pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16177 · v1 · pith:B6PRTJJRnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Observational signatures of negative mass wormholes through their shadows

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 16:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords negative mass objectswormholesEllis-Bronnikov wormholegravitational wavesshadowsphoton ringsoptical appearanceSimpson-Visser wormhole
0
0 comments X

The pith

Negative mass objects form bound states and cast shadows with distinct photon ring substructures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates negative mass objects and demonstrates that they can form bound systems with positive mass objects despite repulsive gravitational forces. Gravitational waves from these systems show decreasing frequency and amplitude over time. A time-dependent model of the Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole is introduced along with a formulation that removes the ghost instability. Numerical simulations of the optical appearance then compare the luminosity and photon ring details of these negative mass wormholes against Schwarzschild black holes and Simpson-Visser wormholes, revealing clear differences in the substructure around the central object.

Core claim

A positive-mass object and a negative-mass object can form a bound state even though the force from the negative-mass object is repulsive. The gravitational waves emitted by the system decrease in both frequency and amplitude with time. A ghost-free formulation of the Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole is constructed as a candidate negative-mass object, and numerical ray-tracing shows that its luminosity and photon-ring substructure differ visibly from those of a Schwarzschild black hole and a Simpson-Visser wormhole.

What carries the argument

The Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole equipped with a ghost-eliminating formulation, whose shadow and luminosity are computed by numerical simulation of light rays.

If this is right

  • Bound positive-negative mass pairs emit gravitational waves whose frequency and amplitude both fall with time.
  • The photon ring around a negative-mass wormhole contains substructure absent from the rings of Schwarzschild black holes.
  • Luminosity profiles computed for the ghost-free Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole are measurably different from those of the Simpson-Visser wormhole.
  • The optical appearance of negative-mass wormholes can therefore serve as an observational discriminator among compact-object candidates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If such wormholes exist near galactic centers, their shadows could be resolved by next-generation very-long-baseline interferometry arrays.
  • The repulsive force might produce unusual orbital dynamics that could be searched for in stellar or gas motions around candidate objects.
  • The ghost-removal technique may extend to other traversable-wormhole metrics and yield additional shadow signatures.

Load-bearing premise

The proposed formulation removes the ghost instability without introducing new instabilities or altering the negative-mass character of the Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole.

What would settle it

High-resolution images of a compact object whose photon-ring substructure matches the simulated negative-mass wormhole pattern but not the Schwarzschild or Simpson-Visser patterns would support the claim; an exact match to the Schwarzschild pattern would falsify it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16177 by Diego S\'aez-Chill\'on G\'omez, Sergei D. Odintsov, Shin'ichi Nojiri.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. In fact, if we choose [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The left figure shows the behaviour of the gravitational wave for the system with two positive mass objects. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. An object sucked into a wormhole that behaves as if it has positive mass is ejected from a wormhole that behaves as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The effective potential for photons (86). The curves describe the Schwarzschild case (dashed black line), the Simpson [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Light trajectories in the equatorial plane for the wormhole (43) with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Transfer functions for the Schwarzschild black hole (left panel), the Simpson-Visser wormhole with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The intensity profile (90) with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Observed intensities (left panels) and the shadows (right panels) for a Schwarzschild black hole. From top to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Observed intensities (left panels) and the shadows (right panels) for a Simpson-Visser wormhole with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Observed intensities (left panels) and the shadows (right panels) for the wormhole black hole (43) with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate systems containing objects with negative mass (NMOs). In a system consisting of one object with positive mass and one NMO, a bound state exists even though the force exerted by the NMO on the object with positive mass is repulsive. Unlike a standard system consisting of two objects with positive mass, the gravitational waves emitted from this system exhibit a decrease in frequency and amplitude over time. We propose a model of the time evolution of the Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole, along with a formulation that eliminates the ghost that appears when constructing the Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole, a candidate for an NMO. Furthermore, numerical simulations are performed to obtain the optical appearance of such NMOs. The observed luminosity is also compared with the Schwarzschild black hole and with the Simpson-Visser wormhole, leading to clear differences in the photon ring substructure around the central object.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: independent formulation and external benchmark comparisons

full rationale

The paper proposes a new ghost-eliminating formulation for the Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole as an NMO candidate, then performs numerical simulations of its optical appearance and luminosity. These are compared directly to the independent Schwarzschild metric and Simpson-Visser wormhole. No step reduces a claimed prediction or shadow substructure result to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction; the derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing self-referential definitions or ansatze.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; full details on parameters, axioms, and entities are not extractable. The work appears to postulate negative-mass objects and a ghost-free formulation without independent evidence supplied in the summary.

invented entities (1)
  • Negative mass objects (NMOs) no independent evidence
    purpose: To form bound states with positive-mass objects and serve as wormhole candidates
    Introduced as the central objects whose observational signatures are simulated

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5693 in / 1087 out tokens · 117884 ms · 2026-05-20T16:57:37.721305+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 37 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    KEK Theory Center, Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Oho 1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan and

  2. [2]

    Odintsov 3,4†

    Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute for the Origin of Particles and the Universe, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan Sergei D. Odintsov 3,4†

  3. [3]

    Institut de Ci` encies de l’Espai, ICE/CSIC-IEEC, Campus UAB, Carrer de Can Magrans s/n, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain and

  4. [4]

    Instituci´ o Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avan¸ cats (ICREA), Passeig Luis Companys, 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain Diego S´ aez-Chill´ on G´ omez5,6‡

  5. [5]

    Department of Theoretical, Atomic and Optical Physics, and Laboratory for Disruptive Interdisciplinary Science (LaDIS), Campus Miguel Delibes, University of Valladolid UVA, Paseo Bel´ en, 7, 47011 Valladolid, Spain and

  6. [6]

    Observational signatures of negative mass wormholes through their shadows

    Department of Physics, Universidade Federal do Cear´ a (UFC), Campus do Pici, Fortaleza - CE, C.P. 6030, 60455-760 - Brazil We investigate systems containing objects with negative mass (NMOs). In a system consisting of one object with positive mass and one NMO, a bound state exists even though the force exerted by the NMO on the object with positive mass ...

  7. [7]

    J. M. Luttinger, Gravity Research Foundation, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5852e579be659442a01f27b8/t/5873dc04d1758eea4b41c720/1483987972731/luttinger.pdf (1951)

  8. [8]

    Bondi, Rev

    H. Bondi, Rev. Mod. Phys.29, 423 (1957)

  9. [9]

    J. S. Farnes, Astron. Astrophys.620, A92 (2018), arXiv:1712.07962 [physics.gen-ph]

  10. [10]

    On negative mass

    J. Belletˆ ete and M. B. Paranjape, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D22, 1341017 (2013), arXiv:1304.1566 [gr-qc]

  11. [11]

    W. B. Bonnor, Gen Relat Gravit21, 1143 (1989)

  12. [12]

    Negative Mass Solitons in Gravity

    H. Cebeci, O. Sarioglu, and B. Tekin, Phys. Rev. D73, 064020 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0602117

  13. [13]

    R. B. Mann, Class. Quant. Grav.14, 2927 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9705007

  14. [14]

    R. L. Forward, Journal of Propulsion and Power6, 28 (1990)

  15. [15]

    C. B. Møller, R. A. Thomas, G. Vasilakis, E. Zeuthen, Y. Tsaturyan, M. Balabas, K. Jensen, A. Schliesser, K. Hammerer, and E. S. Polzik, Nature547, 191 (2017), arXiv:1608.03613 [quant-ph]

  16. [16]

    M. A. Khamehchi, K. Hossain, M. E. Mossman, Y. Zhang, T. Busch, M. M. Forbes, and P. Engels, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 155301 (2017)

  17. [17]

    Can a negative-mass cosmology explain dark matter and dark energy?

    H. Socas-Navarro, Astron. Astrophys.626, A5 (2019), arXiv:1902.08287 [astro-ph.CO]

  18. [18]

    J. P. Petit and G. d’Agostini, Astrophys. Space Sci.354, 2106 (2014). 22

  19. [19]

    N´ ajera, A

    S. N´ ajera, A. Gamboa, A. Aguilar-Nieto, and C. Escamilla-Rivera, Astron. Astrophys.651, L13 (2021), arXiv:2105.11041 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    Cosmological structure formation with negative mass

    G. Manfredi, J.-L. Rouet, B. Miller, and G. Chardin, Phys. Rev. D98, 023514 (2018), arXiv:1804.03067 [gr-qc]

  21. [21]

    Unique Gravitational-Wave Signals from Negative-Mass Binaries

    O. Trivedi and A. Loeb, (2026), arXiv:2605.10976 [gr-qc]

  22. [22]

    H. G. Ellis, J. Math. Phys.14, 104 (1973)

  23. [23]

    K. A. Bronnikov, Acta Phys. Polon. B4, 251 (1973)

  24. [24]

    Huang, H

    H. Huang, H. L¨ u, and J. Yang, Class. Quant. Grav.39, 185009 (2022), arXiv:2010.00197 [gr-qc]

  25. [25]

    J. G. Cramer, R. L. Forward, M. S. Morris, M. Visser, G. Benford, and G. A. Landis, Phys. Rev. D51, 3117 (1995), arXiv:astro-ph/9409051

  26. [26]

    Macrolensing signatures of large-scale violations of the weak energy condition

    M. Safonova, D. F. Torres, and G. E. Romero, Mod. Phys. Lett. A16, 153 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0104075

  27. [27]

    Microlensing by natural wormholes: theory and simulations

    M. Safonova, D. F. Torres, and G. E. Romero, Phys. Rev. D65, 023001 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0105070

  28. [28]

    Chromaticity effects in microlensing by wormholes

    E. Eiroa, G. E. Romero, and D. F. Torres, Mod. Phys. Lett. A16, 973 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0104076

  29. [29]

    Degeneracy in exotic gravitational lensing

    M. Safonova and D. F. Torres, Mod. Phys. Lett. A17, 1685 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0208039

  30. [30]

    Gravitational lensing by scalar-tensor wormholes and the energy conditions

    R. Shaikh and S. Kar, Phys. Rev. D96, 044037 (2017), arXiv:1705.11008 [gr-qc]

  31. [31]
  32. [32]

    Chetouani and G

    L. Chetouani and G. Cl´ ement, Gen. Rel. Grav.16, 111 (1984)

  33. [33]

    On the exact gravitational lens equation in spherically symmetric and static spacetimes

    V. Perlick, Phys. Rev. D69, 064017 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0307072

  34. [34]

    Gravitational Microlensing by the Ellis Wormhole

    F. Abe, Astrophys. J.725, 787 (2010), arXiv:1009.6084 [astro-ph.CO]

  35. [35]

    Deflection angle of light in an Ellis wormhole geometry

    K. Nakajima and H. Asada, Phys. Rev. D85, 107501 (2012), arXiv:1204.3710 [gr-qc]

  36. [36]

    Y. Toki, T. Kitamura, H. Asada, and F. Abe, Astrophys. J.740, 121 (2011), arXiv:1107.5374 [astro-ph.CO]

  37. [37]

    Can we distinguish between black holes and wormholes by their Einstein-ring systems?

    N. Tsukamoto, T. Harada, and K. Yajima, Phys. Rev. D86, 104062 (2012), arXiv:1207.0047 [gr-qc]

  38. [38]
  39. [39]

    C.-M. Yoo, T. Harada, and N. Tsukamoto, Phys. Rev. D87, 084045 (2013), arXiv:1302.7170 [gr-qc]

  40. [40]

    Gravitational lensing shear by an exotic lens object with negative convergence or negative mass

    K. Izumi, C. Hagiwara, K. Nakajima, T. Kitamura, and H. Asada, Phys. Rev. D88, 024049 (2013), arXiv:1305.5037 [gr-qc]

  41. [41]

    Negative time delay of light by a gravitational concave lens

    K. Nakajima, K. Izumi, and H. Asada, Phys. Rev. D90, 084026 (2014), arXiv:1404.2720 [gr-qc]

  42. [42]

    Alternatives to Schwarzschild in the weak field limit of General Relativity

    V. Bozza and A. Postiglione, JCAP06, 036 (2015), arXiv:1502.05178 [gr-qc]

  43. [43]

    Caustics of $1/r^n$ binary gravitational lenses: from galactic haloes to exotic matter

    V. Bozza and C. Melchiorre, JCAP03, 040 (2016), arXiv:1511.07991 [gr-qc]

  44. [44]

    Extended source effect on microlensing light curves by an Ellis wormhole

    N. Tsukamoto and Y. Gong, Phys. Rev. D97, 084051 (2018), arXiv:1711.04560 [gr-qc]

  45. [45]

    Bozza, Int

    V. Bozza, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D26, 1741013 (2017)

  46. [46]

    Gravitational lensing by exotic objects

    H. Asada, Mod. Phys. Lett. A32, 1730031 (2017), arXiv:1711.01730 [gr-qc]

  47. [47]

    Nojiri and S

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, (2026), arXiv:2602.15058 [gr-qc]

  48. [48]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

  49. [49]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022), arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]

  50. [50]

    C.-K. Chan, D. Psaltis, F. ¨Ozel, R. Narayan, and A. Skadowski, Astrophys. J.799, 1 (2015), [Erratum: Astrophys.J. 807, 114 (2015)], arXiv:1410.3492 [astro-ph.HE]

  51. [51]

    S. E. Gralla, D. E. Holz, and R. M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D100, 024018 (2019), arXiv:1906.00873 [astro-ph.HE]

  52. [52]

    Perlick and O

    V. Perlick and O. Y. Tsupko, Phys. Rept.947, 1 (2022), arXiv:2105.07101 [gr-qc]

  53. [53]

    Guerrero, G

    M. Guerrero, G. J. Olmo, D. Rubiera-Garcia, and D. S.-C. G´ omez, JCAP08, 036 (2021), arXiv:2105.15073 [gr-qc]

  54. [54]

    Younsi, D

    Z. Younsi, D. Psaltis, and F. ¨Ozel, Astrophys. J.942, 47 (2023), arXiv:2111.01752 [astro-ph.HE]

  55. [55]

    Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A$^*$

    S. Vagnozziet al., Class. Quant. Grav.40, 165007 (2023), arXiv:2205.07787 [gr-qc]

  56. [56]

    G. J. Olmo, D. Rubiera-Garcia, and D. S.-C. G´ omez, Phys. Lett. B829, 137045 (2022), arXiv:2110.10002 [gr-qc]

  57. [57]

    G. J. Olmo, J. L. Rosa, D. Rubiera-Garcia, A. Rueda, and D. S´ aez-Chill´ on G´ omez, Phys. Rev. D112, 084059 (2025), arXiv:2507.16580 [gr-qc]

  58. [58]

    The Bondi universe: Can negative mass drive the cosmological expansion?

    G. Manfredi, J.-L. Rouet, and B. Miller, (2026), arXiv:2601.22910 [astro-ph.CO]

  59. [59]

    Cosmological Bound from the Neutron Star Merger GW170817 in scalar-tensor and $F(R)$ gravity theories

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B779, 425 (2018), arXiv:1711.00492 [astro-ph.CO]

  60. [60]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. Folomeev, Phys. Rev. D109, 104007 (2024), arXiv:2401.15868 [gr-qc]

  61. [61]

    Nojiri and G

    S. Nojiri and G. G. L. Nashed, Phys. Rev. D108, 124049 (2023), arXiv:2309.12379 [hep-th]

  62. [62]

    Nojiri and G

    S. Nojiri and G. G. L. Nashed, JCAP03, 023 (2024), arXiv:2310.16068 [gr-qc]

  63. [63]

    Elizalde, S

    E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. K. Oikonomou, Phys. Dark Univ.45, 101536 (2024), arXiv:2312.02889 [gr-qc]

  64. [64]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and A. Sedrakian, Nucl. Phys. B1006, 116628 (2024), arXiv:2312.15839 [gr-qc]

  65. [65]

    Katsuragawa, S

    T. Katsuragawa, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Dark Univ.51, 102213 (2026), arXiv:2511.03275 [gr-qc]

  66. [66]

    G. G. L. Nashed and S. Nojiri, Phys. Dark Univ.46, 101655 (2024), arXiv:2402.12860 [gr-qc]

  67. [67]

    Katsuragawa, S

    T. Katsuragawa, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D110, 064014 (2024), arXiv:2406.18368 [gr-qc]

  68. [68]

    Black-bounce to traversable wormhole

    A. Simpson and M. Visser, JCAP02, 042 (2019), arXiv:1812.07114 [gr-qc]

  69. [69]

    Paugnat, A

    H. Paugnat, A. Lupsasca, F. Vincent, and M. Wielgus, Astron. Astrophys.668, A11 (2022), arXiv:2206.02781 [astro- ph.HE]