pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.19836 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-21 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· hep-lat

Recognition: unknown

The emergence of (3+1)-dimensional expanding spacetime from complex Langevin simulations of the Lorentzian type IIB matrix model with deformations

Konstantinos N. Anagnostopoulos , Takehiro Azuma , Mitsuaki Hirasawa , Jun Nishimura , Stratos Papadoudis , Asato Tsuchiya
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 02:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qchep-lat
keywords Lorentzian type IIB matrix modelcomplex Langevin methodemergent spacetimesuperstring theorynumerical simulationsdimensional reductionexpanding universe
0
0 comments X

The pith

Simulations of the deformed Lorentzian type IIB matrix model produce a phase with emergent (3+1)-dimensional expanding spacetime that is smooth and real.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The Lorentzian type IIB matrix model is studied numerically as a nonperturbative formulation of superstring theory, with the eigenvalue distributions of its bosonic matrices expected to generate spacetime dynamically in the large-N limit. Complex Langevin simulations are performed up to matrix size 128 after introducing a supersymmetry-inspired deformation to avoid the singular drift problem caused by the Pfaffian. The deformed model is found to enter a phase in which (3+1)-dimensional expanding spacetime appears, with both the spatial and temporal directions remaining smooth and real. A sympathetic reader would care because this supplies a concrete dynamical mechanism by which the model could select the observed dimensionality and signature from higher-dimensional matrix degrees of freedom.

Core claim

The authors perform numerical simulations of the deformed Lorentzian type IIB matrix model using the complex Langevin method up to matrix size N=128. They find that the deformed model exhibits a phase in which (3+1)-dimensional expanding spacetime emerges with both space and time being smooth and real.

What carries the argument

The eigenvalue distribution of the N by N bosonic matrices A_mu, which encodes the emergent spacetime geometry in the large-N limit and is evolved under the complex Langevin dynamics with the supersymmetry-inspired deformation.

If this is right

  • The model's large-N dynamics can select three spatial dimensions plus time without external tuning.
  • The expansion arises internally from the matrix evolution and therefore carries built-in cosmological behavior.
  • The smoothness of the emergent geometry implies that classical spacetime can appear without disruptive quantum fluctuations at the simulated scales.
  • The reality of both space and time supports emergence of a Lorentzian metric directly from the model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the deformation can be removed in future work while preserving the phase, the result would apply more directly to the original undeformed Lorentzian model.
  • Larger-N runs could reveal whether the expansion rate or dimensionality changes with system size, offering a testable signature.
  • The approach might be combined with other matrix-model techniques to extract additional observables such as correlation functions of the emergent geometry.

Load-bearing premise

The deformation introduced to avoid the singular drift problem does not distort the physical content of the original Lorentzian model in a way that artificially produces the observed (3+1)-dimensional phase.

What would settle it

A simulation of the undeformed model at comparable or larger N that shows no (3+1)-dimensional expanding phase, or that shows the phase only for deformation parameters that significantly alter the original action, would indicate the emergence is an artifact of the deformation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.19836 by Asato Tsuchiya, Jun Nishimura, Konstantinos N. Anagnostopoulos, Mitsuaki Hirasawa, Stratos Papadoudis, Takehiro Azuma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The expectation values of 1 N Tr(A0) 2 (Left) and 1 N Tr(Ai) 2 (Right) are plotted in the complex plane for the Euclidean (E) and Lorentzian (L) models. The relative complex phase for these quantities are − 3π 4 and π 4 , respectively, which agree with Eq. (2.11) [70, 71]. Setting S˜ γ = −iSγ so that it appears in the partition function as e −S˜γ , we obtain S˜ γ = N 2 γ {e − i 4 π(2+3u)Tr(A˜ 0) 2 + e i 4 … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The eigenvalues of the matrix M obtained for N = 16, γ = 6, ˜d = 6, ξ = 18 and mf = 2, where the parameters ˜d and ξ are introduced in Eq.(3.12). in (2.5). Since the drift term includes the following contribution10 ∂ ∂(Ai)ba {− log PfM} = − 1 2 Tr  ∂M ∂(Ai)ba M−1  , (3.10) near-zero eigenvalues of M can lead to the singular drift problem. Here we avoid this problem by adding a fermionic mass term [9] Smf… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (Left) The expectation values ⟨αa⟩ of the eigenvalues of the temporal matrix A0 are plotted in the complex plane for the bosonic model with N = 96, n = 6 and γ = 4. The solid line represents the behavior (2.19) expected for the original Lorentzian model (γ = 0). (Right) The real parts of ⟨λi(t)⟩, the expectation values of the eigenvalues of Tij (t), are plotted against time for the same model. as the simul… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Left) ⟨Xi(t)⟩ defined by Eq. (4.1) is plotted against time for the bosonic model with N = 96, n = 6 and γ = 4 before the Lorentz transformations. Different colors correspond to different indices i. (Right) ⟨Xi(t)⟩ is plotted against time for the same model after the Lorentz transformations. -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 -2.5-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Im 〈α〉 Re 〈α〉 -0.04 -0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.1… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The same as Figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (Left) The expectation values ⟨αa⟩ of the eigenvalues of the temporal matrix A0 are plotted in the complex plane for the bosonic model with N = 128, n = 12, γ = 4, ˜d = 3 and ξ = 10. The solid line represents the behavior (2.19) expected for the original Lorentzian model (γ = 0). (Right) The real parts of ⟨λi(t)⟩, the expectation values of the eigenvalues of Tij (t), are plotted against time for the same m… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (Left) The expectation values ⟨αa⟩ of the eigenvalues of the temporal matrix A0 are plotted in the complex plane for the bosonic model (Top), the model with fermionic contributions at mf = 10 (Middle) and at mf = 6 (Bottom), with N = 128, n = 6, γ = 4, ˜d = 5 and ξ = 12. The solid line represents the behavior (2.19) expected for the original Lorentzian model (γ = 0). (Right) The real parts of ⟨λi(t)⟩, the … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (Left) The phase of space θs(t) is plotted for the bosonic model (Top) and for the model with fermionic contributions at mf = 10 (Middle) and at mf = 6 (Bottom), with N = 128, n = 6, γ = 4, ˜d = 5 and ξ = 12. The horizontal line shows the value π 8 ∼ 0.39 for the original Lorentzian model with γ = 0, which is equivalent to the Euclidean model. (Right) The real parts of ⟨qp(t)⟩, the expectation values of th… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The quantity |Aab|, defined by Eq. (2.16), is plotted for the bosonic model (Top￾Left) and for the model with fermionic contributions at mf = 10 (Top-Right) and at mf = 6 (Bottom), with N = 128, n = 6, γ = 4, ˜d = 5 and ξ = 12. exhibit rapid growth. This result provides an evidence for a phase in which an expanding (3+1)-dimensional spacetime emerges at late times. As we increase mf adiabatically from this… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Lorentzian type IIB matrix model is a promising candidate for a nonperturbative formulation of superstring theory. In this model, the eigenvalue distribution of the $N\times N$ bosonic matrices $A_\mu$ $(\mu = 0 , \ldots , 9)$ represents an emergent spacetime, which is determined by the dynamics of the model in the large-$N$ limit. Here we perform numerical simulations of the model overcoming the sign problem by the complex Langevin method with the matrix size $N$ up to $128$. In order to avoid the singular drift problem due to the Pfaffian, which appears after integrating out the fermionic matrices, we deform the model in a manner inspired by the supersymmetric deformation, which is used to define the ``polarized type IIB matrix model'' in the Euclidean case. We find that the deformed model exhibits a phase in which (3+1)-dimensional expanding spacetime emerges with both space and time being smooth and real.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports complex Langevin simulations of the Lorentzian type IIB matrix model with a deformation introduced to avoid the singular drift problem from the Pfaffian. With matrix sizes up to N=128, the authors claim to identify a phase in which (3+1)-dimensional expanding spacetime emerges, characterized by smooth and real eigenvalue distributions for both spatial and temporal directions.

Significance. If the deformation can be shown to become irrelevant and the numerical evidence is robust, the result would supply non-perturbative support for emergent realistic spacetime in the Lorentzian IIB matrix model, strengthening its status as a candidate for a non-perturbative formulation of superstring theory. The approach of combining complex Langevin dynamics with a supersymmetry-inspired deformation addresses a longstanding technical obstacle in the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [deformation and results sections] The central claim that the observed (3+1)D expanding phase belongs to the original Lorentzian model (rather than being induced by the regulator) requires an explicit scaling study in the deformation parameter. No such limit is reported, leaving open the possibility that the deformation biases the reality and smoothness of the eigenvalues or the effective dimensionality.
  2. [numerical results] The extraction of dimensionality from the eigenvalue distributions of the bosonic matrices A_mu, together with convergence diagnostics and statistical error bars for N up to 128, is not described. Without these, the reliability of the reported phase cannot be assessed.
minor comments (1)
  1. [model definition] The precise definition of the deformation term and its relation to the Euclidean polarized model should be given explicitly (e.g., as an additional term in the action) to allow direct comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [deformation and results sections] The central claim that the observed (3+1)D expanding phase belongs to the original Lorentzian model (rather than being induced by the regulator) requires an explicit scaling study in the deformation parameter. No such limit is reported, leaving open the possibility that the deformation biases the reality and smoothness of the eigenvalues or the effective dimensionality.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit scaling study with respect to the deformation parameter is essential to demonstrate that the emergent (3+1)D phase is not an artifact of the regulator. Our simulations employ a small fixed deformation parameter, chosen on the basis of supersymmetry-inspired regularization to suppress the singular drift while preserving the large-N dynamics of the Lorentzian model. In the revised manuscript we will add results for at least one smaller deformation value, together with a discussion of the observed stability of the phase, to indicate the approach to the undeformed limit. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [numerical results] The extraction of dimensionality from the eigenvalue distributions of the bosonic matrices A_mu, together with convergence diagnostics and statistical error bars for N up to 128, is not described. Without these, the reliability of the reported phase cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We will revise the manuscript to include a dedicated subsection that details the extraction of effective dimensionality from the eigenvalue distributions of the A_μ matrices, the precise criteria used to identify the three extended spatial directions and the compact time direction, the convergence diagnostics applied to the complex Langevin trajectories, and the statistical error estimation (via jackknife or bootstrap resampling) for the N=128 data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct numerical observations from Monte Carlo sampling

full rationale

The paper reports an observed phase in complex Langevin simulations of a deformed Lorentzian type IIB matrix model, where (3+1)-dimensional expanding spacetime emerges for N up to 128. This is a direct output of the dynamics under the chosen regularization, not an analytic derivation that reduces by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citations. The deformation is explicitly introduced as a technical fix for the Pfaffian-induced singular drift (inspired by Euclidean polarized models), and the central claim is the numerical finding itself rather than a prediction forced by parameter fitting or renaming. No load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatze from prior self-work are invoked to derive the spacetime emergence; the result stands as an independent simulation outcome. This matches the low circularity expected for non-analytic Monte Carlo studies.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the complex Langevin algorithm with the chosen deformation correctly samples the target distribution and that the eigenvalue distribution of the bosonic matrices can be interpreted as emergent spacetime geometry.

free parameters (1)
  • deformation parameter
    A tunable deformation strength is introduced to suppress singular drift from the Pfaffian; its specific value is chosen to enable stable simulations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5514 in / 1181 out tokens · 34102 ms · 2026-05-10T02:36:23.257765+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Regularized Master-Field Approximation for Large-$N$ Reduced Matrix Models

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A finite-dimensional regularization of the master field enables direct numerical computation of large-N matrix models in both Euclidean and Minkowski signatures while reproducing known solutions in simple test cases.

  2. Path integral for the closed superstring and the matrix model

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Derives Minkowskian Nambu-Goto path integral for critical closed strings, proves equivalences to Polyakov and Schild forms, and obtains a causality-preserving Minkowski IKKT matrix model via regularization of the type...

  3. Quantum spacetime and quantum fluctuations in the IKKT model at weak coupling

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    In the IKKT matrix model, quantum fluctuations are negligible compared to noncommutativity scales at weak coupling for Moyal-Weyl and covariant quantum spacetime backgrounds, justifying semi-classical emergent geometry.

  4. Impact of supersymmetry on the dynamical emergence of the spacetime in the type IIB matrix model with the Lorentz symmetry "gauge fixed"

    hep-lat 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Numerical investigation of supersymmetry's role in spacetime emergence within the Lorentz gauge-fixed type IIB matrix model using Complex Langevin dynamics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 94 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    A Large-N Reduced Model as Superstring

    N. Ishibashi, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa and A. Tsuchiya,A large N reduced model as superstring,Nucl. Phys.B498(1997) 467 [hep-th/9612115]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  2. [2]

    H. Aoki, S. Iso, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa and T. Tada,Space-time structures from IIB matrix model,Prog. Theor. Phys.99(1998) 713 [hep-th/9802085]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    H. Aoki, S. Iso, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa, A. Tsuchiya and T. Tada,IIB matrix model, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.134(1999) 47 [hep-th/9908038]

    work page arXiv 1999

  4. [4]

    Iso and H

    S. Iso and H. Kawai,Space-time and matter in IIB matrix model: Gauge symmetry and diffeomorphism,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15(2000) 651 [hep-th/9903217]

    work page arXiv 2000

  5. [5]

    H. Aoki, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya,Realizing three generations of the Standard Model fermions in the type IIB matrix model,JHEP05(2014) 131 [arXiv:1401.7848]

    work page arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    Hatakeyama, A

    K. Hatakeyama, A. Matsumoto, J. Nishimura, A. Tsuchiya and A. Yosprakob,The emergence of expanding space–time and intersecting D-branes from classical solutions in the Lorentzian type IIB matrix model,PTEP2020(2020) 043B10 [arXiv:1911.08132]

    work page arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Nishimura, T

    J. Nishimura, T. Okubo and F. Sugino,Systematic study of the SO(10) symmetry breaking vacua in the matrix model for type IIB superstrings,JHEP10(2011) 135 [arXiv:1108.1293]. 21

    work page arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    Anagnostopoulos, T

    K.N. Anagnostopoulos, T. Azuma and J. Nishimura,Monte Carlo studies of dynamical compactification of extra dimensions in a model of nonperturbative string theory,PoSLATTICE2015(2016) 307 [arXiv:1509.05079]

    work page arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    Anagnostopoulos, T

    K.N. Anagnostopoulos, T. Azuma, Y. Ito, J. Nishimura, T. Okubo and S. Kovalkov Papadoudis,Complex Langevin analysis of the spontaneous breaking of 10D rotational symmetry in the Euclidean IKKT matrix model,JHEP06(2020) 069 [arXiv:2002.07410]

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    Spontaneous Breakdown of Lorentz Invariance in IIB Matrix Model

    J. Nishimura and G. Vernizzi,Spontaneous breakdown of Lorentz invariance in IIB matrix model,JHEP04(2000) 015 [hep-th/0003223]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2000

  11. [11]

    Nishimura and G

    J. Nishimura and G. Vernizzi,Brane world from IIB matrices,Phys. Rev. Lett.85 (2000) 4664 [hep-th/0007022]

    work page arXiv 2000

  12. [12]

    Hotta, J

    T. Hotta, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya,Dynamical aspects of large N reduced models, Nucl. Phys. B545(1999) 543 [hep-th/9811220]

    work page arXiv 1999

  13. [13]

    Ambjorn, K.N

    J. Ambjorn, K.N. Anagnostopoulos, W. Bietenholz, T. Hotta and J. Nishimura, Monte Carlo studies of the IIB matrix model at large N,JHEP07(2000) 011 [hep-th/0005147]

    work page arXiv 2000

  14. [14]

    Ambjorn, K.N

    J. Ambjorn, K.N. Anagnostopoulos, W. Bietenholz, T. Hotta and J. Nishimura,Large N dynamics of dimensionally reduced 4-D SU(N) superYang-Mills theory,JHEP07 (2000) 013 [hep-th/0003208]

    work page arXiv 2000

  15. [15]

    Gaussian expansion analysis of a matrix model with the spontaneous breakdown of rotational symmetry

    J. Nishimura, T. Okubo and F. Sugino,Gaussian expansion analysis of a matrix model with the spontaneous breakdown of rotational symmetry,Prog. Theor. Phys.114 (2005) 487 [hep-th/0412194]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  16. [16]

    Aoyama, J

    T. Aoyama, J. Nishimura and T. Okubo,Spontaneous breaking of the rotational symmetry in dimensionally reduced super Yang-Mills models,Prog. Theor. Phys.125 (2011) 537 [arXiv:1007.0883]

    work page arXiv 2011

  17. [17]

    Anagnostopoulos and J

    K.N. Anagnostopoulos and J. Nishimura,New approach to the complex action problem and its application to a nonperturbative study of superstring theory,Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 106008 [hep-th/0108041]

    work page arXiv 2002

  18. [18]

    Anagnostopoulos, T

    K.N. Anagnostopoulos, T. Azuma and J. Nishimura,A general approach to the sign problem: The factorization method with multiple observables,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 054504 [arXiv:1009.4504]

    work page arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    Anagnostopoulos, T

    K.N. Anagnostopoulos, T. Azuma and J. Nishimura,A practical solution to the sign problem in a matrix model for dynamical compactification,JHEP10(2011) 126 [arXiv:1108.1534]

    work page arXiv 2011

  20. [20]

    Anagnostopoulos, T

    K.N. Anagnostopoulos, T. Azuma and J. Nishimura,Monte Carlo studies of the spontaneous rotational symmetry breaking in dimensionally reduced super Yang-Mills models,JHEP11(2013) 009 [arXiv:1306.6135]. 22

    work page arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    Anagnostopoulos, T

    K.N. Anagnostopoulos, T. Azuma, Y. Ito, J. Nishimura and S.K. Papadoudis, Complex Langevin analysis of the spontaneous symmetry breaking in dimensionally reduced super Yang-Mills models,JHEP02(2018) 151 [arXiv:1712.07562]

    work page arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Anagnostopoulos, T

    K.N. Anagnostopoulos, T. Azuma, K. Hatakeyama, M. Hirasawa, Y. Ito, J. Nishimura, S.K. Papadoudis and A. Tsuchiya,Progress in the numerical studies of the type IIB matrix model,Eur. Phys. J. ST232(2023) 3681 [arXiv:2210.17537]

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    S.W. Kim, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya,Expanding (3+1)-dimensional universe from a Lorentzian matrix model for superstring theory in (9+1)-dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 011601 [arXiv:1108.1540]

    work page arXiv 2012

  24. [24]

    Ito, S.W

    Y. Ito, S.W. Kim, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya,Monte Carlo studies on the expanding behavior of the early universe in the Lorentzian type IIB matrix model,PoS LATTICE2013(2014) 341 [arXiv:1311.5579]

    work page arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    Ito, S.W

    Y. Ito, S.W. Kim, Y. Koizuka, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya,A renormalization group method for studying the early universe in the Lorentzian IIB matrix model, PTEP2014(2014) 083B01 [arXiv:1312.5415]

    work page arXiv 2014

  26. [26]

    Y. Ito, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya,Power-law expansion of the Universe from the bosonic Lorentzian type IIB matrix model,JHEP11(2015) 070 [arXiv:1506.04795]

    work page arXiv 2015

  27. [27]

    Y. Ito, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya,Large-scale computation of the exponentially expanding universe in a simplified Lorentzian type IIB matrix model,PoS LATTICE2015(2016) 243 [arXiv:1512.01923]

    work page arXiv 2016

  28. [28]

    Y. Ito, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya,Universality and the dynamical space-time dimensionality in the Lorentzian type IIB matrix model,JHEP03(2017) 143 [arXiv:1701.07783]

    work page arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    T. Aoki, M. Hirasawa, Y. Ito, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya,On the structure of the emergent 3d expanding space in the Lorentzian type IIB matrix model,PTEP2019 (2019) 093B03 [arXiv:1904.05914]

    work page arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    Parisi,On complex probabilities,Phys

    G. Parisi,On complex probabilities,Phys. Lett. B131(1983) 393

    1983

  31. [31]

    Klauder,Coherent state Langevin equations for canonical quantum systems with applications to the quantized Hall effect,Phys

    J.R. Klauder,Coherent state Langevin equations for canonical quantum systems with applications to the quantized Hall effect,Phys. Rev. A29(1984) 2036

    1984

  32. [32]

    Complex Langevin analysis of the space-time structure in the Lorentzian type IIB matrix model

    J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya,Complex Langevin analysis of the space-time structure in the Lorentzian type IIB matrix model,JHEP06(2019) 077 [arXiv:1904.05919]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    S.W. Kim, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya,Expanding universe as a classical solution in the Lorentzian matrix model for nonperturbative superstring theory,Phys. Rev.D86 (2012) 027901 [arXiv:1110.4803]

    work page arXiv 2012

  34. [34]

    S.W. Kim, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya,Late time behaviors of the expanding universe in the IIB matrix model,JHEP10(2012) 147 [arXiv:1208.0711]. 23

    work page arXiv 2012

  35. [35]

    Steinacker,Gravity as a quantum effect on quantum space-time,Phys

    H.C. Steinacker,Gravity as a quantum effect on quantum space-time,Phys. Lett. B 827(2022) 136946 [arXiv:2110.03936]

    work page arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Steinacker,One-loop effective action and emergent gravity on quantum spaces in the IKKT matrix model,JHEP05(2023) 129 [arXiv:2303.08012]

    H.C. Steinacker,One-loop effective action and emergent gravity on quantum spaces in the IKKT matrix model,JHEP05(2023) 129 [arXiv:2303.08012]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Battista and H.C

    E. Battista and H.C. Steinacker,One-loop effective action of the IKKT model for cosmological backgrounds,JHEP01(2024) 125 [arXiv:2310.11126]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Kumar and H.C

    K. Kumar and H.C. Steinacker,Modified Einstein equations from the 1-loop effective action of the IKKT model,Class. Quant. Grav.41(2024) 185007 [arXiv:2312.01317]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Steinacker,Quantum geometry, matrix theory, and gravity, Cambridge University Press (2024)

    H.C. Steinacker,Quantum geometry, matrix theory, and gravity, Cambridge University Press (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Manta, H.C

    A. Manta, H.C. Steinacker and T. Tran,hs-extended gravity from the IKKT matrix model,JHEP02(2025) 031 [arXiv:2411.02598]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Manta and H

    A. Manta and H.C. Steinacker,Minimal covariant quantum space-time,J. Phys. A58 (2025) 175204 [arXiv:2502.02498]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Manta and H

    A. Manta and H.C. Steinacker,Dynamical covariant quantum spacetime with fuzzy extra dimensions in the IKKT model,JHEP02(2026) 062 [arXiv:2509.24753]

    work page arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Klinkhamer,IIB matrix model and regularized big bang,PTEP2021(2021) 063 [arXiv:2009.06525]

    F.R. Klinkhamer,IIB matrix model and regularized big bang,PTEP2021(2021) 063 [arXiv:2009.06525]

    work page arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Emergent cosmology from matrix theory,

    S. Brahma, R. Brandenberger and S. Laliberte,Emergent cosmology from matrix theory,JHEP03(2022) 067 [arXiv:2107.11512]

    work page arXiv 2022

  45. [45]

    Brahma, R

    S. Brahma, R. Brandenberger and S. Laliberte,Emergent metric space-time from matrix theory,JHEP09(2022) 031 [arXiv:2206.12468]

    work page arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Brahma, R

    S. Brahma, R. Brandenberger and S. Laliberte,BFSS matrix model cosmology: Progress and challenges,MDPI Physics5(2023) 1 [arXiv:2210.07288]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Klinkhamer,Emergent gravity from the IIB matrix model and cancellation of a cosmological constant,Class

    F.R. Klinkhamer,Emergent gravity from the IIB matrix model and cancellation of a cosmological constant,Class. Quant. Grav.40(2023) 124001 [arXiv:2212.00709]

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Laliberte and S

    S. Laliberte and S. Brahma,IKKT thermodynamics and early universe cosmology, JHEP11(2023) 161 [arXiv:2304.10509]

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Brandenberger and J

    R. Brandenberger and J. Pasiecznik,Origin of the SO(9)→SO(3)×SO(6) symmetry breaking in the type IIB matrix model,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 026006 [arXiv:2409.00254]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Regularization of Matrices in the Covariant Deriva- tive Interpretation of Matrix Models,

    K. Hattori, Y. Mizuno and A. Tsuchiya,Regularization of matrices in the covariant derivative interpretation of matrix models,PTEP2024(2024) 123B06 [arXiv:2410.13414]. 24

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Gohara and A

    J. Gohara and A. Sako,Quantization of Lie–Poisson algebra and Lie algebra solutions of mass-deformed type IIB matrix model,J. Math. Phys.67(2026) 022301 [arXiv:2503.24060]

    work page arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    P.M. Ho, H. Kawai and H.C. Steinacker,General relativity in IIB matrix model,JHEP 02(2026) 070 [arXiv:2509.06646]

    work page arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    Gaß and H.C

    C. Gaß and H.C. Steinacker,Spatially flat cosmological quantum spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 024050 [arXiv:2510.21283]

    work page arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    Liao and R

    H. Liao and R. Maeta,A new type of saddle in the Euclidean IKKT matrix model and its emergent geometry,arXiv:2512.03161

    work page arXiv

  55. [55]

    Steinacker,Modified gravity at large scales on quantum spacetime in the IKKT model, JHEP04(2026) 044 [2601.08031]

    H.C. Steinacker,Modified gravity at large scales on quantum spacetime in the IKKT model,JHEP04(2026) 044 [arXiv:2601.08031]

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Aarts, F.A

    G. Aarts, F.A. James, E. Seiler and I.O. Stamatescu,Adaptive stepsize and instabilities in complex Langevin dynamics,Phys. Lett. B687(2010) 154 [arXiv:0912.0617]

    work page arXiv 2010

  57. [57]

    Aarts, E

    G. Aarts, E. Seiler and I.O. Stamatescu,The complex Langevin method: When can it be trusted?,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 054508 [arXiv:0912.3360]

    work page arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    Aarts, F.A

    G. Aarts, F.A. James, E. Seiler and I.O. Stamatescu,Complex Langevin: Etiology and diagnostics of its main problem,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1756 [arXiv:1101.3270]

    work page arXiv 2011

  59. [59]

    Nishimura and S

    J. Nishimura and S. Shimasaki,New insights into the problem with a singular drift term in the complex Langevin method,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 011501 [arXiv:1504.08359]

    work page arXiv 2015

  60. [60]

    Nagata, J

    K. Nagata, J. Nishimura and S. Shimasaki,Justification of the complex Langevin method with the gauge cooling procedure,PTEP2016(2016) 013B01 [arXiv:1508.02377]

    work page arXiv 2016

  61. [61]

    The argument for justification of the complex Langevin method and the condition for correct convergence

    K. Nagata, J. Nishimura and S. Shimasaki,Argument for justification of the complex Langevin method and the condition for correct convergence,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 114515 [arXiv:1606.07627]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  62. [62]

    Bonelli, Matrix strings in pp wave backgrounds from deformed superYang-Mills theory , JHEP 08 (2002) 022 [hep-th/0205213]

    G. Bonelli,Matrix strings in pp wave backgrounds from deformed super Yang-Mills theory,JHEP08(2002) 022 [hep-th/0205213]

    work page arXiv 2002

  63. [63]

    The polarised IKKT matrix model,

    S.A. Hartnoll and J. Liu,The polarised IKKT matrix model,JHEP03(2025) 060 [arXiv:2409.18706]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Komatsu, A

    S. Komatsu, A. Martina, J. Penedones, A. Vuignier and X. Zhao,Einstein gravity from a matrix integral. Part I,JHEP12(2025) 029 [arXiv:2410.18173]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Komatsu, A

    S. Komatsu, A. Martina, J. Penedones, A. Vuignier and X. Zhao,Einstein gravity from a matrix integral. Part II,JHEP12(2025) 030 [arXiv:2411.18678]. 25

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Kumar, A

    A. Kumar, A. Joseph and P. Kumar,Complex Langevin study of spontaneous symmetry breaking in IKKT matrix model,PoSLATTICE2022(2023) 213 [arXiv:2209.10494]

    work page arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    Kumar, A

    A. Kumar, A. Joseph and P. Kumar,Investigating spontaneous SO(10) symmetry breaking in type IIB matrix model,Springer Proc. Phys.304(2024) 1201 [arXiv:2308.03607]

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Hartnoll and J

    S.A. Hartnoll and J. Liu,Statistical physics of the polarised IKKT matrix model, SciPost Phys.19(2025) 099 [arXiv:2504.06481]

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    C.Y. Chou, J. Nishimura and C.T. Wang,Monte Carlo studies of the emergent spacetime in the polarized type IIB matrix model,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 221601 [arXiv:2507.18472]

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Hatakeyama, K

    K. Hatakeyama, K. Anagnostopoulos, T. Azuma, M. Hirasawa, Y. Ito, J. Nishimura, S. Papadoudis and A. Tsuchiya,Relationship between the Euclidean and Lorentzian versions of the type IIB matrix model,PoSLATTICE2021(2022) 341 [arXiv:2112.15368]

    work page arXiv 2022

  71. [71]

    Hatakeyama, K

    K. Hatakeyama, K. Anagnostopoulos, T. Azuma, M. Hirasawa, Y. Ito, J. Nishimura, S. Papadoudis and A. Tsuchiya,Complex Langevin studies of the emergent space-time in the type IIB matrix model,arXiv:2201.13200

    work page arXiv

  72. [72]

    Nishimura,Signature change of the emergent space-time in the IKKT matrix model, PoSCORFU2021(2022) 255 [arXiv:2205.04726]

    J. Nishimura,Signature change of the emergent space-time in the IKKT matrix model, PoSCORFU2021(2022) 255 [arXiv:2205.04726]

    work page arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    Hirasawa, K.N

    M. Hirasawa, K.N. Anagnostopoulos, T. Azuma, K. Hatakeyama, J. Nishimura, S.K. Papadoudis and A. Tsuchiya,The emergence of expanding space-time in a novel large-Nlimit of the Lorentzian type IIB matrix model,PoSLATTICE2022(2023) 371 [arXiv:2212.10127]

    work page arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    Hirasawa, K

    M. Hirasawa, K.N. Anagnostopoulos, T. Azuma, K. Hatakeyama, J. Nishimura, S. Papadoudis and A. Tsuchiya,The effects of SUSY on the emergent spacetime in the Lorentzian type IIB matrix model,PoSCORFU2023(2024) 257 [arXiv:2407.03491]

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    Asano, J

    Y. Asano, J. Nishimura, W. Piensuk and N. Yamamori,Defining the type IIB matrix model without breaking Lorentz symmetry,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 041603 [arXiv:2404.14045]

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    C.Y. Chou, J. Nishimura and A. Tripathi,Inequivalence between the Euclidean and Lorentzian versions of the type IIB matrix model from Lefschetz thimble calculations, Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 211601 [arXiv:2501.17798]

    work page arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    Steinacker,Cosmological space-times with resolved Big Bang in Yang-Mills matrix models,JHEP02(2018) 033 [arXiv:1709.10480]

    H.C. Steinacker,Cosmological space-times with resolved Big Bang in Yang-Mills matrix models,JHEP02(2018) 033 [arXiv:1709.10480]. 26

    work page arXiv 2018

  78. [78]

    Scherzer, E

    M. Scherzer, E. Seiler, D. Sexty and I.O. Stamatescu,Complex Langevin and boundary terms,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 014512 [arXiv:1808.05187]

    work page arXiv 2019

  79. [79]

    Scherzer, E

    M. Scherzer, E. Seiler, D. Sexty and I.O. Stamatescu,Controlling complex Langevin simulations of lattice models by boundary term analysis,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 014501 [arXiv:1910.09427]

    work page arXiv 2020

  80. [80]

    Seiler, D

    E. Seiler, D. Sexty and I.O. Stamatescu,Complex Langevin: Correctness criteria, boundary terms, and spectrum,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 014509 [arXiv:2304.00563]

    work page arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.