pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06870 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 💻 cs.CV

Recognition: no theorem link

RefineAnything: Multimodal Region-Specific Refinement for Perfect Local Details

Dewei Zhou , You Li , Zongxin Yang , Yi Yang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords region-specific image refinementlocal detail restorationdiffusion modelsbackground preservationimage editingmultimodal refinementboundary consistency
0
0 comments X

The pith

RefineAnything refines fine details inside a user-specified image region while leaving every non-selected pixel strictly unchanged.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper defines region-specific refinement as the task of restoring local details such as text or thin structures in a chosen area of an image without altering anything outside that area. Existing diffusion and editing models often distort these details or bleed changes into the background when the region is small relative to the fixed input resolution. RefineAnything addresses this by cropping and resizing the target region to concentrate the model's capacity on it, then pasting the result back with a blended mask and a boundary consistency loss that prevents visible seams. The approach is tested on a new Refine-30K dataset and RefineEval benchmark, where it outperforms baselines on both region fidelity and background consistency.

Core claim

By reallocating the fixed VAE resolution budget to the user region through crop-and-resize and enforcing background identity via blended-mask paste-back plus a boundary-aware consistency loss, RefineAnything produces high-fidelity local corrections in both reference-based and reference-free settings while guaranteeing that all pixels outside the specified region remain identical to the input.

What carries the argument

Focus-and-Refine strategy that crops the user region, refines it at higher effective resolution, and pastes it back with a blended mask to enforce strict background preservation.

If this is right

  • Supports both reference images and text prompts for the same local-refinement task.
  • Enables iterative correction of defects such as logos, thin structures, and text without global side effects.
  • Reduces seam visibility through explicit boundary consistency supervision.
  • Provides a benchmark that separately scores region fidelity and background identity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same crop-and-resize idea may help other diffusion tasks where only a small fraction of the canvas needs high detail.
  • Blended-mask paste-back could be combined with existing global editing models to create hybrid pipelines that first edit coarsely then refine locally.
  • The approach implies that resolution allocation, rather than model scale alone, is a practical lever for precision in local image tasks.

Load-bearing premise

That cropping and resizing the target region improves local reconstruction quality under a fixed VAE resolution, and that blended-mask paste-back can guarantee zero change to background pixels without introducing artifacts.

What would settle it

Run the model on an input containing a small region with legible text or fine lines; if any background pixel value differs after refinement or if the text remains distorted, the central claim is falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06870 by Dewei Zhou, Yi Yang, You Li, Zongxin Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: RefineAnything restores fine-grained details (e.g., text, logos, and faces) in user-specified regions (indicated by the bounding boxes) for both reference-based and reference-free inputs, keeping the background unchanged. Abstract. We introduce region-specific image refinement as a dedi￾cated problem setting: given an input image and a user-specified region (e.g., a scribble mask or a bounding box), the go… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Architecture of RefineAnything. Given an input image and an optional reference image, the user specifies an edit region via a scribble mask; the images, region cue, and text instruction are encoded by a frozen Qwen2.5-VL encoder into multimodal conditioning tokens. Conditioned on these tokens, a diffusion backbone built from MMDiT blocks (trainable, e.g., via LoRA [15, 47]) denoises a VAE latent from times… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Motivation for Focus-and-Refine. We compare VAE reconstructing a local region (red box) from the full image versus first cropping the region and resizing it to original full image resolution before VAE encoding. Although the crop-and-resize step does not introduce new information, it substantially improves the reconstruction quality within the target region. This observation suggests that, under a fixed in… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Overview of Focus-and-Refine Method. and expand it with a margin m to obtain the focus crop box \small C = \mathrm {Expand}(B,m) \label {eq:expand_bbox} (4) clipped to the image boundary. We then crop and resize the input (and the corresponding mask) to obtain the focused view: \small I_c = \mathrm {Crop}(I,C), \qquad M_c = \mathrm {Crop}(M,C). \label {eq:crop_view} (5) The margin m provides local context … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Overview of Reference-Based Refine Data Construction Pipeline. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative Result on Reference-Based Refinement. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Qualitative Result on Reference-Free Refinement. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Ablation of the Focus-and-Refine strategy. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Ablation of the Boundary Consistency Loss. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce region-specific image refinement as a dedicated problem setting: given an input image and a user-specified region (e.g., a scribble mask or a bounding box), the goal is to restore fine-grained details while keeping all non-edited pixels strictly unchanged. Despite rapid progress in image generation, modern models still frequently suffer from local detail collapse (e.g., distorted text, logos, and thin structures). Existing instruction-driven editing models emphasize coarse-grained semantic edits and often either overlook subtle local defects or inadvertently change the background, especially when the region of interest occupies only a small portion of a fixed-resolution input. We present RefineAnything, a multimodal diffusion-based refinement model that supports both reference-based and reference-free refinement. Building on a counter-intuitive observation that crop-and-resize can substantially improve local reconstruction under a fixed VAE input resolution, we propose Focus-and-Refine, a region-focused refinement-and-paste-back strategy that improves refinement effectiveness and efficiency by reallocating the resolution budget to the target region, while a blended-mask paste-back guarantees strict background preservation. We further introduce a boundary-aware Boundary Consistency Loss to reduce seam artifacts and improve paste-back naturalness. To support this new setting, we construct Refine-30K (20K reference-based and 10K reference-free samples) and introduce RefineEval, a benchmark that evaluates both edited-region fidelity and background consistency. On RefineEval, RefineAnything achieves strong improvements over competitive baselines and near-perfect background preservation, establishing a practical solution for high-precision local refinement. Project Page: https://limuloo.github.io/RefineAnything/.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces RefineAnything, a multimodal diffusion model for region-specific image refinement given a user mask or box. It proposes Focus-and-Refine: crop-and-resize the region to reallocate VAE resolution, refine, then use blended-mask paste-back to return the result while claiming strict background preservation. A Boundary Consistency Loss is added to reduce seams. The authors release Refine-30K (20K reference-based + 10K reference-free) and RefineEval benchmark, reporting strong gains over baselines and near-perfect background preservation on RefineEval.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work establishes a practical, high-precision local refinement pipeline that avoids the background drift common in instruction-driven editors. The new problem formulation, dataset, and benchmark are useful contributions for the community. The counter-intuitive crop-and-resize observation, if empirically validated, could influence how future VAE-based editors allocate resolution budgets. The emphasis on strict background invariance addresses a real pain point in applications such as product photography and document editing.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, §3.2] Abstract and §3.2: The assertion that 'blended-mask paste-back guarantees strict background preservation without introducing artifacts' is load-bearing for the central claim yet rests on an unverified assumption. Blending necessarily interpolates pixels near the mask edge; if the refined crop differs from the original in illumination, texture, or high-frequency detail, residual changes can appear outside the strict mask even when the mask itself is binary. The Boundary Consistency Loss regularizes only during training and does not enforce pixel-level invariance at inference. Before/after difference maps or background-only metrics (e.g., PSNR/LPIPS restricted to non-masked pixels) are required to bound any leakage.
  2. [§3.1] §3.1: The key empirical observation that crop-and-resize substantially improves local reconstruction under fixed VAE input resolution is presented without quantitative support or ablation. The manuscript should report reconstruction error (or perceptual metrics) on small regions with and without the crop-and-resize step, ideally across multiple region sizes and VAE resolutions, to confirm the effect is not an artifact of the particular training regime.
  3. [§4.2, results table] §4.2 and Table 2 (or equivalent results table): The abstract claims 'strong improvements over competitive baselines' and 'near-perfect background preservation,' but the provided text does not include the actual numerical values, baseline names, or exact background-consistency metrics. Without these numbers it is impossible to judge whether the gains are practically meaningful or whether background preservation is truly near-perfect (e.g., background LPIPS < 0.01).
minor comments (2)
  1. [§3.2] The manuscript should clarify the exact blending function (alpha ramp width, interpolation method) used in the paste-back step and whether it is applied only at inference or also during training.
  2. [Figures 2-3] Figure captions and method diagrams should explicitly label the crop-and-resize and paste-back stages so readers can trace the resolution reallocation path.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback, which highlights important areas for strengthening the manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to provide additional quantitative support, metrics, and clarifications as requested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, §3.2] The assertion that 'blended-mask paste-back guarantees strict background preservation without introducing artifacts' is load-bearing for the central claim yet rests on an unverified assumption. Blending necessarily interpolates pixels near the mask edge; if the refined crop differs from the original in illumination, texture, or high-frequency detail, residual changes can appear outside the strict mask even when the mask itself is binary. The Boundary Consistency Loss regularizes only during training and does not enforce pixel-level invariance at inference. Before/after difference maps or background-only metrics (e.g., PSNR/LPIPS restricted to non-masked pixels) are required to bound any leakage.

    Authors: We appreciate this point and agree that explicit verification strengthens the central claim. The blended-mask paste-back copies original background pixels directly outside the mask, applying blending only within a narrow boundary zone to minimize seams. However, to empirically bound any potential leakage from illumination or detail mismatches, we will add background-only PSNR and LPIPS metrics (computed solely on non-masked pixels) and input-output difference maps in the revised §3.2 and results. We will also clarify the inference-time invariance of the paste-back mechanism versus the training-time role of the Boundary Consistency Loss. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.1] The key empirical observation that crop-and-resize substantially improves local reconstruction under fixed VAE input resolution is presented without quantitative support or ablation. The manuscript should report reconstruction error (or perceptual metrics) on small regions with and without the crop-and-resize step, ideally across multiple region sizes and VAE resolutions, to confirm the effect is not an artifact of the particular training regime.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for quantitative validation of this observation. While the benefit is reflected in the overall RefineEval results and qualitative examples, the revised manuscript will include a new ablation subsection in §3.1. This will report PSNR and LPIPS reconstruction errors for small regions of varying sizes, comparing the crop-and-resize approach against direct fixed-resolution processing across multiple VAE input resolutions, to confirm the resolution reallocation effect. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§4.2, results table] §4.2 and Table 2 (or equivalent results table): The abstract claims 'strong improvements over competitive baselines' and 'near-perfect background preservation,' but the provided text does not include the actual numerical values, baseline names, or exact background-consistency metrics. Without these numbers it is impossible to judge whether the gains are practically meaningful or whether background preservation is truly near-perfect (e.g., background LPIPS < 0.01).

    Authors: We apologize for any lack of clarity in presentation. The full manuscript contains Table 2 reporting results on RefineEval against baselines such as InstructPix2Pix and MagicBrush, with both region fidelity and background consistency metrics. In the revision, we will explicitly state all numerical values in the main text of §4.2, highlight background LPIPS scores (which fall below 0.01), and ensure baseline names and exact metrics are prominent in the table and surrounding discussion to allow direct assessment of the gains. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: method grounded in empirical observation, new dataset, and benchmark without self-referential reductions.

full rationale

The paper defines a new problem setting for region-specific refinement and proposes Focus-and-Refine based on a stated counter-intuitive observation about crop-and-resize reallocating VAE resolution. It constructs Refine-30K (20K reference-based + 10K reference-free) and RefineEval benchmark, then reports empirical gains. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-citations for uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work appear in the derivation. The blended-mask paste-back and Boundary Consistency Loss are presented as design choices with training regularization, not as outputs forced by the inputs. The central claims rest on external evaluation rather than reducing to self-definition or self-citation chains.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard diffusion model capabilities for conditional generation and the assumption that reallocating resolution via cropping improves local fidelity; no new entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption VAE-based diffusion models have a fixed input resolution that limits capture of fine local details when the region of interest is small.
    Invoked to justify the crop-and-resize step in Focus-and-Refine.
  • domain assumption Blended-mask paste-back can preserve background pixels strictly unchanged while allowing natural boundary transitions.
    Core to the claim of near-perfect background preservation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5591 in / 1360 out tokens · 78787 ms · 2026-05-10T19:06:10.286757+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. From Zero to Detail: A Progressive Spectral Decoupling Paradigm for UHD Image Restoration with New Benchmark

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new framework called ERR decomposes UHD image restoration into three frequency stages with specialized sub-networks and introduces the LSUHDIR benchmark dataset of over 82,000 images.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 15 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report

    Bai, S., Chen, K., Liu, X., Wang, J., Ge, W., Song, S., Dang, K., Wang, P., Wang, S., Tang, J., Zhong, H., Zhu, Y., Yang, M., Li, Z., Wan, J., Wang, P., Ding, W., Fu, Z., Xu, Y., Ye, J., Zhang, X., Xie, T., Cheng, Z., Zhang, H., Yang, Z., Xu, H., Lin, J.: Qwen2.5-vl technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13923 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    BlackForest: Black forest labs; frontier ai lab (2024),https://blackforestlabs. ai/

    2024

  3. [3]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Brooks, T., Holynski, A., Efros, A.A.: Instructpix2pix: Learning to follow image editing instructions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 18392–18402 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    HiDream-I1: A high-efficient image generative foundation model with sparse diffusion transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22705, 2025

    Cai, Q., Chen, J., Chen, Y., Li, Y., Long, F., Pan, Y., Qiu, Z., Zhang, Y., Gao, F., Xu, P., et al.: Hidream-i1: A high-efficient image generative foundation model with sparse diffusion transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22705 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    In: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

    Cao, M., Wang, X., Qi, Z., Shan, Y., Qie, X., Zheng, Y.: Masactrl: Tuning-free mutual self-attention control for consistent image synthesis and editing. In: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). pp. 22560–22570 (October 2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    SAM 3: Segment Anything with Concepts

    Carion, N., Gustafson, L., Hu, Y.T., Debnath, S., Hu, R., Suris, D., Ryali, C., Alwala,K.V.,Khedr,H.,Huang,A.,etal.:Sam3:Segmentanythingwithconcepts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.16719 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    In: ICLR

    Chen, J., Yu, J., Ge, C., Yao, L., Xie, E., Wang, Z., Kwok, J.T., Luo, P., Lu, H., Li, Z.: Pixart-α: Fast training of diffusion transformer for photorealistic text-to-image synthesis. In: ICLR. OpenReview.net (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Chen, Z., Li, Y., Wang, H., Chen, Z., Jiang, Z., Li, J., Wang, Q., Yang, J., Tai, Y.: Ragd:Regional-awarediffusionmodelfortext-to-imagegeneration.In:Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 19331–19341 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    Dip: Taming diffusion models in pixel space

    Chen, Z., Zhu, J., Chen, X., Zhang, J., Hu, X., Zhao, H., Wang, C., Yang, J., Tai, Y.: Dip: Taming diffusion models in pixel space. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.18822 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Altclip: Altering the lan- guage encoder in clip for extended language capabilities

    Chen, Z., Liu, G., Zhang, B.W., Ye, F., Yang, Q., Wu, L.: Altclip: Altering the language encoder in clip for extended language capabilities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.06679 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Emerging Properties in Unified Multimodal Pretraining

    Deng, C., Zhu, D., Li, K., Gou, C., Li, F., Wang, Z., Zhong, S., Yu, W., Nie, X., Song, Z., et al.: Emerging properties in unified multimodal pretraining. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14683 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.23461 (2025)

    Du, N., Chen, Z., Gao, S., Chen, Z., Chen, X., Jiang, Z., Yang, J., Tai, Y.: Textcrafter: Accurately rendering multiple texts in complex visual scenes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.23461 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    In: ICML (2024)

    Esser, P., Kulal, S., Blattmann, A., Entezari, R., Müller, J., Saini, H., Levi, Y., Lorenz, D., Sauer, A., Boesel, F., et al.: Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. In: ICML (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    In: NeurIPS

    Ho, J., Jain, A., Abbeel, P.: Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In: NeurIPS. pp. 6840–6851 (2020)

    2020

  15. [15]

    ICLR1(2), 3 (2022)

    Hu, E.J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., Wang, L., Chen, W., et al.: Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. ICLR1(2), 3 (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: A method for stochastic optimization (2017)

    2017

  17. [17]

    Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes

    Kingma, D.P., Welling, M.: Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114 (2013) 16 D. Zhou et al

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  18. [18]

    FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Image Generation and Editing in Latent Space

    Labs, B.F., Batifol, S., Blattmann, A., Boesel, F., Consul, S., Diagne, C., Dock- horn, T., English, J., English, Z., Esser, P., et al.: Flux. 1 kontext: Flow match- ing for in-context image generation and editing in latent space. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15742 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.00596 (2025)

    Li, D., Zhang, H., Wang, S., Li, J., Wu, Z.: Seg2any: Open-set segmentation- mask-to-image generation with precise shape and semantic control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.00596 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07987 (2024)

    Li, M., Yang, T., Kuang, H., Wu, J., Wang, Z., Xiao, X., Chen, C.: Controlnet++: Improving conditional controls with efficient consistency feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07987 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision

    Li, M., Yang, T., Kuang, H., Wu, J., Wang, Z., Xiao, X., Chen, C.: Controlnet++: Improving conditional controls with efficient consistency feedback. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 129–147. Springer (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    Anysynth: Harnessing the power of image synthetic data generation for generalized vision-language tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16749, 2024

    Li, Y., Ma, F., Yang, Y.: Anysynth: Harnessing the power of image synthetic data generation for generalized vision-language tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16749 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference (CVPR)

    Li, Y., Ma, F., Yang, Y.: Imagine and seek: Improving composed image retrieval with an imagined proxy. In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference (CVPR). pp. 3984–3993 (June 2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    FoleyDirector: Fine-Grained Temporal Steering for Video-to-Audio Generation via Structured Scripts

    Li, Y., Zhou, D., Ma, F., Li, F., He, D., Yang, Y.: Foleydirector: Fine-grained tem- poral steering for video-to-audio generation via structured scripts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.19857 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Li, Z., Zhang, J., Lin, Q., Xiong, J., Long, Y., Deng, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Huang, M., Xiao, Z., Chen, D., He, J., Li, J., Li, W., Zhang, C., Quan, R., Lu, J., Huang, J., Yuan, X., Zheng, X., Li, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, C., Chen, M., Liu, J., Fang, Z., Wang, W., Xue, J., Tao, Y., Zhu, J., Liu, K., Lin, S., Sun, Y., Li, Y., Wang, D., Chen, M., Hu, Z., Xia...

    2024

  26. [26]

    Step1X-Edit: A Practical Framework for General Image Editing

    Liu, S., Han, Y., Xing, P., Yin, F., Wang, R., Cheng, W., Liao, J., Wang, Y., Fu, H., Han, C., et al.: Step1x-edit: A practical framework for general image editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17761 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Lu, S., Lian, Z., Zhou, Z., Zhang, S., Zhao, C., Kong, A.W.K.: Does flux al- ready know how to perform physically plausible image composition? arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.21278 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    In: ICCV (2023)

    Lu, S., Liu, Y., Kong, A.W.K.: Tf-icon: Diffusion-based training-free cross-domain image composition. In: ICCV (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    CVPR (2024)

    Lu, S., Wang, Z., Li, L., Liu, Y., Kong, A.W.K.: Mace: Mass concept erasure in diffusion models. CVPR (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Robust watermarking using generative priors against image editing: From benchmarking to advances

    Lu, S., Zhou, Z., Lu, J., Zhu, Y., Kong, A.W.K.: Robust watermarking using gener- ative priors against image editing: From benchmarking to advances. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.18775 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    com / index / introducing - 4o - image - generation/(2025)

    OpenAI: Gpt-4o.https : / / openai . com / index / introducing - 4o - image - generation/(2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision

    Oquab, M., Darcet, T., Moutakanni, T., Vo, H., Szafraniec, M., Khalidov, V., Fernandez, P., Haziza, D., Massa, F., El-Nouby, A., et al.: Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193 (2023)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesis

    Podell, D., English, Z., Lacey, K., Blattmann, A., Dockhorn, T., Müller, J., Penna, J., Rombach, R.: Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952 (2023) RefineAnything 17

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    In: ICML

    Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., Krueger, G., Sutskever, I.: Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In: ICML. pp. 8748–8763 (2021)

    2021

  35. [35]

    Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., Ommer, B.: High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models (2022)

    2022

  36. [36]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.18333 (2025)

    Shi, X., Li, B., Han, X., Cai, Z., Yang, L., Lin, D., Wang, Q.: Consistcom- pose: Unified multimodal layout control for image composition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.18333 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Shi, Y., Wang, P., Huang, W.: Seededit: Align image re-generation to image editing (2024),https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.06686

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Team, G.: Gemini 2.5 flash & gemini 2.5 flash image model card (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    Team, G.: Gemini 3.0 pro & gemini 3.0 pro image model card (2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    Seedream 4.0: Toward Next-generation Multimodal Image Generation

    Team, S., Chen, Y., Gao, Y., Gong, L., Guo, M., Guo, Q., Guo, Z., Hou, X., Huang, W., Huang, Y., et al.: Seedream 4.0: Toward next-generation multimodal image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.20427 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Gpt-image-edit-1.5 m: A million-scale, gpt-generated image dataset

    Wang, Y., Yang, S., Zhao, B., Zhang, L., Liu, Q., Zhou, Y., Xie, C.: Gpt- image-edit-1.5 m: A million-scale, gpt-generated image dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.21033 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    IEEE transactions on image processing 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

    Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE transactions on image processing 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

    2004

  43. [43]

    Qwen-Image Technical Report

    Wu, C., Li, J., Zhou, J., Lin, J., Gao, K., Yan, K., Yin, S.m., Bai, S., Xu, X., Chen, Y., et al.: Qwen-image technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02324 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    OmniGen2: Towards Instruction-Aligned Multimodal Generation

    Wu, C., Zheng, P., Yan, R., Xiao, S., Luo, X., Wang, Y., Li, W., Jiang, X., Liu, Y., Zhou, J., et al.: Omnigen2: Exploration to advanced multimodal generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.18871 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Reconstruction alignment improves unified multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.07295, 2025a

    Xie, J., Darrell, T., Zettlemoyer, L., Wang, X.: Reconstruction alignment improves unified multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.07295 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Con- textgen: Contextual layout anchoring for identity-consistent multi-instance generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11000,

    Xu, R., Zhou, D., Ma, F., Yang, Y.: Contextgen: Contextual layout anchoring for identity-consistent multi-instance generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11000 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.09400 , year=

    Xu, Y., He, Z., Shan, S., Chen, X.: Ctrlora: An extensible and efficient framework for controllable image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.09400 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    CogVideoX: Text-to-Video Diffusion Models with An Expert Transformer

    Yang, Z., Teng, J., Zheng, W., Ding, M., Huang, S., Xu, J., Yang, Y., Hong, W., Zhang, X., Feng, G., et al.: Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072 (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    ImgEdit: A Unified Image Editing Dataset and Benchmark

    Ye, Y., He, X., Li, Z., Lin, B., Yuan, S., Yan, Z., Hou, B., Yuan, L.: Imgedit: A unified image editing dataset and benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20275 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detection

    Zhang, H., Li, F., Liu, S., Zhang, L., Su, H., Zhu, J., Ni, L.M., Shum, H.Y.: Dino: Detr with improved denoising anchor boxes for end-to-end object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.03605 (2022)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01097 (2025)

    Zhang, H., Duan, Z., Wang, X., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y.: Eligen: Entity-level controlled image generation with regional attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01097 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Nexus-gen: A unified model for image understanding, generation, and editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21356, 2025

    Zhang, H., Duan, Z., Wang, X., Chen, Y., Zhao, Y., Zhang, Y.: Nexus-gen: A unified model for image understanding, generation, and editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21356 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Creatilayout: Siamese multimodal diffusion transformer for creative layout-to-image generation

    Zhang,H.,Hong,D.,Gao,T.,Wang,Y.,Shao,J.,Wu,X.,Wu,Z.,Jiang,Y.G.:Cre- atilayout: Siamese multimodal diffusion transformer for creative layout-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03859 (2024) 18 D. Zhou et al

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.19114 (2025)

    Zhang, H., Hong, D., Yang, M., Cheng, Y., Zhang, Z., Shao, J., Wu, X., Wu, Z., Jiang, Y.G.: Creatidesign: A unified multi-conditional diffusion transformer for creative graphic design. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.19114 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Zhang, Z., Xie, J., Lu, Y., Yang, Z., Yang, Y.: Enabling instructional image editing within-contextgenerationinlargescalediffusiontransformer.In:TheThirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2025)

    2025

  56. [56]

    CVPR (2024)

    Zhao, C., Cai, W., Dong, C., Hu, C.: Wavelet-based fourier information interac- tion with frequency diffusion adjustment for underwater image restoration. CVPR (2024)

    2024

  57. [57]

    In: ICASSP 2024- 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)

    Zhao, C., Cai, W., Dong, C., Zeng, Z.: Toward sufficient spatial-frequency in- teraction for gradient-aware underwater image enhancement. In: ICASSP 2024- 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). pp. 3220–3224. IEEE (2024)

    2024

  58. [58]

    Luve: Latent-cascaded ultra-high-resolution video generation with dual frequency experts.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.11564, 2026

    Zhao, C., Chen, J., Li, H., Kang, Z., Lu, S., Wei, X., Zhang, K., Yang, J., Tai, Y.: Luve: Latent-cascaded ultra-high-resolution video generation with dual frequency experts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.11564 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition Conference

    Zhao, C., Chen, Z., Xu, Y., Gu, E., Li, J., Yi, Z., Wang, Q., Yang, J., Tai, Y.: From zero to detail: Deconstructing ultra-high-definition image restoration from progressive spectral perspective. In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition Conference. pp. 17935–17946 (2025)

    2025

  60. [60]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.20661 (2025)

    Zhao, C., Ci, E., Xu, Y., Fan, T., Guan, S., Ge, Y., Yang, J., Tai, Y.: Ultrahr- 100k: Enhancing uhr image synthesis with a large-scale high-quality dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.20661 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01497 (2024)

    Zhao, C., Dong, C., Cai, W.: Learning a physical-aware diffusion model based on transformer for underwater image enhancement. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01497 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Bidedpo: Condi- tional image generation with simultaneous text and condition alignment.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.19268, 2025

    Zhou, D., Li, M., Yang, Z., Lu, Y., Xu, Y., Wang, Z., Huang, Z., Yang, Y.: Bidedpo: Conditional image generation with simultaneous text and condition alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.19268 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    In: ICCV (2025)

    Zhou, D., Li, M., Yang, Z., Yang, Y.: Dreamrenderer: Taming multi-instance at- tribute control in large-scale text-to-image models. In: ICCV (2025)

    2025

  64. [64]

    In: CVPR (2024)

    Zhou, D., Li, Y., Ma, F., Zhang, X., Yang, Y.: Migc: Multi-instance generation controller for text-to-image synthesis. In: CVPR (2024)

    2024

  65. [65]

    3dis: Depth-driven decoupled instance synthesis for text-to-image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.12669, 2024

    Zhou, D., Xie, J., Yang, Z., Yang, Y.: 3dis: Depth-driven decoupled instance syn- thesis for text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.12669 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    In: IJCAI (2023)

    Zhou, D., Yang, Z., Yang, Y.: Pyramid diffusion models for low-light image en- hancement. In: IJCAI (2023)

    2023

  67. [67]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.02253 (2025)

    Zhou, Z., Lu, S., Leng, S., Zhang, S., Lian, Z., Yu, X., Kong, A.W.K.: Dragflow: Unleashing dit priors with region based supervision for drag editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.02253 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025