(2020) 126930, arXiv:2003.03684 14 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Craps, M

    B. Craps, M. De Clerck and O. Evnin,Time- periodicities in holographic CFTs,JHEP09(2021) 030, arXiv:2103.12798 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    De Clerck and O

    M. De Clerck and O. Evnin,A superintegrable quantum field theory,arXiv:2511.03373 [nlin.SI]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    Biasi and O

    A. Biasi and O. Evnin,Turbulent cascades in a trun- cation of the cubic Szeg˝ o equation and related systems, Anal. PDE15(2022) 217, arXiv:2002.07785 [math.AP]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Craps, M

    B. Craps, M. De Clerck, O. Evnin, P. Hacker and M. Pavlov,Bounds on quantum evolution complexity via lattice cryptography,SciPost Phys.13(2022) 090, arXiv:2202.13924 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Cizeau and J

    P. Cizeau and J. P. Bouchaud,Theory of L´ evy matrices, Phys. Rev. E50(1994) 1810

    1994

  51. [51]

    Burda, R

    Z. Burda, R. A. Janik, J. Jurkiewicz, M. A. Nowak, G. Papp and I. Zahed,Free random L´ evy matrices,Phys. Rev. E65(2002) 021106, arXiv:cond-mat/0011451

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  52. [52]

    Tarquini, G

    E. Tarquini, G. Biroli and M. Tarzia,Level statis- tics and localization transitions of L´ evy matrices,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 010601, arXiv:1507.00296 [cond- mat.dis-nn]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  53. [53]

    Biroli and M

    G. Biroli and M. Tarzia,The L´ evy-Rosenzweig-Porter random matrix ensemble,Phys. Rev. B103(2021) 104205, arXiv:2012.12841 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    S. Roy, I. M. Khaymovich, A. Das and R. Moess- ner,Multifractality without fine-tuning in a Floquet quasiperiodic chain,SciPost Phys.4(2018) 025, arXiv:1706.05012 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  55. [55]

    Tarzia,The many-body localization transition in the Hilbert space,Phys

    M. Tarzia,The many-body localization transition in the Hilbert space,Phys. Rev. B102(2020) 014208, arXiv:2003.11847 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    Ph. J. D. Crowley and A. Chandran,A constructive theory of the numerically accessible many-body local- ized to thermal crossover,SciPost Phys.12(2022) 201, arXiv:2012.14393 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    F. H. L. Essler and A. J. J. M. de Klerk,Statistics of matrix elements of local operators in integrable models, Phys. Rev. X14(2024) 031048, arXiv:2307.12410 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Rottoli and V

    F. Rottoli and V. Alba,Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis for off-diagonal matrix elements in inte- grable spin chains,Phys. Rev. B113(2026) 054308, arXiv:2505.23602 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    A. D. Mirlin and Y. V. Fyodorov,Universality of level correlation function of sparse random matrices,J. Phys. A24(1991) 2273

    1991

  60. [60]

    Frisch, M

    A. Frisch, M. Mark, K. Aikawa, F. Ferlaino, J. L. Bohn, C. Makrides, A. Petrov and S. Kotochigova,Quan- tum chaos in ultracold collisions of gas-phase erbium atoms,Nature507(2014) 475, arXiv:1312.1972 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  61. [61]

    Donget al.,Measuring the spectral form factor in many-body chaotic and localized phases of quan- tum processors,Phys

    H. Donget al.,Measuring the spectral form factor in many-body chaotic and localized phases of quan- tum processors,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 010402, arXiv:2403.16935 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Maieret al.,Emergence of chaotic scattering in ul- tracold Er and Dy,Phys

    T. Maieret al.,Emergence of chaotic scattering in ul- tracold Er and Dy,Phys. Rev. X5(2015) 041029, arXiv:1506.05221 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  63. [63]

    Moritaet al.,Magnetic Feshbach resonances in Ba++Li collisions due to strong spin-orbit coupling, arXiv:2507.12936 [physics.atom-ph]

    M. Moritaet al.,Magnetic Feshbach resonances in Ba++Li collisions due to strong spin-orbit coupling, arXiv:2507.12936 [physics.atom-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    Olver and A

    S. Olver and A. Townsend,Fast inverse transform sampling in one and two dimensions,arXiv:1307.1223 [math.NA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv