pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.14958 · v1 · pith:JCJVUNTWnew · submitted 2026-05-14 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.SR

Conservative and dissipative sectors in a nonlinear scalar model for the gravitational self-force problem

Francisco M. Blanco , Eanna E. Flanagan , Abraham I. Harte This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 20:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.SR
keywords self-forceconservative sectordissipative sectornonlinear scalar fieldHamiltoniantwo-body problemscattering trajectories
0
0 comments X

The pith

Requiring the conservative sector to be Hamiltonian yields multiple definitions of the second-order self-force in a nonlinear scalar model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In this toy model an object couples to a nonlinear scalar field without backreacting on the spacetime, allowing a clean study of self-force decompositions. At first order multiple splitting criteria agree on the same conservative and dissipative pieces. At second order the criteria generally disagree, so the authors impose the additional requirement that the conservative piece must derive from a Hamiltonian and thereby obtain several distinct candidate definitions. They construct the associated Hamiltonians, discuss the physical motivations for each choice, and note that the construction rests on the existence of a suitable three-point function. The analysis applies only to unbound scattering trajectories because infrared divergences appear for bound orbits.

Core claim

Demanding that any reasonable conservative sector be Hamiltonian, we identify multiple possible definitions of the conservative second-order self-force. Motivations for these possibilities and their properties are discussed and relevant Hamiltonians are obtained. We assume the existence of a three-point function with certain properties that is a generalization of the Detweiler-Whiting two-point function. These results apply to the two-body problem but are restricted to unbound scattering trajectories, due to infrared divergences that arise for bound orbits.

What carries the argument

A three-point function that generalizes the Detweiler-Whiting two-point function and is used to define candidate conservative sectors that are required to be Hamiltonian.

If this is right

  • Several distinct but Hamiltonian-consistent definitions of the conservative second-order self-force become available.
  • Corresponding Hamiltonians can be derived for each of these definitions.
  • The splitting criteria that agreed at first order produce inequivalent conservative sectors at second order.
  • The results are restricted to unbound scattering trajectories in the two-body problem.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Different choices among the Hamiltonian definitions may correspond to distinct regularization schemes when the same logic is applied to the gravitational self-force.
  • Numerical evolution of the nonlinear scalar model on scattering trajectories could test which of the candidate definitions best matches the full dynamics.
  • If infrared divergences for bound orbits can be controlled, the same Hamiltonian requirement might yield conservative definitions for periodic or inspiraling motion.

Load-bearing premise

The existence of a three-point function with the required properties that generalizes the Detweiler-Whiting two-point function.

What would settle it

An explicit construction showing that no three-point function with the stated properties exists, or a direct calculation demonstrating that none of the proposed conservative sectors can be derived from a Hamiltonian.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14958 by Abraham I. Harte, Eanna E. Flanagan, Francisco M. Blanco.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The conservative 3-point function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

When considering how self-interaction affects an object's motion, it can be convenient to decompose the self-force into conservative and dissipative pieces. As a toy model for understanding such decompositions of the gravitational self-force, we consider objects that do not affect the spacetime, but are instead coupled to a nonlinear scalar field. There is then a standard splitting of the first-order scalar self-force into conservative and dissipative components. Multiple criteria can be used to obtain this splitting, all of which imply the same result. However, the implications of these criteria generically differ at higher orders. Demanding that any reasonable conservative sector be Hamiltonian, we identify multiple possible definitions of the conservative second-order self-force. Motivations for these possibilities and their properties are discussed and relevant Hamiltonians are obtained. We assume the existence of a three-point function with certain properties that is a generalization of the Detweiler-Whiting two-point function. These results apply to the two-body problem but are restricted to unbound scattering trajectories, due to infrared divergences that arise for bound orbits.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the splitting of the self-force into conservative and dissipative parts in a nonlinear scalar toy model intended to mimic aspects of the gravitational self-force problem. It shows that while different criteria agree on the first-order conservative sector, they lead to distinct possibilities at second order when requiring the conservative sector to be Hamiltonian. Multiple definitions are identified, with corresponding Hamiltonians derived, under the assumption of a suitable three-point function. The analysis is limited to unbound trajectories.

Significance. If valid, the result demonstrates an ambiguity in the conservative-dissipative decomposition at second order that is not present at first order. This has potential implications for higher-order self-force calculations in general relativity, particularly for scattering orbits. The toy model clarifies the role of the Hamiltonian condition. The explicit Hamiltonians and discussion of motivations are positive aspects of the work.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and their recommendation to accept.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper states upfront its assumption of a three-point function generalizing the Detweiler-Whiting two-point function and derives multiple possible conservative second-order self-force definitions from the independent Hamiltonian requirement on the conservative sector. No load-bearing step reduces a claimed prediction or definition to a fitted input, self-citation chain, or ansatz smuggled via prior work by the same authors; the derivation remains self-contained within the stated toy-model assumptions and restrictions to unbound trajectories.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of a generalized three-point function and on the restriction to unbound trajectories; these are stated explicitly as assumptions in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Existence of a three-point function with certain properties that generalizes the Detweiler-Whiting two-point function
    Explicitly invoked in the abstract as required for the results.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5718 in / 1131 out tokens · 28736 ms · 2026-06-30T20:11:22.184992+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Self-force on a static scalar charge in traversable wormholes

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Mode-sum computation of static scalar self-force in Konoplya-Zhidenko wormholes shows parameter-dependent sign changes and slower-than-usual large-distance decay for large redshift parameter p.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 30 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Select the piece of ˆG+ 2 which is obtained by symmetriz- ing under exchange of arguments

  2. [2]

    Select the piece of ˆG+ 2 which is invariant under time re- versal, meaning that it remains the same when retarded and advanced Green’s functions are exchanged

  3. [3]

    These prescriptions all give the same result at first order

    Instead of finding an effective field for the retarded field and then isolating a particular component of that field, start by solving the field equations with time-symmetric boundary conditions and then find the effective field as- sociated with that solution. These prescriptions all give the same result at first order. How- ever, we show in the followin...

  4. [4]

    global time-even projection

    The retarded Green’s function in turn depends on the physical boundary conditions. If we had used advanced boundary conditions in- stead,G + 2 would be replaced byG − 2 whileG S 2 andG S 3 would remain as is. With this in mind, we consider objects with the form gn(x1, . . . ,x n;G + 2 ,G − 2 ].(37) These aren-point functions on spacetime that depend func-...

  5. [5]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241103 (2016), arXiv:1606.04855

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X6, 041015 (2016), arXiv:1606.04856

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    G. Agazieet al.(NANOGrav Collaboration), The Astrophysi- cal Journal Letters951, L8 (2023), arXiv:2306.16213

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Agazieet al.(NANOGrav Collaboration), The Astrophysi- cal Journal Letters951, L9 (2023), arXiv:2306.16217

    G. Agazieet al.(NANOGrav Collaboration), The Astrophysi- cal Journal Letters951, L9 (2023), arXiv:2306.16217

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al., (2017), arXiv:1702.00786

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

    L. Blanchet, Living Rev. Rel.17, 2 (2014), arXiv:1310.1528

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  12. [12]

    Poisson and C

    E. Poisson and C. M. Will,Gravity: Newtonian, post- Newtonian, relativistic(Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    2014

  13. [13]

    Levi, Rept

    M. Levi, Rept. Prog. Phys.83, 075901 (2020), arXiv:1807.01699

    work page arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    R. A. Porto, Phys. Rept.633, 1 (2016), arXiv:1601.04914

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation and Effective One-Body theory

    T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D94, 104015 (2016), arXiv:1609.00354

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    Numerical Relativity and Astrophysics

    L. Lehner and F. Pretorius, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.52, 661 (2014), arXiv:1405.4840

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  17. [17]

    The General Relativistic Two Body Problem and the Effective One Body Formalism

    T. Damour, Fundam. Theor. Phys.177, 111 (2014), arXiv:1212.3169

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  18. [18]

    Effective-one-body model for black-hole binaries with generic mass ratios and spins

    A. Taracchiniet al., Phys. Rev. D89, 061502 (2014), arXiv:1311.2544

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  19. [19]

    The motion of point particles in curved spacetime

    E. Poisson, A. Pound, and I. Vega, Living Rev. Rel.14, 7 (2011), arXiv:1102.0529

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  20. [20]

    Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity

    L. Barack and A. Pound, Rept. Prog. Phys.82, 016904 (2019), arXiv:1805.10385

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    F. M. Blanco and ´E. ´E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 051201 (2023), arXiv:2205.01667

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    F. M. Blanco and ´E. ´E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D107, 124017 (2023), arXiv:2302.10233

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Y . Mino, M. Sasaki, and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D55, 3457 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9606018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  24. [24]

    T. C. Quinn and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D56, 3381 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9610053

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  25. [25]

    Second-order gravitational self-force

    A. Pound, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 051101 (2012), arXiv:1201.5089

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  26. [26]

    Nonlinear gravitational self-force. I. Field outside a small body

    A. Pound, Phys. Rev. D86, 084019 (2012), arXiv:1206.6538

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  27. [27]

    S. E. Gralla, Phys. Rev. D85, 124011 (2012), arXiv:1203.3189

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  28. [28]

    A practical, covariant puncture for second-order self-force calculations

    A. Pound and J. Miller, Phys. Rev. D89, 104020 (2014), arXiv:1403.1843

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    Second-order perturbation theory: problems on large scales

    A. Pound, Phys. Rev. D92, 104047 (2015), arXiv:1510.05172

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    Second-order perturbation theory: the problem of infinite mode coupling

    J. Miller, B. Wardell, and A. Pound, Phys. Rev. D94, 104018 (2016), arXiv:1608.06783

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    Sch ¨afer and P

    G. Sch ¨afer and P. Jaranowski, Living Rev. Rel.21, 7 (2018), arXiv:1805.07240

    work page arXiv 2018

  32. [32]

    Hamiltonians and canonical coordinates for spinning particles in curved space-time

    V . Witzany, J. Steinhoff, and G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Class. Quantum Gravity36, 075003 (2019), arXiv:1808.06582

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Ramond, (2022), arXiv:2210.03866

    P. Ramond, (2022), arXiv:2210.03866

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    F. M. Blanco, Phys. Rev. D110, 024061 (2024), arXiv:2406.00106

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    A. I. Harte, F. M. Blanco, and ´E. ´E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 151401 (2025), arXiv:2504.11912

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    A. I. Harte, F. M. Blanco, and E. E. Flanagan, In preparation

  37. [37]

    A. I. Harte, Class. Quantum Gravity25, 235020 (2008), arXiv:0807.1150

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  38. [38]

    Mechanics of extended masses in general relativity

    A. Harte, Class. Quantum Gravity29, 055012 (2012), arXiv:1103.0543

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  39. [39]

    A. I. Harte, Fund. Theor. Phys.179, 327 (2015), arXiv:1405.5077

    work page arXiv 2015

  40. [40]

    S. L. Detweiler and B. F. Whiting, Phys. Rev. D67, 024025 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0202086

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  41. [41]

    Geroch and J

    R. Geroch and J. Traschen, Phys. Rev. D36, 1017 (1987)

    1987

  42. [42]

    G ¨unther,Huygens’ principle and hyperbolic equations, Per- spectives in mathematics (Academic press, 1988)

    P. G ¨unther,Huygens’ principle and hyperbolic equations, Per- spectives in mathematics (Academic press, 1988)

    1988

  43. [43]

    Two timescale analysis of extreme mass ratio inspirals in Kerr. I. Orbital Motion

    T. Hinderer and E. E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D78, 064028 (2008), arXiv:0805.3337

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  44. [44]

    Mino, Phys

    Y . Mino, Phys. Rev. D67, 084027 (2003), arXiv:gr- qc/0302075

    work page arXiv 2003

  45. [45]

    Trestini, Phys

    D. Trestini, Phys. Rev. D112, 024076 (2025), arXiv:2504.13245

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K ¨alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Lett. B831, 137203 (2022), arXiv:2106.08276

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Nonlocal-in-time action for the fourth post-Newtonian conservative dynamics of two-body systems

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Sch ¨afer, Phys. Rev. D89, 064058 (2014), arXiv:1401.4548

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  48. [48]

    Fourth post-Newtonian effective one-body dynamics

    T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, and G. Sch ¨afer, Phys. Rev. D91, 084024 (2015), arXiv:1502.07245

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  49. [49]

    Hamiltonian Formulation of the Conservative Self-Force Dynamics in the Kerr Geometry

    R. Fujita, S. Isoyama, A. Le Tiec, H. Nakano, N. Sago, and T. Tanaka, Class. Quant. Grav.34, 134001 (2017), arXiv:1612.02504

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  50. [50]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 161103 (2022), arXiv:2112.10750

    work page arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, PoSLL2022, 051 (2022)

    2022

  52. [52]

    R. A. Porto, M. M. Riva, and Z. Yang, J. High Energy Phys. 2025(2025), arXiv:2409.05860

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Phys. Rev. D102, 024062 (2020), arXiv:2003.11891

    work page arXiv 2020

  54. [54]

    G. L. Almeida, S. Foffa, and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021), arXiv:2110.14146

    work page arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    G. L. Almeida, S. Foffa, and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023), arXiv:2209.11594. 15

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V . Smirnov, S. Smith, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett.in press(2026), arXiv:2512.23654

    work page arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    Driesse, G

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, (2026), arXiv:2601.16256

    work page arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    Bini and T

    D. Bini and T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D112, 044002 (2025)

    2025

  59. [59]

    Schwinger, J

    J. Schwinger, J. Math. Phys.2, 407 (1961)

    1961

  60. [60]

    L. V . Keldysh, inSelected papers of Leonid V . Keldysh(World Scientific, 2023) pp. 47–55

    2023

  61. [61]

    C. R. Galley, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 174301 (2013), arXiv:1210.2745

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  62. [62]

    Llosa and J

    J. Llosa and J. Vives, J. Math. Phys.35, 2856 (1994). Appendix A: Notation We consider a number of different scalar fields – typically denoted by a variant ofϕ– and alson-point functions, which are typically denoted by a variant ofG. This appendix ex- plains the various adornments we apply to those base sym- bols. First, superscripts applied to fields and...

    1994

  63. [63]

    General class of nonlocal dynamical systems The equations of motion we consider are integro- differential equations, as opposed to the ordinary differential equations characteristic of simpler local-in-time systems. An example of such an integro-differential equation is ¨x(t)=f(x(t))+ Z ∞ −∞ dt′K(t,t ′)x(t ′).(B1) Here,f(x) is proportional to the local pi...

  64. [64]

    Because of this, solutions are generally not parametrized by initial data con- sisting of a single phase space pointQ

    Local dynamical systems obtained by treating nonlocalities perturbatively Equation (B10) is an integro-differential system of equa- tions for the trajectoriesX s on phase space. Because of this, solutions are generally not parametrized by initial data con- sisting of a single phase space pointQ. In fact, the space of initial data required to determine sol...

  65. [65]

    In the second term on the right hand side of Eq

    Local Hamiltonian description Although the perturbative expansion of subsection B 2 al- leviates the problem of nonlocality, the equations of motion (B12) are not manifestly Hamiltonian. In the second term on the right hand side of Eq. (B13), the derivative with respect to the first argument evaluated at coincidence is not necessarily of the form of a tot...