Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

A collection of regional proto-areas comes from one bulk geometry only when a gauge-invariant sewing criterion holds, equivalently when BKM information loss matches Jacobi normal acceleration across the interval family.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-15 10:37 UTC pith:4RIL2DT2

load-bearing objection Abstract promises sharp sewing certificates and BKM–Jacobi matching for when proto-areas define bulk geometry, but the supplied full text is a completely different COVID-mobility paper, so nothing can be checked. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.22598 v2 pith:4RIL2DT2 submitted 2026-06-21 hep-th math-phmath.MPquant-ph

When does a state-dependent proto-area define a bulk geometry?

Ruiliang Li This is my paper
classification hep-th math-phmath.MPquant-ph
keywords proto-areabulk geometrysewing problemBKM metricJacobi equationPetz recoveryholographic codesgeodesic X-ray transform
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

An area-like function assigned to each boundary region need not come from any single bulk geometry. For the data of all regions to be consistent with one local bulk metric, they must factor through a single boundary-length map—a nonlinear sewing problem. This paper derives exact primal and dual certificates for that problem on a fixed network chamber, proves that first variations on the hyperbolic disk lie in the range of a rank-two geodesic X-ray transform, and shows that second-order consistency is controlled by a forced Jacobi equation for the normal Hessian of renormalized boundary length. Linking the geometry to the Bogoliubov–Kubo–Mori metric of the Petz recovery map yields BKM–Jacobi matching: the negative BKM information-loss form must equal the Jacobi normal acceleration across the full interval family. Two isometric code families exhibit complementary obstructions when matching fails, and under source density and derivative consistency, corrected discrete witnesses converge to the continuum obstruction.

Core claim

A regular proto-area coefficient two-jet arises from a metric two-jet if and only if a gauge-invariant sewing criterion is satisfied. Equivalently, after combining the geometric certificates with the Petz/BKM structure at a product reference, the negative BKM information-loss form must equal the Jacobi normal acceleration across the full interval family (BKM–Jacobi matching).

What carries the argument

BKM–Jacobi matching—the identity that the negative Bogoliubov–Kubo–Mori information-loss form of the Petz recovery map equals the Jacobi normal acceleration of renormalized boundary length—together with the nonlinear sewing problem and its primal/dual certificates for central area operators.

Load-bearing premise

The continuum certificates and discrete convergence require a regular proto-area two-jet, a fixed network chamber, a product reference for the BKM decomposition, and source density plus first- and second-derivative consistency of sampled data; if any of these fails, the necessity and sufficiency claims no longer apply.

What would settle it

Produce a regular proto-area coefficient two-jet that meets the gauge-invariant sewing criterion (or BKM–Jacobi matching on the full interval family) yet is not realized by any metric two-jet, or a continuum metric whose induced regional areas violate the matching identity for some interval family.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Regional area data that fail the primal or dual sewing certificates cannot arise from any single local bulk metric.
  • Exact regional central area operators on a recoverable algebra can still refuse to sew into one local graph geometry.
  • When the traced-out factor is nontrivial, no unrestricted reverse stability bound exists for Petz recovery; on the observable tangent space the sharp constant is (1−α_E)/α_E.
  • A fixed-central-fiber affine logical path can have vanishing first response yet a nonzero quadratic witness of obstruction.
  • Under source density, sampled-data convergence, and first- and second-derivative consistency, corrected discrete witnesses converge to the continuum obstruction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • BKM–Jacobi matching can serve as a practical diagnostic for whether a given holographic or tensor-network code is realizing a local bulk geometry rather than merely assigning regional areas.
  • Many approximate codes with good first-order area laws may still lack a continuum geometric limit if second-order sewing fails.
  • The sharp reverse-stability constant may bound how much bulk locality can be recovered from partial boundary data when the erased factor is nontrivial.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The abstract claims that a state-dependent proto-area for boundary regions defines a bulk geometry only when the regional data factor through a single boundary-length map, formulated as a nonlinear sewing problem. On a fixed network chamber it asserts exact primal/dual certificates and an operator criterion for central area operators; on the hyperbolic disk, first variations lie in the range of the rank-two geodesic X-ray transform, while at second order a forced Jacobi equation controls the normal Hessian of renormalized boundary length. A gauge-invariant necessary-and-sufficient criterion is claimed for a regular proto-area two-jet to arise from a metric two-jet. At a product reference an exact BKM orthogonal decomposition for the Petz recovery map is stated, with sharp reverse-stability constant (1−α_E)/α_E on an observable tangent space when the traced-out factor is nontrivial. Combining these yields BKM–Jacobi matching (negative BKM information-loss form equals Jacobi normal acceleration). Two isometric code families with complementary sewing/quadratic obstructions are constructed, with discrete witnesses claimed to converge under source density and derivative consistency.

Significance. If the claimed certificates, two-jet criterion, and BKM–Jacobi matching are correct, the work would give a precise, checkable condition under which holographic-style area data determine a bulk metric jet, and would tightly couple geometric Jacobi data to Petz/BKM information loss. That would be a substantial contribution to the interface of holographic entanglement, bulk reconstruction, and quantum information recovery maps. The abstract also advertises exact certificates, a sharp constant, and complementary code obstructions—features that, if machine-checkable or fully proved, would be high-value. None of these strengths can be confirmed from the materials actually supplied for review.

major comments (2)
  1. The full manuscript text provided under this arXiv id is an unrelated empirical economics paper on COVID-19 mobility networks and behavioral bubbles (Massachusetts municipalities, two-way fixed effects, Louvain communities). It contains none of the geometric sewing problem, X-ray transform, Jacobi equation, BKM decomposition, or code constructions asserted in the abstract. Every load-bearing claim—primal/dual certificates on a network chamber, the gauge-invariant two-jet criterion, forced Jacobi normal Hessian, exact BKM orthogonal decomposition, sharp constant (1−α_E)/α_E, BKM–Jacobi matching, and discrete-to-continuum convergence—is therefore uninspectable. No internal consistency, proof correctness, or hidden regularity assumptions can be assessed.
  2. Without the correct hep-th source, the weakest assumptions flagged by the abstract alone (regularity of the proto-area two-jet; fixed network chamber; product-reference structure for the BKM split; source density, sampled-data convergence, and first-/second-derivative consistency for discrete witnesses) cannot be checked against lemmas or counter-examples. The central necessary-and-sufficient claim and the complementary isometric-code obstructions remain formally unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract notation is dense (proto-area, network chamber, BKM–Jacobi matching, α_E) with no pointer to definitions; once the correct manuscript is supplied, a short notation table would help.
  2. The abstract asserts both continuum certificates and discrete convergence; the correct paper should clearly separate continuum theorems from discrete approximation hypotheses so that each can be audited independently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No inspectable circularity: abstract poses sewing/BKM–Jacobi as nontrivial criteria; provided full text is an unrelated economics paper, so no derivation chain can be reduced to inputs.

full rationale

The hep-th abstract formulates a common-source sewing problem, claims exact primal/dual certificates, a gauge-invariant necessary-and-sufficient two-jet criterion, a forced Jacobi equation for the normal Hessian, an exact BKM orthogonal decomposition with sharp reverse-stability constant (1−α_E)/α_E, and BKM–Jacobi matching as a cross-structure equality, plus complementary isometric-code obstructions. None of these, on the abstract alone, is a self-definitional loop, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or a uniqueness claim imported from overlapping authors. The CACHEABLE full manuscript is a different paper (COVID-19 mobility / behavioral bubbles, arXiv:2606.22599-style econ.EM content), so no equation-level reduction of the sewing certificates, Jacobi normal acceleration, or BKM–Jacobi matching to their own inputs can be exhibited. Per the hard rules, circularity is only claimed when a specific reduction can be quoted; that is impossible here. Residual risk that some continuum criterion is tautological by construction remains uncheckable without the correct source, but does not license a positive circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 3 invented entities

Abstract-only review: free parameters are not numerically fitted in the usual empirical sense; the load-bearing structure is a stack of geometric and information-theoretic assumptions (regular two-jets, fixed network chamber, product reference, source density and derivative consistency). Invented entities are mostly named constructions (proto-area, sewing problem, BKM–Jacobi matching) rather than new physical particles. All entries are inferred from the abstract wording.

free parameters (2)
  • α_E (minimum retained BKM fraction)
    Appears as the sharp constant (1−α_E)/α_E in the reverse-stability bound; treated as determined by the retained observable algebra rather than fitted to external data, but its value is model-dependent and not fixed by the abstract.
  • network chamber / discrete sampling parameters
    Fixed chamber and sampled-data scheme enter the certificates and discrete-to-continuum limit; abstract does not specify uniqueness or canonical choice.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Cross-region locality requires all regional area data to factor through a single boundary-length map (common-source / sewing condition).
    Stated as the organizing requirement for bulk geometry; not derived from more primitive axioms in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Regularity of the proto-area coefficient two-jet and of the underlying metric two-jet on the hyperbolic disk (or analogous bulk).
    Needed for the first-variation X-ray range statement and the second-order forced Jacobi analysis.
  • domain assumption Product reference state for the exact orthogonal decomposition of the BKM metric of the Petz recovery map.
    Abstract restricts the sharp BKM decomposition and reverse-stability discussion to a product reference.
  • ad hoc to paper Source density, sampled-data convergence, and first- and second-derivative consistency for discrete witnesses.
    Stated as the hypotheses under which corrected discrete witnesses converge to the continuum obstruction.
  • standard math Standard differential-geometric and operator-algebraic background (geodesic X-ray transform, Jacobi fields, BKM metric, Petz recovery).
    Used throughout as prior toolkit; not re-proved in the abstract.
invented entities (3)
  • proto-area (state-dependent area-like function per boundary region) no independent evidence
    purpose: Input data that may or may not arise from a single bulk metric; object of the sewing problem.
    Named and used as the primary object; independent evidence would be any concrete holographic or code example where the sewing criterion is checked externally.
  • BKM–Jacobi matching condition no independent evidence
    purpose: Equality that forces negative BKM information-loss form to equal Jacobi normal acceleration across the interval family.
    Central combined criterion claimed in the abstract; falsifiable only by checking the equality in models outside this paper.
  • Two isometric code families with complementary obstructions no independent evidence
    purpose: Witnesses that exact regional central areas need not sew, and that zero first response can coexist with a nonzero quadratic obstruction.
    Constructed examples internal to the paper; no external experimental handle stated.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 9844 in / 3599 out tokens · 35286 ms · 2026-07-15T10:37:15.403553+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

An area-like function for each boundary region need not come from a single bulk geometry. Cross-region locality requires the data for all regions to factor through a single boundary-length map. We formulate this common-source condition as a nonlinear sewing problem. For a fixed network chamber, we derive exact primal and dual certificates together with an operator-valued criterion for central area operators. On the hyperbolic disk, the first variation lies in the range of the rank-two geodesic X-ray transform. At second order, extremality no longer removes geodesic displacement, and the forced Jacobi equation determines the normal Hessian of renormalized boundary length. We prove a gauge-invariant necessary and sufficient criterion for a regular proto-area coefficient two-jet to arise from a metric two-jet. At a product reference, we prove an exact orthogonal decomposition for the Bogoliubov--Kubo--Mori (BKM) metric associated with the Petz recovery map. If the traced-out factor is nontrivial, no unrestricted reverse stability bound exists; on an observable tangent space the sharp constant is $(1-\alpha_E)/\alpha_E$, with $\alpha_E$ the minimum retained BKM fraction. Combining the geometric and information-theoretic structures yields BKM--Jacobi matching: the negative BKM information-loss form must equal the Jacobi normal acceleration across the full interval family. We construct two isometric code families with complementary obstructions. Exact regional central area operators on the recoverable algebra can fail to sew into one local graph geometry, while a fixed-central-fiber affine logical path has zero first response and a nonzero quadratic witness. Under source density, sampled-data convergence, and first- and second-derivative consistency, corrected discrete witnesses converge to the continuum obstruction.

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Certified boundary-magic witness for state-dependent proto-area in a holographic code

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    Only matter-controlled bond motion yields state-dependent proto-area in a four-qubit holographic code, and a projected stabilizer-Rényi quadratic witness certifies it while total magic does not.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    J.M. Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, https://doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1 Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 2 (1998) 231 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9711200 hep-th/9711200 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a1 1998

  2. [2]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00377-3 Physics Letters B 428 (1998) 105 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9802109 hep-th/9802109 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00377-3 1998

  3. [3]

    E. Witten, Anti de Sitter space and holography , https://doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2 Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 2 (1998) 253 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9802150 hep-th/9802150 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a2 1998

  4. [4]

    M. Van Raamsdonk, Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-010-1034-0 General Relativity and Gravitation 42 (2010) 2323 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.3035 1005.3035 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s10714-010-1034-0 2010

  5. [5]

    Swingle, Entanglement renormalization and holography, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.065007 Physical Review D 86 (2012) 065007 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0905.1317 0905.1317 ]

    B. Swingle, Entanglement renormalization and holography, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.065007 Physical Review D 86 (2012) 065007 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0905.1317 0905.1317 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.065007 2012

  6. [6]

    Balasubramanian, B.D

    V. Balasubramanian, B.D. Chowdhury, B. Czech, J. de Boer and M.P. Heller, Bulk curves from boundary data in holography, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.086004 Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 086004 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.4204 1310.4204 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.086004 2014

  7. [7]

    Czech and L

    B. Czech and L. Lamprou, Holographic definition of points and distances, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.106005 Physical Review D 90 (2014) 106005 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.4473 1409.4473 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.106005 2014

  8. [8]

    Czech, L

    B. Czech, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish and J. Sully, Integral geometry and holography, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2015)175 JHEP 10 (2015) 175 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.05515 1505.05515 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2015)175 2015

  9. [9]

    Czech, L

    B. Czech, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish and J. Sully, Tensor networks from kinematic space, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2016)100 Journal of High Energy Physics 2016 (2016) 100 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.01548 1512.01548 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2016)100 2016

  10. [10]

    Cao, X.-L

    C. Cao, X.-L. Qi, B. Swingle and E. Tang, Building bulk geometry from the tensor Radon transform, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2020)033 Journal of High Energy Physics 2020 (2020) 033 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.00004 2007.00004 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2020)033 2020

  11. [11]

    Papadodimas and S

    K. Papadodimas and S. Raju, State-dependent bulk-boundary maps and black hole complementarity, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.086010 Physical Review D 89 (2014) 086010 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.6335 1310.6335 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.086010 2014

  12. [12]

    Cotler, P

    J. Cotler, P. Hayden, G. Penington, G. Salton, B. Swingle and M. Walter, Entanglement wedge reconstruction via universal recovery channels, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031011 Phys. Rev. X 9 (2019) 031011 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.05839 1704.05839 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.031011 2019

  13. [13]

    Faulkner and A

    T. Faulkner and A. Lewkowycz, Bulk locality from modular flow, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2017)151 JHEP 07 (2017) 151 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.05464 1704.05464 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2017)151 2017

  14. [14]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from the anti-de Sitter Space/Conformal Field Theory Correspondence , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.181602 Physical Review Letters 96 (2006) 181602 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0603001 hep-th/0603001 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.181602 2006

  15. [15]

    M. Headrick, General properties of holographic entanglement entropy, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2014)085 Journal of High Energy Physics 2014 (2014) 085 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6717 1312.6717 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2014)085 2014

  16. [16]

    Faulkner, A

    T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2013)074 Journal of High Energy Physics 2013 (2013) 074

    doi:10.1007/jhep11(2013)074 2013

  17. [17]

    Engelhardt and A.C

    N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Quantum extremal surfaces: Holographic entanglement entropy beyond the classical regime, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2015)073 Journal of High Energy Physics 2015 (2015) 073

    doi:10.1007/jhep01(2015)073 2015

  18. [18]

    Almheiri, X

    A. Almheiri, X. Dong and D. Harlow, Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2015)163 Journal of High Energy Physics 2015 (2015) 163

    doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)163 2015

  19. [19]

    Pastawski, B

    F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow and J. Preskill, Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2015)149 Journal of High Energy Physics 2015 (2015) 149

    doi:10.1007/jhep06(2015)149 2015

  20. [20]

    Harlow, The ryu--takayanagi formula from quantum error correction, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-017-2904-z Communications in Mathematical Physics 354 (2017) 865

    D. Harlow, The ryu--takayanagi formula from quantum error correction, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-017-2904-z Communications in Mathematical Physics 354 (2017) 865

    doi:10.1007/s00220-017-2904-z 2017

  21. [21]

    C. Cao, G. Cheng, K. Karthikeyan, C. Li and J. Preskill, State-dependent geometries from magic-enriched quantum codes, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.13475 (2026) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.13475

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.13475 2026

  22. [22]

    Witten, A note on corrections to entanglement wedge reconstruction, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.18639 (2026) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.18639

    E. Witten, A note on corrections to entanglement wedge reconstruction, arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.18639 (2026) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.18639

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.18639 2026

  23. [23]

    Akers, N

    C. Akers, N. Engelhardt, D. Harlow, G. Penington and S. Vardhan, The black hole interior from non-isometric codes and complexity, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2024)155 Journal of High Energy Physics 2024 (2024) 155 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.06536 2207.06536 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2024)155 2024

  24. [24]

    Eptaminitakis, F

    N. Eptaminitakis, F. Monard and Y.J. Zou, Tensor tomography on asymptotically hyperbolic surfaces, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.04144 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.04144

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.04144 2025

  25. [25]

    Eptaminitakis, F

    N. Eptaminitakis, F. Monard and Y. Zou, The hyperbolic x-ray transform: New range characterizations, mapping properties and functional relations, https://doi.org/10.3934/ipi.2025045 Inverse Problems and Imaging 22 (2026) 65

    work page doi:10.3934/ipi.2025045 2026

  26. [26]

    N. Bao, S. Nezami, H. Ooguri, B. Stoica, J. Sully and M. Walter, The holographic entropy cone, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2015)130 Journal of High Energy Physics 2015 (2015) 130

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2015)130 2015

  27. [27]

    Hayden, S

    P. Hayden, S. Nezami, X.-L. Qi, N. Thomas, M. Walter and Z. Yang, Holographic duality from random tensor networks, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2016)009 Journal of High Energy Physics 2016 (2016) 009

    doi:10.1007/jhep11(2016)009 2016

  28. [28]

    Freedman and M

    M. Freedman and M. Headrick, Bit threads and holographic entanglement, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-016-2796-3 Communications in Mathematical Physics 352 (2017) 407 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.00354 1604.00354 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00220-016-2796-3 2017

  29. [29]

    Headrick and V.E

    M. Headrick and V.E. Hubeny, Riemannian and Lorentzian flow-cut theorems, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aab83c Classical and Quantum Gravity 35 (2018) 105012 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09516 1710.09516 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aab83c 2018

  30. [30]

    Graham, C

    C.R. Graham, C. Guillarmou, P. Stefanov and G. Uhlmann, X-ray transform and boundary rigidity for asymptotically hyperbolic manifolds, https://doi.org/10.5802/aif.3339 Annales de l'Institut Fourier 69 (2019) 2857

    work page doi:10.5802/aif.3339 2019

  31. [31]

    N. Eptaminitakis, Stability estimates for the x-ray transform on simple asymptotically hyperbolic manifolds, https://doi.org/10.2140/paa.2022.4.487 Pure and Applied Analysis 4 (2022) 487

    work page doi:10.2140/paa.2022.4.487 2022

  32. [32]

    Mazzeo and F

    R. Mazzeo and F. Monard, Double b -fibrations and desingularization of the x-ray transform on manifolds with strictly convex boundary, https://doi.org/10.5802/jep.266 Journal de l'\'Ecole polytechnique --- Math\'ematiques 11 (2024) 809

    work page doi:10.5802/jep.266 2024

  33. [33]

    Lefeuvre, Boundary rigidity of negatively-curved asymptotically hyperbolic surfaces, https://doi.org/10.4171/CMH/483 Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 95 (2020) 129

    T. Lefeuvre, Boundary rigidity of negatively-curved asymptotically hyperbolic surfaces, https://doi.org/10.4171/CMH/483 Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 95 (2020) 129

    work page doi:10.4171/cmh/483 2020

  34. [34]

    Chae, Covariant holographic entanglement entropy inversion to reconstruct bulk geometry, arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.16459 (2026) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.16459

    J.-S. Chae, Covariant holographic entanglement entropy inversion to reconstruct bulk geometry, arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.16459 (2026) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.16459

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.16459 2026

  35. [35]

    Schumacher and M.A

    B. Schumacher and M.A. Nielsen, Quantum data processing and error correction, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.54.2629 Physical Review A 54 (1996) 2629

    doi:10.1103/physreva.54.2629 1996

  36. [36]

    Petz, Monotone metrics on matrix spaces, https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(94)00211-8 Linear Algebra and its Applications 244 (1996) 81

    D. Petz, Monotone metrics on matrix spaces, https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(94)00211-8 Linear Algebra and its Applications 244 (1996) 81

    work page doi:10.1016/0024-3795(94)00211-8 1996

  37. [37]

    Gallo, M.D

    G. Gallo, M.D. Grigoriadis and R.E. Tarjan, A fast parametric maximum flow algorithm and applications, https://doi.org/10.1137/0218003 SIAM Journal on Computing 18 (1989) 30

    work page doi:10.1137/0218003 1989

  38. [38]

    Granot, S.T

    F. Granot, S.T. McCormick, M. Queyranne and F. Tardella, Structural and algorithmic properties for parametric minimum cuts, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-011-0463-1 Mathematical Programming 135 (2012) 337

    work page doi:10.1007/s10107-011-0463-1 2012

  39. [39]

    Korte and J

    B. Korte and J. Vygen, Combinatorial Optimization: Theory and Algorithms, Springer, Berlin, 5 ed. (2012), 10.1007/978-3-642-24488-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24488-9

    doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24488-9 2012

  40. [40]

    Paternain, M

    G.P. Paternain, M. Salo and G. Uhlmann, Tensor tomography on surfaces, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-012-0432-1 Inventiones Mathematicae 193 (2013) 229

    doi:10.1007/s00222-012-0432-1 2013

  41. [41]

    Paternain, M

    G.P. Paternain, M. Salo and G. Uhlmann, Geometric Inverse Problems: With Emphasis on Two Dimensions, vol. 204 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2023), 10.1017/9781009039901 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009039901

    doi:10.1017/9781009039901 2023

  42. [42]

    Besse, Einstein Manifolds, vol

    A.L. Besse, Einstein Manifolds, vol. 10 of Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 3. Folge, Springer, Berlin (1987), 10.1007/978-3-540-74311-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74311-8

    doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74311-8 1987

  43. [43]

    B \'e ny, A

    C. B \'e ny, A. Kempf and D.W. Kribs, Quantum error correction of observables, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042303 Physical Review A 76 (2007) 042303 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/0705.1574 0705.1574 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042303 2007

  44. [44]

    Audenaert, A sharp continuity estimate for the von neumann entropy, https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/40/28/S18 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 40 (2007) 8127

    K.M.R. Audenaert, A sharp continuity estimate for the von neumann entropy, https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/40/28/S18 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 40 (2007) 8127

    doi:10.1088/1751-8113/40/28/s18 2007

  45. [45]

    Engelhardt and S

    N. Engelhardt and S. Fischetti, Surface theory: The classical, the quantum, and the holographic, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ab3bda Classical and Quantum Gravity 36 (2019) 205002

    doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab3bda 2019

  46. [46]

    Gourgoulhon, 3+1 Formalism in General Relativity: Bases of Numerical Relativity, vol

    E. Gourgoulhon, 3+1 Formalism in General Relativity: Bases of Numerical Relativity, vol. 846 of Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer, Berlin (2012), 10.1007/978-3-642-24525-1 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24525-1

    doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24525-1 2012

  47. [47]

    Faulkner, M

    T. Faulkner, M. Guica, T. Hartman, R.C. Myers and M. Van Raamsdonk, Gravitation from entanglement in holographic CFTs , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2014)051 Journal of High Energy Physics 2014 (2014) 051

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2014)051 2014

  48. [48]

    Jafferis, A

    D.L. Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena and S.J. Suh, Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2016)004 Journal of High Energy Physics 2016 (2016) 004

    doi:10.1007/jhep06(2016)004 2016

  49. [49]

    Hubeny, M

    V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2007/07/062 Journal of High Energy Physics 2007 (2007) 062

    doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/07/062 2007

  50. [50]

    X. Dong, D. Harlow and A.C. Wall, Reconstruction of bulk operators within the entanglement wedge in gauge-gravity duality, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.021601 Physical Review Letters 117 (2016) 021601

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.021601 2016

  51. [51]

    Bonnans and A

    J.F. Bonnans and A. Shapiro, Perturbation Analysis of Optimization Problems, Springer, New York (2000), 10.1007/978-1-4612-1394-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1394-9

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1394-9 2000

  52. [52]

    N.J. Higham, Functions of Matrices: Theory and Computation, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2008), 10.1137/1.9780898717778 https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898717778

    doi:10.1137/1.9780898717778 2008

  53. [53]

    Lesniewski and M.B

    A. Lesniewski and M.B. Ruskai, Monotone Riemannian metrics and relative entropy on noncommutative probability spaces, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.533053 Journal of Mathematical Physics 40 (1999) 5702

    work page doi:10.1063/1.533053 1999

  54. [54]

    Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, Springer, Berlin, 2 ed

    T. Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, Springer, Berlin, 2 ed. (1995), 10.1007/978-3-662-12678-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12678-3

    doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12678-3 1995

  55. [55]

    Rockafellar and R.J.-B

    R.T. Rockafellar and R.J.-B. Wets, Variational Analysis, Springer, Berlin (1998), 10.1007/978-3-642-02431-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02431-3

    doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02431-3 1998

  56. [56]

    Bauschke and P.L

    H.H. Bauschke and P.L. Combettes, Convex Analysis and Monotone Operator Theory in Hilbert Spaces, Springer, Cham, 2 ed. (2017), 10.1007/978-3-319-48311-5 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48311-5

    doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48311-5 2017

  57. [57]

    Berschneider and Z

    G. Berschneider and Z. Sasv \'a ri, On a theorem of Karhunen and related moment problems and quadrature formulae, in Spectral Theory, Mathematical System Theory, Evolution Equations, Differential and Difference Equations, vol. 221 of Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, (Basel), pp. 173--187, Birkh \"a user (2012), DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-0297-0_10 2012

  58. [58]

    Uhlmann, The ``transition probability'' in the state space of a * -algebra, https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4877(76)90060-4 Reports on Mathematical Physics 9 (1976) 273

    A. Uhlmann, The ``transition probability'' in the state space of a * -algebra, https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4877(76)90060-4 Reports on Mathematical Physics 9 (1976) 273

    doi:10.1016/0034-4877(76)90060-4 1976

  59. [59]

    Jozsa, Fidelity for mixed quantum states, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500349414552171 Journal of Modern Optics 41 (1994) 2315

    R. Jozsa, Fidelity for mixed quantum states, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500349414552171 Journal of Modern Optics 41 (1994) 2315

    doi:10.1080/09500349414552171 1994

  60. [60]

    Reimpell and R.F

    M. Reimpell and R.F. Werner, Iterative optimization of quantum error correcting codes, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.080501 Physical Review Letters 94 (2005) 080501 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0307138 quant-ph/0307138 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.080501 2005

  61. [61]

    Fletcher, P.W

    A.S. Fletcher, P.W. Shor and M.Z. Win, Optimum quantum error recovery using semidefinite programming, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.75.012338 Physical Review A 75 (2007) 012338 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0606035 quant-ph/0606035 ]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.75.012338 2007

  62. [62]

    Kretschmann, D

    D. Kretschmann, D. Schlingemann and R.F. Werner, The information-disturbance tradeoff and the continuity of Stinespring's representation, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2008.917696 IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 54 (2008) 1708 [ https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0605009 quant-ph/0605009 ]

    doi:10.1109/tit.2008.917696 2008