arxiv: 2604.16529 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 💻 cs.SE · cs.AI· cs.CL· cs.LG

Recognition: unknown

Scaling Test-Time Compute for Agentic Coding

Joongwon Kim , Wannan Yang , Kelvin Niu , Hongming Zhang , Yun Zhu , Eryk Helenowski , Ruan Silva , Zhengxing Chen

show 8 more authors

Srinivasan Iyer Manzil Zaheer Daniel Fried Hannaneh Hajishirzi Sanjeev Arora Gabriel Synnaeve Ruslan Salakhutdinov Anirudh Goyal

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 10:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SE cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

keywords test-time scalingagentic codingrollout summariesSWE-Benchcoding agentsinference-time computetrajectory representation

0 comments

The pith

Compact summaries of agent rollouts enable selection and reuse of prior experience for test-time scaling in long-horizon coding agents.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that test-time scaling works for short outputs but fails for coding agents whose attempts produce extended sequences of actions, observations, and partial results. It addresses this by turning each full trajectory into a compact structured summary that keeps the key hypotheses, progress points, and failure modes while dropping low-value details. These summaries then support two scaling strategies: one that compares them in recursive tournaments to choose winners, and another that feeds distilled versions into new attempts. A sympathetic reader would care because this turns extra inference compute into better performance on realistic software tasks without retraining models.

Core claim

Converting each rollout into a structured summary that preserves its salient hypotheses, progress, and failure modes while discarding low-signal trace details enables two complementary forms of inference-time scaling: Recursive Tournament Voting, which recursively narrows a population of rollout summaries through small-group comparisons, and an adaptation of Parallel-Distill-Refine that conditions new rollouts on summaries distilled from prior attempts. This approach improves frontier coding agents on SWE-Bench Verified and Terminal-Bench v2.0.

What carries the argument

structured summary of rollout trajectories that preserves salient hypotheses, progress, and failure modes

Load-bearing premise

Converting extended agent trajectories into compact structured summaries reliably preserves the salient hypotheses, progress, and failure modes needed for effective selection and reuse without introducing critical information loss.

What would settle it

If applying the structured summaries produces no improvement or worse results than using full raw trajectories or simple ranking on SWE-Bench Verified and Terminal-Bench v2.0, the claim that these summaries enable effective scaling would be falsified.

read the original abstract

Test-time scaling has become a powerful way to improve large language models. However, existing methods are best suited to short, bounded outputs that can be directly compared, ranked or refined. Long-horizon coding agents violate this premise: each attempt produces an extended trajectory of actions, observations, errors, and partial progress taken by the agent. In this setting, the main challenge is no longer generating more attempts, but representing prior experience in a form that can be effectively selected from and reused. We propose a test-time scaling framework for agentic coding based on compact representations of rollout trajectories. Our framework converts each rollout into a structured summary that preserves its salient hypotheses, progress, and failure modes while discarding low-signal trace details. This representation enables two complementary forms of inference-time scaling. For parallel scaling, we introduce Recursive Tournament Voting (RTV), which recursively narrows a population of rollout summaries through small-group comparisons. For sequential scaling, we adapt Parallel-Distill-Refine (PDR) to the agentic setting by conditioning new rollouts on summaries distilled from prior attempts. Our method consistently improves the performance of frontier coding agents across SWE-Bench Verified and Terminal-Bench v2.0. For example, by using our method Claude-4.5-Opus improves from 70.9% to 77.6% on SWE-Bench Verified (mini-SWE-agent) and 46.9% to 59.1% on Terminal-Bench v2.0 (Terminus 1). Our results suggest that test-time scaling for long-horizon agents is fundamentally a problem of representation, selection, and reuse.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper introduces structured summaries of agent trajectories to enable Recursive Tournament Voting and adapted Parallel-Distill-Refine for test-time scaling in long-horizon coding, with reported gains on SWE-Bench and Terminal-Bench, but the abstract leaves the summarization step's reliability untested.

read the letter

The core idea here is shifting test-time scaling away from raw output comparison toward compact representations of full agent rollouts. They turn extended action-observation-error traces into structured summaries that keep hypotheses, progress, and failure modes, then use those for Recursive Tournament Voting in parallel and conditioned generation in sequential scaling. This directly targets the mismatch between short-output scaling methods and the messy, long traces that coding agents produce. The reported lifts are concrete: Claude-4.5-Opus moves from 70.9% to 77.6% on SWE-Bench Verified and from 46.9% to 59.1% on Terminal-Bench v2.0. That kind of improvement on frontier models and real benchmarks is worth noticing for anyone building practical coding agents. The framing also feels right—representation, selection, and reuse are the actual bottlenecks once you have multiple trajectories. The main weakness is the lack of evidence on whether the summaries actually preserve what matters. Agent trajectories often hinge on subtle state details, partial patches, or specific test interactions that an LLM summarizer could easily drop. Without ablations comparing summary-based selection to full-trajectory reuse, human fidelity ratings, or controls that isolate the representation from extra compute budget, the gains could be explained by simply running more rollouts rather than smarter reuse. The abstract also gives no baseline details, rollout counts, or statistical tests, which makes it hard to judge how much the new components drive the results. This work is aimed at researchers focused on agentic systems and inference-time methods for software engineering. Readers who need ideas for handling long traces in coding agents will get usable concepts even if the experiments require more scrutiny. It deserves peer review because the problem is timely and the empirical direction is relevant, though the referee process should focus on validating the summarization step and tightening the experimental controls.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a test-time scaling framework for long-horizon agentic coding. It converts each agent rollout trajectory (actions, observations, errors, partial progress) into a compact structured summary that retains salient hypotheses, progress, and failure modes. These summaries enable two scaling techniques: Recursive Tournament Voting (RTV), which performs recursive small-group comparisons for parallel selection, and an adaptation of Parallel-Distill-Refine (PDR) for sequential scaling by conditioning new rollouts on distilled prior summaries. The authors report consistent gains for frontier agents, e.g., Claude-4.5-Opus improving from 70.9% to 77.6% on SWE-Bench Verified (mini-SWE-agent) and from 46.9% to 59.1% on Terminal-Bench v2.0 (Terminus 1), concluding that representation, selection, and reuse are the core challenges rather than raw generation.

Significance. If the structured summaries reliably preserve the information needed for effective selection and reuse, the work would meaningfully extend test-time scaling to agentic settings where full trajectories cannot be directly ranked or compared. The complementary RTV and PDR mechanisms offer a principled way to leverage prior experience at inference time, and the reported benchmark gains suggest practical value for improving coding agent success rates on real software engineering tasks.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The performance claims (Claude-4.5-Opus: 70.9% → 77.6% on SWE-Bench Verified; 46.9% → 59.1% on Terminal-Bench v2.0) are presented without any experimental details on the number of rollouts, inference budget allocation, baseline implementations, ablation studies isolating the summarization step, or statistical significance tests. This prevents determining whether the gains arise from the proposed representation and scaling methods or from simply expending additional test-time compute.
[Abstract] Abstract: The framework's validity rests on the claim that structured summaries 'preserve its salient hypotheses, progress, and failure modes while discarding low-signal trace details.' No supporting evidence is supplied for this preservation, such as human fidelity ratings, information-recall ablations, or direct comparisons of summary-based RTV/PDR against full-trajectory reuse. In agentic coding, where subtle state dependencies and partial patches often determine success, loss of such details would undermine both selection in RTV and conditioning in PDR.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: The specific agent setups (mini-SWE-agent, Terminus 1) are mentioned only in parentheses without further description of their configurations or how they interact with the summarization process.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional experimental details in the abstract as well as direct validation of the structured summaries.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The performance claims (Claude-4.5-Opus: 70.9% → 77.6% on SWE-Bench Verified; 46.9% → 59.1% on Terminal-Bench v2.0) are presented without any experimental details on the number of rollouts, inference budget allocation, baseline implementations, ablation studies isolating the summarization step, or statistical significance tests. This prevents determining whether the gains arise from the proposed representation and scaling methods or from simply expending additional test-time compute.

Authors: We agree the abstract would benefit from more context. The full manuscript (Sections 4 and 5) details the experimental protocol: we use a fixed inference budget matched across methods via 8 rollouts for RTV and up to 16 for PDR; baselines include best-of-N and majority voting on final outputs; ablations isolate summarization by comparing summary-based methods to raw-trajectory variants; and statistical significance is assessed via bootstrap resampling (gains significant at p<0.05). We have revised the abstract to concisely reference compute-matched baselines and statistically significant improvements. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The framework's validity rests on the claim that structured summaries 'preserve its salient hypotheses, progress, and failure modes while discarding low-signal trace details.' No supporting evidence is supplied for this preservation, such as human fidelity ratings, information-recall ablations, or direct comparisons of summary-based RTV/PDR against full-trajectory reuse. In agentic coding, where subtle state dependencies and partial patches often determine success, loss of such details would undermine both selection in RTV and conditioning in PDR.

Authors: We acknowledge that explicit validation of summary fidelity strengthens the claims. The consistent outperformance of summary-based RTV and PDR over compute-matched baselines that lack structured reuse provides indirect evidence of effective preservation. To address this directly, the revised manuscript adds a new subsection with human fidelity ratings (expert annotations on 100 summaries), information-recall ablations (performance drops when key elements are masked), and comparisons to full-trajectory conditioning on shorter trajectories where context limits permit. These results support that salient information is retained for selection and reuse. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical gains rest on benchmark results, not self-referential definitions or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper introduces a representation-based test-time scaling method for long-horizon coding agents and reports consistent improvements on SWE-Bench Verified and Terminal-Bench v2.0. No equations, parameter-fitting steps, or uniqueness theorems appear in the provided text. The central claims (structured summaries enabling RTV and PDR) are justified by external benchmark deltas rather than reducing to the inputs by construction or via self-citation chains. The summarization step is presented as a design choice whose fidelity is evaluated empirically, not assumed tautologically.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the core idea of structured summaries are detailed.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Structured summaries of rollout trajectories preserve salient hypotheses, progress, and failure modes while discarding low-signal details.
This premise is stated directly in the abstract as the foundation enabling selection and reuse.

invented entities (1)

Structured summary of rollout trajectories no independent evidence
purpose: Compact representation that enables parallel and sequential test-time scaling for long-horizon agents.
Introduced in the abstract as the key mechanism for the framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5667 in / 1320 out tokens · 42137 ms · 2026-05-10T10:41:30.029721+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Pause and Reflect: Conformal Aggregation for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
stat.ML 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

A conformal procedure for CoT replaces majority voting with weighted aggregation and calibrates abstention to guarantee low confident-error rates, achieving 90.1% selective accuracy on GSM8K by abstaining on under 5% ...
Compute Aligned Training: Optimizing for Test Time Inference
cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Compute Aligned Training derives new loss functions by modeling test-time strategies as operators on the base policy, yielding empirical gains in test-time compute scaling over standard SFT and RL.
Shepherd: A Runtime Substrate Empowering Meta-Agents with a Formalized Execution Trace
cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 partial

Shepherd is a runtime system that formalizes meta-agent operations via typed execution traces, enabling fast forking and demonstrated improvements in agent intervention, optimization, and training on benchmarks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

[1]

The complexity trap: Simple observation masking is as efficient as LLM summarization for agent context management, 2025

doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2508.21433.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.21433. Miao Lu, Weiwei Sun, Weihua Du, Zhan Ling, Xuesong Yao, Kang Liu, and Jiecao Chen. Scaling LLM multi-turn RL with end-to-end summarization-based context management.CoRR, abs/2510.06727, 2025. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV. 2510.06727.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.06727. Aman Madaan, Nik...

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.21433.https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2508.21433 2025
[2]

Reproduction: Addressed the ‘IndexError‘ when empty
[3]

The ‘d2 < 0‘ error trace won’t appear anymore

Result on empty match: Checks ‘b == S.Zero‘ in ‘_sqrt_match‘ and returns unmodified ‘[]‘. The ‘d2 < 0‘ error trace won’t appear anymore
[4]

Based on the analysis of 4 previous parallel attempts

Extraneous files are deleted. ‘git diff‘ looks clean and identical to what’s expected for this fix. I will now submit the outcome. <bash> echo COMPLETE_TASK_AND_SUBMIT_FINAL_OUTPUT && git add -A && git diff --cached </bash> Figure 16Excerpt of a rollout executed byGemini-3.1-ProonSWE-Bench Verified(sympy_sympy-17318). Figure 17 contains an excerpt of a ro...

2001
[5]

Create a directory at ‘/app/ssl/‘ to store all files
[6]

Generate a 2048-bit RSA private key: - Save it as ‘/app/ssl/server.key‘ - Ensure proper permissions (600) for the key file

2048
[7]

DevOps Team

Create a self-signed certificate with the following details: - Valid for 365 days (1 year) - Organization Name: "DevOps Team" - Common Name: "dev-internal.company.local" - Save it as ‘/app/ssl/server.crt‘ 34
[8]

Create a combined PEM file that includes both the private key and certificate: - Save it as ‘/app/ssl/server.pem‘
[9]

Verify the certificate details: - Create a file called ‘/app/ssl/verification.txt‘ containing: - The certificate’s subject - The certificate’s validity dates in YYYY-MM-DD format or OpenSSL format with optional timezone - The certificate’s SHA-256 fingerprint
[10]

Certificate verification successful

Create a simple Python script at ‘/app/check_cert.py‘ that: - Imports the ssl and subprocess modules - Verifies that the certificate exists and can be loaded - Prints certificate details including the Common Name and expiration date in YYYY-MM-DD format - Prints "Certificate verification successful" if all checks pass Use OpenSSL commands to complete the ...

2048
[11]

/app/ssl/ directory created with all required files
[12]

server.key - 2048-bit RSA private key with 600 permissions

2048
[13]

server.crt - Self-signed certificate valid for 365 days with Organization Name ’DevOps Team’ and Common Name ’dev- internal.company.local’
[14]

server.pem - Combined PEM file with both key and certificate
[15]

verification.txt - Contains subject, validity dates, and SHA-256 fingerprint
[16]

,"explanation

/app/check_cert.py - Python script that verifies the certificate and prints ’Certificate verification successful’ The Python script ran successfully, showing the Common Name (dev-internal.company.local), Expiration Date (2027-03- 05), and the success message.","explanation":"All requirements have been met. The SSL certificate infrastructure is complete wi...

2027
[17]

Exists at /app/gpt2.c
[18]

Is 3467 bytes (under 5000 byte limit)
[19]

Compiles successfully with gcc -O3 -lm
[20]

Reads the .ckpt and .bpe files
[21]

Produces output containing ’WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED’ 41
[22]

,"explanation

The test passes","explanation":"Task completed successfully. The gpt2.c file meets all requirements: it’s under 5000 bytes, compiles with gcc -O3 -lm, reads the checkpoint and vocabulary files, and produces output that passes the test.","bash_commands":[],"is_task_complete":true} Figure 21Subset of a successful refinement rollout trajectory executed byCla...
[23]

Swap columns: c, b, a
[24]

Error: too_long

Uppercase Also, previous attempts faced formatting issues and timeout issues. Running ‘%normal! @a‘ with substitution like ‘:s/ //g \r‘ is extremely slow if it does ‘s/ //g‘ line by line. Actually, ‘%normal‘ runs the macro once per line. If we do ‘%s‘ inside the macro, it runs globally for *each* line, which is ‘O(N^2)‘! That explains the "Error: too_long...
[25]

‘:set verbosefile=/app/vimlog‘
[26]

‘call setreg(’a’, ...)‘
[27]

‘call setreg(’b’, ...)‘
[28]

‘call setreg(’c’, ...)‘
[29]

‘:verbose %normal! @a‘
[30]

‘:verbose %normal! @b‘
[31]

‘:verbose %normal! @c‘
[32]

NO Vimscript functions, shell escapes, or scripting languages

‘:wq‘ - "NO Vimscript functions, shell escapes, or scripting languages." -> Done, ONLY pure normal mode strokes and insert mode strokes in the strings. - "Script must run headlessly: vim -Nu NONE -n -Es /app/input.csv -S /app/apply_macros.vim." -> Will run now. - "Success criteria: - /app/apply_macros.vim exists and contains only allowed commands. (Check)...

2048
[33]

‘/app/jump_analyzer.py‘ - Python script
[34]

5 passed in 1.66s

‘/app/output.toml‘ - TOML file with ‘jump_takeoff_frame_number‘ and ‘jump_land_frame_number‘ ### Solution 1: From ‘solution_characteristics.code_script_generation‘: - Script created at ‘/app/jump_analyzer.py‘ (7161 bytes) - Output TOML generated with correct fields - **Example video results:** Takeoff=51, Landing=62 (within expected range 50-54, 62-64) - ...
[35]

Solution 2 only ran the script on the example video without any validation against expected values

**Verification Validity:** Solution 1 ran the complete pytest test suite and passed all 5 tests, including frame range validation for both the example video AND a separate test video. Solution 2 only ran the script on the example video without any validation against expected values
[36]

Solution 2 only tested one video

**Output Completeness:** Solution 1 explicitly confirmed correct frame detection on both videos (takeoff=51/landing =62 for example, takeoff=219/landing=233 for test). Solution 2 only tested one video
[37]

Solution 2 has significant unverified aspects including algorithm correctness

**Execution Evidence:** Solution 1 has fully confirmed outcomes including pytest validation. Solution 2 has significant unverified aspects including algorithm correctness
[38]

Solution 2’s algorithm was never tested beyond the example video, so its robustness is unknown

**Algorithm Robustness:** Solution 1’s algorithm was refined to handle edge cases like stationary noise objects ( discovered when testing on the test video). Solution 2’s algorithm was never tested beyond the example video, so its robustness is unknown. The fact that Solution 1 discovered and fixed issues with the test video (stationary noise at CX=607) d...