Recognition: unknown
Carrollian ABJM: Fermions and Supersymmetry
Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 10:44 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
The c to zero limit of ABJM theory can be realized with Carrollian Dirac matrices and possesses an infinite Carrollian superconformal symmetry including the extended BMS4 algebra.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The c→0 limit of the ABJM theory can be recast in terms of Carrollian Dirac matrices. The resulting theory enjoys an infinite-dimensional Carrollian superconformal symmetry whose bosonic subsector is the extended BMS4 algebra encoding the asymptotic symmetries of four dimensional Minkowski space. This provides a concrete starting point for constructing a Carrollian gauge theory dual to M-theory in flat space.
What carries the argument
Carrollian Dirac matrices realized with 4x4 matrices in three dimensions, which replace the usual Dirac matrices in the zero-speed limit and enable the supersymmetric extension.
If this is right
- The bosonic sector of the symmetry reproduces the extended BMS4 algebra of four-dimensional Minkowski space.
- The full symmetry is an infinite-dimensional Carrollian superconformal algebra.
- Fermions are consistently included in the limit using the appropriate Carrollian matrices.
- The construction yields an explicit starting point for a Carrollian gauge theory dual to M-theory in flat space.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Similar Carrollian limits on other AdS/CFT pairs could produce additional concrete models of flat-space holography.
- The need for 4x4 matrices in three dimensions may constrain the possible representations of Carrollian supersymmetry.
- Correlation functions computed in this Carrollian theory could correspond to scattering processes in flat spacetime.
Load-bearing premise
That the flat-space limit of the AdS4 bulk exactly corresponds to the c→0 limit on the boundary and that the chosen Carrollian fermion realization preserves the entire superconformal symmetry without inconsistencies.
What would settle it
A calculation demonstrating that the infinite-dimensional symmetry does not close or that the fermion limit does not match any of the four Carrollian realizations would disprove the central claim.
read the original abstract
A natural approach for constructing a concrete example of flat space holography is to take the flat space limit of a well-understood example of AdS/CFT, such as the one relating M-theory in AdS$_4$ times an orbifolded 7-sphere to a certain three dimensional superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theory known as the ABJM theory living in the boundary of AdS$_4$. In particular, taking the flat space limit of the bulk corresponds to taking the speed of light $c$ to zero in the boundary, giving rise to a Carrollian superconformal theory. This limit is subtle to implement for fermions, however, since the Dirac algebra is sensitive to the spacetime metric and therefore takes a different form in Carrollian spacetimes than it does in Minkowski space. In fact, we show that there are four possible ways of realising Carrollian fermions, one of which arises at leading order in the $c\rightarrow0$ limit of relativistic fermions. In three dimensions, there is an additional complication that the minimal realisation of the Carrollian Dirac algebra requires $4\times4$ matrices rather than $2\times 2$ matrices familiar from the relativistic case. Nevertheless, we show that the $c\rightarrow0$ limit of the ABJM theory can be recast in terms of Carrollian Dirac matrices and enjoys and infinite-dimensional Carrollian superconformal symmetry whose bosonic subsector is the extended BMS$_4$ algebra encoding the asymptotic symmetries of four dimensional Minkowski space. This provides a concrete starting point for constructing a Carrollian gauge theory dual to M-theory in flat space.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript constructs the c→0 Carrollian limit of the ABJM theory, focusing on the fermionic sector. It identifies four realizations of the Carrollian Dirac algebra in three dimensions, one of which emerges at leading order from the relativistic ABJM fermions, and shows that this limit requires 4×4 matrices. The resulting Carrollian ABJM theory is recast in terms of these matrices and is claimed to possess an infinite-dimensional Carrollian superconformal symmetry whose bosonic subalgebra is the extended BMS4 algebra of four-dimensional Minkowski space.
Significance. If the central claims are verified, the work supplies an explicit supersymmetric Carrollian field theory as a boundary dual for flat-space M-theory, furnishing a concrete starting point for Carrollian holography beyond purely bosonic constructions. The treatment of fermions and the preservation of the infinite-dimensional superconformal structure would constitute a non-trivial extension of existing flat-space limits of AdS/CFT.
major comments (2)
- [Sections discussing supersymmetry transformations and algebra closure (around the Carrollian limit of the ABJM action)] The central claim that the selected 4×4 Carrollian Dirac realization preserves closure of the full infinite-dimensional Carrollian superconformal algebra on the matter fields (including generation of the extended BMS4 bosonic subalgebra plus fermionic extensions) is load-bearing. Explicit verification of the supercharge anticommutators and supersymmetry variations is required to confirm that no extra central charges, non-local terms, or broken generators appear due to the doubled spinor dimension relative to the relativistic 2×2 case.
- [Section on realizations of Carrollian Dirac algebra] The paper asserts that one of the four Carrollian fermion realizations arises at leading order from the relativistic limit and yields a consistent theory. The justification for selecting this realization over the other three, and confirmation that it alone permits the full superconformal symmetry without additional constraints, should be provided with explicit matrix representations and limit expansions.
minor comments (1)
- [Abstract] Abstract contains a typographical error: 'enjoys and infinite-dimensional' should read 'enjoys an infinite-dimensional'.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment in detail below, providing clarifications and agreeing to include additional explicit calculations in the revised version to strengthen the presentation of our results.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: The central claim that the selected 4×4 Carrollian Dirac realization preserves closure of the full infinite-dimensional Carrollian superconformal algebra on the matter fields (including generation of the extended BMS4 bosonic subalgebra plus fermionic extensions) is load-bearing. Explicit verification of the supercharge anticommutators and supersymmetry variations is required to confirm that no extra central charges, non-local terms, or broken generators appear due to the doubled spinor dimension relative to the relativistic 2×2 case.
Authors: We appreciate the referee pointing out the need for explicit verification. In our work, the Carrollian supersymmetry transformations are obtained directly from the c→0 limit of the relativistic ABJM transformations. We have computed the anticommutators of the supercharges explicitly using the 4×4 Carrollian Dirac matrices, confirming that they close onto the extended BMS4 generators plus the appropriate fermionic extensions without introducing extra central charges or non-local terms. The doubled dimension is handled by the Carrollian structure, which projects out inconsistent components. To make this fully transparent, we will add the detailed anticommutator calculations and supersymmetry variation verifications to an appendix in the revised manuscript. revision: yes
-
Referee: The paper asserts that one of the four Carrollian fermion realizations arises at leading order from the relativistic limit and yields a consistent theory. The justification for selecting this realization over the other three, and confirmation that it alone permits the full superconformal symmetry without additional constraints, should be provided with explicit matrix representations and limit expansions.
Authors: We agree that explicit details on the selection process enhance clarity. Section 3 of the manuscript presents the four possible realizations of the Carrollian Dirac algebra in 3D, with their explicit 4×4 matrix representations. We show in Section 4 that only one of these arises at leading order in the c→0 expansion of the relativistic Dirac matrices and spinors, as detailed in the limit procedure around Equation (4.2). The other realizations do not match the leading term or result in inconsistent actions that fail to support the infinite-dimensional symmetry. We will expand this discussion with a comparative table of the four cases and additional limit expansions to confirm that the selected realization uniquely preserves the full superconformal symmetry. revision: yes
Circularity Check
Derivation via explicit c→0 limit with only background self-citation
full rationale
The central construction takes the well-defined c→0 limit of the established ABJM theory, obtains the Carrollian Dirac matrices at leading order from the relativistic ones, and verifies the infinite-dimensional Carrollian superconformal symmetry (including its BMS4 bosonic subalgebra) by direct computation of supersymmetry variations and algebra closure on the matter fields. No parameter is fitted to data and then renamed a prediction, no quantity is defined in terms of the result it is supposed to derive, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported solely via self-citation. Self-citations to prior Carrollian work supply context and notation but are not load-bearing for the limit-derived result.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- domain assumption The flat space limit of AdS/CFT corresponds to taking c to zero in the boundary theory
- ad hoc to paper There exist four possible realizations of the Carrollian Dirac algebra, one arising at leading order from the relativistic limit
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Couch-Torrence conformal inversion, supersymmetry and conserved charges for D3-branes
Couch-Torrence inversion matches Newman-Penrose charges at null infinity to Aretakis charges near horizons for D3-branes in D=10 and bound states in D=4,5, with supersymmetry mapping scalar charges to spinorial dilati...
-
Carroll fermions from null reduction: A case of good and bad fermions
Carrollian fermionic actions for electric and magnetic sectors are derived from a single Bargmann Dirac action by null reduction, with good and bad fermions as dynamical and constrained modes valid in any dimension.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity
G. ’t Hooft, Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity, Conf. Proc.C930308(1993) 284 [gr-qc/9310026]
work page Pith review arXiv 1993
-
[2]
L. Susskind, The World as a hologram, J. Math. Phys.36(1995) 6377 [hep-th/9409089]
work page Pith review arXiv 1995
-
[3]
The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity
J.M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys.38(1999) 1113 [hep-th/9711200]
work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999
-
[4]
Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory
A. Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory (3, 2017), [1703.05448]
work page Pith review arXiv 2017
-
[5]
S. Pasterski, M. Pate and A.-M. Raclariu, Celestial Holography, in Snowmass 2021, 11, 2021 [2111.11392]
-
[6]
Raclariu,Lectures on Celestial Holography,arXiv:2107.02075 [hep-th]
A.-M. Raclariu, Lectures on Celestial Holography,2107.02075. – 31 –
-
[7]
A. Bagchi, Correspondence between Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes and Nonrelativistic Conformal Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 171601 [1006.3354]
work page Pith review arXiv 2010
-
[8]
A. Bagchi and R. Fareghbal, BMS/GCA Redux: Towards Flatspace Holography from Non-Relativistic Symmetries, JHEP 10(2012) 092 [1203.5795]
-
[9]
Flat Holography: Aspects of the dual field theory
A. Bagchi, R. Basu, A. Kakkar and A. Mehra, Flat Holography: Aspects of the dual field theory, JHEP12(2016) 147 [1609.06203]
work page Pith review arXiv 2016
-
[10]
A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, P. Dhivakar, S. Mondal and A. Shukla, The Carrollian Kaleidoscope, 2506.16164
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[11]
Nguyen,Lectures on Carrollian Holography,2511.10162
K. Nguyen, Lectures on Carrollian Holography,2511.10162
-
[12]
Ruzziconi,Carrollian Physics and Holography,arXiv:2602.02644 [hep-th]
R. Ruzziconi, Carrollian Physics and Holography,2602.02644
- [13]
- [14]
- [15]
-
[16]
A. Lipstein, R. Ruzziconi and A. Yelleshpur Srikant, Towards a flat space Carrollian hologram from AdS 4/CFT3, JHEP06(2025) 073 [2504.10291]
-
[17]
J. de Boer and S.N. Solodukhin, A Holographic reduction of Minkowski space-time, Nucl. Phys. B665(2003) 545 [hep-th/0303006]
- [18]
-
[19]
K. Costello, N.M. Paquette and A. Sharma, Burns space and holography, JHEP10(2023) 174 [2306.00940]
- [20]
-
[21]
N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals
O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D.L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena, N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals, JHEP10(2008) 091 [0806.1218]
work page Pith review arXiv 2008
-
[23]
Magic fermions: Carroll and flat bands,
A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, R. Basu, M. Islam and S. Mondal, Magic fermions: Carroll and flat bands, JHEP03(2023) 227 [2211.11640]
-
[24]
Carroll fermions, expansions and the lightcone
A. Bagchi and S. Mondal, Carroll fermions, expansions and the lightcone,2604.14301
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[25]
J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N.A. Obers, W. Sybesma and S. Vandoren, Carroll Symmetry, Dark Energy and Inflation, Front. in Phys.10(2022) 810405 [2110.02319]. – 32 –
-
[26]
Null Infinity and Unitary Representation of The Poincare Group
S. Banerjee, Null Infinity and Unitary Representation of The Poincare Group, JHEP01 (2019) 205 [1801.10171]
work page Pith review arXiv 2019
-
[27]
Carrollian superconformal theories and super BMS,
A. Bagchi, D. Grumiller and P. Nandi, Carrollian superconformal theories and super BMS, JHEP05(2022) 044 [2202.01172]
-
[28]
Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry
C. Duval, G.W. Gibbons and P.A. Horvathy, Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry, Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 092001 [1402.5894]
work page Pith review arXiv 2014
-
[29]
Bondi, M.G.J
H. Bondi, M.G.J. van der Burg and A.W.K. Metzner, Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond.A269(1962) 21
1962
-
[30]
Sachs, Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory, Phys
R. Sachs, Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory, Phys. Rev.128(1962) 2851
1962
-
[31]
Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence
G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence, JHEP05(2010) 062 [1001.1541]
work page Pith review arXiv 2010
-
[32]
G. Barnich, A. Gomberoff and H.A. Gonzalez, The Flat limit of three dimensional asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 024020 [1204.3288]
- [33]
-
[34]
Holography of 3d Flat Cosmological Horizons
A. Bagchi, S. Detournay, R. Fareghbal and J. Simon, Holography of 3D Flat Cosmological Horizons, Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 141302 [1208.4372]
work page Pith review arXiv 2013
-
[35]
Entropy of three-dimensional asymptotically flat cosmological solutions
G. Barnich, Entropy of three-dimensional asymptotically flat cosmological solutions, JHEP 10(2012) 095 [1208.4371]
work page Pith review arXiv 2012
-
[36]
Entanglement entropy in Galilean conformal field theories and flat holography
A. Bagchi, R. Basu, D. Grumiller and M. Riegler, Entanglement entropy in Galilean conformal field theories and flat holography, Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 111602 [1410.4089]
work page Pith review arXiv 2015
- [37]
- [38]
-
[39]
Holographic Reconstruction of 3D Flat Space-Time
J. Hartong, Holographic Reconstruction of 3D Flat Space-Time, JHEP10(2016) 104 [1511.01387]
work page Pith review arXiv 2016
- [40]
- [41]
- [42]
-
[43]
E.A. Bergshoeff, A. Campoleoni, A. Fontanella, L. Mele and J. Rosseel, Carroll fermions, SciPost Phys.16(2024) 153 [2312.00745]
-
[44]
Super-Carrollian and Super-Galilean Field Theories,
K. Koutrolikos and M. Najafizadeh, Super-Carrollian and Super-Galilean Field Theories, Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 125014 [2309.16786]. – 33 –
- [45]
-
[46]
Majumdar, On the Carrollian nature of the light front, Int
S. Majumdar, On the Carrollian nature of the light front, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39(2024) 2447012 [2406.10353]
-
[47]
L.F. Alday and X. Zhou, All Holographic Four-Point Functions in All Maximally Supersymmetric CFTs, Phys. Rev. X11(2021) 011056 [2006.12505]
- [48]
-
[49]
Bandres, A.E
M.A. Bandres, A.E. Lipstein and J.H. Schwarz, Studies of the abjm theory in a formulation with manifest su(4) r-symmetry, Journal of High Energy Physics2008(2008) 027–027
2008
- [50]
- [51]
-
[52]
Raju,New Recursion Relations and a Flat Space Limit for AdS/CFT Correlators,Phys
S. Raju, New Recursion Relations and a Flat Space Limit for AdS/CFT Correlators, Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 126009 [1201.6449]
-
[53]
R. Marotta, K. Skenderis and M. Verma, Flat space spinning massive amplitudes from momentum space CFT, JHEP08(2024) 226 [2406.06447]
-
[54]
Tension- less Superstrings: View from the Worldsheet,
A. Bagchi, S. Chakrabortty and P. Parekh, Tensionless Superstrings: View from the Worldsheet, JHEP10(2016) 113 [1606.09628]
- [55]
-
[56]
I. Lodato and W. Merbis, Super-BMS3 algebras fromN= 2 flat supergravities, JHEP11 (2016) 150 [1610.07506]
-
[57]
A Carroll Limit of AdS/CFT: A Triality with Flat Space Holography?,
A. Fontanella and O. Payne, A Carroll Limit of AdS/CFT: A Triality with Flat Space Holography?,2508.10085
-
[58]
A Twisted Origin for Magnetic Carroll Supersymmetry
I. Bulunur, O. Ergec, O. Kasikci, M. Ozkan and M.S. Zog, A Twisted Origin for Magnetic Carroll Supersymmetry,2603.28269
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[59]
Aspects of Non-Relativistic Supersymmetric Theories
O. Ergec, Aspects of Non-Relativistic Supersymmetric Theories,2604.09275
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
-
[60]
Carrollian supersymmetry and SYK-like models,
O. Kasikci, M. Ozkan, Y. Pang and U. Zorba, Carrollian supersymmetry and SYK-like models, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) L021702 [2311.00039]
-
[61]
Supersymmetric Carroll Galileons in three dimensions,
U. Zorba, I. Bulunur, O. Kasikci, M. Ozkan, Y. Pang and M.S. Zog, Supersymmetric Carroll Galileons in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 085008 [2409.15428]
-
[62]
Non-Lorentzian supergravity and kinematical superalgebras,
P. Concha and L. Ravera, Non-Lorentzian supergravity and kinematical superalgebras, JHEP03(2025) 032 [2412.07665]
-
[63]
Structure of Carrollian 7 (conformal) superalgebra,
Y.-f. Zheng and B. Chen, Structure of Carrollian (conformal) superalgebra, JHEP08(2025) 111 [2503.22160]. – 34 –
-
[64]
Bruce, The Carrollian Superplane and Supersymmetry,2603.21677
A.J. Bruce, The Carrollian Superplane and Supersymmetry,2603.21677
-
[65]
N. Lambert, C. Papageorgakis and M. Schmidt-Sommerfeld, M5-Branes, D4-Branes and Quantum 5D super-Yang-Mills, JHEP01(2011) 083 [1012.2882]
-
[66]
Douglas, On D=5 super Yang-Mills theory and (2,0) theory, JHEP02(2011) 011 [1012.2880]
M.R. Douglas, On D=5 super Yang-Mills theory and (2,0) theory, JHEP02(2011) 011 [1012.2880]
-
[67]
N. Lambert, A. Lipstein and P. Richmond, Non-Lorentzian M5-brane Theories from Holography, JHEP08(2019) 060 [1904.07547]. – 35 –
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.