Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 cited by

Transforming raw KL scores into batch-level relative advantages stabilizes on-policy distillation for multimodal models.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-27 16:58 UTC pith:3I363CVR

load-bearing objection GNDPO adds batch-level normalization to KL scores for on-policy distillation stability, but the abstract gives no numbers or ablations to back the performance claims. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2606.09091 v1 pith:3I363CVR submitted 2026-06-08 cs.LG cs.CV

Stabilizing On-Policy Distillation for MLLM Reasoning with Global Normalization

Dongze Hao , Zhiwei Jin , Chen Chen , Haonan Lu This is my paper
classification cs.LG cs.CV
keywords on-policy distillationglobal normalizationmultimodal reasoningpolicy optimizationgradient stabilityKL divergencelarge language modelsknowledge distillation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that on-policy distillation from a stronger teacher can supply dense supervision for multimodal reasoning but often fails due to unstable gradients. The instability arises because raw token-level KL scores vary sharply in magnitude across outlier states within a batch. GNDPO addresses this by converting those scores into relative advantages computed over the full batch, which damps extreme updates while keeping the fine-grained per-token signal. Experiments indicate the change produces more reliable training runs and higher accuracy on downstream multimodal tasks.

Core claim

GNDPO stabilizes optimization by replacing raw per-token KL scores with batch-level relative advantages; this removes the dominant source of gradient explosions from magnitude misalignment in outlier states while preserving the dense token-level guidance that distinguishes on-policy distillation from sparse-reward reinforcement learning.

What carries the argument

Batch-level relative advantages computed from raw KL scores, which re-scale the distillation loss so that each token's contribution is measured against the current batch rather than in absolute terms.

Load-bearing premise

Magnitude misalignment across outlier states is the main driver of gradient instability, and shifting to batch-level relative advantages will keep the original token-level signal without adding new biases or losing useful information.

What would settle it

Training runs on the same multimodal reasoning data with and without the batch normalization step, checking whether gradient-norm spikes disappear and whether final task accuracy rises or falls.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Training runs exhibit fewer gradient explosions and require less manual intervention to stay stable.
  • Multimodal reasoning benchmarks show measurable gains in accuracy and consistency over un-normalized distillation.
  • The method keeps the dense per-token supervision that on-policy distillation provides over outcome-only reinforcement learning.
  • The same normalization step can be inserted into existing distillation pipelines without changing the teacher or sampling procedure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same batch-relative scaling might reduce variance in other token-level distillation settings that currently rely on absolute KL or cross-entropy losses.
  • If the dominant instability truly comes from outlier magnitude rather than from the teacher itself, the technique could be combined with existing variance-reduction tricks in policy optimization without conflict.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes Globally Normalized Distillation Policy Optimization (GNDPO) to stabilize on-policy distillation (OPD) for multimodal large language models (MLLMs). It identifies gradient instability arising from magnitude misalignment in outlier states during naive token-level distillation of KL scores, and introduces batch-level relative advantages via global normalization to mitigate explosions while retaining token-level guidance. The central claim is that GNDPO improves training robustness and downstream performance on multimodal reasoning tasks relative to prior OPD and RLVR approaches, with public code release.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold with appropriate controls and ablations, GNDPO would offer a targeted stabilization technique for dense-supervision distillation in MLLM post-training, potentially making on-policy methods more reliable than sparse-reward RLVR for reasoning tasks. The approach is conceptually straightforward and could be broadly applicable if the normalization preserves signal without introducing batch-dependent biases.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central performance claim that 'GNDPO substantially improves training robustness and downstream performance across multimodal reasoning tasks' is unsupported by any quantitative results, error bars, ablation studies, baseline comparisons, or derivation details in the provided text. This is load-bearing for the paper's contribution and prevents assessment of whether batch-level relative advantages actually solve the stated misalignment without new instabilities.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and the opportunity to clarify the manuscript. We address the major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central performance claim that 'GNDPO substantially improves training robustness and downstream performance across multimodal reasoning tasks' is unsupported by any quantitative results, error bars, ablation studies, baseline comparisons, or derivation details in the provided text. This is load-bearing for the paper's contribution and prevents assessment of whether batch-level relative advantages actually solve the stated misalignment without new instabilities.

    Authors: The abstract is a high-level summary of the paper's contributions and findings. The full manuscript provides the supporting evidence in Section 3 (method derivation for global normalization of KL scores into batch-level relative advantages) and Section 4 (Experiments), which reports quantitative results on multimodal reasoning benchmarks. These include direct comparisons against naive OPD and RLVR baselines, ablation studies isolating the effect of batch-level normalization, multiple-run error bars, and metrics for training stability (e.g., gradient norm statistics). If these sections were insufficiently highlighted or the abstract's phrasing appeared unsubstantiated without explicit cross-references, we will revise the manuscript to add explicit pointers from the abstract to the relevant results and expand the abstract with one or two key quantitative improvements where space permits. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The GNDPO normalization is defined directly from batch statistics on raw KL scores (a standard statistical rescaling), with no equations shown reducing to fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The abstract and description present the transformation as an explicit preprocessing step whose output is independent of downstream performance metrics, and the central claim rests on empirical results rather than any derivation that collapses to its inputs by construction. No load-bearing steps qualify under the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that gradient instability arises primarily from magnitude misalignment in outlier states during token-level distillation, and that batch normalization will address it without side effects; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Magnitude misalignment in outlier states is the main cause of gradient explosions in naive token-level on-policy distillation.
    Invoked to motivate the need for global normalization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5680 in / 1168 out tokens · 15185 ms · 2026-06-27T16:58:37.127087+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

On-policy distillation (OPD) has recently emerged as an important post-training paradigm. By using a stronger teacher model to provide dense, fine-grained supervision for sampled trajectories, OPD offers a clear advantage over reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), which typically depends on sparse binary or outcome-based environmental feedback. However, naive token-level distillation can suffer from gradient instability, due to magnitude misalignment in outlier states. To address this issue, we propose Globally Normalized Distillation Policy Optimization (GNDPO), a practical method that stabilizes optimization by transforming raw KL scores into batch-level relative advantages. This normalization effectively mitigates gradient explosions while retaining the benefits of token-level guidance. Experimental results show that GNDPO substantially improves training robustness and downstream performance across multimodal reasoning tasks. The code is released at https://github.com/OPPO-Mente-Lab/GNDPO.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09091 by Chen Chen, Dongze Hao, Haonan Lu, Zhiwei Jin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The comparison of GSPO, OPD and our proposed GNDPO method. GSPO relies on sparse, sequence-level rewards, which makes detailed credit assignment difficult. OPD provides dense, token-level guidance using raw KL divergence, but it is prone to gradient explosion. Our GNDPO solves this problem by normalizing the rewards within each batch, ensuring both high signal density and stable training dynamics. token-le… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Training dynamics of OPD method and GNDPO method. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Behavior Leverage Imbalance in Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Multi-teacher on-policy distillation can cause tool over-calling due to disproportionate signals at mode-entry tokens, and a per-token divergence calibration method called Soft Clamp mitigates this shift.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 8 internal anchors

  1. [4]

    Patterns , volume=

    A survey of multilingual large language models , author=. Patterns , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  2. [7]

    On-Policy Distillation , howpublished =

    Lu, Kevin and. On-Policy Distillation , howpublished =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  3. [10]

    Inter-gps: Interpretable geometry problem solving with formal language and symbolic reasoning , author=. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=

  4. [11]

    International Conference on Learning Representations , volume=

    Mathvista: Evaluating mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , volume=

  5. [12]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Mmmu: A massive multi-discipline multimodal understanding and reasoning benchmark for expert agi , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  6. [13]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Measuring multimodal mathematical reasoning with math-vision dataset , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  7. [14]

    European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

    Mathverse: Does your multi-modal llm truly see the diagrams in visual math problems? , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  8. [15]

    International Conference on Learning Representations , volume=

    Dynamath: A dynamic visual benchmark for evaluating mathematical reasoning robustness of vision language models , author=. International Conference on Learning Representations , volume=

  9. [16]

    Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=

    We-math: Does your large multimodal model achieve human-like mathematical reasoning? , author=. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pages=

  10. [18]

    Proceedings of the Twentieth European Conference on Computer Systems , pages=

    Hybridflow: A flexible and efficient rlhf framework , author=. Proceedings of the Twentieth European Conference on Computer Systems , pages=

  11. [19]

    Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=

    Vlmevalkit: An open-source toolkit for evaluating large multi-modality models , author=. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=

  12. [20]

    DeepSeek-AI . 2026. DeepSeek-V4 : Towards highly efficient million-token context intelligence

    2026

  13. [21]

    Haodong Duan, Junming Yang, Yuxuan Qiao, Xinyu Fang, Lin Chen, Yuan Liu, Xiaoyi Dong, Yuhang Zang, Pan Zhang, Jiaqi Wang, and 1 others. 2024. Vlmevalkit: An open-source toolkit for evaluating large multi-modality models. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 11198--11201

    2024

  14. [22]

    Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Ruoyu Zhang, Shirong Ma, Xiao Bi, and 1 others. 2025. Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [23]

    Jian Hu, Jason Klein Liu, Haotian Xu, and Wei Shen. 2025. Reinforce++: Stabilizing critic-free policy optimization with global advantage normalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.03262

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [24]

    Kevin Lu and Thinking Machines Lab . 2025. https://doi.org/10.64434/tml.20251026 On-policy distillation . Thinking Machines Lab: Connectionism. Accessed: 2026-05-19

    work page doi:10.64434/tml.20251026 2025

  17. [25]

    Pan Lu, Hritik Bansal, Tony Xia, Jiacheng Liu, Chunyuan Li, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Hao Cheng, Kai-Wei Chang, Michel Galley, and Jianfeng Gao. 2024. Mathvista: Evaluating mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. In International Conference on Learning Representations, volume 2024, pages 23439--23554

    2024

  18. [26]

    Pan Lu, Ran Gong, Shibiao Jiang, Liang Qiu, Siyuan Huang, Xiaodan Liang, and Song-Chun Zhu. 2021. Inter-gps: Interpretable geometry problem solving with formal language and symbolic reasoning. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processin...

    2021

  19. [27]

    Runqi Qiao, Qiuna Tan, Guanting Dong, MinhuiWu MinhuiWu, Chong Sun, Xiaoshuai Song, Jiapeng Wang, Zhuoma Gongque, Shanglin Lei, Yifan Zhang, and 1 others. 2025. We-math: Does your large multimodal model achieve human-like mathematical reasoning? In Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Pape...

    2025

  20. [28]

    Libo Qin, Qiguang Chen, Yuhang Zhou, Zhi Chen, Yinghui Li, Lizi Liao, Min Li, Wanxiang Che, and Philip S Yu. 2025. A survey of multilingual large language models. Patterns, 6(1)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Guangming Sheng, Chi Zhang, Zilingfeng Ye, Xibin Wu, Wang Zhang, Ru Zhang, Yanghua Peng, Haibin Lin, and Chuan Wu. 2025. Hybridflow: A flexible and efficient rlhf framework. In Proceedings of the Twentieth European Conference on Computer Systems, pages 1279--1297

    2025

  22. [30]

    Mingyang Song and Mao Zheng. 2026. A survey of on-policy distillation for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.00626

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  23. [31]

    Kimi Team, Tongtong Bai, Yifan Bai, Yiping Bao, SH Cai, Yuan Cao, Y Charles, HS Che, Cheng Chen, Guanduo Chen, and 1 others. 2026. Kimi k2. 5: Visual agentic intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02276

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  24. [32]

    Ke Wang, Junting Pan, Weikang Shi, Zimu Lu, Houxing Ren, Aojun Zhou, Mingjie Zhan, and Hongsheng Li. 2024. Measuring multimodal mathematical reasoning with math-vision dataset. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:95095--95169

    2024

  25. [33]

    Weiyun Wang, Zhangwei Gao, Lixin Gu, Hengjun Pu, Long Cui, Xingguang Wei, Zhaoyang Liu, Linglin Jing, Shenglong Ye, Jie Shao, and 1 others. 2025. Internvl3. 5: Advancing open-source multimodal models in versatility, reasoning, and efficiency. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18265

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [34]

    Bangjun Xiao, Bingquan Xia, Bo Yang, Bofei Gao, Bowen Shen, Chen Zhang, Chenhong He, Chiheng Lou, Fuli Luo, Gang Wang, and 1 others. 2026. Mimo-v2-flash technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.02780

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  27. [35]

    Yijia Xiao, Edward Sun, Tianyu Liu, and Wei Wang. 2024. Logicvista: Multimodal llm logical reasoning benchmark in visual contexts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.04973

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [36]

    Xiang Yue, Yuansheng Ni, Kai Zhang, Tianyu Zheng, Ruoqi Liu, Ge Zhang, Samuel Stevens, Dongfu Jiang, Weiming Ren, Yuxuan Sun, and 1 others. 2024. Mmmu: A massive multi-discipline multimodal understanding and reasoning benchmark for expert agi. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 9556--9567

    2024

  29. [37]

    Renrui Zhang, Dongzhi Jiang, Yichi Zhang, Haokun Lin, Ziyu Guo, Pengshuo Qiu, Aojun Zhou, Pan Lu, Kai-Wei Chang, Yu Qiao, and 1 others. 2024. Mathverse: Does your multi-modal llm truly see the diagrams in visual math problems? In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 169--186. Springer

    2024

  30. [38]

    Chujie Zheng, Shixuan Liu, Mingze Li, Xiong-Hui Chen, Bowen Yu, Chang Gao, Kai Dang, Yuqiong Liu, Rui Men, An Yang, and 1 others. 2025. Group sequence policy optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.18071

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [39]

    Chengke Zou, Xingang Guo, Rui Yang, Junyu Zhang, Bin Hu, and Huan Zhang. 2025. Dynamath: A dynamic visual benchmark for evaluating mathematical reasoning robustness of vision language models. In International Conference on Learning Representations, volume 2025, pages 48337--48383

    2025