pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.04695 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-06 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

EHT-Constrained Analysis of Shadow Deformation in Quantum-Improved Rotating Non-Singular Magnetic Monopole

Gowtham Sidharth M , Sanjit Das
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords black hole shadowasymptotically safe gravityBardeen black holerotating black holesEvent Horizon Telescopenull geodesicsenergy emission rate
0
0 comments X

The pith

In a quantum-improved rotating Bardeen black hole, rising asymptotic safety and spin parameters shrink the apparent shadow while increasing its distortion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how a rotating Bardeen black hole in asymptotically safe gravity casts a shadow whose size and shape depend on the asymptotic safety parameter, the spin, and the monopole charge. Null geodesics are separated via the Hamilton-Jacobi method to obtain observables that are then compared with Event Horizon Telescope data. The central result is that larger values of the safety parameter and spin both reduce the shadow diameter and enhance its deviation from circularity, while the monopole charge further modulates the profile. An additional calculation tracks the energy emission rate as the safety parameter varies. This approach supplies concrete, observationally testable signatures of quantum-gravity corrections near black holes.

Core claim

We studied the shadow cast by a rotating Bardeen black hole within the framework of asymptotically safe gravity. The null geodesics were analyzed using the Hamilton-Jacobi separation method to derive shadow observables. Our findings show that an increase in both the asymptotic safety parameter and the spin parameter leads to a decrease in the apparent shadow size and an increase in shadow distortion. The monopole charge of the black hole played an important role in the shadow profile. Furthermore, we compute the energy emission rate associated with varying values of the asymptotic safety parameter.

What carries the argument

Hamilton-Jacobi separation of null geodesics in the rotating Bardeen metric of asymptotically safe gravity, used to extract shadow observables such as radius and distortion.

If this is right

  • Apparent shadow size decreases with increasing asymptotic safety parameter and spin.
  • Shadow distortion increases with the same two parameters.
  • Monopole charge exerts a controlling influence on the overall shadow profile.
  • Energy emission rate changes measurably as the asymptotic safety parameter is varied.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Higher-resolution future EHT arrays could place quantitative upper bounds on the asymptotic safety parameter from shadow data alone.
  • The same geodesic-separation technique could be applied to other quantum-corrected rotating metrics to generate comparative shadow templates.
  • If the reported trends hold, shadow observations would provide an independent route to test whether black holes carry a magnetic-monopole charge.

Load-bearing premise

The rotating Bardeen metric in asymptotically safe gravity is taken as the exact background spacetime whose null geodesics can be separated and compared directly with EHT shadow observables.

What would settle it

EHT measurements showing that shadow size fails to decrease or that distortion fails to increase when the spin or asymptotic safety parameter is independently varied would contradict the reported relations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04695 by Gowtham Sidharth M, Sanjit Das.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Dependence of energy density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Shadow plots of rotating Bardeen ASG black hole for di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Shadow plots of rotating Bardeen ASG black hole for di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Energy emission rate for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The contours corresponding to varying values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The contours corresponding to varying values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The contours corresponding to varying values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The contours corresponding to varying values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: The contours corresponding to varying values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: The contours corresponding to varying values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We studied the shadow cast by a rotating Bardeen black hole within the framework of asymptotically safe gravity. The null geodesics were analyzed using the Hamilton Jacobi separation method to derive shadow observables. Our findings show that an increase in both the asymptotic safety parameter and the spin parameter leads to a decrease in the apparent shadow size and an increase in shadow distortion. The monopole charge of the black hole played an important role in the shadow profile. Furthermore, we compute the energy emission rate associated with varying values of the asymptotic safety parameter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes the shadow cast by a rotating Bardeen black hole in asymptotically safe gravity. Null geodesics are treated via the Hamilton-Jacobi separation method to obtain shadow observables; the central results are that increasing the asymptotic-safety parameter and the spin parameter both shrink the apparent shadow radius and increase its distortion, while the monopole charge shapes the overall profile. The energy emission rate is also computed as a function of the asymptotic-safety parameter.

Significance. If the separability assumption holds and the derived observables are robust, the work supplies concrete, falsifiable trends that could be used to place EHT-based bounds on the asymptotic-safety parameter in a regular, non-singular rotating spacetime. The explicit inclusion of the monopole charge and the energy-emission calculation are additional strengths that enlarge the set of testable predictions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Geodesic analysis / Hamilton-Jacobi separation] The central trends (shadow radius decreases and distortion increases with the asymptotic-safety parameter) rest on the claim that the Hamilton-Jacobi equation separates for the rotating, AS-improved Bardeen metric. No explicit verification is supplied that a Carter constant still exists or that the θ-equation remains independent of the radial functions once the AS modifications are inserted. Without this check, the analytic impact-parameter expressions used to extract size and distortion are uncontrolled.
  2. [Metric construction] The rotating metric is obtained by applying the Newman-Janis algorithm to the non-rotating AS-improved Bardeen solution. It is not shown that the resulting line element retains the precise functional form (g_{tφ}, Δ, etc.) required for separability; any deviation introduced by the running-G or other AS corrections would invalidate the separation constants and therefore the reported shadow observables.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that the analysis is 'EHT-constrained,' yet the text provides no quantitative comparison (e.g., χ² fits or allowed ranges) against the published M87* or Sgr A* shadow diameters and asymmetries. Adding such a direct confrontation would make the constraint claim concrete.
  2. No numerical error estimates, convergence tests, or resolution checks are reported for the ray-tracing or boundary-finding procedure used to extract the shadow silhouette. These are needed to assess the reliability of the quoted size and distortion trends.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript on the shadow of a rotating Bardeen black hole in asymptotically safe gravity. The comments on geodesic separability and metric construction are well taken, and we address them point by point below. We are happy to revise the manuscript to incorporate explicit verifications that strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Geodesic analysis / Hamilton-Jacobi separation] The central trends (shadow radius decreases and distortion increases with the asymptotic-safety parameter) rest on the claim that the Hamilton-Jacobi equation separates for the rotating, AS-improved Bardeen metric. No explicit verification is supplied that a Carter constant still exists or that the θ-equation remains independent of the radial functions once the AS modifications are inserted. Without this check, the analytic impact-parameter expressions used to extract size and distortion are uncontrolled.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original manuscript did not include an explicit step-by-step verification of separability after inserting the asymptotic-safety modifications. The AS parameter enters the metric through a radially dependent running of the gravitational coupling that modifies the effective mass function while preserving the overall Kerr-like structure. Consequently, the Hamilton-Jacobi equation continues to admit a Carter constant, and the θ-equation decouples from the radial functions. To make this fully transparent, we will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) that explicitly derives the separation constants and confirms the independence of the θ-equation for the AS-improved metric. This addition will not alter the reported trends but will place them on firmer analytic ground. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Metric construction] The rotating metric is obtained by applying the Newman-Janis algorithm to the non-rotating AS-improved Bardeen solution. It is not shown that the resulting line element retains the precise functional form (g_{tφ}, Δ, etc.) required for separability; any deviation introduced by the running-G or other AS corrections would invalidate the separation constants and therefore the reported shadow observables.

    Authors: The Newman-Janis algorithm was applied to the static AS-improved Bardeen line element in the standard manner, with the AS corrections absorbed into the mass function M(r). The resulting rotating metric retains the required functional dependence: Δ remains a function of r only, g_{tφ} has the standard cross-term structure, and no angular-dependent corrections appear in the metric coefficients that would spoil separability. We agree, however, that an explicit display of the full metric components and a short demonstration that the AS modifications do not introduce non-separable terms would eliminate any ambiguity. We will include this explicit metric form and verification in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: derivation rests on metric assumption and geodesic separation rather than self-referential fitting or definition

full rationale

The paper takes the rotating Bardeen metric in asymptotically safe gravity as given background, applies Hamilton-Jacobi separation to obtain null geodesic constants of motion, and computes shadow observables (radius, distortion) as functions of the asymptotic-safety parameter, spin, and monopole charge. These quantities are then compared to EHT data for constraints, but the observables are not defined in terms of themselves or fitted back into the input parameters. No equation reduces a claimed prediction to a quantity constructed from the same fit; the separability step is asserted but does not create a closed loop with the reported trends. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for the central shadow-size and distortion results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claim rests on the assumed validity of the rotating Bardeen metric in asymptotically safe gravity and on the applicability of the Hamilton-Jacobi method to its null geodesics; no independent evidence for these is supplied here.

free parameters (2)
  • asymptotic safety parameter
    Varied to produce the reported trends in shadow size and distortion; its concrete values are not derived from first principles within the abstract.
  • monopole charge
    Treated as a free parameter that shapes the shadow profile.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The spacetime is described by the rotating Bardeen metric modified by asymptotic-safety corrections.
    Invoked as the background for all geodesic calculations.
  • domain assumption Null geodesics can be separated by the Hamilton-Jacobi method in this spacetime.
    Standard assumption in black-hole shadow studies but not re-derived here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5385 in / 1492 out tokens · 58187 ms · 2026-05-10T19:49:50.319826+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Families of regular spacetimes and energy conditions

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A classification of admissible energy density profiles with bounded Kretschmann scalar produces families of regular static spherically symmetric spacetimes in GR, including new closed-form solutions involving hypergeo...

  2. Families of regular spacetimes and energy conditions

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A classification of admissible energy density profiles with bounded Kretschmann scalar yields a unified framework for regular static spherically symmetric spacetimes satisfying the weak energy condition, recovering kn...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The corresponding energy emission rate is studied in Section 6

    In Section 4, we analyse the effective potential governin g photon motion, followed by the computation and visualisation of black hole shadows in Section 5. The corresponding energy emission rate is studied in Section 6. Finally, in Section 7, we employ observational data to place constraints on the black hole shadow and the underlying model parameters. I...

  2. [2]

    In the context of Quantum Ein- stein Gravity (QEG), this idea is implemented through the Eu - clidean path integral over metric configurations, starting from a specified action S

    The Running Newton Constant The effective average action Γ k is constructed by integrat- ing out quantum fluctuations with momenta that are above the infrared cutoff scale k[ 59]. In the context of Quantum Ein- stein Gravity (QEG), this idea is implemented through the Eu - clidean path integral over metric configurations, starting from a specified action S. ...

  3. [3]

    is inserted into the ERGE ( 2), the flow equation reduces to a pair of cou- pled differential equations of dimensionless Newton coupl ing and the dimensionless cosmological constant. These quanti - ties are introduced as follows: gk ≡ kd− 2Gk, λ k ≡ k− 2 ¯λ k, as derived in [ 21, 26]: ∂ t g = (d − 2 + η N) g, (5) and ∂ t λ = − (2 − η N) λ + 1 2 g(4π )(1− d...

  4. [4]

    into definitions ( 9) and (10) leads to, Φ 1 1 (0) = π 2 6 , Φ 2 2 (0) = 1 ˜Φ 1 1 (0) = 1, ˜Φ 2 2 (0) = 1 2 4 and, B1 = π 18 − 8 π , B2 = 2 3π , (16) with these expressions for B1 and B2, we substitute ( 13) in (12) to obtain the following expression for the β -function β (g) = 2g ( 1 − ( B2 − 1 2 B1 ) g 1 − B2g ) , (17) with the following definitions w ≡ −...

  5. [5]

    These run toward the infrared (IR) fixed point gIR ∗ = 0 as k → 0

    Flows for which g(k) remains negative at all scales. These run toward the infrared (IR) fixed point gIR ∗ = 0 as k → 0

  6. [6]

    Flows satisfying g(k) > gUV ∗ for all k, which are driven into the UV fixed point gUV ∗ = 1/ ω ′ in the limit k → ∞

  7. [7]

    These interpolate between two fixed points: they approach gIR ∗ as k → 0 and tend towards gUV ∗ for k → ∞

    Flows that evolve entirely within band g(k) ∈ [0,gUV ∗ ]. These interpolate between two fixed points: they approach gIR ∗ as k → 0 and tend towards gUV ∗ for k → ∞ . The first group corresponds to an unphysical scenario be- cause it requires a negative Newton constant, whereas the se c- ond group does not match the low-energy sector. Therefore, only the tra...

  8. [8]

    Cutoff Identification Drawing inspiration from the renormalization group treat- ment of the Uehling correction to the Coulomb potential in 5 QED where the RG scale k is linked to the inverse radial dis- tance r [62, 63] we employ an analogous identification in the gravitational setting. In this approach, the running scale k is tied directly to the geometric...

  9. [9]

    ¯w is proportional to ¯h, reflecting its quantum origin

  10. [10]

    ¯w is the only constant in ( 29) that governs the scale de- pendence of G

  11. [11]

    In general, the explicit form of d(P) depends on the choice of integration path C

    In the classical limit ¯ w = 0, the standard Newton con- stant is recovered, G(P) = G0. In general, the explicit form of d(P) depends on the choice of integration path C . However, for spherically symmetric space-times, the path can be Considered as a straight line from the origin to P, in which case d(P) depends solely on the radial coordinate r through ...

  12. [12]

    (66) Thus, the radial component of the WEC is always satisfied

    Radial Condition Using pr = − E , we immediately obtain E + pr = 0. (66) Thus, the radial component of the WEC is always satisfied

  13. [13]

    Energy Density Condition The condition E ≥ 0 requires G(r)ρ ′(r) +ρ (r)G′(r) ≥ 0. (67) This expression consists of two contributions: • A classical term G(r)ρ ′(r) arising from the Bardeen profile, • A correction term ρ (r)G′(r) induced by the running Newton coupling

  14. [14]

    (69) 8 This expression depends on two key structures: Gρ ′+ ρ G′, Gρ ′′+ 2ρ ′G′+ ρ G′′

    Tangential Condition The non-trivial condition is E + pθ ≥ 0, (68) which yields E + p θ = 2E − 1 8π Σ [ 2(Gρ ′+ ρ G′) +r(Gρ ′′+ 2ρ ′G′+ ρ G′′) ] . (69) 8 This expression depends on two key structures: Gρ ′+ ρ G′, Gρ ′′+ 2ρ ′G′+ ρ G′′. (70) The second term introduces higher-derivative corrections aris- ing purely from the running of the Newton coupling. At...

  15. [15]

    The Foundation of the General Theory of Relati v- ity,

    A. Einstein, “The Foundation of the General Theory of Relati v- ity,” Annalen der Physik 49 (1916) 769–822

    1916

  16. [16]

    Black holes in general relativity

    Hawking, S.W. Black holes in general relativity. Com- mun.Math. Phys. 25, 152–166 (1972)

    1972

  17. [17]

    K. Schwarzschild, ¨Uber das Gravitationsfeld eines Massen- punktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie, Sitzungsberichte der K¨ oniglich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin), 1916, pp. 189–196

    1916

  18. [18]

    (1916) ¨Uber die Eigengravitation des elektrischen Feldes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie

    Reissner, H. (1916) ¨Uber die Eigengravitation des elektrischen Feldes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie. Annalen der Physik, 355, 106-120

    1916

  19. [19]

    1238-1245

    Gunnar Nordstr¨ om, On the Energy of the Gravitation field in Einstein’s Theory, in: KNAW, Proceedings, 20 II, 1918, Ams- terdam, 1918, pp. 1238-1245

    1918

  20. [20]

    J. R. Oppenheimer and H. Snyder,On Continued Gravitational Contraction,Phys. Rev., 56(5), 455–459, Sep 1939

    1939

  21. [21]

    R. P . Kerr,Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass as an Example of Algebraically Special Metrics, Phys. Rev. Lett., 11(5), 237– 238, Sep 1963

    1963

  22. [22]

    E. T. Newman, E. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash, R. Torrence; Metric of a Rotating, Charged Mass. J. Math. Phys. 1 June 1965; 6 (6): 918–919. 13

    1965

  23. [23]

    Constraining the spin and the deformation parameters from the black hole shadow

    N. Tsukamoto, Z. Li, and C. Bambi, “Constraining the spin and the deformation parameters from the black hole shadow,” JCA P 06, 043 (2014), arXiv:1403.0371 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  24. [24]

    Black hole shadow in a general rotating space - time obtained by the Newman–Janis algorithm,

    N. Tsukamoto, “Black hole shadow in a general rotating space - time obtained by the Newman–Janis algorithm,” Phys. Rev. D 97, 064021 (2018), arXiv:1708.07427 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  25. [25]

    Israel,Gravitational Collapse and Causality,Phys

    W. Israel,Gravitational Collapse and Causality,Phys. Rev ., 153(5), 1388–1393, Jan 1967

    1967

  26. [26]

    Carter,Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two Degrees of Freedom,Phys

    B. Carter,Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two Degrees of Freedom,Phys. Rev. Lett., 26(6), 331–333, Feb 1971

    1971

  27. [27]

    D. C. Robinson,Uniqueness of the Kerr Black Hole,Phys. Rev. Lett., 34(14), 905–906, Apr 1975

    1975

  28. [28]

    Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report,

    V . Cardoso and P . Pani, Testing the nature of dark compact ob- jects: a status report, Living Reviews in Relativity 22 (2019) 4, doi:10.1007/s41114-019-0020-4, arXiv:1904.05363 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1007/s41114-019-0020-4 2019

  29. [29]

    Shaikh, Testing black hole mimickers with the Event Hori- zon Telescope image of Sagittarius A ∗, Mon

    R. Shaikh, Testing black hole mimickers with the Event Hori- zon Telescope image of Sagittarius A ∗, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 523 (2023) 375–384, doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1383

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1383 2023

  30. [30]

    N. D. Birrell and P . C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982)

    1982

  31. [31]

    The ultraviolet behavior of Einstein g rav- ity,

    Sagnotti, A. (1986) “The ultraviolet behavior of Einstein g rav- ity,” Nucl.Phys. B266 (1986) 709. Elsevier

    1986

  32. [32]

    Aharony and T

    O. Aharony and T. Banks, Note on the quantum mechan- ics of M theory, J. High Energy Phys. 9903 (1999) 016, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/03/016, arXiv:hep-th/9812237

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/03/016 1999

  33. [33]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. V eltman, One-loop divergencies in the the- ory of gravitation, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e A 20 (1974) 69–94

    1974

  34. [34]

    Weinberg, Ultraviolet Divergences in Quantum Theories o f Gravitation, in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Sur- vey, edited by S

    S. Weinberg, Ultraviolet Divergences in Quantum Theories o f Gravitation, in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Sur- vey, edited by S. W. Hawking and W. Israel (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 1979, pp. 790-831)

    1979

  35. [35]

    Reuter, Nonperturbative evolution equation for quan- tum gravity, Phys

    M. Reuter, Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 971–985, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.57.971, arXiv:hep-th/9605030

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.57.971 1998

  36. [36]

    Percacci, Asymptotic Safety, in Approaches to Quantum Gravity: Toward a New Understanding of Space, Time and Matter, edited by D

    R. Percacci, Asymptotic Safety, in Approaches to Quantum Gravity: Toward a New Understanding of Space, Time and Matter, edited by D. Oriti (Cambridge University Press, Cam - bridge, 2009, pp. 111-128)

    2009

  37. [37]

    Niedermaier and M

    M. Niedermaier and M. Reuter, The asymptotic safety scenari o in quantum gravity, Living Reviews in Relativity 9, 5 (2006)

    2006

  38. [38]

    Eichhorn, Status of the asymptotic safety paradigm for quantum gravity and matter, F oundations of Physics 48 (2018) 1407–1429, doi:10.1007/s10701-018-0196-6

    A. Eichhorn, Status of the asymptotic safety paradigm for quantum gravity and matter, F oundations of Physics 48 (2018) 1407–1429, doi:10.1007/s10701-018-0196-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s10701-018-0196-6 2018

  39. [39]

    Percacci, An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety (World Scientific, 2017)

    R. Percacci, An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety (World Scientific, 2017)

    2017

  40. [40]

    Reuter and F

    M. Reuter and F. Saueressig, Renormalization group flow of quantum gravity in the Einstein–Hilbert truncation, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 065016, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.065016, arXiv:hep-th/0110054

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.65.065016 2002

  41. [41]

    D. F. Litim, On fixed points of quantum gravity, AIP Conf. Proc. 841 (2006) 322–329, doi:10.1063/1.2218173, arXiv:hep- th/0606044

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2218173 2006

  42. [42]

    Falls, D

    K. Falls, D. F. Litim, K. Nikolakopoulos, and C. Rahmede, Asymptotic safety of quantum gravity beyond Ricci scalars, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 104022, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.104022, arXiv:1601.07696 [hep - th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.104022 2016

  43. [43]

    Donoghue, Leading Quantum Correction to the Newtonian Poten- tial, Phys

    J. Donoghue, Leading Quantum Correction to the Newtonian Poten- tial, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2996, (1994); General Rela - tivity as an Ef- fective Field Theory: The Leading Quantum Corrections, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3874, (1994)

    1994

  44. [44]

    Bonanno and F

    A. Bonanno and F. Saueressig, Asymptotically safe gravity a nd black holes, Comptes Rendus Physique 13 (2012) 566–577, doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2012.02.002, arXiv:1202.5291 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2012.02.002 2012

  45. [45]

    Narain and R

    G. Narain and R. Percacci, Renormalization group flow in scalar–tensor theories. I, Class. Quantum Grav. 27 (2010) 075001, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/7/075001, arXiv:0911.0386 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/7/075001 2010

  46. [46]

    D. F. Litim, Renormalisation group and the Planck scale, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369 (2011) 2759–2778, doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0103, arXiv:1102.4624 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0103 2011

  47. [47]

    Falls and D

    K. Falls and D. F. Litim, Black hole thermodynamics under the microscope, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 084002, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.084002, arXiv:1212.1821 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.084002 2014

  48. [48]

    Shaposhnikov and C

    M. Shaposhnikov and C. Wetterich, Asymptotic safety of gravity and the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Lett. B 683 (2010) 196–200, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.12.022, arXiv:0912.0208 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.12.022 2010

  49. [49]

    2009.A Statistical Learning Perspective of Genetic Programming

    M. Reuter and F. Saueressig, Quantum Einstein Gravity, Lect. Notes Phys. 863 (2013) 185–223, doi:10.1007/978-3-642- 33036-2 4, arXiv:1202.2274 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642- 2013

  50. [50]

    H. W. Hamber, Quantum Gravitation: The Feynman Path Integral Approach (Springer-V erlag, Berlin, 2009), doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85293-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85293-9 2009

  51. [51]

    Percacci and D

    R. Percacci and D. Perini, Constraints on matter from asymptotic safety, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 081503, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.081503, arXiv:hep-th/0207033

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.67.081503 2003

  52. [52]

    Falls, D

    K. Falls, D. F. Litim, and A. Raghuraman, Black holes and asymptotically safe gravity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 27 (2012) 1250019, doi:10.1142/S0217751X12500194, arXiv:1002.02 60 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x12500194 2012

  53. [53]

    Ruiz and E

    O. Ruiz and E. Tuiran, Nonperturbative quantum cor- rection to the Reissner–Nordstr¨ om spacetime with run- ning Newton’s constant, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 066003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.066003

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.066003 2023

  54. [54]

    Quantum Schwarzschild geometry in effective field theory models of gravity,

    E. Battista, “Quantum Schwarzschild geometry in effective field theory models of gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 109, 026004 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.026004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.026004 2024

  55. [55]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Su- permassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019) L1, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7, arXiv:1906.11238 [as tro- ph.GA]

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 2019

  56. [56]

    Kocherlakota et al

    P . Kocherlakota et al. , Constraints on black-hole space- times with nontrivial topology from the Event Hori- zon Telescope, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 104047, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104047, arXiv:2103.12281 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.104047 2021

  57. [57]

    A. Held, R. Gold, and A. Eichhorn, Asymptotic safety casts its shadow, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2019) 029, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/06/029, arXiv:1904.07 133 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/06/029 2019

  58. [58]

    P . V . P . Cunha and C. A. R. Herdeiro, Shadows and strong gravitational lensing: a brief review, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 50 (2018) 42, doi:10.1007/s10714-018-2361-9, arXiv:1801.0 0860 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-018-2361-9 2018

  59. [59]

    Brahma and C

    S. Brahma and C. F. Steinwachs, Loop quantum grav- ity corrections to black hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 126004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.126004, arXiv:1911.11606 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.126004 2020

  60. [60]

    Ashtekar and M

    A. Ashtekar and M. Bojowald, Black hole evaporation: A paradigm, Class. Quantum Grav. 38 (2021) 035015, doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abd47e, arXiv:2009.10096 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abd47e 2021

  61. [61]

    Barcel´ o, R

    C. Barcel´ o, R. Carballo-Rubio, and L. J. Garay, Gravitatio nal echoes from macroscopic quantum gravity effects, J. High En- ergy Phys. 2020 (2020) 34, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2020)054, arXiv:1901.04951 [gr-qc]. 14

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)054 2020

  62. [62]

    On consistency of the interacting (anti)holomorphic higher-spin sector

    A. Platania, Dynamical renormalization group flow of black holes, Eur . Phys. J. C79 (2019) 470, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 019-6970-2, arXiv:1903.10411 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 2019

  63. [63]

    Gambini, J

    R. Gambini, J. Olmedo, and J. Pullin, Quantum black holes in loop quantum gravity, Class. Quantum Grav. 37 (2020) 205012, doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abac2a, arXiv:2006.01513 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abac2a 2020

  64. [64]

    H. Liu, P . Liu, Y . Liu, and Y . Wei, Shadows of rotating black holes in modified gravity, Chin. Phys. C 45 (2021) 015105, doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abc1b8, arXiv:2002.08007 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abc1b8 2021

  65. [65]

    J. M. Bardeen, Black Hole Shadows in the Presence of a Cos- mological Constant, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth Marce l Grossmann Meeting, edited by K. Rosquist et al. (World Scien - tific, 2015), p. 1349

    2015

  66. [66]

    Kumar, S

    R. Kumar, S. G. Ghosh, and A. Wang, Gravitational deflection of light and shadow cast by rotating Kalb-Ramond black holes , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 104001

    2020

  67. [67]

    Alesci and L

    E. Alesci and L. Modesto, Particle creation by loop black hol es, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 51 (2019) 141, doi:10.1007/s10714-019- 2610-0, arXiv:1812.01836 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-019- 2019

  68. [68]

    S. W. Hawking, Black hole explosions?, Nature 248 (1974) 30– 31, doi:10.1038/248030a0

    work page doi:10.1038/248030a0 1974

  69. [69]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333–2346, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.7.2333 1973

  70. [70]

    Bonanno and M

    A. Bonanno and M. Reuter, Renormalization group improved black hole spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 62, 043008 (2000), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.043008, arXiv:hep-th/0002196

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.043008 2000

  71. [71]

    J. M. Bardeen, Non-singular general-relativistic gravita tional collapse, in Proceedings of the International Conference G R5 (Tbilisi, USSR, p. 174, 1968)

    1968

  72. [72]

    Ayon-Beato and A

    E. Ay´ on-Beato and A. Garc´ ıa, “The Bardeen model as a non- linear magnetic monopole,” Phys. Lett. B 493 (2000) 149–152, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(00)01125-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(00)01125-4 2000

  73. [73]

    Reuter, Newton’s Constant isn’t Constant, arXiv:hep- th/0012069

    M. Reuter, Newton’s Constant isn’t Constant, arXiv:hep- th/0012069

    work page arXiv

  74. [74]

    Souma, Non-trivial ultraviolet fixed point in quan- tum gravity, Prog

    W. Souma, Non-trivial ultraviolet fixed point in quan- tum gravity, Prog. Theor . Phys. 102 (1999) 181–195, doi:10.1143/PTP .102.181, arXiv:hep-th/9907027

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp 1999

  75. [75]

    A. M. Polyakov, A few projects in string theory, arXiv:hep- th/9304146

    work page arXiv

  76. [76]

    Dittrich and M

    W. Dittrich and M. Reuter, Effective Lagrangians in Quantum Electrodynamics (Springer-V erlag, Berlin, 1985)

    1985

  77. [77]

    E. A. Uehling, Polarization effects in the positron theory, Phys. Rev. 48 (1935) 55–63, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.48.55

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.48.55 1935

  78. [78]

    Tuiran, Quantum Gravity Effects in Rotating Black Hole Spacetimes, Ph.D

    E. Tuiran, Quantum Gravity Effects in Rotating Black Hole Spacetimes, Ph.D. thesis, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (2007)

    2007

  79. [79]

    E. T. Newman and A. I. Janis, Note on the Kerr spin- ning particle metric, J. Math. Phys. 6 (1965) 915–917, doi:10.1063/1.1704350

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1704350 1965

  80. [80]

    Generating rotating regular black hole solutions without complexification

    M. Azreg-A¨ ınou, “Generating rotating regular black hole s o- lutions without complexification,” Phys. Rev. D 90, 064041 (2014), arXiv:1405.2569 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

Showing first 80 references.