pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17233 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-19 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

Enhancing Zero-shot Personalized Image Aesthetics Assessment with Profile-aware Multimodal LLM

Chun Wang , Chenfeng Wei , Chenyang Liu , Weihong Deng This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 06:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI
keywords zero-shot personalizationpersonalized image aestheticsmultimodal large language modeluser profile conditioningselective fusionimage aesthetics assessmentprofile-aware reasoning
0
0 comments X

The pith

A profile-aware multimodal LLM predicts individual image aesthetics ratings using only user profiles and no rating history.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to solve zero-shot personalized image aesthetics assessment by treating user profiles as the sole source of personalization signals. It augments a frozen large language model with selective fusion modules that insert visual features into the model's internal states only during profile-conditioned steps. This design lets the model reason about an image in a way that reflects the profile's implied preferences. A sympathetic reader would care because existing methods collapse without historical ratings, leaving new users unable to receive tailored aesthetic judgments.

Core claim

P-MLLM augments a frozen LLM with selective fusion modules that integrate visual information into the evolving hidden states in a profile-aware manner during reasoning, enabling competitive zero-shot performance on PIAA benchmarks even when profile information is coarse.

What carries the argument

Selective fusion modules that control the injection of visual tokens into the LLM's hidden states conditioned on profile text.

If this is right

  • Zero-shot PIAA becomes possible for users who have never rated any images before.
  • Personalization no longer requires collection or storage of historical rating sequences.
  • The same selective-fusion approach can be reused on other subjective judgment tasks that currently depend on user history.
  • Coarse or incomplete profiles still suffice, lowering the data quality threshold for deployment.
  • Frozen LLMs can be turned into profile-conditioned predictors without full fine-tuning.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method implies that profile text alone can substitute for behavioral data in many preference-modeling settings.
  • It opens a route to privacy-preserving personalization because no past interaction logs are needed.
  • If the fusion mechanism proves robust, similar modules could be added to other multimodal models for user-specific vision-language tasks.
  • Future benchmarks could measure how profile granularity trades off against prediction accuracy.

Load-bearing premise

User profiles carry enough stable information about aesthetic preferences that a frozen LLM can extract and apply that signal without any user-specific training data or ratings.

What would settle it

On a held-out zero-shot PIAA test set, replace all user profiles with neutral generic text and check whether P-MLLM's accuracy drops to the level of a non-personalized multimodal LLM baseline.

read the original abstract

Personalized image aesthetics assessment (PIAA) aims to predict an individual user's subjective rating of an image, which requires modeling user-specific aesthetic preferences. Existing methods rely on historical user ratings for this modeling and therefore struggle when such data are unavailable. We address this zero-shot setting by using user profiles as contextual signals for personalization and adopting a profile-based personalization paradigm. We introduce P-MLLM, a profile-aware multimodal LLM that augments a frozen LLM with selective fusion modules for controlled visual integration. These modules selectively integrate visual information into the model's evolving hidden states during profile-conditioned reasoning, allowing visual information to be incorporated in a profile-aware manner. Experiments on recent PIAA benchmarks show that P-MLLM achieves competitive zero-shot performance and remains effective even with coarse profile information, highlighting the potential of profile-based personalization for zero-shot PIAA.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims to enhance zero-shot personalized image aesthetics assessment (PIAA) by introducing P-MLLM, a profile-aware multimodal LLM. It augments a frozen LLM with selective fusion modules that integrate visual information into hidden states during profile-conditioned reasoning, allowing profile-based personalization without historical ratings. Experiments reportedly show competitive performance on PIAA benchmarks, even with coarse profiles.

Significance. If the selective fusion modules demonstrably enable profile-conditioned visual integration, this work could significantly advance zero-shot PIAA by reducing the need for user-specific data. It highlights the potential of using user profiles as contextual signals in multimodal LLMs for subjective tasks like aesthetics assessment.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the selective fusion modules incorporate visual information 'in a profile-aware manner' is not supported by any referenced ablation studies or mechanistic analyses. Without evidence that the modules route visual features differently based on profile content (as opposed to the LLM treating the profile as standard text input), the contribution of the proposed architecture to the competitive zero-shot performance remains unestablished. This is load-bearing for the paper's core contribution.
  2. [Experiments] Experiments section: The reported competitive zero-shot performance lacks controls or variants (e.g., standard multimodal fusion without selectivity, or profile text alone) to isolate whether gains arise from profile-aware integration rather than general LLM capabilities or profile inclusion.
minor comments (1)
  1. The description of the selective fusion modules would benefit from additional detail, such as pseudocode or a diagram, to clarify how profile conditioning affects visual integration.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which identify key areas where additional evidence is needed to support the core claims about the selective fusion modules. We will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested ablation studies and control experiments, thereby strengthening the validation of the profile-aware integration mechanism.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the selective fusion modules incorporate visual information 'in a profile-aware manner' is not supported by any referenced ablation studies or mechanistic analyses. Without evidence that the modules route visual features differently based on profile content (as opposed to the LLM treating the profile as standard text input), the contribution of the proposed architecture to the competitive zero-shot performance remains unestablished. This is load-bearing for the paper's core contribution.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript currently grounds the 'profile-aware' claim primarily in the architectural design of the selective fusion modules, which condition visual integration on the evolving hidden states during profile-based reasoning. However, we agree that this requires explicit empirical support via ablation studies and mechanistic analyses (e.g., comparing fusion behavior under profile vs. non-profile conditions or inspecting differential routing of visual features). In the revision, we will add these analyses, including quantitative comparisons of visual token influence with and without profile conditioning, to demonstrate that the modules do not simply treat the profile as generic text input. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experiments] Experiments section: The reported competitive zero-shot performance lacks controls or variants (e.g., standard multimodal fusion without selectivity, or profile text alone) to isolate whether gains arise from profile-aware integration rather than general LLM capabilities or profile inclusion.

    Authors: We agree that isolating the source of performance gains is essential. The current experiments focus on end-to-end zero-shot PIAA results but do not include the suggested variants. In the revised manuscript, we will introduce control experiments such as: (i) a non-selective multimodal fusion baseline, (ii) profile text input without any visual fusion, and (iii) comparisons against standard multimodal LLMs without profile conditioning. These will help attribute gains specifically to the profile-aware selective mechanism rather than general LLM capabilities or mere profile inclusion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: architecture proposal and empirical results are independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper introduces P-MLLM as a profile-aware multimodal LLM augmented with selective fusion modules, claiming these enable profile-conditioned visual integration in zero-shot PIAA without historical ratings or fine-tuning. No equations, derivations, or parameter-fitting steps are described that reduce any claimed performance metric to the inputs by construction. The central claims rest on the proposed architecture and reported benchmark experiments rather than self-definitional loops, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. This is a standard empirical ML architecture paper whose logic does not collapse to its own definitions or data subsets.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the unproven effectiveness of the newly introduced selective fusion modules and the assumption that profiles alone suffice for personalization; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are explicitly quantified in the abstract.

invented entities (1)
  • P-MLLM no independent evidence
    purpose: Profile-aware multimodal LLM with selective fusion for zero-shot PIAA
    New model architecture introduced to address the zero-shot setting.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5443 in / 1073 out tokens · 34087 ms · 2026-05-10T06:48:56.439772+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Enhancing Zero-shot Personalized Image Aesthetics Assessment with Profile-aware Multimodal LLM

    INTRODUCTION Personalized image aesthetics assessment (PIAA) aims to predict user-specific aesthetic judgments for images and is increasingly relevant to human-centric applications such as personal photo management and personalized content recom- mendation [1]. As illustrated in Fig. 1, users with different backgrounds or personality traits may assign not...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    RELATED WORKS 2.1. Personalized Image Aesthetics Assessment To address the data scarcity challenge, early PIAA ap- proaches often train a general GIAA model first and then fine-tune it into user-specific PIAA models using limited per- user data [2], while meta-learning methods improve adapta- tion efficiency with only a few samples [4]. Subsequent works f...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Rate the aesthetics of this based on the persona you are embodying,

    METHODS In this section, we introduce the P-MLLM architecture, high- lighting the selective fusion modules for profile-aware visual integration, and then describe the dataset construction used to train P-MLLM. 3.1. Profile-aware MLLM Architecture P-MLLM is designed to support profile-based personalization in PIAA by conditioning the multimodal reasoning p...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Datasets We evaluate P-MLLM on two recent PIAA datasets, PARA

    EXPERIMENTS 4.1. Datasets We evaluate P-MLLM on two recent PIAA datasets, PARA

    work page

  5. [5]

    and LAPIS [22], both of which provide rich and diverse user profiles essential for personalized aesthetic modeling

    work page

  6. [6]

    We follow the evaluation protocol of PARA [1], with mi- nor modifications to the data construction

    PARA includes demographic attributes (age, gender, and experience in art and photography) and Big-Five personality traits, while LAPIS provides demographic metadata (age, gender, nationality, education level, and art-related interests). We follow the evaluation protocol of PARA [1], with mi- nor modifications to the data construction. Specifically, we ran...

    work page

  7. [7]

    as the LLM due to its verified profile-interpretation ca- pability [23], and empirically insert the selective fusion mod- ules into its lowest three transformer blocks (Appendix D). Following [11][12], CLIP-ViT-L/14 [25] serves as the image encoder with an input resolution of 336×336, and the pro- jection module adopts a Linear-GELU-Linear structure with ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    We introduce P-MLLM, a profile-aware multimodal LLM that leverages user profiles to guide its reasoning and controlled visual in- tegration for personalized prediction

    CONCLUSION This work investigates PIAA in a zero-shot setting where no aesthetic ratings are available for the target user. We introduce P-MLLM, a profile-aware multimodal LLM that leverages user profiles to guide its reasoning and controlled visual in- tegration for personalized prediction. Experiments show that P-MLLM achieves competitive zero-shot perf...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Personalized image aesthetics as- sessment with rich attributes,

    Yuzhe Yang et al., “Personalized image aesthetics as- sessment with rich attributes,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2022, pp. 19861–19869

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Personalized image aesthetics,

    Jian Ren, Xiaohui Shen, Zhe Lin, Radomir Mech, and David J. Foran, “Personalized image aesthetics,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Oct 2017

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    A Survey of Personalized Large Language Models: Progress and Future Directions

    Jiahong Liu et al., “A survey of personalized large language models: Progress and future directions,” arXiv:2502.11528, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Meta-learning perspective for personalized image aesthetics assessment,

    Weining Wang, Junjie Su, Lemin Li, Xiangmin Xu, and Jiebo Luo, “Meta-learning perspective for personalized image aesthetics assessment,” in2019 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2019

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Personalized image aesthet- ics assessment via multi-attribute interactive reasoning,

    Hancheng Zhu et al., “Personalized image aesthet- ics assessment via multi-attribute interactive reasoning,” Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 22, 2022

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Multi-level transitional contrast learning for personalized image aesthetics assessment,

    Zhichao Yang, Leida Li, Yuzhe Yang, Yaqian Li, and Weisi Lin, “Multi-level transitional contrast learning for personalized image aesthetics assessment,”IEEE Trans- actions on Multimedia, vol. 26, pp. 1944–1956, 2024

    work page 1944

  15. [15]

    Personality-assisted multi-task learning for generic and personalized image aesthetics assessment,

    Leida Li, Hancheng Zhu, Sicheng Zhao, Guiguang Ding, and Weisi Lin, “Personality-assisted multi-task learning for generic and personalized image aesthetics assessment,”IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 29, pp. 3898–3910, 2020

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Using large language models to simulate multiple hu- mans and replicate human subject studies,

    Gati V Aher, Rosa I. Arriaga, and Adam Tauman Kalai, “Using large language models to simulate multiple hu- mans and replicate human subject studies,” inProceed- ings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2023, pp. 337–371

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    LLMs + persona-plug = personal- ized LLMs,

    Jiongnan Liu et al., “LLMs + persona-plug = personal- ized LLMs,” inProceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol- ume 1: Long Papers), July 2025, pp. 9373–9385

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    PAD: Personalized alignment at decoding-time,

    Ruizhe Chen, Xiaotian Zhang, Meng Luo, Wenhao Chai, and Zuozhu Liu, “PAD: Personalized alignment at decoding-time,” inThe Thirteenth International Con- ference on Learning Representations, 2025

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    Aesexpert: Towards multi-modality foundation model for image aesthetics perception,

    Yipo Huang et al., “Aesexpert: Towards multi-modality foundation model for image aesthetics perception,” in Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, New York, NY , USA, 2024, MM ’24

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Q-instruct: Improving low-level vi- sual abilities for multi-modality foundation models,

    Haoning Wu et al., “Q-instruct: Improving low-level vi- sual abilities for multi-modality foundation models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2024

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Uncovering personality traits via multimodal llm for personalized image emotion analysis,

    Jianzhang Gao, Hao Pu, Yuchong Sun, and Ruihua Song, “Uncovering personality traits via multimodal llm for personalized image emotion analysis,” in 2025 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), 2025, pp. 1–6

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Vl- adapter: Parameter-efficient transfer learning for vision- and-language tasks,

    Yi-Lin Sung, Jaemin Cho, and Mohit Bansal, “Vl- adapter: Parameter-efficient transfer learning for vision- and-language tasks,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion (CVPR), June 2022

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    LLaMA-adapter: Efficient fine-tuning of large lan- guage models with zero-initialized attention,

    Renrui Zhang, Jiaming Han, Chris Liu, Aojun Zhou, Pan Lu, Yu Qiao, Hongsheng Li, and Peng Gao, “LLaMA-adapter: Efficient fine-tuning of large lan- guage models with zero-initialized attention,” inThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Repre- sentations, 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Memory-space visual prompting for efficient vision-language fine-tuning,

    Shibo Jie et al., “Memory-space visual prompting for efficient vision-language fine-tuning,” inProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024, ICML’24

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Flamingo: a visual lan- guage model for few-shot learning,

    Jean-Baptiste Alayrac et al., “Flamingo: a visual lan- guage model for few-shot learning,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022, vol. 35

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Gip: Gated interaction prompt for parame- ter efficient vision-language fine-tuning,

    Xiang Lin, Weixin Li, Shu Guo, Lihong Wang, and Di Huang, “Gip: Gated interaction prompt for parame- ter efficient vision-language fine-tuning,” in2025 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2025, pp. 617–622

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Cheap and quick: Efficient vision- language instruction tuning for large language models,

    Gen Luo et al., “Cheap and quick: Efficient vision- language instruction tuning for large language models,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023, vol. 36, pp. 29615–29627

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Gated attention for large lan- guage models: Non-linearity, sparsity, and attention- sink-free,

    Zihan Qiu et al., “Gated attention for large lan- guage models: Non-linearity, sparsity, and attention- sink-free,” inThe Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2025

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report

    Shuai Bai et al., “Qwen2.5-vl technical report,” arXiv:2502.13923, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Lapis: A novel dataset for personalized image aesthetic assess- ment,

    Anne-Sofie Maerten, Li-Wei Chen, Stefanie De Winter, Christophe Bossens, and Johan Wagemans, “Lapis: A novel dataset for personalized image aesthetic assess- ment,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops, June 2025, pp. 6356–6365

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Lmlpa: Language model linguis- tic personality assessment,

    Jingyao Zheng, Xian Wang, Simo Hosio, Xiaoxian Xu, and Lik-Hang Lee, “Lmlpa: Language model linguis- tic personality assessment,”Computational Linguistics, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 599–640, 06 2025

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    The Llama 3 Herd of Models

    Abhimanyu Dubey et al., “The llama 3 herd of models,” arXiv:2407.21783, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Learning transferable visual mod- els from natural language supervision,

    Alec Radford et al., “Learning transferable visual mod- els from natural language supervision,” inProceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learn- ing, 18–24 Jul 2021, pp. 8748–8763

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    GPT-4o System Card

    OpenAI, “Gpt-4o system card,”arXiv:2410.21276, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    The oscars of ai theater: A survey on role-playing with language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.11484, 2024

    Nuo Chen, Yan Wang, Yang Deng, and Jia Li, “The oscars of ai theater: A survey on role-playing with lan- guage models,”arXiv:2407.11484, 2025. Appendices A. TRAINING TASKS This section lists the training tasks used for the PARA dataset (Sec. A.1) and the LAPIS dataset (Sec. A.2). A.1. PARA datasets Three types of tasks are presented below, each with a que...

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [40]

    pyotr- konchalovsky roses-and-asparagus-1954

    **Depth of Field**: Explain the focus, background blur, and the sense of depth conveyed. Present your description as a single, fluent paragraph, in English.” • Answer: generated by the Qwen2.5-VL-32B. • Example (by Qwen2.5-VL-32B): “The image show- cases a modern, minimalist living room with a clean white color scheme that emphasizes simplicity and ele- g...

    work page 1954

  37. [41]

    **Content**: Describe what is depicted in the image and identify the main subject matter

    work page

  38. [42]

    **Composition**: Discuss the arrangement of visual elements, including framing, balance, and per- spective

    work page

  39. [43]

    **Color**: Analyze the color palette, harmony, contrasts, and saturation levels

    work page

  40. [44]

    **Light**: Describe the type, direction, and quality of light, as well as the mood it creates

    work page

  41. [45]

    # Role Profile

    **Depth of Field**: Explain the focus, background blur, and the sense of depth conveyed. Present your description as a single, fluent paragraph, in English.” • Answer: generated by the Qwen2.5-VL-32B. • Example (by Qwen2.5-VL-32B): “The painting depicts a still life arrangement of flowers in a vesa, with vi- brant red and pink roses prominently displayed ...

    work page