Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 1 cited by

The positivity of the biorthogonal Gibbs functional characterises quasi-Hermiticity for non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with real spectra.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-07-01 07:39 UTC pith:CDRJFO7F

load-bearing objection The paper's main result is a clean iff link between positivity of the biorthogonal Gibbs functional and quasi-Hermiticity, recovered via Riesz from the projectors, though the reconstruction step needs tighter verification that the output metric is positive definite and intertwines correctly. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2606.13251 v2 pith:CDRJFO7F submitted 2026-06-11 quant-ph math-phmath.MP

Kubo-Martin-Schwinger conditions for non-Hermitian systems

Chen Lan , Luyao Ma , Hao Yang This is my paper
classification quant-ph math-phmath.MP
keywords Kubo-Martin-Schwinger conditionnon-Hermitian Hamiltoniansquasi-Hermiticitybiorthogonal Gibbs statethermal equilibriumRiesz representationTomita-Takesaki theory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the Kubo-Martin-Schwinger thermal equilibrium condition to bounded non-Hermitian Hamiltonians that are diagonalisable with real spectra and complete biorthogonal eigenbases. It proves that the associated biorthogonal Gibbs functional is positive semidefinite on all operators of the form A†A if and only if the Hamiltonian is quasi-Hermitian, i.e., similar to a Hermitian operator via a positive definite metric. This supplies a metric-free test that reconstructs the metric directly from the functional via the Riesz representation theorem. Under the quasi-Hermitian condition the corresponding η-Gibbs state satisfies the full analytic KMS boundary condition, and the construction yields a Tomita-Takesaki modular structure in finite dimensions.

Core claim

For any diagonalisable H∈M_d(C) with real spectrum, the biorthogonal Gibbs functional ω_bi(A)=Z_bi^{-1}∑_n e^{-β E_n}⟨ϕ_n|A|ψ_n⟩ satisfies ω_bi(A†A)≥0 for all A if and only if H is quasi-Hermitian. The proof reconstructs the metric η directly from the eigenprojectors of ω_bi via the Riesz representation theorem. Under the quasi-Hermitian hypothesis the η-Gibbs state ω_η(A)=Z_η^{-1} Tr[η e^{-β H} A] satisfies the full analytic KMS condition, while the transported state generally differs from the Gibbs state of the isospectral Hermitian partner whenever [η,h]≠0.

What carries the argument

The biorthogonal Gibbs functional ω_bi whose positivity on A†A is equivalent to the existence of a positive metric η making H quasi-Hermitian, with the metric recovered via Riesz representation from the functional's eigenprojectors.

Load-bearing premise

The Hamiltonian is bounded, diagonalisable, and possesses a complete biorthogonal eigensystem with real eigenvalues.

What would settle it

A diagonalisable matrix with real eigenvalues such that the biorthogonal functional is positive semidefinite yet no positive definite metric η satisfies ηH = H†η.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Under quasi-Hermiticity the η-Gibbs state satisfies the full analytic KMS condition by the Hadamard three-line theorem and Bari's theorem on Riesz bases.
  • The KMS property cannot be recovered by similarity transformation alone, since the transported state differs from the Hermitian-partner Gibbs state when the commutator [η,h] is nonzero.
  • The η-Gibbs state carries a Tomita-Takesaki modular structure in finite dimensions.
  • A quantum-detailed-balance condition holds for the associated open-system dynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Numerical computation of the biorthogonal functional on a finite set of operators could serve as a practical test for quasi-Hermiticity without first solving for the metric.
  • The result suggests that positivity of thermal expectations may diagnose whether a given non-Hermitian model admits a consistent probabilistic interpretation.
  • The finite-dimensional modular structure raises the question of which parts of the construction extend when the Hamiltonian is unbounded.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper extends the Kubo-Martin-Schwinger (KMS) condition to bounded non-Hermitian Hamiltonians in M_d(C) that are diagonalisable with real spectra and complete biorthogonal eigensystems. Its central claim is an equivalence: the biorthogonal Gibbs functional ω_bi(A) = Z_bi^{-1} ∑ e^{-β E_n} ⟨ϕ_n|A|ψ_n⟩ satisfies ω_bi(A†A) ≥ 0 for all A if and only if H is quasi-Hermitian, with the 'only if' direction obtained by reconstructing the metric η directly from the eigenprojectors of ω_bi via the Riesz representation theorem. Under the quasi-Hermitian assumption the paper proves that the η-Gibbs state satisfies the full analytic KMS boundary condition via the Hadamard three-line theorem and Bari's theorem on Riesz bases; it also treats a quantum detailed-balance condition for the associated open dynamics and the Tomita-Takesaki modular structure of the η-Gibbs state in finite dimensions.

Significance. If the central equivalence is established, the work supplies a metric-free thermodynamic characterisation of quasi-Hermiticity together with a complete analytic KMS theorem for the associated states. The explicit invocation of the Hadamard three-line theorem and Bari's theorem for the analytic continuation, and the reconstruction of η via Riesz representation, constitute concrete technical strengths. The result would be of interest to researchers working on non-Hermitian quantum mechanics and open-system thermodynamics.

major comments (1)
  1. [main result paragraph] Main result paragraph (abstract): the 'only if' direction asserts that positivity of ω_bi(A†A) for all A implies quasi-Hermiticity by reconstructing η from the eigenprojectors of ω_bi via Riesz representation. The stated hypotheses (diagonalisability, real spectrum, complete biorthogonal system) do not automatically guarantee that the reconstructed sesquilinear form is Hermitian, positive definite, and satisfies the intertwining relation ηH = H†η. A explicit verification that these metric properties follow from positivity alone is required for the equivalence to hold.
minor comments (1)
  1. [abstract] The abstract notes that construction of a compatible C*-norm and proof of σ-weak continuity remain open; these limitations should be stated more explicitly when the paper situates its results inside the Haag-Hugenholtz-Winnink programme.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying the need for explicit verification in the 'only if' direction. We agree that the manuscript would benefit from a clearer step-by-step demonstration that the sesquilinear form reconstructed via Riesz representation is Hermitian, positive definite, and satisfies the intertwining relation. We will revise the paper accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [main result paragraph] Main result paragraph (abstract): the 'only if' direction asserts that positivity of ω_bi(A†A) for all A implies quasi-Hermiticity by reconstructing η from the eigenprojectors of ω_bi via Riesz representation. The stated hypotheses (diagonalisability, real spectrum, complete biorthogonal system) do not automatically guarantee that the reconstructed sesquilinear form is Hermitian, positive definite, and satisfies the intertwining relation ηH = H†η. A explicit verification that these metric properties follow from positivity alone is required for the equivalence to hold.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification is required. The current manuscript states that the metric is reconstructed from the eigenprojectors via Riesz representation but does not spell out the verification that the resulting form is Hermitian, positive definite, and obeys ηH = H†η. In the revised version we will insert a dedicated paragraph (or short appendix) that carries out this verification in detail: starting from ω_bi(A†A) ≥ 0 for all A, we show that the associated sesquilinear form is Hermitian by direct computation with the biorthogonal projectors, positive definite by the completeness of the system and the strict positivity of the weights, and satisfies the intertwining relation by using the eigenvalue equation for both the left and right eigenvectors together with the reality of the spectrum. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; equivalence uses external Riesz theorem

full rationale

The central claim is an iff equivalence: positivity of ω_bi(A†A) for all A holds precisely when H is quasi-Hermitian. The 'only if' direction reconstructs η from the eigenprojectors of ω_bi by invoking the Riesz representation theorem (an independent external result). The setup assumes a diagonalisable H with real spectrum and complete biorthogonal system; the reconstruction step does not reduce to a self-definition, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or a self-citation chain. No load-bearing self-citations or ansatz smuggling appear. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The constructions rest on standard results from functional analysis and complex analysis; no free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or new physical entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (3)
  • standard math Riesz representation theorem
    Invoked to reconstruct the metric η from the eigenprojectors of the biorthogonal functional.
  • standard math Hadamard three-line theorem
    Used to establish the analytic KMS condition for the η-Gibbs state.
  • standard math Bari's theorem on Riesz bases
    Applied to show that the η-Gibbs state satisfies the full KMS boundary condition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5900 in / 1663 out tokens · 35580 ms · 2026-07-01T07:39:46.588663+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the extension of the Kubo--Martin--Schwinger (KMS) thermal equilibrium condition to bounded non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with real spectra and biorthogonal eigensystems, providing a unified framework through three complementary constructions: a complete KMS theorem under quasi-Hermiticity, a biorthogonal KMS-type identity whose positivity characterises quasi-Hermiticity, and a quantum-detailed-balance condition for the associated open-system dynamics. Our main result is a thermodynamic characterisation of quasi-Hermiticity: for any diagonalisable $H\in M_d(\mathbb C)$ with real spectrum, the biorthogonal Gibbs functional $\omega_{\rm bi}(A)=Z_{\rm bi}^{-1}\sum_n e^{-\beta E_n}\langle\phi_n|A|\psi_n\rangle$ satisfies $\omega_{\rm bi}(A^\dagger A)\ge0$ for all $A$ if and only if $H$ is quasi-Hermitian. The proof reconstructs the metric $\eta$ directly from the eigenprojectors of $\omega_{\rm bi}$ via the Riesz representation theorem, yielding a metric-free criterion for quasi-Hermiticity. Under the quasi-Hermitian hypothesis, we prove that the $\eta$-Gibbs state $\omega_\eta(A)=Z_\eta^{-1}{\rm Tr}[\eta e^{-\beta H}A]$ satisfies the full analytic KMS condition using the Hadamard three-line theorem and Bari's theorem on Riesz bases. The transported state generally differs from the Gibbs state of the isospectral Hermitian partner whenever $[\eta,h]\neq0$, so the KMS property cannot be obtained by similarity transformation alone. Finally, within the Haag--Hugenholtz--Winnink programme, we establish the Tomita--Takesaki modular structure of the $\eta$-Gibbs state in finite dimensions, while the construction of a compatible $C^*$-norm and the proof of $\sigma$-weak continuity remain open.

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Non-Hermitian entropy production from fluctuation theorems

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Post-selected fluctuation theorems yield a nonnegative entropy production Σ=⟨ΔS⟩+Ξ for non-Hermitian evolution, equal to a Petz–Rényi gap and sensitive to exceptional points via its coherent part.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 15 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Statistical mechanical theory of irreversible processes. 1. General theory and simple applications in magnetic and conduction problems,

    R. Kubo, “Statistical mechanical theory of irreversible processes. 1. General theory and simple applications in magnetic and conduction problems,”J. Phys. Soc. Jap.12(1957) 570–586

    work page 1957

  2. [2]

    Theory of many particle systems. 1.,

    P. C. Martin and J. S. Schwinger, “Theory of many particle systems. 1.,”Phys. Rev.115 (1959) 1342–1373

    work page 1959

  3. [3]

    On the Equilibrium states in quantum statistical mechanics,

    R. Haag, N. M. Hugenholtz, and M. Winnink, “On the Equilibrium states in quantum statistical mechanics,”Commun. Math. Phys.5(1967) 215–236

    work page 1967

  4. [4]

    Bratteli and D

    O. Bratteli and D. W. Robinson,Operator algebras and quantum statistical mechanics. Vol. 2: Equilibrium states. Models in quantum statistical mechanics. Springer, 1996

    work page 1996

  5. [5]

    Takesaki,Tomita’s Theory of Modular Hilbert Algebras and its Applications

    M. Takesaki,Tomita’s Theory of Modular Hilbert Algebras and its Applications. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, 1970

    work page 1970

  6. [6]

    Tomita-Takesaki Modular Theory

    S. J. Summers, “Tomita-Takesaki modular theory,”arXiv:math-ph/0511034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Haag,Local Quantum Physics

    R. Haag,Local Quantum Physics. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. Springer, Berlin, 1996

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    KMS, etc

    L. Birke and J. Froehlich, “KMS, etc,”Rev. Math. Phys.14(2002) 829–872, arXiv:math-ph/0204023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  9. [9]

    Real Spectra in Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians Having PT Symmetry

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, “Real spectra in nonHermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry,”Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 5243–5246,arXiv:physics/9712001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  10. [10]

    Making Sense of Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians

    C. M. Bender, “Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians,”Rept. Prog. Phys.70(2007) 947,arXiv:hep-th/0703096

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  11. [11]

    PT-symmetric quantum mechanics,

    C. M. Bender and D. W. Hook, “PT-symmetric quantum mechanics,”Rev. Mod. Phys.96 (Oct, 2024) 045002,arXiv:2312.17386 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Non-Hermitian Physics

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, “Non-Hermitian physics,”Adv. Phys.69no. 3, (2021) 249–435,arXiv:2006.01837 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. 44

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Exceptional Topology of Non-Hermitian Systems

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, “Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems,”Rev. Mod. Phys.93no. 1, (2021) 015005,arXiv:1912.10048

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Quasi-Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics and the variational principle,

    F. G. Scholtz, H. B. Geyer, and F. J. W. Hahne, “Quasi-Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics and the variational principle,”Annals Phys.213(1992) 74–101

    work page 1992

  15. [15]

    Pseudo-Hermiticity versus PT Symmetry: The necessary condition for the reality of the spectrum of a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian

    A. Mostafazadeh, “PseudoHermiticity versus PT symmetry. The necessary condition for the reality of the spectrum,”J. Math. Phys.43(2002) 205–214,arXiv:math-ph/0107001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  16. [16]

    Pseudo-Hermitian Representation of Quantum Mechanics

    A. Mostafazadeh, “Pseudo-Hermitian Representation of Quantum Mechanics,”Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.7(2010) 1191–1306,arXiv:0810.5643 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  17. [17]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford University Press, 1, 2007

    work page 2007

  18. [18]

    PT-symmetric quantum Liouvillian dynamics

    T. Prosen, “PT-Symmetric Quantum Liouvillean Dynamics,”Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 090404,arXiv:1207.4395 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    Symme- try and topology in non-Hermitian physics,

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, “Symmetry and Topology in Non-Hermitian Physics,”Phys. Rev. X9no. 4, (2019) 041015,arXiv:1812.09133 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    On the stability of KMS states in perturbative algebraic quantum field theories

    N. Drago, F. Faldino, and N. Pinamonti, “On the stability of KMS states in perturbative algebraic quantum field theories,”Commun. Math. Phys.357no. 1, (2018) 267–293, arXiv:1609.01124 [math-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    Non-hermitian quantum thermodynamics

    B. Gardas, S. Deffner, and A. Saxena, “Non-hermitian quantum thermodynamics,”Sci. Rep.6(2016) 23408,arXiv:1511.06256 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  22. [22]

    Physics of PT-symmetric quantum systems at finite temperatures,

    Q. Du, K. Cao, and S.-P. Kou, “Physics of PT-symmetric quantum systems at finite temperatures,”Phys. Rev. A106no. 3, (2022) 032206

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Cao and S.-P

    K. Cao and S.-P. Kou, “Statistical mechanics for non-Hermitian quantum systems,”Phys. Rev. Res.5no. 3, (2023) 033196,arXiv:2304.04691 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Quantum and Classical Statistical Mechanics of a Class of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians

    H. F. Jones and E. S. Moreira, Jr, “Quantum and Classical Statistical Mechanics of a Class of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians,”J. Phys. A43(2010) 055307,arXiv:0905.2879 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  25. [25]

    Gibbs states defined by biorthogonal sequences

    Bagarello, F and Trapani, C and Triolo, S, “Gibbs states defined by biorthogonal sequences,”Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical49no. 40, (Sep, 2016) 405202,arXiv:1609.00660 [math-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians violate the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis,

    G. Cipolloni and J. Kudler-Flam, “Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians violate the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis,”Phys. Rev. B109no. 2, (2024) L020201,arXiv:2303.03448

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Toward non-Hermitian quantum statistical thermodynamics,

    N. Bebiano, J. da Providˆ encia, and J. P. da Providˆ encia, “Toward non-Hermitian quantum statistical thermodynamics,”Journal of Mathematical Physics61no. 2, (Feb., 2020) 022102,arXiv:1907.13221 [quant-ph]. 45

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    A Spectral Characterization of KMS States,

    J. De Canniere, “A Spectral Characterization of KMS States,”Commun. Math. Phys.84 (1982) 187–205

    work page 1982

  29. [29]

    Stability Properties and the Kms Condition,

    O. Bratteli, A. Kishimoto, and D. W. Robinson, “Stability Properties and the Kms Condition,”Commun. Math. Phys.61(1978) 209

    work page 1978

  30. [30]

    Perturbation theory of W*-dynamics, Liouvilleans and KMS-states,

    J. Derezinski, V. Jaksic, and C. Pillet, “Perturbation theory of W*-dynamics, Liouvilleans and KMS-states,”Rev. Math. Phys.15(2003) 447–489

    work page 2003

  31. [31]

    Perturbation theory of KMS states,

    Ejima, S and Ogata, Y, “Perturbation theory of KMS states,” inAnnales Henri Poincar´ e, vol. 20, pp. 2971–2986, Springer. 2019.arXiv:1902.05734 [math-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    Perturbative construction of equilibrium states for interacting fermionic field theories Semiclassical Maxwell equation and the Debye screening length,

    S. Galanda, “Perturbative construction of equilibrium states for interacting fermionic field theories Semiclassical Maxwell equation and the Debye screening length,”Commun. Contemp. Math.27no. 10, (2025) 2550019,arXiv:2404.06249 [math-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Gibbs states, algebraic dynamics and generalized Riesz systems,

    Bagarello, Fabio and Inoue, Hiroshi and Trapani, Camillo, “Gibbs states, algebraic dynamics and generalized Riesz systems,”Complex Analysis and Operator Theory14no. 8, (2020) 76,arXiv:2009.02950 [math-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    Generators of Detailed Balance Quantum Markov Semigroups,

    Fagnola, Franco and Umanit` a, Veronica, “Generators of Detailed Balance Quantum Markov Semigroups,”Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics10no. 03, (2007) 335–363

    work page 2007

  35. [35]

    Entropy Production for Quantum Markov Semigroups,

    Fagnola, Franco and Rebolledo, Rolando, “Entropy Production for Quantum Markov Semigroups,”Communications in Mathematical Physics335no. 2, (2015) 547–570

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Designing open quantum systems with known steady states: Davies generators and beyond,

    J. Guo, O. Hart, C.-F. Chen, A. J. Friedman, and A. Lucas, “Designing open quantum systems with known steady states: Davies generators and beyond,”Quantum9(2025) 1612,arXiv:2404.14538 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    2025 , url =

    M. Scandi and ´A. M. Alhambra, “Thermalization in Open Many-Body Systems and KMS Detailed Balance,”Phys. Rev. X16no. 1, (2026) 011040,arXiv:2505.20064 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Complex Extension of Quantum Mechanics

    C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody, and H. F. Jones, “Complex extension of quantum mechanics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.89(2002) 270401,arXiv:quant-ph/0208076. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 92, 119902 (2004)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  39. [39]

    Biorthogonal systems and bases in Hilbert space,

    N. K. Bari, “Biorthogonal systems and bases in Hilbert space,”Uchenye Zapiski Moskovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta148(1951) 69–107

    work page 1951

  40. [40]

    Bratteli and D

    O. Bratteli and D. W. Robinson,Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics 1. C*- and W*-Algebras. Symmetry Groups. Decomposition of States. Springer, 1979

    work page 1979

  41. [41]

    Biorthogonal Quantum Mechanics

    D. C. Brody, “Biorthogonal quantum mechanics,”J. Phys. A47no. 3, (2013) 035305, arXiv:1308.2609 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [42]

    Pseudo-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics with Unbounded Metric Operators

    A. Mostafazadeh, “Pseudo-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics with Unbounded Metric Operators,”arXiv:1203.6241 [math-ph]. 46

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Markovian master equations,

    E. B. Davies, “Markovian master equations,”Commun. Math. Phys.39no. 2, (1974) 91–110

    work page 1974

  44. [44]

    The physics of exceptional points

    W. D. Heiss, “The physics of exceptional points,”J. Phys. A45(2012) 444016, arXiv:1210.7536 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  45. [45]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon,Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. 1. Functional Analysis. Academic Press, 1975. 47

    work page 1975